Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Join AASTANABLOG
Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

TRANSLATION OF QURAN
BY DR. QAMAR ZAMAN
Translation Status
آیات
سورۃ
نمبر
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now


»«
QURAN
TRANSLATIONS
Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
Dear all,  
there are 2 schools thought, one says "first know the truth then believe", and the other says " first believe only then will you be able to know the truth". I belong to the first and struggling, someone please explain to me surah tehrim.
Add Your Comments  Question by: NADEEM On 29 May 2010
Comments by: aurangzaib On 29 May 2010Report Abuse
Dear brother Nadeem,  
 
God’s decree about your question is:  
 
17:36  
لا تقف ما لیس لک بہ علم- ان السمع و البصر و الفواد کل اولئک کان عنہ مسئولا-  
 
“Do not take a stand upon what you have no knowledge about. And the responsibility (basis) of knowledge lies upon all your senses i.e., hearing, seeing and thinking etc.”  
 
Very clearly my friend, knowing comes first, then analyzing with the help of your physical and mental faculties, then finally you reach the stage of believing.  
 
Sorry about Surah Tehrim. Too risky for me to try to explain. It’s Doctor Qamar’s domain. All I can say is that I doubt very much that the Sura is dealing with Prophet’s “wives”. My misfortune that I belong to those very few who do not believe my Lord pbuh had more than one wife at a time.  
 
God bless you.  

Comments by: Danish roomi On 30 May 2010Report Abuse
Dear, sir  
 
I may not be the right person to comment on this question but I have the right to put my opinion into test. Mr Nadeem as you said about the two schools of thoughts. true… , believing that the information we receive through our senses is necessarily accurate, but it’s not always true…( that all knowledge comes to us through the senses, knowledge lies upon all your senses,) but I argued the opposite, that true knowledge comes only through the application of pure reason….I don’t want to put low life example like if you view a flat road, where you senses allows that the road is flat so the world is like flat…..or if you go into a desert you see water far away but actually its mirage. Let just move our self away from old platonic reasons…. The real example where one should think and argues that when we often dreams of things that seem real to us while asleep….. In one dream, a person sits by a fire in his room, and it seems he can feel the warmth of the fire, just as he feels it in his waking life, even though there is no fire. The fact that he feels the fire doesn’t really allow him to tell when he is awake and when he is dreaming. Moreover, if his senses can convey to him the heat of the fire when he does not really feel it, he can’t trust that the fire exists when he feels it in his waking life…..  
Thought and reason, because we clearly perceived, must be the essence of humanity, that a human would still be a human without hands or hair or a face. We also assert that other things that are not human may have hair, hands, or faces…. but a human would not be a human without reason, and only humans possess the ability to reason….. (The point of knowing the truth first and you belong to the first schools of thought). Truth is based on knowledge, which is based on reasons, but we must know that there are always two types of knowledge right and wrong. If we try to prove wrong knowledge from right reasons, we will never find the truth… or wise versa… our knowledge is limited comes exclusively through experience, at birth the mind is a blank slate, we fill the ideas as we experience the world through the five senses, and then our experiences became facts. So from facts and experiences of life we prove our knowledge. When we prove our right knowledge from right reasoning only then we will be able to find the truth.  
Now lets comes to the second school of thought…. they say knowledge as the connection and agreement, or disagreement and repugnancy, of the ideas humans form. From this definition it follows that our knowledge does not extend beyond the scope of human ideas. In fact, it would mean that our knowledge is even narrower than this description implies, because the connection between most simple human ideas is unknown. Because ideas are limited by experience, and we cannot possibly experience everything that exists in the world, our knowledge is further compromised… so our knowledge is necessarily limited in these ways, we can still be certain of some things…. Example … we have an intuitive and immediate knowledge of our own existence, even if we are ignorant of the metaphysical essence of our souls. We also have a demonstrative knowledge of God’s existence, though our understanding cannot fully comprehend who or what he is…. But …we know other things through sensation. We know that our ideas correspond to external realities because the mind cannot invent such things without experience…. A blind man….would not be able to form a concept of color….those of us who have sight can reason that since we do perceive colors, they must exist…. Now the point comes when 2nd school of thought start believing (faith, accepting metaphysics, God etc ) first…. and later find the truth, based on in.. They say that God gave us our capacity for reason to aid us in the search for truth. As God’s creations, we know that we must preserve ourselves….. To help other, God created in us a natural aversion to misery and a desire for happiness, so we avoid things that cause us pain and seek out pleasure instead. We can reason that since we are all equally God’s creations, God must want everyone to be happy, and peace worthy, If one person makes another unhappy by causing him pain, that person has rejected God’s will… etc…  
The conclusion is not that what is relevant to our experience must be capable of being known by us and that what can have no importance for us cannot be real….. One immediate reason for rejecting this false impression is man's natural interest in both practical and theoretical, knowledge. Everything that is real is naturally relevant to the intellect …desirous of knowing the truth about the universe….Thus there is no reason to suppose that man's interest in knowledge confines itself to the things in his experience…. Whatever can be known is relevant the practice of knowing, not the converse….I firmly believed that reason is a native gift of humans and that true knowledge can be directly gleaned not only from books but also through the methodical application of reason…  
 
Regards  
Danish Roomi

Comments by: aurangzaib On 30 May 2010Report Abuse
My dear Danish,  
 
Your reflections are of a matured nature and I have felt a certain happiness and pride in reading them.  
 
In conclusion you reached the point of "application of reason". That's also, as far as I can think, is a right conclusion. In my reply above to brother Nadeem, you will kindly note that the Almighty, in HIS verdict, also specified the basis of any knowledge as "al-fowad", and this is exactly the reason, the mind, the analyzing faculty.  
Of course, other senses like seeing, listening etc., also help your reasoning and are an integral part of the process of reaching the truth.  
 
But, which school of thought is finally proved right after your discussion - you did not mention?  
 
Also you discussed "knowledge". Now that is a subject that knows no boundaries. Knowledge is a question of "Epistemology" and to discuss it you have to go through the whole human history and various concepts of knowledge starting at least from the age of Greek philosophers, up to the post modern intellectuals of the present age of extreme advancement in human intellect and sciences. Where people are constantly talking about metaphysics and quantum physics and about psychology and para-psychology; and also about universe and multi-verse!  
 
God bless you.

Comments by: Danish roomi On 31 May 2010Report Abuse
Dear Sir,  
 
Sub : (which school of thought is finally proved right after your discussion - you did not mention?)  
 
