Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Join AASTANABLOG
Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

TRANSLATION OF QURAN
BY DR. QAMAR ZAMAN
Translation Status
آیات
سورۃ
نمبر
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now


»«
QURAN
UN-QURANIC BELIEFS
Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
I am proud of you Mr. Aurangzaib.
Add Your Comments  Question by: MINAAL On 20 January 2011
Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 22 January 2011Report Abuse
Why ?................pappu pass hogaya ?  
 
If am not wrong Bro Aurangzaib is busy with some sort of exams. All the best.  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.

 REPORT ABOUT ABUSING COMMENTSCancell
 YOUR REMARKS 
MemberID : Password: >> Forgot Id/Password
Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 22 January 2011Report Abuse
Dear Minal, that was for humor ( It was taken from an indian Ad for Dairy milk chocolate by Amitabh bachhan. Hope you must have seen that?)  
 
Sorry to annoy you.  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.

Comments by: Minaal On 22 January 2011Report Abuse
Doesn’t matter, you are my Friend.  
 
Continue your study on Holy Quran and share your views with me "whatever have your leanred".  
 
Thanx.

Comments by: aurangzaib On 22 January 2011Report Abuse
Dear Brothers Minaal and Mubashir,  
 
Thanks for your concerns. Yes, I am free at last, and now full time with you guys. The last paper I "smashed" yesterday was that of ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE (اسلامی فقہ ). You can appoint me now as Judge of some traditional Islamic Court in some distant, backward corner of "the Rotten Islamic Empire"!!! Please do that as soon as you acquire POWER.  
 
Yes; I might also ask Brother Minaal, as Brother Mubashir also asked, as to what have I done to deserve a very beautiful compliment from him?  
 
God bless you both.

Comments by: Minaal On 24 January 2011Report Abuse
Dear Friend,  
 
Regret to say that there are no courts in Pakistan as you required.  
 
Regards  

Comments by: aurangzaib On 25 January 2011Report Abuse
So I remain out of job, unemployed.  
 
But wait! That might be a good omen. Some innocent guys might have been saved from the clutches of Fiqah.  
You know why? I was hell bent upon quickly imposing "ISLAMIC HUDOOD" on some of the guys and sentencing them to RIJIM and Amputation of Hands, etc. etc. And also sentencing some others to death for Blasphemy.  
 
Some guys should be thankful to Almighty, no? Or should that be me who should be thankful?

Comments by: Minaal On 26 January 2011Report Abuse
Dear Friend,  
 
I can understand your feelings. Don’t be disappointed, be resolute, being a Muslim you are in a job, and you can start your good job individually like our Prophet Muhammad (S). My best wishes with you.  
 
God may success you.  

Comments by: Minaal On 14 February 2011Report Abuse
My Aastana Friends, Participants & Friend Moazzam,  
 
Which discussion had been made between me and Moazzam is as under:  
 
Moazzam: The Quranic term “KHATAMA” has been used in verses 2/7,6/46,45/23,42/24,36/35 meanings are very clear as a SEAL in orthodox translations. Mind God is فاعل in these verses.  
 
Minaal: Al -Quran has brief the word Seal in verses 2/7,6/46,45/23,42/24, as per his Terminology, not orthodox terminology. So why you disagree with Quranic Terminological Translation. And Verse No. 36/35 is not concern with the word Khatam.  
 
Moazzam: The Qura’nic terminology “ IMAM “ has been used for prophets, see the verses 25/74,17/71,21/73,33/24.  
 
Minaal: 1) Friend submits your comments carefully. The Verse 25/74 is related to  
those people who repented for sin, not about the Prophets.  
 
(2) The Verse 17/71 is concern with Political Leaders/Religious Leaders,  
not concern with the Prophets.  
 
(3) And the Verse No. 21/73, is related to the Abraham Prophet (I agree).  
 
(4) The Verse No. 33/24 is concern to the Hypocrites, not concern with the  
Prophets.  
 
Moazzam: The Qura’nic terminology “RAJJAL” has also been used for prophets see the verses 21/7,16/43,12/109.  
 
Minaal: God has explained in the Verses 21/7, 16/43 & 12/109 that every Prophet was male, not female. Try to understand the Spirit of Quran.  
 
Moazzam: We believe that Qura’n is the last and final book (Alkitab)  
 
Minaal: I 101% agree with you.  
 
Moazzam: There is almost half the Muslim population who believe in continuation of IMAMS (ahl-e-tashie). Mind the difference is only to call them as a IMAM OR RASOOL.  
 
Minaal: God sent only two Imam for the rectification of mankind (1) Imam-un-Naas “Abraham Prophet” and (2) Imam-e-Mubeen (Al-Quran).  
 
