Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Join AASTANABLOG
Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

TRANSLATION OF QURAN
BY DR. QAMAR ZAMAN
Translation Status
آیات
سورۃ
نمبر
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now


»«
QURAN
OBJECTIONS
Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
 
Please see this PDF file for a critique of QZ view of Quran verses 5:6 and 4:43  
 
http://alturl.com/bzkjd  
 
It points out his many errors.  
 
PLEASE MEMBERS COMMENT.
Add Your Comments  Question by: SAEED On 18 August 2011
Comments by: bob On 18 August 2011Report Abuse
I have asked the author of this "analysis" few questions, but he is not bothered to answer, please have a look  
 
 
http://free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9601323.msg282934#msg282934  
 

Comments by: Dr. Qamar Zaman On 18 August 2011
Dear readers .  
Yes I have gone through the lenghty article . But It seems the writer has preconceived ideas engraved in his mind,so that he just can not digest the the interpretation based on an idealogy of " human rights " and "devoloping a society based on " socio-economic system of justice "  
lets first decide a few crucial points ,  
1.. IS QURAN A BOOK OF WORSHIP OR DOES IT DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS OF SOCIETY ?.  
2..IS QURAN A COPY OF SO CALLED PREVIOUS HOLY BOOKS OR IS IT DIFFERENT .?  
3..DOES QURAN NEED HELP OF BOKHARI AND ALLIED BOOKS OR NOT ?  
IF QURAN  
IS NOT BOOK OF WORSHIP  
IS NOT A COPY OF PREVIOUS SO CALLED HOLY BOOKS  
DOES NOT NEED HELP OF BOKHARI AND ALLIED BOOKS  
Then whatever is written in favour of orthodox interpretations is totally incorrect . Any interpretation without worship ,without copying the prvious religions ,and without copying from Bokhari and allied books is acceptible provided it tallies with the meanings of the root letters ang Arabic grammer .  
Now to decide what is correct and what is wrong is every readers own understanding .  
whatever is said in the Link is the orthodox view and without any doubt in favour of Bokharis Islam ,  

Comments by: Damon On 18 August 2011Report Abuse
Dr. Qamar Zaman - It seems the writer has preconceived ideas engraved in his mind,so that he just can not digest the the interpretation based on an idealogy of " human rights " and "devoloping a society based on " socio-economic system of justice "  
 
Damon - You are correct which is why I STOPPED discussing anything with him. As long as the preconceived ideas remain I feel there is nothing to discuss.

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 18 August 2011Report Abuse
Dr. Zaman,  
 
***But It seems the writer has preconceived ideas engraved in his mind,so that he just can not digest the the interpretation based on an idealogy of " human rights " and "devoloping a society based on " socio-economic system of justice " ***  
 
Everyone comes to new ideas with preconceived ones, no mystery or controversy in that. In fact, Allah commands the individual to keep his/her preconceived ideas until accurate knowledge proves otherwise:  
 
17:36 And do not follow anything of which you have no knowledge…  
 
***lets first decide a few crucial points ,***  
 
***1.. IS QURAN A BOOK OF WORSHIP***  
 
Of course al-Quran it isn’t a book of worship, it is the book of guidance.  
 
2:185 The month of Ramadan is that in which the Quran was revealed, a guidance to men and clear proofs of the guidance and the Criterion…  
 
***OR DOES IT DEAL WITH THE PROBLEMS OF SOCIETY ?.***  
 
One the most pervasive and destructive problems facing society is sexual behavior, yet the position of you and your followers is that Al-Quran does not address sexual conduct at all. So, if Al-Quran deals with social problems, then how is it possible for Al-Quran/The Word of Allah not to address this very pervasive and destructive problem? Even though Al-Quran does address social problems, it’s main goal is to develop in the individual a moral consciousness founded on it, so that the individual can pass the test of conduct and gain Paradise:  
 
18:7 That which is on earth we have made but as a glittering show for the earth, in order that We may test them - as to which of them are best in conduct.  
 
7:43 And We shall remove whatever of ill-feeling is in their hearts — rivers flow beneath them. And they say: All praise is due to Allah, Who guided us to this! And we would not have found the way if Allah had not guided us. Certainly the messengers of our Lord brought the truth. And it will be cried out to them: This is the Garden which you are made to inherit for what you did.  
 
61:12 He will forgive you your sins and cause you to enter Gardens wherein rivers flow, and goodly dwellings in Gardens of perpetuity — that is the supreme achievement —  
 
***IS NOT A COPY OF PREVIOUS SO CALLED HOLY BOOKS***  
 
My, my, at least you agree that Al-Quran comes after prior books i.e. Torah and Injeel. Perhaps you can correct Nargy on this point. Al-Quran is not a copy of previous books, but Al-Quran commands the Muslim to refer to the previous to establish a particular truth i.e. 7:157  
 
10:37 And this Quran is not such as could be forged by those besides Allah, but it is a verification of that which is before it and a clear explanation of the Book, there is no doubt in it, from the Lord of the worlds.  
 