( Both ) Example if I write the digit 6 on my palm its look 9 to you, but if I look form my view it look 6 to me… with due respect sir … …the conclusion is not which one is right but which one is relevant to our experience and must be capable of being known through our natural interest in both practical and theoretical, knowledge…. Everything that is real is naturally relevant to the intellect …desirous of knowing the truth about the universe. Whatever can be known is relevant and the practice of knowing,( means ) application of knowledge, is the right truth.  
 
For your further inquiry, I would like to mention two types of provision. First …. The very original definition you find about the epistemology is concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge,,,,, Among its central concerns has been the challenge posed by skepticism and the relationships between truth, belief, and justification…. And Meta physics is the study of beyond the physical means, an account of which words refer to entities, which do not, why, and what categories result. When one applies this process to nouns such as electrons, energy, contract, happiness, space, time, truth, causality, and God.  
Now see where the problems originates …when people with an inadequate study of this subject and playing the part in which they bring metaphysic only as religion metaphysics, GOD, angel, heaven, earth, etc also ( Religious ) God first and then on bases of that define  
energy, contract, happiness, space, time, truth, causality followed by epistemology etc…. in my view if we dealt all the things separate, as God , happiness, time , space , energy etc…we will have much better understanding of pure knowledge. And as you said people talking about quantum physics and about psychology and para-psychology; and also about universe and multi-verse, so these are the branches of it explaining the same link..  
 
Second is that metaphysic is rationally critical thinking, of a more or less systematic kind about the general nature of the world, the justification of belief reasoning, etc…..(epistemology or theory of knowledge)….., and the conduct of life (ethics or theory of value). Each of the three elements in this list has a non-philosophical counterpart, which is Quran, from which it is distinguished and by its explicitly rational and critical way of proceeding the systematic nature. Everyone has some general conception of the nature of the world in which they live and of their place in it.. Everyone has occasion to doubt and question beliefs, their own or those of others, with more or less success and without any theory of what they are doing but with the scope of knowledge we seeks by an argument and make explicit rules and correct belief formation. Everyone governs their conduct by directing it to desired or valued ends. Quran comes to provide ethics, or moral philosophy, in its most inclusive sense,…. seeks to articulate, in rationally systematic form, the rules or principles involved. It also concerns the nature of right thought, comparison of various precise systems, whether there are absolute moral truths, and how such truths could be known.  
The study which I do here on your website allows me to bring close together, both the provisions which I mentions above. So we as human can give correct reasons to justify the right and wrong knowledge, to find the actual truth.  
 
Regards,  
Danish Roomi  

Comments by: aurangzaib On 31 May 2010Report Abuse
My dear Danish,  
 
I had suggested that you draw some conclusion with regard to the question of brother Nadeem.  
You, on the contrary, resorted to more vague philosophical terminologies taken from some books of modern and post-modern philosophy.  
 
I don't think we can afford this kind of quotations on the pages of this blog. In my earlier message too, I, in some way, tried to warn you that to discuss "knowledge" can unfold an unending exchange of philosophical inputs here, for knowledge is the question of epistemology and to discuss it we will have to start from the theories of at least the old Greek scholars. It is too lengthy and complex to discuss epistemology here. However, you still opted to touch the subject again. I am sorry, I can only advise - can't stop you. Most of our participants can’t follow that rhetoric.  
 
The fundamental policy of this blog is to spread the light of Quran. We all discuss things in the perspective of Quran. While men cannot agree with each others’ reflections and viewpoints, Quran, being an impartial, universal, divine guidance, has the capacity and the depth of wisdom that can convince and gather people on a single platform.  
 
So, let us discuss things in the light of Quran. I hope all participants would agree on this point.  
 
The reply to brother Nadeem’s question consisted of a Quranic verdict which was direct and to the point, and I am sure, easy to understand. I hoped you would expand on it with the help of some other verses. Or you could have refuted it in the same way.  
 
After your protracted and excessive philosophical verbiage, we still are not sure whether you have rejected the divine ruling, or have actually accepted it.  
 
Haven’t you actually lost the actual theme of the question in trying to see through borrowed lenses? I request that your comments should be unambiguous and explicit for friends to understand. The vague terminology that you have ‘quoted’ can be defined and interpreted in several diverse ways without any precise conclusion..  
 
Let us be simple and straightforward and try to make people understand what we are talking about. A lot of irrelevant talk is just wastage of time.  
 
Your example of 6 and 9, is just acrobatics. I bet nobody has followed what you are trying to prove. And you are not trying to prove anything but your borrowed "word prowess". My dear, let us be objective and brief, and above all, to the point.  
 
And your quote:  
"the methodical application of reason…", "So we as human can give correct reasons to justify the right and wrong knowledge, to find the actual truth."  
 
Knowledge my dear, is not "right" and "wrong". Knowledge is just Knowledge and can't be classified into, at least, right and wrong! And "actual truth".?.......... actual truth of WHAT? I bet you can't explain. It's the usual word acrobatics I used to call " a euphoria of speculative verbalism" when I was working with a friend of mine, assisting him in collecting the data on post modern western philosophy. Then "right thought" and "absolute Moral truth"?....... What do you mean by these inadequate and vague terms?  
These are just abstract terms - there are hundreds of them - invented by those westerners who had well-fed stomachs and 'well provided for' leisure lives in their comfortable confinements.  
 
Life out there is very cruel and its realities are bitter and fear inspiring. The humanity and the hospitable mother earth is being gang raped endlessly by the powerful capitalist elite mafia. THERE IS NO END OF SUFFERING. Let us find PEACE as so benevolently offered by the ideology of QURAN. PEACE is the only Absolute Truth. PEACE is the quintessential of all philosophies. It's only PEACE that is not a relative term but ABSOLUTE. And it's a question of saving our coming generations, our blossoming little angels.  
 
Please save this blog for pure, simple and straightforward Quranic understanding!  
 
God bless you.  

Comments by: nadeem On 31 May 2010Report Abuse
Dear Danish/Aurangzeb Sb. I asked a simple question i.e. I want to understand Surah Tehrim for the reason that when one does the objective study of "Quran" it looks as if the Author, in some Ayaat maintain a high level of intellect and moralities while in some Ayaats one finds presentation of mere Justifications to the most common Male chauvinism, greed and immoralities. Few of those Ayaats one finds in Surah Tehrim.  
Your comments are requested for my guidance.  
A supplementary Question: If one is not sure about his comprehension of the entire script or contents of a book, should he still make the same book his constitution of life, and even try to understand it from the material available within that book.  
 
