Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Join AASTANABLOG
Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

TRANSLATION OF QURAN
BY DR. QAMAR ZAMAN
Translation Status
آیات
سورۃ
نمبر
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now


»«
BOOKS
HAQIQAT E MALAIKA
Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
I don't understand much Urdu, so could someone please elaborate who/what Harut and Marut are in 2:102 ? I do not think they are proper noun names.
Add Your Comments  Question by: FAISAL On 28 August 2010
Comments by: aurangzaib On 29 August 2010 Edit DeleteReport Abuse
Dear Faisal,  
 
Dr. Qamar Zaman has very recently elaborated the story of Haroot and Maroot with his usual, most rational interpretation of Quran. Kindly go through herebelow. You are absolutely right. They may not be proper nouns.  
 
""Yes you are right the translations we see is definitely not according to the subject of Quran .Why……?  
because,  
وَاتَّبَعُوا مَا تَتْلُو الشَّيَاطِينُ عَلَى مُلْكِ سُلَيْمَانَ وَمَا كَفَرَ سُلَيْمَانُ وَلَكِنَّ الشَّيَاطِينَ كَفَرُوا يُعَلِّمُونَ النَّاسَ  
السِّحْرَ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ عَلَى الْمَلَكَيْنِ بِبَابِلَ هَارُوتَ وَمَارُوتَ وَمَا يُعَلِّمَانِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ حَتَّى يَقُولا إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ فِتْنَةٌ  
فَلا تَكْفُرْ فَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مِنْهُمَا مَا يُفَرِّقُونَ بِهِ بَيْنَ الْمَرْءِ وَزَوْجِهِ وَمَا هُمْ بِضَارِّينَ بِهِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ إِلا بِإِذْنِ  
اللَّهِ وَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مَا يَضُرُّهُمْ وَلا يَنْفَعُهُمْ وَلَقَدْ عَلِمُوا لَمَنِ اشْتَرَاهُ مَا لَهُ فِي الآخِرَةِ مِنْ خَلاقٍ وَلَبِئْسَ مَا  
شَرَوْا بِهِ أَنْفُسَهُمْ لَوْ كَانُوا يَعْلَمُونَ  
Please note  
1…. The verse is starting with و which means the subject has its context  
in previous verses .  
2….The word علی is wrongly translated for علی , فی means, upon, on or against  
3…. Who were شیاطین  
4… What is the meaning of فتنہ  
5… What is the significance of مَا يُفَرِّقُونَ بِهِ بَيْنَ الْمَرْءِ وَزَوْجِهِ  
 
1…, The previous sura is  
وَلَمَّا جَاءَهُمْ رَسُولٌ مِنْ عِنْدِ اللَّهِ مُصَدِّقٌ لِمَا مَعَهُمْ نَبَذَ فَرِيقٌ مِنَ الَّذِينَ أُوتُوا الْكِتَابَ كِتَابَ اللَّهِ وَرَاءَ ظُهُورِهِمْ كَأَنَّهُمْ لا يَعْلَمُونَ  
101. and whenever came to them a Messenger from Allâh confirming what was with them, a party of those who were given the Scripture threw away the Book of Allâh behind their backs as if they did not know!  
 
This was the attitude of the people of that time. Not only they threw away the divine teachings but they followed what was taught against Sulaiman’s state .  
وَاتَّبَعُوا مَا تَتْلُو الشَّيَاطِينُ عَلَى مُلْكِ سُلَيْمَانَ وَمَا كَفَرَ سُلَيْمَانُ وَلَكِنَّ الشَّيَاطِينَ كَفَرُوا  
102. they followed what the Shayâtin gave to them against the state of Sulaiman. Sulaimân did not refuse to accept Divine orders, but the Shayâtin refused to accept  
 
يُعَلِّمُونَ النَّاسَ السِّحْرَ  
They used to teach Fake and Bogus teaching ( magic )  
 
وَمَا أُنْزِلَ عَلَى الْمَلَكَيْنِ بِبَابِلَ هَارُوتَ وَمَارُوتَ  
i.e.whatever was given at Babylon to the two angels, Hârût and Mârût  
 
So people were learning and teaching Fake and Concocted stories i.e. whatever was given to Haroot and Maroot .  
 
Haroot is derived from the root letters ھرت which means to pierce, to injure one’s honour, Man with long corners of mouth .  
 
Maroot is derived from the root letter مرت which means desert, land without vegetations, Hairless  
 
وَمَا يُعَلِّمَانِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ حَتَّى يَقُولا إِنَّمَا نَحْنُ فِتْنَةٌ فَلا تَكْفُر  
"and neither of the two taught anyone till they had said, "We are to stir up revolt , so don’t refuse to accept "  
 
A word فتنہ has appeard here in this verse which is from root letters ف ت ن which means try, probe, civil war, revolt, mischief, disorder,  
فَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مِنْهُمَا مَا يُفَرِّقُونَ بِهِ بَيْنَ الْمَرْءِ وَزَوْجِهِ وَمَا هُمْ بِضَارِّينَ بِهِ مِنْ أَحَدٍ إِلا بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ  
So from them people learnt all that by which they can cause separation between the man  
(the leader ) and his people , but they could not harm with it anyone except through divine command .  
 