7:157 Those who follow the Messenger-Prophet, the Ummi, whom they find mentioned in the Torah and the Injeel.  
 
***DOES NOT NEED HELP OF BOKHARI AND ALLIED BOOKS***  
 
Right again! It is outright shirk to take anything along with Allah for one’s guidance.  
 
6:106 Follow that which is revealed to thee from thy Lord — there is no god but He; and turn away from the mushrikeen.  
 
18:110 Say: I am only a mortal like you — it is revealed to me that your God is one God. So whoever hopes to meet his Lord, he should do good deeds, and join no one in the service of his Lord.  
 
***Then whatever is written in favour of orthodox interpretations is totally incorrect.***  
 
Do you mean translation or interpretation?  
 
Looking forward to your reply  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 18 August 2011Report Abuse
Damon,  
 
Are you back?  
 
I could really use your help in trying to understand these people's mindest.  
 
You speak english and that is a huge factor. Sometimes I cannot, with confidence, make out what some are saying due to language.  
 
Hope you will help me here.  
 
Dhulqarnain-SA

Comments by: Adnan Muhammad Khan On 19 August 2011
Dear Dr. Qamar Zaman Sb:  
I dare to ask following questions from you which have been botherig me since long: Please reply accordingly.  
 
1. Are you from a group of atheists. Do you believe Allah means "Govt. based on Justice?".  
 
2. Don't you preach pure materialism ???.  
 
3. Have you not eliminated the ideal personalities of Divine Messengers and made them symbols of attributes,  
with no existing reality.  
 
4. Are you not scanning through the lexical meanings of Messengers' names?.  
 
5. Don't you believe in the Divine nature of Wahi?.  
 
6. Don't you believe that any genius can derive Wahi from nature?.  
 
7. Don't you believe in the spiritual life of Hereafter?  
 
8. Don't you want proofs of spiritual things that do not exist physically. Similar is the case of Allah's existence??.  
 
9. Because of incomplete explanation, your definitions of ZINA is being taken as an open license for Free Sex in different circles??.  
 
10. Don't you reduce human life to that of animals requiring satisfaction of only their instinctive needs, i.e. socio-economic needs.  
 
11. You translate "Al-Ghaib" as "Qudrat ke Paimaaney" - is this not Ridiculous!  
 
12. You translate al-Maut (Death) as death of nations, in all situations, which is not absurd???.  
 
if your answer is YES........, YOU ARE ATHEIST, TOO. and then " I SAY GOOD-BY TO AASTANA"  

Comments by: moazzam On 19 August 2011
Dear Adnan Muhammad Khan! Although you directly enquired Dr qamar, but Aastana connection/relation (being a colleague) forced me to beg to share my comments at this issue please  
 
1. Are you from a group of atheists? Do you believe Allah means "Govt. based on Justice?"  
Aastana doesn’t believe in sects and religion/anti religion cult, rather restrain itself to interpret the true message of Alkitab, while observing Rata al Quran ie tasreef al ayaat, context of the verse, core message of Quran, lain/lexicon,grammer and universal values/laws of nature as well, no matter it suits to whom.  
Allah doesn’t always taken as a sense of "Govt. based on Justice?” but depends upon the context of the subject under description, eg in verse 8/17  
And you did not kill them, but it was Allah who killed them. And you threw not, [O Muhammad], when you threw, but it was Allah who threw that He might test the believers with a good test. Indeed, Allah is Hearing and Knowing.  
 
2. Don't you preach pure materialism???.  
No, we teach “Generosity  
 
3. Have you not eliminated the ideal personalities of Divine Messengers and made them symbols of attributes,  
with no existing reality.  
No we didn’t, yes they are the symbol of attributes as a role model. We believe in their existing reality till the last day.  
4. Are you not scanning through the lexical meanings of Messengers' names?.  
What harm is there ?  
5. Don't you believe in the Divine nature of Wahi?.  
You should know the sense of Wahy first, this is not a supernatural thing see the verse 6/112 بَعْضُهُمْ إِلَىٰ بَعْضٍ زُخْرُفَ الْقَوْلِ غُرُورًا يُوحِي 5/111, 20/38, 41/12,16/68  
رَبُّكَ إِلَى النَّحْلِ أَنِ اتَّخِذِي مِنَ الْجِبَالِ بُيُوتًا وَأَوْحَىٰ  
We believe in divine nature of wahy as per Quran, not as written in Ahadith.  
6. Don't you believe that any genius can derive Wahi from nature?.  
Yes, we believe  
7. Don't you believe in the spiritual life of Hereafter?  
We believe what is written in Quran, by the way what is “spiritual life of Hereafter”?  
 