Thanking You,  
 
Nadeem  

Comments by: Danish roomi On 01 June 2010Report Abuse
Dear Sir,  
With due respect, I didn't mean to offend your belief or point of view, but I only try to clear my point of view, which you commented first. From the view of my expectation I really felt sorry to know when the specialist like you put on blinders in order to shut out from his vision all the world but one little spot to which he glued his nose, the real perspective was lost. ..  
Respected sir for you information.. facts replaced understanding; and knowledge split into a thousand isolated fragments no longer generated wisdom. And your are right that you mention every science, and every branch of philosophy, (also do include Quran ) has developed a technical terminology intelligible only to its exclusive devotees, but as men learned more about the world, they found themselves ever less capable of expressing to their educated fellow-men what it was that they had learned. So the gap between life and knowledge grew wider and wider; those who governed could not understand those who thought, and those who wanted to know could not understand those who knew.  
You mentioned (Life out there is very cruel and its realities are bitter and fear inspiring. The humanity and the hospitable mother earth is being gang raped endlessly by the powerful capitalist elite mafia. THERE IS NO END OF SUFFERING. ) Your think form the mind of Nietzsche and speak from the view of Schopenhauer… and finding peace which you called the Absolute Truth… is totally a childish thinking… What peace ? religious peace, home peace, social peace, self peace, .. Just define peace what peace we trying to achieve. ( In reality don’t know ).PEACE is the quintessential of all philosophies.>>> Totally wrong !!! having a bird eye view of the subject in the midst of unprecedented learning your popular ignorance flourished and chose its exemplars to rule the mind of others, like this a new religions were born every day,. The common man found himself forced to choose between a scientific priesthood mumbling unintelligible pessimism, and a theological priesthood mumbling incredible hopes… I was not here to correct you or your belief.... but I think one should….. The only reason which I thought that this website or people like you are the mediate between the specialist and the nation; to learn the specialist's language, as the specialist had learned natures, in order to break down the barriers between knowledge and need, and find for new truths old terms that all literate people might understand, But my expectation were wrong the base of knowledge based upon a technical erudition that had become the monopoly of an esoteric class monastically isolated from the world by the high birth rate of your terminologies, which actually negate the scholasticism, so only the weak acceptance of authority; mankind would slip into a new age of your faith, worshiping at a respectful distance its new priests; and on the other hand the civilization, which had hoped to raise itself upon education disseminated far and wide, would be left precariously….  
 
Regards,  
Danish Roomi  
 

Comments by: aurangzaib On 01 June 2010Report Abuse
My dear Nadeem,  
 
About Surah Tehrim, I think we need the new most up-to-date interpretation from Dr. Sahib. I offered the same excuse earlier too in my first response to you.  
 
Your second paragraph. I think in that case one should try to find and explore some other ideology or book that may satisfy him and answer all his questions. Irrespective of whether that ideology or book is divine or man made.  
 
God bless you.

Comments by: aurangzaib On 01 June 2010Report Abuse
My dear Danish,  
 
In view of your persistent philosophical quotations, I would leave the discussion at this point. You have already used the word 'childish' about other's point of view. Next you will come down to more derogatory remarks. And as a policy, we try our best to avoid that situation. So it is better to close the matter being unfruitful to participants.  
 
You said I was offended. I take no offense but try to make things clear without compromises, without using personal or insulting words. You, however, do seem to be offended when requested not to waste time.  
 
When you quoted the example of 6 being 9 from some other angle, your negation tactics was fully exposed. I duly called that acrobatics. Because 6 written on the wall, will have to be read 9 by turning your self upside down, i.e, by standing on your head with feet and legs upwards. Isn't it so? So, I wouldn't like to accompany you in this useless word acrobatics. It's a wastage of time. I do not have to stress or prove my ego on these pages through the copying of borrowed terminology.  
 
I will again tell you that the focal point of this Blog is to impart the ideology of Quran, whether you agree with it or not. Not the reproduction of fancy, disintegrated, hollow verbiage of modern philosophers, that draws neither conclusions nor leads anywhere.  
 
Your reflections on PEACE, are 'amusing' and 'remarkable' and are offered to participants for opinion. From my point of view, it is again that same theory of negativism which is construed as a negative and routine tactics to assert one's ego.  
 
God bless you.

Comments by: nadeem On 01 June 2010Report Abuse
Dear Danish,  
take a chill pill yaar,

Comments by: Adnan Muhammad Khan On 02 June 2010
Dear Danish.  
i don't understand what you exactly are trying ot SAY... somewhere in your writting it seems that you have copied and pasted, somewhere it looks that you want to show off something... IT IS VERY MUCH VAGUE to understand.  
please ask and comment whatever you want but do keep in mind that this IS A BLOG where everyone is not PHILOSOPHER.  
 

Comments by: Dr. Qamar Zaman On 05 June 2010
Dear members Assalam-o-alaikum,  
The discussion has gone too far, I thought better to put the translation of Sura Tehreem.  
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ لِمَ تُحَرِّمُ مَا أَحَلَّ اللَّهُ لَكَ تَبْتَغِي مَرْضَاةَ أَزْوَاجِكَ وَاللَّهُ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ  
1. O Prophet! why do You ban that which Allâh has made lawful to you, seeking to please your companions? and Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.  
(Please note nothing is mentioned what was lawful which he forbade, so why to make stories.)  
 