وَيَتَعَلَّمُونَ مَا يَضُرُّهُمْ وَلا يَنْفَعُهُمْ  
and they learn that which could harm themselves and did not profit them.  
وَلَقَدْ عَلِمُوا لَمَنِ اشْتَرَاهُ مَا لَهُ فِي الآخِرَةِ مِنْ خَلاقٍ وَلَبِئْسَ مَا شَرَوْا بِهِ أَنْفُسَهُمْ لَوْ كَانُوا يَعْلَمُونَ  
and indeed they knew that the bussiness they were doing would have no share in the end and How bad indeed was that for which they sold their ownselves, if they knew .  
 
Summary ,  
This verse is about a revolt against the Muslim head of the state. There were two traitors called Haroot and Maroot i.e. شیاطین من الملا یکہ who wanted to topple the state (The confusion starts when Malaika are supposed to be innocent, although Quran says that Iblees was one of the شیا طین )  
 
These two traitors were preparing people to go against Sulaiman and used to tell people absolutely false stories and tried to convince them that they were the saviours, so they tried to convince public to stand against Sulaiman. But they did not succeed. Although they knew that in the end they will get nothing .  
 
If you study the next verse it becomes even more clear  
وَلَوْ أَنَّهُمْ آمَنُوا وَاتَّقَوْا لَمَثُوبَةٌ مِنْ عِنْدِ اللَّهِ خَيْرٌ لَوْ كَانُوا يَعْلَمُونَ  
103. and if they had accepted to live in peace, and guarded themselves from evil according to divine commands , far better would have been the reward from their Lord, if they knew.  
Date : 7/22/2010 ""  

»«
OTHER QUESTIONS ON
HAQIQAT E MALAIKA
Dr.sahib regards,im persuaded the "Jinn & malaika"by you ,if jinn is the specific charecter of insan ,like munafiq and kafir.Allah addressed all mankind as 2/21,then why jinns are addressed alog with" ins"55/39,6/130,7/179,55/33,also tell about 15/27 Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 15/04/2010
 
Dear Dr. sahib slam, please elaborate 43:80 and 6:61regarding rusul and malaika. God bless you. Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 21/04/2010
 
AOA Dr Sahib, Could you please explain about the Geusts of Ibrahim AS, that who were they (15:51-15:84)? They had the tiding of the son for Ibrahim AS and they were sent to destroy Lot AS's nation. Question by: Anwer Suri From UNITED STATES On 27/04/2010
 
Dear dr. sahib Plz clerify the concept of kiraman katibin 82:11 كراما كتبين regarding angles? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 07/05/2010
 
Dear dr. sahib plz clerify the concept of coming angles at the time of death and beating wicked people ? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 07/05/2010
 
Please define follwoing verses: 17/94, 17/95, 11/31 & 6/50. in cited verses Rasool S.A.W. has clearly declared himself "NOT FARISHTA/MALAIKA"... This does contradict with the book of "Haqiqat-e-Malaika"... Question by: Adnan Khan On 08/05/2010
 
Dear Sir .. i have read the book HAQIAT E MALAIKA, But kindly explain The Ayat : He created the human from a clay, like pottery. And the Jinn He created from a smokeless fire." (55:14-15) Question by: Danish roomi On 15/05/2010
 
dr qamar ur interpretation of "MALAIKA" "as human beings" is very convincing but the intrpretation of MALIKA by great personalities like SIR SYED and ALLAMA PERVEZ "AS THE FORCES OF NATURE "is convincing too.i am confused which on to take.plz xplan Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 22/07/2010
 
Dear Dr Sahib, Your explanations are really eye opening and edifying, thank you in taking mystery out of the Malika and explaning the concept, I wonder if you came across anyone else using the word in this context? Question by: Kjahan From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 23/07/2010
 
Plz elaborate 35:1. And I think GIBREEL, and MIKAAL are non-Arabic words asa these words don't accept zair. kindly re-think and Guide us. And answer my two previous Questions regarding MALAIKA . Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 05/08/2010
 
mailaika agar insan hai to rasool ke paas quran kis tarha aya wahi kistrha aai ? aur ek sawal allah ne malaika se kha ke main zameen par khalifa banarha hun to malaika to ap ki nazar main insan hain Question by: MOHAD OSMAN On 22/08/2010
 
malaika agar insan hai to jibraail aur mikaail koun hai ? Question by: MOHAD OSMAN On 22/08/2010
 