8. Don't you want proofs of spiritual things that do not exist physically? Similar is the case of Allah's existence??.  
Yes we need proofs of spiritual things that do not exist physically, but in case of Allah we believe as the verse 6/103  
9. Because of incomplete explanation, your definitions of ZINA is being taken as an open license for Free Sex in different circles??.  
No not at all. We have to abide by all the society’s law legislated according to the basic theme of Quran. Remember the fornication/rape (are haram in a Muslim Society) should not be intermingled with the quranic terminology of ZINA.  
10. Don't you reduce human life to that of animals requiring satisfaction of only their instinctive needs, i.e. socio-economic needs?  
Not only instinctive needs, i.e. socio-economic requirements, but want to uplift the humanity at its climax, which is the ultimate goal of Quran.  
11. You translate "Al-Ghaib" as "Qudrat ke Paimaaney" - is this not Ridicu lous!  
Might it seem ridiculous to some one who doesn’t know.  
See the verse 2/33 السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ غَيْبَ إِنِّي أَعْلَمُ 16/77 السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ غَيْبُ وَلِلَّهِ  
12. You translate al-Maut (Death) as death of nations, in all situations, which is not absurd???.  
The maut has been translated as per context of the verses to comprehend the sense of this Quranic terminology see the verse 3/49  
بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ الْمَوْتَىٰ وَأُبْرِئُ الْأَكْمَهَ وَالْأَبْرَصَ وَأُحْيِي  
 
27/80  
وَلَا تُسْمِعُ الصُّمَّ الدُّعَاءَ الْمَوْتَىٰإِنَّكَ لَا تُسْمِعُ  
 
if your answer is YES........, YOU ARE ATHEIST, TOO. and then " I SAY GOOD-BY TO AASTANA"  
It will be your decision every one is free to choose and decide. Allah bless you.  

Comments by: Nargis On 19 August 2011Report Abuse
Mr Adnan Mohammed Khan ZAI  
 
Do you wan't Aastana to change their understanding because you and few others disagree ? That is ridiculous and absurd.  
 
Like brother Moazzam said, you are a free man and you may decide what's good for you.  
 
byebye

Comments by: Adnan Muhammad Khan On 20 August 2011
Dear Moazzam: i respect you a lot!... but sorry i have nothing to do with the reply given by you.... i don't care what you and other think.....i only require answer from Dr. Qamar Zaman....in detail.....  
 
Being a very senior member at this website, i do have a right to demand reply from Dr. Qamar.....

Comments by: Nargis On 20 August 2011Report Abuse
oh you still here :( ?? No bye bye?

Comments by: Adnan Muhammad Khan On 22 August 2011
Dear Sir, where have you been....  
i need answer from you.....are you contacting someone or asking Adnan to create one MORE fake ID to answer my questions,,, Sir please understand.... innocent Adnan can not run more than 07 IDs at one time as he has been doing since long...  

Comments by: Perwez1 On 22 August 2011Report Abuse
Mr. Adnan Muhammad Khan, here is your true face :-  
You have already been accusing Dr. Qamar for misguiding you. And you are crying like a crybaby who has been forced not to eat the chocolate!!!  
 
Why you left namaaz, roza when you were not sure?  
It means you were not sincere with yout previous beliefs and you are not sincere with your current understanding.  
You are nothing but a confused man.  
 
This is your Email communication with Aurangzaib :-  
 
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Muhammad Khan wrote:  
 
Assalam-0-Alaikum.  
 
Today i visited aastana.com/blog and could not find your much needed presence over there... i have been myself as bussy as bee with my job, but i somehow get time out to visit aastana.com as this is as imparative as oxygen for me.  
 
Sir, i would be very much happy if you share some words with me regarding your absence from aastana.com.  
 
 
Thanx & Best regards,  
 
 
Adnan Muhammad Khan  
Karachi  
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 21:59:46 +0500  
Subject: Re: It has been ages!  
From: aurangzaib.yousufzai@gmail.com  
To: luckyinlucky@hotmail.com  
 
My dear Adnan,  
 
Thanks for your mail of 9th August which, due to my preoccupations, I could not answer promptly.  
 
I have left Aastana for good due to their purely materialistic interpretation of basic Quranic philosophy of human life. My colleague, Zubair, one of the oldest Exec.Members like myself, has also accompanied me in bidding farewell to Dr. Sahib.  
 
Best wishes.  
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
From: luckyinlucky@hotmail.com  
To: aurangzaib.yousufzai@gmail.com  
Subject: RE: It has been ages!  
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:52:35 +0000  
 
Sir,  
 
Sorry i could not understand....  
 
Should I also leave aastana for the reason you have cited ??  
 
Kindly expedite to take out some time for me and elucidate, DON'T YOU AGREE ON THE PHILOSOPY OF AASTANA???  
 
Sir, i have left every thing, NAMAZ, ROZA, etc..... , but due to differences b/w quranists, sometimes, i feel to be quite alone in my family,  
 
I don't fast...... but my daughter having age of just 03 yearas questions me about it.. she says "chacho or dada, dadi sab roza kholty hain or namaz parrhtey hain aap kyon nahi parrtey" somehow i manage to answer, but how long could i face such situation, as she is not in a age of understanding and fighting with the society....  
 
sometime, i do wish that i might not have joined aastana or gone through such literature, which have made me "ALIEN" amoung my very own people....  
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
Now why are you creating this drama here on the forum when you have already been spitting your venom against Dr. Qamar in your Emails?  
 