A very important thing to note is that the مخاطب is النبی but the subject matter told is not for prophet. Nor his wives can do such a thing that their hearts have gone so astray that if they don’t turn to Allah the whole Allah’s machinery including Himself ,the community of pious Momins angels and the Quran will come and stand against them.  
(as described in verse 4 so ازواج and امراۃ are not his wife or wives but they are either his communities or his companions. The text decides accordingly.)  
This Sura is about those people who claim to be Momins but in actuality they are not (Verse 8 ). Hence words like ازواج and امراۃ are not for ladies but for the community.  
قَدْ فَرَضَ اللَّهُ لَكُمْ تَحِلَّةَ أَيْمَانِكُمْ وَاللَّهُ مَوْلاكُمْ وَهُوَ الْعَلِيمُ الْحَكِيمُ  
2. Allâh has already made compulsory the legality of your oaths. And Allâh is Your Lord, and He is the All-Knower, the All-Wise.  
وَإِذْ أَسَرَّ النَّبِيُّ إِلَى بَعْضِ أَزْوَاجِهِ حَدِيثًا فَلَمَّا نَبَّأَتْ بِهِ وَأَظْهَرَهُ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ عَرَّفَ بَعْضَهُ وَأَعْرَضَ عَنْ بَعْضٍ فَلَمَّا نَبَّأَهَا بِهِ قَالَتْ مَنْ أَنْبَأَكَ هَذَا قَالَ نَبَّأَنِيَ الْعَلِيمُ الْخَبِيرُ  
3. Remember when the Prophet disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his companion, so when he told it to another companion , and Allâh overpowered prophet over him, so that he came to know part of it . Then, when prophet inquired him thereof, he said: "Who told you this?" He said: "The All-Knower, the All-Aware has told me.”  
إِنْ تَتُوبَا إِلَى اللَّهِ فَقَدْ صَغَتْ قُلُوبُكُمَا وَإِنْ تَظَاهَرَا عَلَيْهِ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ مَوْلاهُ وَجِبْرِيلُ وَصَالِحُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَالْمَلائِكَةُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ ظَهِيرٌ  
4. Better if You two turn in repentance to Allâh, because your hearts have already inclined to disobedience, but if you try to overcome him then undoubtedly Allâh is his Lord , and Jibrael (the commandments), and the righteous among the peaceful and furthermore the law implementers are his helpers.  
عَسَى رَبُّهُ إِنْ طَلَّقَكُنَّ أَنْ يُبْدِلَهُ أَزْوَاجًا خَيْرًا مِنْكُنَّ مُسْلِمَاتٍ مُؤْمِنَاتٍ قَانِتَاتٍ تَائِبَاتٍ عَابِدَاتٍ سَائِحَاتٍ ثَيِّبَاتٍ وَأَبْكَارًا  
5. It may be if he broke up with you that his Lord will give him instead of you, communities better than you, Muslimatin (who establish protection), Mominatin (who provide peace ), Qanetatin (everready to obey), Ta’ibatin (those who turn to Allâh in repentance) , Aabedatin (obedient to Allâh), Sa’ihatin (provider of remedy to peoples sufferings ) Sayyebatin ( who repeatedly turn to commandments ) and Abkara (those who bring new dawn to community) .  
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا قُوا أَنْفُسَكُمْ وَأَهْلِيكُمْ نَارًا وَقُودُهَا النَّاسُ وَالْحِجَارَةُ عَلَيْهَا مَلائِكَةٌ غِلاظٌ شِدَادٌ لا يَعْصُونَ اللَّهَ مَا أَمَرَهُمْ وَيَفْعَلُونَ مَا يُؤْمَرُونَ  
6. O You the peace provider protect yourselves and your followers from the Fire whose fuel is men and stones, over which are stern and strong law implementers , who do not disobey the commands of Allâh, but obey that what they are commanded.  
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا لا تَعْتَذِرُوا الْيَوْمَ إِنَّمَا تُجْزَوْنَ مَا كُنْتُمْ تَعْمَلُونَ  
7. O You who disagreed, make no excuses This day! You are being rewarded only for what you used to do.  
يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا تُوبُوا إِلَى اللَّهِ تَوْبَةً نَصُوحًا عَسَى رَبُّكُمْ أَنْ يُكَفِّرَ عَنْكُمْ سَيِّئَاتِكُمْ وَيُدْخِلَكُمْ جَنَّاتٍ تَجْرِي مِنْ تَحْتِهَا الأنْهَارُ يَوْمَ لا يُخْزِي اللَّهُ النَّبِيَّ وَالَّذِينَ آمَنُوا مَعَهُ نُورُهُمْ يَسْعَى بَيْنَ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَبِأَيْمَانِهِمْ يَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَا أَتْمِمْ لَنَا نُورَنَا وَاغْفِرْ لَنَا إِنَّكَ عَلَى كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ  
8. O you who claim to be peaceful citizen turn to Allâh with sincere repentance! it may be that your lord will pardon you from your sins, and admit you into Gardens where prosperity flourishes under their control. The day when Allâh does not disgrace the prophet and those who deliver peace with him, Their beacon ( چراغ راہ، / نور) will guide their power and oaths. They will say: "Our Lord! complete perfectly our light for us and save us, Undoubtedly, you are able to do All things."  
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ جَاهِدِ الْكُفَّارَ وَالْمُنَافِقِينَ وَاغْلُظْ عَلَيْهِمْ وَمَأْوَاهُمْ جَهَنَّمُ وَبِئْسَ الْمَصِيرُ  
9. O Prophet strive hard against those who refuse to implement peace those who are hypocrites, and be firm and uncompromising against them, their destiny is Hell, and worst indeed is that destination.  
ضَرَبَ اللَّهُ مَثَلا لِلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا اِمْرَأَةَ نُوحٍ وَامْرَأَةَ لُوطٍ كَانَتَا تَحْتَ عَبْدَيْنِ مِنْ عِبَادِنَا صَالِحَيْنِ فَخَانَتَاهُمَا فَلَمْ يُغْنِيَا عَنْهُمَا مِنَ اللَّهِ شَيْئًا وَقِيلَ ادْخُلا النَّارَ مَعَ الدَّاخِلِينَ  
10. Allâh sets forth an example for those who refuse to implement peace , the community of Noh and the community of Lot , they were under two of our righteous law abiding persons, but both the communities betrayed ,so they both did not benefit themselves against Allâh, and it was said: "Enter the Fire along with those who enter!"  
وَضَرَبَ اللَّهُ مَثَلا لِلَّذِينَ آمَنُوا اِمْرَأَةَ فِرْعَوْنَ إِذْ قَالَتْ رَبِّ ابْنِ لِي عِنْدَكَ بَيْتًا فِي الْجَنَّةِ وَنَجِّنِي مِنْ فِرْعَوْنَ وَعَمَلِهِ وَنَجِّنِي مِنَ الْقَوْمِ الظَّالِمِينَ  
11. and Allâh has set forth an example for the implementer of peace the community of Pharaoh, when she said: "My Lord! build a home for me with you in paradise, and save me from Pharaoh and his actions and save me from the oppressors cruel and unjust people .  
وَمَرْيَمَ ابْنَتَ عِمْرَانَ الَّتِي أَحْصَنَتْ فَرْجَهَا فَنَفَخْنَا فِيهِ مِنْ رُوحِنَا وَصَدَّقَتْ بِكَلِمَاتِ رَبِّهَا وَكُتُبِهِ وَكَانَتْ مِنَ الْقَانِتِينَ  
12. And Maryam the follower of sociology who guarded her weaknesses and we enlightened her with our knowledge and she proved the truth of the commands her sustainer and his Scriptures, and she was one of the Qanitîn (ever ready to obey) .

Comments by: aurangzaib On 06 June 2010Report Abuse
Thank you Dr. Sahib,  
 
Sura Tehrim also interpreted. Another step ahead towards the goal of a comprehensive tafseer.  
Congratulations to all.  
 