Dear Dr. sahib u don't cover all verses regarding Malaika, I don't know the reason. If u elaborate all verses it will be your greatness and kindness. Would u please like to elaborate ? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 04/09/2010
 
Dear Dr. please reply my these queries : http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?MID=1&SID=7&QID=191 http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?MID=1&SID=7&QID=241 http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?MID=1&SID=7&QID=476 Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 20/09/2010
 
Dear Dr. sahib slam, please elaborate 2:97-98, 16:2,28,32, 25:21, 11/69-----81 ,15/51---74, 35:1, 10:21, 82:11, 43:80 and 6:61-62 regarding rusul and malaika. Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 20/09/2010
 
A.O.A .Dr,sahib please describe the word ;AASTANA; why you specially use this word for your platform .thanks ? Question by: nadeem sohail From PAKISTAN (OKARA) On 27/09/2010
 
Dear Dr. sahib slam, please elaborate MALAIKA in the verses : 70/4,2/ 210 ,6/8-9. 25/21-22,25 ? It would be ur great work. Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 06/10/2010
 
Please try to throw light on the ascending( NAZUOL / TANAZZALO, 97/4,16/2) n the descending ( ARUOJ / TAARAJU,70/4 )of MALAAIKA , if MALAAIKA don't descend according to page 34 0f book-let HAQIQAT E MALAIKA ? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 11/10/2010
 
A.O.A.Dear Dr, sahib, Please explain why ALLAH order us to obtain ; IMAAN' on ; MALAIKA ,How could we do if they are human like us . Question by: nadeem sohail From PAKISTAN (OKARA) On 24/10/2010
 
A.O.A...PLEASE anyone send the reply of the question about ' KIRAMAN KATIBEEN' I could not read that....Thanks a lot Question by: nadeem sohail From PAKISTAN (OKARA) On 25/10/2010
 
A.O.A..Dear Dr sahib please explain ' MUSJAD-Y-AQSA'.If that was a ; ILME SAFER; then what was its logic. If according to Allama pervez that was about ;HIJRATY-MADINA; If so then what is your openion about. Thanks Question by: nadeem sohail From PAKISTAN (OKARA) On 30/10/2010
 
Plz explain the complete translation of 16/2 with reference to the context regarding Malaika. Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 11/11/2010
 
Please reconsider and answer this question completely. Plz explain the complete translation of 16/2 with reference to the context regarding Malaika. http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?MID=1&SID=7&QID=743 Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 13/12/2010
 
How does the interpretation of malaika as "people with power & wealth" fit in verse 4:97? Verse 4:97 describes the approach of death of the zalimeen and the malaika questioning them. Question by: Naushad On 09/02/2011
 
Dear sir, i humbly request please elaborate tarkah in islam.I think it is also different. Question by: thinkquran On 09/02/2011
 
Dr. Qamar / Aurangzaib/ Moazzam ! Please answer the question asked by an Aastana member( awaited long)."Dear sir, i humbly request please elaborate tarkah in islam.I think it is also different. " I myself interested in the same? Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 16/02/2011
 
I WOULD LIKE KNOW DETAIL ABOUT THE ANGLE KIRAMAN KATIBEEN IN URDU LANGUAGE. Question by: MOHAMMED AHED From SAUDI ARABIA (BURAIDA) On 02/03/2011
 
We are pleased to inform that the English Translation of Dr. Qamar Zaman’s Book, Haqiqat-e-Malaaika is now available for downloading. DOWNLOAD Question by: Adnan From PAKISTAN On 06/04/2011
 
Salam If Malaika are human then what is the idea behind 2:30-2:39? These malaika don't have the same knowledge it appears as does Adam and this event seems to unfold in the heavens before they are "sent down" to earth. This is not in Dr QZs book. Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 27/05/2011
 
Plz elaborate Verse # 5-14 & 25 of Sura Najam, Sura # 53 regarding Malaika. Also plz answer the unanswered questions regarding Malaika. Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 18/09/2011
 
Dear Dr. sahib slam, please elaborate 15:26-27. plz also answer the unanswered questions regarding Malaika. God bless you. Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 18/09/2011
 
Dear Dr. Zaman who are the Yajuj wa Majuj (Gog and Magog)? Question by: Bling Ding From ARGENTINA (BUENO AIRES) On 30/07/2012
 
Dear Sir , Does ' Zakat ' mean , " to justify " ? if so , please refer quotation from lexicon. Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 01/08/2012
 
SLAM, I have a question regarding two two three three four four Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 27/11/2012
 
Salaam, If Malaaikah are humans, Please explain whom Allah is addressing in 2:30, where man (intellectually endowed) has not yet been created? Shukran Question by: ImraanOmar From SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE TOWN) On 05/05/2013
 
is Adam is the first human being or first prophet? is there any proof in quran that Adam is created as first human being? Question by: kanasser From INDIA (KERALA) On 15/08/2013
 
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved
www.aastana.com