I am surprised who made you an executive member here, because I have never seen you contributing anything positive here. Maybe you were promoted as an executive member for being a close friend of Aurangzaib! :P

Comments by: Adnan Muhammad Khan On 22 August 2011
Showing what you have inside!!!!  
Dear Perwez in real Adnan (Developer)  
Dear i have lots of respect for Dr. Qamar Zaman... show me in cited e-mail where i have not repsected Dr. Qamar....  
Stop blamming...... stop doing so.......... this will not make your "ATHEISTIC / MATERILIASTIC WEBISTE" popular....  
i will not quit, untill answer is given by Dr. QZ. ::)))))

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 22 August 2011Report Abuse
Mr Adnan Muhammad Khan! No, your reflections not supporting your claim that, you respect Dr Qamar, Brother Moazzam and Aastana as well.You was suppose to bring arguments with Quranic references to correct or at least point out their mistakes.The Aastana's appraoch which currently present at this blog is called ATHEISTIC / MATERILIASTIC WEBISTE, then i proud to be a consistant member of the said blog, i don't care whather you OR some one else CALL it KAFIR,HINDU OR ATHEIST/POLYTHEIST.  
It seems you have childish brain with no vision at all.Sorry

Comments by: Modudi On 22 August 2011Report Abuse
ADNAM MUHAMMAD KHAN: Dear i have lots of respect for Dr. Qamar Zaman... show me in cited e-mail where i have not repsected Dr. Qamar....  
 
MODUDI: Here you go. Your own words are telling everything.  
 
Check your comments:-  
 
ADNAN MUHAMMAD KHAN: YOU ARE ATHEIST, TOO. and then " I SAY GOOD-BY TO AASTANA"  
ADNAM MUHAMMAD KHAN: this will not make your "ATHEISTIC / MATERILIASTIC WEBISTE" popular....  
 
MODUDI: Now check your Emails :-  
 
ADNAM MUHAMMAD KHAN: sometime, i do wish that i might not have joined aastana or gone through such literature, which have made me "ALIEN" amoung my very own people....  
 
You have called the website which is actually Dr. Qamar's site as ATHEISTIC / MATERILIASTIC WEBISTE  
You have called Dr. Qamar and ATHEIST, despite the fact that he is just a teacher who is helping us to understand Quran interpreting the words with the help of Tasreef using grammar and lexicon. It's not his fault that the orthodox translations are turning out to be totally different from what the religious freaks interpreted. He is just bringing forth the truth by sharing the real meaning in true sense and according to the context.  
 
HOW ELSE WOULD A PERSON DISRESPECT OTHER???  
 
ADNAN MUHAMMAD KHAN: Sir, i have left every thing, NAMAZ, ROZA, etc..... ,  
 
MODUDI: Thats your own decision and no one forced you to do it. The truth is that you were not sincere with your previous faith, and you are not sincere and not confident about your current stance either.  
You are a confused man !  
 
NOW GO AND CRY IN A CORNER BECAUSE YOU DON'T DESERVE ANY EXPLANATION FROM ANYONE.  
 
AND  
 
Don't count on Aurangzaib, because he is too busy with his PAID Job and he will have no time to address your issues. Money, Money. Money is more important than anything else mate, and if he will not give proper time to JPP, he will get fired from the job and will lose a lucrative source of income, that's why he left aastana because he had no time for translations and lengthy discussions.  
Just don't depend on him because you will not get much response!!!

Comments by: Nargis On 22 August 2011Report Abuse
This will not make your "ATHEISTIC / MATERILIASTIC WEBISTE" popular.. ADNAN MUHAMMED KHAN  
 
You used the right word: - POPULAR  
 
This word portrait a wish and desire in average people and their mindset can be analyzed through the use of this word.  
 
Providentially, that's not us.  
 
Those who follow the path as given in the Quran, they will face much hardship and strife. It is best to either leave now or continue only if one has the courage to face all kinds of sufferings and teething troubles.  
 
If we wanted to become “popular”, we wouldn’t choose this path. Popular or egoism is a requirement of the one who want to be acknowledged in the society.  
 
Prophets came among their people, and they faced their cults and rituals with courage. They reformed the society and today we don’t even know their birth names. We only know what they did and what’s to be done.  
 
The Quran is given to people so they can develop out of the chains, out from the illusions and grow out from the family society acknowledgments, but stand for the humanity as a whole. The human development is more important than live a care free life among care free people who live in a fantasy castle.  
 
The Quran is not a book of myths and tales, that’s why the one who is going to read out to those who live in a fairy tale, will face hardship instead of being popular.  
 
So the aim is not to be popular, but to show the content of a book in the way it is presenting it.  
 