God bless you.

Comments by: dr shahid On 06 June 2010
Respected Dr. Qamar accept my very warm and heartly gratitude for this extraordinary intelletual, full of logical interpretation of sura Tehreem.it helped a lot to through away the consperacy of traditional mullaism and the clergy against QURAN.  
 
MAY ALLAH BE WITH U  
 
with regards  
dr.shahid

Comments by: moazzam On 08 June 2010 Edit Delete
Dr. Qamar zaman sahib! Assalam o alaikum,really great interpratition ,the true tafseer of sora tahreem is sufficient to wash the wrong endurings related to the nabi and his wive.Almost all trepedations has been removed regarding tafseer of this sora. May Allah bless u.

»«
OTHER QUESTIONS ON
TRANSLATIONS
what is the meining of baqara or al baqara Question by: laiq ahmed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 15/02/2010
 
al baqara 121 to 128 can you difne Question by: laiq ahmed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 18/02/2010
 
what is ataz zakat Question by: laiq ahmed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 23/02/2010
 
chapter 23, verses 5,6 are transtaled as "what your right hand posseses " thereby implying slavery of women and concubinage. can u pl provide correct translation . thanks. Question by: WaseemHassan On 01/03/2010
 
can you define these aayat al baqara 121 to 128 please give me your under standing ? Question by: laiq ahmed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 10/03/2010
 
Please Define Yajooj Majood as per Quran and please describe Surah Ambiya Ayat # 97 Question by: Umair_Hamidani From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 16/03/2010
 
I visited you site, i am very glad to read your precious study about islam. i want to ask u about SURAH KOSAR, plz describe me this SURAH, what does KOSAR mean? Question by: UMAR HUSSAIN On 22/03/2010
 
Please define SORATUL QADAR??? Question by: Adnan Yousuf Zai On 25/03/2010
 
Kinldy define Soratul NAAS and Soratul Falak... Question by: Umair_Hamidani From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 25/03/2010
 
Salamunalaikum Respected Br. D. Qamar Zaman. Brother you are truely Qamar Zaman .I am not over praising but it is fact your work shows that. Alhamdulillah. Can you present us your understanding of Sura 10. verse 92. Question by: abdullahbashoeb From INDIA (HYDERBAD) On 28/03/2010
 
AOA dear Dr Qamar, Does the surah 105 relates to the event of Abraha as qouted in traditional tafasir , if yes then how that event reached us? If not then who were 'ashabi alfeel' بِأَصْحَابِ الْفِيلِ ? Wassalam Question by: Anwer Suri From UNITED STATES On 30/03/2010
 
Dear Mr. Aurangzaib/ Dr. Qamar Zaman: Kindly define soratul aadiyat (sora # 100).... Question by: Adnan Khan On 03/04/2010
 
وَلَقَدْ رَآهُ بِالْأُفُقِ الْمُبِينِ (81:23) I am looking for a translation of this verse based on Quran. Also what we should understand from word 'Jibrael"? Question by: Anwer Suri From UNITED STATES On 03/04/2010
 
Dear Dr.Qamarzaman regards, thankyou very much to enlighten us at AL-BAQARA,kindly complet this topic by including the verse 2/71alongwith the verse2/67---70 (new horison for us).plz enlighten the bani israeel,yahood and nasara. Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 07/04/2010
 
Dr. Qamarzaman regards,kindly enlighten us the verse 33/40. thanks Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 12/04/2010
 
Salam...................Surah-e-furqan ayat 32 ko define krdain. Question by: UMAR HUSSAIN On 15/04/2010
 
Dear Dr. sahib slam, Does verse 4 of sura14 prove that messenger is always present in every nation ? May God bless u . thanks. Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 24/04/2010
 
Dr. Qamar sahib regards,The term "malakat aimanukum" and verses 4/3,23/6 are now clear to me.But i hv a query,when consolidate verses 4/24,4/25 it seems conditional permission to merry with "malakat aimanukum" also the verse 33/52 looks like same. Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 30/04/2010
 
Could u please explain what is the meaning of the verses 36-39 of sura Tauba/Ultimatum (Barã'at) ( 9/36-37 )? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 30/04/2010
 
Could u please explain what is the meaning of the verses 2:72-74 ? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 30/04/2010
 
Dr. sahib regards,as u mensioned "yajooj majooj" are the anti islamic ideological forces.If "Zulqarnains"story from verse 18/93-99 is in metaphoric way ,then it neads quranic justification also consolidate 21/95-97.plz solve the query. Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 03/05/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Zaman Sb / Aurangzaib Sb. SA Please explain the meaning in detail of two ayats of surah baqra 259 and 260 in urdu but in english type. 2- What is mano-salwa Dr. M.Alam Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 08/05/2010
 
Salamunalaikum Respected Br Dr Qamar Zaman, And Respected AurangZaib. Can you give us your precious understanding of Sur 9 Tauba verse 5and 36. it is very important we were discussing them. Fee amanillah Question by: abdullahbashoeb From INDIA (HYDERBAD) On 12/05/2010
 
Dr. Qamar sahib regards,although the meanings of words in quranic verses could be selective as per context.But u hv taken 2 different meaning of LAIL,DULOOK used in the verse 17/78 in HAQEEQAT E SOAM &HAQEEQAT E SALAT. Same query a Ali haider's. Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 04/06/2010
 
Dr. Qamar zaman and all Assalam o alaikum.Food for thought ,Thought is related to the tafseer al quran by Dr Qamar sahib,plz read and comment. Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 23/06/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman i have just come to know that ou are writing the tafseer based translation of quran .i am waiting for it anxiously.plz let me know until when will it be available on the website?God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 28/06/2010
 
Dr. Qamar and Aurangzeb Bhai Regards!!!!!!!!!! I have to ask a question regarding 10:92 verse of Quran, due to shortage of space I am explaining my question by giving a comment on it. Thanks Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 02/07/2010
 
Due to shortage of space i am writing my question in remakrs. Kindly answer it. Question by: Dr. Samreen Mohsin From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 02/07/2010
 
Aslamoalikum Dr Qamar Zaman: I have come some questions which I want to ask regarding Chapter 27 that is Soreh Namal. I am giving my questions below in comments Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 18/07/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamarzaman regards,kindly elaborate the verse 17/16.thanks Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 27/07/2010
 
Respected Dr. Qamar sahab regards,if meanings of NISA is taken as the weaker persons of the society ,and RAJJAL means men,then kindly elaborate the verse 4/98.Plz also explain the verse 7/81,keeping in view the verse 3/14 Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 21/09/2010
 
Aslamoalikum Respected Dr. Qamar Zaman Sahab, I want to ask a question and I hope you will reply me soon and will clear my doubts.I am explaining my question below by giving comment on it. Question by: Nadeem_Akhtar From PAKISTAN On 23/09/2010
 
Salamun Alaykum I would like to ask the following question regarding SURAH 2 VERSE 3 especially this part: Alladhina y’uminina bilghaib - those persons who believe in the unseen;” What is really meant by the unseen? Question by: ardee From SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE TWON) On 05/10/2010
 
Salamun Alaykum Can someone kindly explain if this translation is correct. And if correct, whats the purpose? 2:228 After divorce, women shall wait three menstruations before remarriage. Question by: ardee From SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE TWON) On 23/10/2010
 
Dr.Sb / Auranzaib sb. SAK Plz explain seven ayats of surah Al. Haqqah 69/40-46 Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 23/10/2010
 
PUNISHING WOMEN, PLEASE EXPLAIN AYAT 34 OF SURA AL NISA Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 28/10/2010
 
MEN CAN MARRY A JEW OR CHRISTIAN WOMEN WHY CAN' T WOMEN DO THE SAME? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 28/10/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamarzaman,Brother Aurangzaib :Regards,In the light of your " Food for thought" related to surah feel(105) ,It seems that this debate was held with QOUM E LOOT and concluded as Surah Feel describs.Fpr details plz read my comments. Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 24/11/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Sb. Kindly explain sura recited for SAFAR (Travelling) Question by: Saad Haider On 26/11/2010
 
dr sahib aap hamar salam ho god bless u every time but aap jo translation kr rahy umeed ha muslam us pr itfaak kr ly gy inshallaha.... Question by: abbas From PAKISTAN (LAHORE) On 27/11/2010
 
Dear all, what do you believe is the CORRECT interpretation of 24:30-31 where believing men and women are told to "yagudduu absaariheem wa yahfathuu furujahum"? Question by: Damon From UNITED STATES (PITTSBURGH) On 11/12/2010
 
What does the following verse denote? He is the Lord of two Easts and two Wests what is the meaning of this? Question by: ardee From SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE TWON) On 07/02/2011
 
Here is the some of the translation of the Quran by Aidid Safar, maybe Aastana family would like to read:- Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 07/02/2011
 
What is the law of Absolute Right? Question by: Zubair From UNITED STATES (WASHINGTON) On 07/02/2011
 
Dear All, how many unbiased western ( Non Muslim ) researchers have decoded Quran as it has to be? If Any ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 10/03/2011
 
What is the meaning in 39:42? Question by: ardee From SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE TWON) On 24/03/2011
 
Salaam to all. Dr. Qamar I hope you are in the best of your health, if possible please give a draft translation/understanding of Surah Al-Takweer 81. Moazam bhai or Badar or Aurangzaib bhai or anyone. Mujazee or Haqeeqi. thanX in advance. Question by: Iqbal kay shaheen From NAMIBIA (WALVIS BAY) On 10/05/2011
 
DHULQARNAIN ASKED 61:6 giving the good news of a Messenger who will come after me, his name being Ahmad. But when he came to them with clear arguments, they said: This is clear enchantment. Who is Ahmed? Who is the.. "he"? Question by: Nargis-Badshah-Salamat From FIJI (FAUJI) On 31/05/2011
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Sb. Kia Quran men jahan "AL" lagey hai un ka matlab khaas hojaata hai. Mene yeh sawal buhut dinon ki confusion ke baad poocha hai. Like 3/14,16/8 Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 31/05/2011
 
Dear Brs. and Srs at Aastana: Please share your understanding about 4:163 and 17:55, paying special attention to the last parts of these verses and the relationship these may have with the other respective parts of the verses. Question by: dawood On 09/06/2011
 
Dear Moazzam and Members Please explain soorah Alqaariah (101). Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 13/06/2011
 
Dear Brother Moazzam! kindly define RATAL as you are very frequently using this term "wa rattil al Qurana tarteela"Thanks, the prompt response will be appreciated. Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 22/06/2011
 
Quran said to prophet as Rehmatal lil aalameen. Please explain. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 23/06/2011
 
Brother Moazzam, can you please explain Jaloot taloot in detail :P???? Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 30/06/2011
 
Dear Moazzam Bhai, Please explain sora e Ikhlas. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 01/07/2011
 
Please explain 22/36-37 Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 14/07/2011
 
Salaam; Brother Moazzam, Please explain (in detail) the true concept behind the following verses; Question by: Junaid From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 14/07/2011
 
Dear Brother Moazzam : Kindly enlighten us about the attrebute "ABU LAHAB" described in Surah 111, as you said,ABU LAHAB is a character not A specific personality.THANKS Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 16/07/2011
 
Salam to All: where are MOAZZAR, AURANGZAIB, DR. SB. ADNAN, and more ???? kindly let me know any ayat where Allah has mentioned to do good deed for HUMAN BEING instead of himself or good deed to human being = Allah's consent. Question by: Dr. Samreen Mohsin From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 22/07/2011
 
Dear Moazzam and members, Please explain 2/180-181 Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 25/07/2011
 
Dear Brother Moazzam. Please Translate Sura Al-Feel (الفیل). and elaborate who is "ashab ul feel" and what is the mistake of ashab ul feel. Question by: abbas From PAKISTAN (LAHORE) On 25/07/2011
 
Dear All, Why God choose language to pass his message(Quran in Arabic, Bible in Hebrew etc). It should be for each era and for every one, like air,water,sun and universal laws.Please enlighten. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 26/07/2011
 
Respected Sir, Would you be kind enough for me to please explain the meanings of verse No.69 to 83 of Sura Hud (11) ? Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 04/08/2011
 
When Dr.qamar sb, u will translate whole Quran? Question by: ashfaq From CANADA (ETOBICOKE) On 07/08/2011
 
The Short Interpretation of The Quran by Mughal1 Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 07/08/2011
 
What is proof and proving? Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 08/08/2011
 
Quranic Conference in Johannesburg, South Africa Question by: ardee From SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE TWON) On 17/08/2011
 
Dear Sir, Certain Sura's of Quran begin with "Haroof-e-Muqatteaat" such as " Alaf-laam-meem" (2/1) " Yaa-Seen" (36/1) etc. Please describe what your research about these "words" ?., Which commandants these words attributed to ? Regards, M.Aslam Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 27/08/2011
 
Dear All: Can someone please define "what is the core message" of the Quran in the light of the Quran? How many components it may have? Which verses can show the various components of this core message? thanks. Question by: dawood On 01/09/2011
 