Anyone who has something better can present it and discuss it. But if they hope to bring us back to the primitive level of believing in dogmas and supernatural cold stuff, and then don’t bother.  
 
Not even an atom bomb can stop knowledge; words like atheist, kaafir, materialist etc. have no meaning if they don’t have content.  
 
leaders are always alone...please read through this  
 
Leaders vs. Followers  
 
When leaders make a mistake, they say, "I was wrong."  
When followers make mistakes, they say, "It wasn't my fault."  
 
 
A leader works harder than a follower and has more time;  
a follower is always "too busy" to do what is necessary.  
 
 
A leader goes through a problem;  
a follower goes around it and never gets past it.  
 
 
A leader makes and keeps commitments;  
a follower makes and forgets promises.  
 
 
A leader says, "I'm good, but not as good as I ought to be;"  
a follower says, "I'm not as bad as a lot of other people."  
 
 
Leaders listen;  
followers just wait until it's their turn to talk.  
 
 
Leaders respect those who are superior to them and tries to learn something from them;  
followers resent those who are superior to them and try to find chinks in their armor.  
 
 
Leaders feel responsibile for more than their job;  
followers say, "I only work here."  
 
 
A leader says, "There ought to be a better way to do this;"  
followers say, "That's the way it's always been done here."

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 23 August 2011Report Abuse
Mr Adnan Muhammad Khan! You inquired Dr Qamar Zaman that “. Are you from a group of atheists? Do you believe Allah means "Govt. based on Justice?"  
 
Read the following verse translated by Dr Zaman which reflects his stance  
2/225  
لَّا يُؤَاخِذُكُمُ اللَّهُ بِاللَّغْوِ فِي أَيْمَانِكُمْ وَلَٰكِن يُؤَاخِذُكُم بِمَا كَسَبَتْ قُلُوبُكُمْ ۗ وَاللَّهُ غَفُورٌ حَلِيمٌ  
اللہ کی مملکت کسی ایسے معاہدے کو تسلیم نہیں کرتی ہے جو بے بنیاد ہو لیکن تمہارا مواخذہ اس بات کا ضرور ہوگا جو تم نے پورے وثوق اور سوچ بچار کے ساتھ کیا ہو۔اور اللہ کی مملکت حفاظت فراہم کرنے والی بردبارہے۔  
مباحث:۔  
اس آیت میں کہا گیا ہے کہ لَّا يُؤَاخِذُكُمُ اللَّهُ بِاللَّغْوِ فِي أَيْمَانِكُمْ (اللہ کسی ایسے معاہدے کو تسلیم نہیں کرتا ہے جو بے بنیاد ہو ) ۔ یہاں اللہ سے کیا مراد ہے ؟ اگر تو اللہ کا تصور اس الہہ کا ہے جو آسمانوں کا الہہ ہےتو وہ خدا تو آسمانوں سے نیچے اتر کر فیصلے نہیں صادر کرتا ہے ، یہ اس الہہ کے احکامات پر مبنی اللہ کی مملکت کا کام ہے کہ وہ اپنی عدلیہ کے ذریعےاحکامات قرآنی کو نافذ کرے۔  
یہ بات بھی ذہن نشیں کر لیجئے کہ جہاں جہاں لفظ اللہ وارد ہوا ہے وہاں وہاں اللہ کی نمائندگی اللہ کے احکامات پر مبنی مملکت یا اس کی ماتحت عدلیہ ہوگی۔  

Comments by: Adnan Muhammad Khan On 24 August 2011
My questions have still not been answered by Dr. Sb., despite, meaningless arguments were executed on my e-mail, in which i only expressed my feelings... the feelings which every one does have at the different stage of life when he/she encounters some situation related to his/her "change" regarding religeous belief..  
 
i will wait for the reply by Sr. QZ.

Comments by: Perwez1 On 24 August 2011Report Abuse
Are you sure you mean Sr. QZ and not ATHEIST QZ???  
 
I remember that I never had such feelings anytime in my life :D  
And even if I had, I never started bragging about these feelings and I never started calling people ATHEISTS.  
 
And what questions do you want to be answered?  
 
If you had some questions, you should have Emailed directly to Dr, QZ instead of doing all this mudslinging on the blog. Why are you demanding the answers after creating all that fuss???  
 
Well that reminded me of Iqbal Kay Shaheen.  
Bro Iqbal kay Shaheen, did you notice the mudslinging by Adnan Muhammad Khan?  
Did you see the words he used against Dr. Qamar and aastana???  
 
Or was nothing, and you only feel bad about Aurangzaib, Zubair, Abdun Nur and Ume Aimoon ???  
And sorry I forgot to mention that poor Dr. Shabbir :D

Comments by: Adnan Muhammad Khan On 24 August 2011
Where has your petience gone dear??? at this blog it is claimed that "we are muslim" and having tolerance ready to give answers of all questions etc.. then why you people have got such personal ????... i only asked few questions directly from Dr. Sb., then why did you put your nose in it ????. where is your tolerance???? where is your learning???? where is your islam ?????  
YOU HAVE BECOME SO MUCH PERSONAL AND DRAGGED MY E-MAIL...IN THIS BLOG.... AND NOW YOU ARE CONTRADICTING YOURSELF THAT "I SHOULD HAVE SENT E-MAIL TO DR. SB."  
 