The South African Quran Conference Question by: ardee From SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE TWON) On 08/09/2011
 
Dear Brs. and Srs: Please refer to 2:34 and 2:35. " And behold, We said to the angels: "Bow down to Adam" and they bowed down. Not so Iblis: he refused and was haughty: He was of those who reject Faith. (2:34)" , continued next... Question by: dawood On 18/09/2011
 
PEACE TO ALL, CONCERNING MULTIPLE ID's Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 02/10/2011
 
Brother Moazzam ! As there are many strange creatures at earth why Allah pointed out only CAMEL being a strange creature in universe, see the verse 88/17 أَفَلَا يَنظُرُونَ إِلَى الْإِبِلِ كَيْفَ خُلِقَتْ Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 11/10/2011
 
Brothe Moazzam Please enlighten us about the verse 100/6 إِنَّ الْإِنسَانَ لِرَبِّهِ لَكَنُودٌ Truly man is, to his Lord, ungrateful Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 13/10/2011
 
Brother Moazzam and Aastana members: Can you please explain the spider's house(web) as Allah quoted it as the weakest house(the web, whereas scientifically it is strongest one? Read the comments for details. Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 18/10/2011
 
ASA. What would you say is the grammatical distinction in the meanings of Muslim (مُسْلِمْ), muslimaan (مُسْلِمَانْ) and Suleman (سُلَيْمَان), given that they all have the same root? Thanks in advance. Question by: Dr Shiraz From NORWAY (OSLO) On 18/10/2011
 
Brother Moazzam: Please enlighten us about the verse 16/66, where Allah said "MILK EXTRACTS from the cattle's body between the blood and their dung.Whereas Medical science takes it as a separate system with no relation with blood and dung? Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 19/10/2011
 
Brother Moazzam! Please enlighten us about the bounties mentioned in Surah Rehman, are these for this world or in life after death, if for this world then what does the verse حُورٌ مَّقْصُورَاتٌ فِي الْخِيَامِ72 mean? Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 26/10/2011
 
Dear sir, Please elaborate 27/44 =.......قِيلَ لَهَا ادْخُلِي الصَّرْحَ ۖ فَلَمَّا رَأَتْهُ حَسِبَتْهُ لُجَّةً وَكَشَفَتْ عَنْ سَاقَيْهَا ۚ Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 31/10/2011
 
SALAM to all respected members of Aastana Blog, Please elaborate focal point of "Divine Guidance" for humankind with reference to Quranic Verses, the status , whereat , Quran wants to see its followers. Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 03/11/2011
 
Dear Sir I mean , extract of Quranic educations...We want know, what we have to do..,followin which we can attain the status described as (وَأَنْتُمُ الْأَعْلَوْنَ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ مُؤْمِنِينَ (3:139 Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 04/11/2011
 
Aslamoalikum: Here are few links of Javeed Ahmed Ghamdi, he says that Ghulam Ahmed Perveez was not knowing Arabic language and he used Arabic lexicons to support his ideas and Arabs even don't know those meanings. Read my comments. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 07/11/2011
 
Salam to All, Please explain 6/82 .( الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَلَمْ يَلْبِسُوا إِيمَانَهُمْ بِظُلْمٍ أُولَئِكَ لَهُمُ الْأَمْنُ وَهُمْ مُهْتَدُونَ ) Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 08/11/2011
 
Who is saying what is 12:71? The grammatical form suddenly changes from "They said" to "I am". Guidende appreciated. Question by: Dr Shiraz From NORWAY (OSLO) On 08/11/2011
 
Salaam to all, Could you please translate, Surah Al-Fajr and provide your stand word for word. specially 89:27 Nafse Mutmaina, and 89:22 Wa jaa Rabukaa wal malaku safaan saffa. How does your meanings of malaikaa (influencial) people fits in here. Question by: Iqbal kay shaheen From NAMIBIA (WALVIS BAY) On 09/11/2011
 
Dr.Qamarzaman; translation of verse 2/286.Kindly explain the word “RABBANA”, how اے پروردگار could be fitted here, whereas all the matters in the said verse has been settled through مملکت الہی Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 10/11/2011
 
Brother Moazzam: If "JINNS" are one of the category of Human being then what does verses 55/14-15 mean " And He created the jinn from a smokeless flame of fire"?? Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 23/11/2011
 
Dear Sir, Please explain 30/2-3-4 & 9/118 . Are these historical events? & should we be familiar with history to understand Quran ?. Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 26/11/2011
 
Some verses end with "for those who use wisdom(yaʿqilūna/taʿqilūna)",,, Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 29/11/2011
 
یَوۡمَ یُکۡشَفُ عَنۡ سَاقٍ وَّ یُدۡعَوۡنَ اِلَی السُّجُوۡدِ فَلَا یَسۡتَطِیۡعُوۡنَ ﴿068:042﴾‏ ‏ What does this verse mean , Sir. Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 01/12/2011
 
What does the verse(68/42) mean, Sir? Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 01/12/2011
 
Please explain 114:1-6 Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 04/12/2011
 
Brother moazzam, please explain 36:12 imamin mubeen Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 13/12/2011
 
Meaning of NAFS (نفس) are different like (NAFS-e-Ammara and NAFS-e-lawwama), what is the difference please explaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin :D Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 04/01/2012
 
Plz explain 86:6-8 Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 15/01/2012
 
May I draw your attention to isue of constitution, please! Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 17/01/2012
 
Brother Moazzam: Now a days in battle field the tanks are being used instead of horses. Please enlighten us about this verse100 :1 وَالْعَادِيَاتِ ضَبْحًا . Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 18/01/2012
 
Online resources for all to use: Lexicons, Dictionaries and books regarding Arabic Grammar Question by: William From UNITED KINGDOM On 18/01/2012
 
Respected Dear Moazzam; please explain ayat # 04 of sura -e-Nisa.... Question by: Saad Haider On 26/01/2012
 
ISLAM V ISLAM WHY? What are reasons for divisions and what can be basis for unity? Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 29/01/2012
 
Dear Members: As we see, there are many animals on earth those are very strange in creature, then why Allah emphasized at CAMEL being the most strange animal refer to verse 88/17 ?????? Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 06/02/2012
 
Dear Sir , Please give in detail , meanings of 22/ 1-2 Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 28/02/2012
 
Dear readers, sharing a post from FB, the traditional view on 4:34 vs Astana's version. plz correct mistakes Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 10/03/2012
 
sura baqra 1st ayat ..ALIF LAM MEM .. ME MEEM PER LAGI HUYE TASHDID KIYON NAHI PARHI JATI.?.KIYA TASHDEED SIRF KHUBSURTI KE LIYE HAI... Question by: nachowdhry From INDIA (MUMBAI) On 17/03/2012
 