YOU WOULD HAVE DRAGGED THAT E-MAIL ALSO, HERE. IF I HAD SENT TO DR. SB....TURE ???  
 
Actualy, it clearly shows that you do not have any tolerance.....if someone leaves your blog and have differences, you start opposing, abusing,,,, mudslinging him.... you people ruining this website and blog....  
 

Comments by: Saad Haider On 24 August 2011Report Abuse
Hayyyy. hay hay... buddies what's up!!!!  
take a light arm (go easy :)()()))  
matti dalo jeeeee....kutttti khatam... dosti karo jeeeee...  
Perwez jee tussi bhi kamal kitta ai... kisi ki e-mail blog pe hi khench laaey... ye ghalt hai jeee.....and tuhaada behavior vi ghalt hai... Adnan jee tussi vi sawal tu kar sakdey ho but ye Atheist vedheist nahi likhna chaiye da....  
now Dr. Sb. tussi aana chahye da is situation me......  
 
i am back>>>>>>>>>>> for tooteeee photeee punjabi ....  
 
Saad

Comments by: moazzam On 24 August 2011
Adnan Muhammad Khan! BEING AN EXECUTIVE/SENIOR MEMBER THIS IS YOUR BLOG TOO.  
I don't agree with your statement "Actually, it clearly shows that you do not have any tolerance.....if someone leaves your blog and have differences, you start opposing, abusing,,,, mudslinging him.... you people ruining this website and blog"  
BROTHER ADNAN; COME AND SHOULDER THE AASTANA BLOG, IF IT SEEMS YOU SINKING. LET THE DEFERENCE OF OPINION PUT ASIDE.

Comments by: Nargis2 On 24 August 2011Report Abuse
.if someone leaves your blog and have differences, you start opposing, abusing,,,, mudslinging him.... you people ruining this website and blog....Adnan  
 

This is false accusation  
 
To make an insurrection, you have to point out the mistakes in the books, articles, works offered by Dr Uncle, and provide something BETTER. Salaat soum appealed to you, so you changed your stand, but when something didn’t appeal to your firm belief, you started the blame game?

“While we are free to choose our actions, we are not free to choose the consequences of our actions.” Stephen R

Dr Qamar Zaman is NOT accountable for anyone, not me, brother Moazzam, you or your friends.  
 
No1  
 
Keep in mind that he is demonstrating his right, to study and understand something which is given to him just like everyone else, the Quran.

“Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.” Benjamin Franklin

You can either study and agree, or reject it. It’s your right to do so and no1 will ever stop you.

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"  
Evelyn Beatrice Hall

Go ahead and leave the blog if you want to, but if you want to stay and learn, you’re more than welcome and it would be really nice to share thoughts with you if you can point out productive objections. Even other members who left by their own choice, they are more than welcome and join the blog for profitable discussions.

“Good management is the art of making problems so interesting and their solutions so constructive that everyone wants to get to work and deal with them.” Paul Hawken

To do that every human being must get out of himself and get on the platform of something higher, which is the podium of knowledge, learning, teaching, ideas, views, constructive contribution

"Pride, envy, avarice - these are the sparks that have set on fire the souls of man."  
Alighieri Dante  
 
“A proud man is always looking down on things and people; and, of course, as long as you're looking down, you can't see something that's above you.”C.S. Lewis

It’s that easy!!!  
To try the mullah method to stop people to think, is an attack on the freedom every human being is given by the Creator.  
 
don’t even go there. ”

“I know but one freedom and that is the freedom of the mind.

SAAD:- nice to have you back, missed your tooti phooti punjabi, it was better than mine though :P :)

Comments by: Perwez1 On 25 August 2011Report Abuse
Adnan Muhammad Khan;  
 
What you are doing here is nothing new. You always tried to belittle Dr. Qamar and his work in the past but your character had been exposed way earlier on this blog, when you used the ID Lucky 1402 to throw mud on Dr. Qamar's work.  
 
Now don't say that you are not Lucky1402 because your Email ID is the biggest proof here.  
From: luckyinlucky@hotmail.com  
This is the same ID attached to the account Lucky1402 and you cannot hide it now.  
 
Your intentions and your motive is clearly visible in all the comments you wrote as Lucky1402.  
 
See this thread where you got caught red handed but you didn't realize that perhaps :-  
 
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?QID=1333  
 
I invite all readers to check the posts by Lucky1402 and see how he disrespected Dr. Qamar in the past. He got caught by Maniza and Dr Qamar but he failed to realize it :D  
 
If anyone has doubt, then look what Maniza pointed out in her comments. She wrote it so many days ago that Lucky1402 is none other than a senior member of this blog ****** which is Adnan Muhammad Khan !!!  
 