Brother Moazzam, Asstana members: Allah created all living-being including DONKEY,MONKEY AND PIGS,why Allah mentioned these animals as a similitude of the worst people. Are these really the worst animals amongst other animal kingdom. Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 28/03/2012
 
how i download this translation to read it with out net Question by: owaisok From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 29/04/2012
 
Can Any One Translate This In Quran 17:1 Question by: maklewis123 From INDIA (JEDDAH) On 24/05/2012
 
Dear, Q. Zaman: Quran Arabic Language main nazil hoa, Arab main bhi wesa hi islam hai jaisa hamaray han. Sir, Rozay (Som) wo bhi wese hi rakhtay hain jese k ham,kia wo rozo, namaz, haj etc. ka mafhoom nahi samjhay jb k Quran unki hi zaban main hai. Question by: smusman From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 27/06/2012
 
Salaam. Given that the message always has been the same, what is your suggested understanding of verse 11:17 where the orthodox translation says "and before it was book of Moses" ? Question by: J. Malik From PAKISTAN (LAHORE) On 21/07/2012
 
Dr.Sahab, When Sura Al-Ahzab remaining translation is available. Since it is long time Ayat-40 translation is on the site. Mozam Sahab can you please give your input on the issue. Regards. Aamir. Question by: aamiralwaz From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 03/09/2012
 
Quran Surah 2, Ayaat 30-39 Question by: Damon From UNITED STATES (PITTSBURGH) On 22/09/2012
 
إِن كان المراد ببسم "الكتاب" لماذا قال كلمة "بسم " مجروراً؟ Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 25/09/2012
 
SALAAM, PLEASE EXPLAINE 43 :36 WHO IS قَرِين ? Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 29/09/2012
 
Salam can anyone plz give the meaning of "aahad" Question by: Maniza From DENMARK (COPENHAGEN) On 25/11/2012
 
Dear Moazzam Bhai,Salam, Jannat agar Quranic state hai to isme hamesha rehne ka matlab kya hai? Question by: Mohd Danish From INDIA (SAHARANPUR) On 25/01/2013
 
Dear Moazzam Bhai,Salam, Jannat agar Quranic state hai to isme hamesha rehne ka matlab kya hai? Question by: Mohd Danish From INDIA (SAHARANPUR) On 25/01/2013
 
salam. What is divine commencements in Quran? Question by: maideen5 From MALAYSIA (KUALA LUMPUR) On 06/02/2013
 
Salam ,pls Explain 19: 28 Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 12/02/2013
 
salaam Dr sahib pls Explain " Innee vajathuha va kowmaha yasjudoona lissamsi" What is the sujood lissamsi Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 13/02/2013
 
Dear Moazzam sb, pls can u explain the (21:58), "Then he broke them all into pieces, sparing only the supreme one among them that they may possibly return to him".... what broken ... what let spare.? Question by: sajjad hussain From SAUDI ARABIA (JEDDAH) On 14/02/2013
 
Dearest all Salaam. Please elaborate on the meanings/understanding of 6:108 and 5:116. Will really appreciate it. Question by: Iqbal kay shaheen From NAMIBIA (WALVIS BAY) On 18/02/2013
 
Moazzam bhai salaam,Imaan Kufr ka opposite hai,kufr ka meaning inkar karna hai fir Imaan ka meaning Aman kaise hai wo to Maan lena hona chahiye. Question by: Mohd Danish From INDIA (SAHARANPUR) On 24/02/2013
 
Dr Sahib Salaam. pls Explain 24:2 and 24:4 مائة جلدة and ثمانين جلدة Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 27/02/2013
 
God, a proven fact or a mere fiction? Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 02/03/2013
 
Dear All see verse 54:18 How can someone deny AADUN? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 09/03/2013
 
Dr sir pls explain minimum 1-25 verses in soora yousuf in English Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 13/03/2013
 
Explanation of the whole quran in urdu by allaama ghulam ahmed parwez. http://archive.org/details/ImportantLinks Also need for dimaagh, hawaas, quran, hadith, fiqh, itiba, itaat, ijma and qayaas explained in urdu. Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 14/03/2013
 
Hey everyone, I found a note on http://www.aastana.com/blog/NewsLetter.asp that said that the English translation by Dr Qamar Zaman of the Qur'an is available as a PDF, but I am unable to find it on the site (my Urdu's lacking). Help please? Question by: noman From UNITED STATES (CLIFFWOOD) On 17/12/2013
 
One more question, over at the Ourbeacon forum Syed Ijlal Hussain has accused Dr Qamar Zaman of declaring Prophet Muhammad as not being the last messenger. Don't mean to fan flames, but again, my Urdu's lacking. Can someone confirm please? Thanks. Question by: noman From UNITED STATES (CLIFFWOOD) On 17/12/2013
 
Dr.Sahab salam,21/91 me Hazrat Maryam ke liye Fiha ka pronoun aya hai jabki 66/12 me Fihi ka pronoun aya hai.Plz isko samjha den. Question by: Mohd Danish From INDIA (SAHARANPUR) On 25/12/2013
 
Mehrbani karke sufi ke bare me batyen kay sufi islam ke dushman they? Question by: Saleem Ahmed Shaikh From INDIA (AURANGABAD) On 05/01/2014
 
Dear Moazzam sir,regards, Sir Quran me kain places par na ki pronoun use huyee hai joki first person ki plural hai jaise 2/3 me hai razaq na hum.Yahan na(we) se murad kaun hai?kya khaliq e kaynat? Question by: Mohd Danish From INDIA (SAHARANPUR) On 09/04/2014
 
Salam.Is there a Translation of Quran in English By Dr Qamar Zaman.?I have read the translation in English by Mughal 1 . Your feedback highly appreciated. Question by: ashukorkc From MALAYSIA (SELANGOR) On 20/10/2014
 
Re verse no 92 Allah n Malaika are translated as understood by previous translators implying that here they are actually meant as sky bound god and angels Question by: saleem From INDIA (CHENNAI) On 07/11/2014
 
Dear members Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 03/07/2017
 
Assalamualikum dear all, I am new to aastana ... I saw some videos of Dr Qamar Zaman. Can anyone give me a link where I can find an english translation of the holy Quran bty Dr. Qamar Zaman? Question by: Amimul Ehsan Emon From BANGLADESH (DHAKA) On 28/05/2019
 
Comments...
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved
www.aastana.com