And also run a search for all the previous posts by this guy Lucky 1402 where he has been fighting with various members of this blog, promoting Hadith based Islam which aastana has already refuted.  
 
I also invite all the readers to see another member, which is the only member who is supporting Lucky1402 by authenticating his questions and supporting his views.  
See it yourself who that member is. I will not point out any name.  
 
I ask you all to link the ideas presented by Lucky1402 with the writings of Dawood and you'll note another similarity in it.  
No please don't misunderstand me. I am not blaming anyone for using fake IDs rather I am saying that this is a group which was too influenced by the ideology of Allama Pervez to an extent that they proudly call themselves Pervezis which is a clear example of personality cult.  
Right from the start, their aim was to create confusion on this blog and misguide other readers.  
Aurangzaib, Zubair, Umeaimon, Dawood Pervez, Momin, BQayyum all belong to this group and you can see that all these guys were posting together at Our Beacon before they came to aastana.  
Pervez satti, BQayyum, Momin, SS, are all gone and because of their departure, Aurangzaib and Zubair got pissed and they are gone too. Umeaimon tried to carry on their work but she failed and had to leave. Now she is posting with a different ID as pointed out by Mr. Modudi and Iqbal kay shaheen but I will not comment on that.  
 
What I want to tell everyone here is: that these guys are completely influenced by a personality cult and the words of Allama Pervez are the word of God for them which even Allama Pervez never asked them to do.  
 
These people will always remain in a state of bewilderment, uncertainty and they will always create hurdles for others who are trying to explore Quran with the help of grammar and tasreef.  
 
MR ADNAN MUHAMMAD KHAN, I HAVE NO PERSONAL PROBLEM WITH YOU BUT I CANNOT SEE YOU ACTING LIKE AN INNOCENT GUY AFTER CREATING SO MUCH MISCHIEF IN THE PAST AND HE IS STILL DOING IT.  
 
I ALSO HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH THE OTHER NAMES I HAVE MENTIONED BUT THEY HAVE ALREADY CREATED SO MUCH DISTURBANCES IN THE PAST THAT I CANNOT TOLERATE THEIR MISCHIEF ANYMORE ON THIS BLOG.  
 
PLEASE GO TO THE RELIGIOUS BLOGS TO DISCUSS NAMAAZ, ROZA, QABAR, PUL E SIRAAT, JANNAT, DOZAKH AND LEAVE US ALONE !!!  
 
In the end I want to point out few names and I want to know why these people are never fighting with each other?  
Moazzam, Nargis, Maniza, William, Junaid, Mubashir Syed, Damon, Bob, Waseem ameer and also Dr. Qamar .  
They all are from different countries and different cultures but they are always cooperating with each other and whenever there is a difference of opinion, they come in harmony again after having discussions and debate.  
To me, these are the real members of aastana and if anyone is interested to learn something, please stick to them.  
STAY AWAY FROM ALL THOSE WHO ARE CREATING MISCHIEF HERE THROUGH HARSH REMARKS AND TIME WASTING DEBATES.

Comments by: Adnan Muhammad Khan On 25 August 2011
Dear perwez: i challenge you to prove that i had created id named lucky1402....by this you could get help from ADNAN CREATOR OF THIS WEBSITE..(if you are not adnan).....  
 
this again shows your mental illness........ i have nothing to do with ID named LUCKY1402...  
yes my e-mail address is luckyinlucky@hotmail.com; becuase i work in "LUCKY cement limited".....  
 
but i don't know why you are trying to do such bad things.????????? for which you have no proof....  
 
I used to have ID named "Adnan Khan" only but Adnan (developer) had informed me that "he had made one more ID for me as an Executive Member named "Adnan Muhammad Khan"... at that time he also dispatched some books of Dr. Sb. and Aziz ullah bohiyoo's.........  
 
Yes i do admit that i should have used lenient language while asking question directly from Dr. Sb. (to err is human) but i never ever created any fake ID to do what you have elucidated in your dirty posts......  
 

Comments by: Adnan Muhammad Khan On 25 August 2011
you dragged my personal e-mail somehow here at open blog; i accepted that this e-mail is mine... i never get shy to accept the reality... but that ID (lucky1402) is not mine... understand??  
 
do not create more fuss...

Comments by: Saad Haider On 27 August 2011Report Abuse
Dear perwez1...geeeee.... i think Salman Khan whould have created this ID (Lucky1402) after launching his movie.... hahahahha... don't mind yaar.... tussi vi great ho... having lucky name in e-mail ID or nick name or orgnisation name or group name or SINGER NAME.... there are thousands of people having LUCKY name... does it mean that "they have created thaty ID??????  
OO Geeeeeee... tussi vi greate ho....  

Comments by: Perwez1 On 29 August 2011 Edit DeleteReport Abuse
Saad jeee tussi vi great ho ....  
Why so much sympathies for someone who is insulting everyone???  
 
Read this whole thread again :_  
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?QID=1333  
I am not the only one who is saying this. Even the admins of aastana are suspecting him.  
WHY???  
There must be some reason for it???  
There is a lot more behind this other than the Email ID Lucky and there are many things you and others don't know. You have no idea what it is all about and you don't know what is going on behind the scene. Didn't you see the Email I quoted? How do you think I had that Email, if it was sent privately to Aurangzaib by Adnan Muhammad Khan??? Am I a Jinn winn??? No dude I am not.  
Truth is this that Adnan Muhammad Khan has posted a lot of things on this blog even after Aurangzaib was gone and he participated in that discussion when Aurangzaib announced to go. Why all of a sudden he started acting as if he is a new comer who don't know that Aurangzaib is gone???  
And why he sent a personal message to Aurangzaib but added many many people in BCC???  
ONLY BECAUSE HIM AND AURANGZAIB WANTED OTHERS TO SEE THIS EMAIL AND IT WAS ALL PLANED.  
YES ... that is how I got this Email, because I was added in BCC among many many unknown recipients.  
Why do you think he did that???  
Only to create a confusion and to throw mud on the character of Dr. Qamar and aastana.  
It was all planned and the biggest proof is that Adnan is an executive member who talk to Dr. Qamar and aastana management regularly. He could have easily contacted Dr. Qamar and got all his confusion cleared.  
 
See another example of how he is accusing Dr. Qamar for illicit activities in such a sarcastic and disrespecting tone :-  
ADNAN MUHAMMAD KHAN: Dear Sir, where have you been....  
i need answer from you.....are you contacting someone or asking Adnan to create one MORE fake ID to answer my questions,,, Sir please understand.... innocent Adnan can not run more than 07 IDs at one time as he has been doing since long...  
 
IF YOU HAVE SO MUCH SYMPATHY WITH THIS GUY THAT YOU ARE IGNORING ALL WHAT HE DID, THEN ITS YOUR PERSONAL OPINION AND YOU CAN DO WHATEVER YOU WANT. BUT PLEASE DO NOT INTERFERE IN A DISCUSSION YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT !!!!

»«
OTHER QUESTIONS ON
OBJECTIONS
An oversease friend asked this,I dont know the answer,can anyone? 1) Does god exist? Please answer without giving quranic quotes because they are useless for me. If I were to believe in quranic quotes then obviously I'd first have to believe in god. Question by: MohYam On 11/03/2010
 
what about Torat Ingeel Zuboor are these books belong to Allah ? Question by: laiq ahmed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 12/05/2010
 
salam Dr. Sahib, i am sincerely waiting for my Q to be answered. as the Q was too long i put it under comments on july 02. plz answer my Q. thank you Question by: shireen On 13/07/2010
 
Dr. Sb SAK - surah 2 / 1 alif-laam-meem par meem par tashdeed ko kyon nahi padha jata??????? Question by: mohd.areeb On 20/10/2010
 
The Quranic interpretations are said to be men-centric. All translations, Tafseers, history and other books have mostly been written by men, which obviously affected the women's rights. Please comment in the light of Ayat 34 of Sura Nisa Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 25/11/2010
 
Dear All, why Quran? Why ONLY Quran ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 11/12/2010
 
Dear All, Who gave A'raab ( zer, zabar, pesh ) to arabic letters for Quran and when ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 14/12/2010
 
Aastana Teem ! please reply the objection raised in my comment. Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 28/12/2010
 
Dr. Qamar Sb: How many non-Arabic words precisely occurred in Al-Quraan ? Question by: M.N.Khalid From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 29/12/2010
 
CAN DIVINITY BE DISCOVERED WITH SCIENCE ???? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 08/01/2011
 
Dear Doctor Qamer, you think Quran deals with socioeconomic aspects of human life and doesn't cover human quest for knowledge regarding life after death. If I am correct in this perception , please explain from Quranic references? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 08/01/2011
 
Dear Friends, Some verses of the Quran imply that the deaf, the mute, and the blind have no sense or they lack any intellect. Do you agree? Question by: Zubair From UNITED STATES (WASHINGTON) On 28/05/2011
 
I think we are getting misled; we are not advancing towards our destination, personal remarks, meaningless arguments are creating this bolg "NOTHING". I request/suggest to shut this blog for awhile, which must make us think it over...... Question by: Adnan Muhammad Khan From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 01/06/2011
 
Dear aastana team in your book TRUTH ABOUT SAUM there is a mistake on page 38 and I request the concern person to please correct it. (The word in 2/187 is not Alnisa its nisaikum). Thank you Question by: Amirkhan From INDIA On 30/09/2011
 
Define Naqatullah mentioned in 7/73[the story of Qaom e samud] Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 06/12/2012
 
People says you have to be alim to understand Quran , but i diss agree , its very simple to understand , why these mullahs don't think (they can't even understand the meaning of the (TO IZO MAN TA SHA WA...) what you think? Question by: kanju swat From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 23/05/2015
 
Comments...
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved
www.aastana.com