And according to Al-Quran only two International Prophet have been deputed by the God (1) “Imam-un-Naas “ Abraham Prophet and (2) “Nabi-e-Ummi / International Prophet” namely Muhammad (S).  
 
Moazzam: If we believe ,that KHATIM means last, then according to orthodox believe the prophet EISA must be the last one not the MOHAMMAD.  
 
Minaal: As per Quranic Believe, Christ not a Last Prophet because God didn’t called him as Khatim-un-Nabiyeen. But as per Quranic Terminology Muhammad Prophet is a Last and Perfect Prophet by way of his Last and Perfect Reminder “Al-Quran” and ‘Lexically’ Seal of Prophet.  
 
For more information you may see;  
 
Gospel of John, Chapter No.14, Verse No.16,  
Gospel of John, Chapter No.14, Verse No.26  
Gospel of John, Chapter No.16, Verse No.7  
 
Moazzam: If suppose, we consider the KHATEM means last then this will be in particular for NABI NOT FOR RASOOLS. Let us analyze the verse 33/40 مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ وَلَكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا 1: In verse 33/40 (فاعل ) is MUHAMMAD not God.  
 
Minaal: After closing the chapter of Divine Prophecies, Divine Messaging System automatically closed.  
 
Moazzam: Think what would be the justification of verses 16/36,3/164,2/129,9/128,40/34,28/59,39/71,3/101,20/134,23/32 ,14/4 where God likes to send his messengers in every nation in their languages وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِنْ رَسُولٍ إِلا بِلِسَانِ قَوْمِهِ لِيُبَيِّ  
 
Minaal: Good Question. Remember Friend, all Prophets/Messengers of God had come to the Children of Israel as per their National Language, not for all mankind, before Muhammad Prophet. Be Clear.  
 
Moazzam: Remember “ RASOOL GOD خاتم النبیین is the antonym of “ ABAA AHADUN MIRRIJALEKUM” as it is obvious from the verse33/40.  
 
Minaal: In Verse 33/40 “Muhammad (S) is not a father of your men, mean “God has Sealed/closed the continuation of Breed of Muhammad Prophet” so that any person in future could not claim that (Being breed of Prophet/Messenger of God I am also Prophet/Messenger of God. Be clear.  
 
Look Friend, always keep in mind 3 points about Verse 33/40, you will never confuse.  
 
1. God has sealed/closed the phylogeny system of Prophet Muhammad, its reason I have mentioned  
above.  
2. Continuation of Prophets is Sealed/closed by the God.  
3. Continuation of Messengers of God is Sealed/closed, by the God.  
 
You know why? Because Quran has been completed by the God, its clear.  
 
And which verse 5/33 you have mentioned above, is concern with the two True Believers Men/male, who were Companion of Mosses. Regret to say that above captioned verse 5/33 not about the Prophets.  
 
Moazzam: Now go to the verse 33/23 and concentrate at term “RIJAAL” actually these are the people to whom Muhammad appointed as a (nabi) for the task given by him.  
 
Minaal: My Honest Friend, without having knowledge you have no right to interpret any verse of Quran, do you know, selection of Prophets or Messengers is a responsibility of God, not a Prophet’s responsibility. Prophets had no right to select the other prophet as substitute.  
 
.Moazzam: The conclusion of this verse is,that every RAJJAL can’t be the nabi except who having the ATTREBUTS of Muhammad 61/6 (وَإِذْ قَالَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ يَا بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ إِنِّي رَسُولُ اللَّهِ إِلَيْكُم مُّصَدِّقًا لِّمَا بَيْنَ يَدَيَّ مِنَ التَّوْرَاةِ وَمُبَشِّرًا بِرَسُولٍ يَأْتِي مِن  
بَعْدِي اسْمُهُ أَحْمَدُ فَلَمَّا جَاءَهُم بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ قَالُوا هَذَا سِحْرٌ مُّبِينٌ)  
 
.Minaal: Remember, every human name is based upon “attributes”, and Muhammad is not only a “attribute” it is a name of our Last Prophet by way of Last Reminder (Quran). For confirmation you may see  
 
Surah-e-Muhammad, Verse No.1.  
 
Those who disbelieved and hindered from the path of God, God has destroyed their deeds.  
 
And those who believed and did good works and believed in what has been sent down upon Mohammad, and that is the truth from their Lord, God has removed from them their evils and has made good their conditions.  
(Surah-e-Muhammad, Verse No.2)  
 
Remember, mother of Muhammad Prophet have chosen his name as “AHMAD”, when he was suckling child, and after that his Grand-Father had chosen his name as “MUHAMMAD”. He has famous with name of Muhammad in all over the world.  
 
I absolute agree with 61/6.  
 
Moazzam: Any Rajjal can claim the status of Nabi, so the calamity of Nabuwat will be verified by Quran as per Muhammad’s attributes.  
 
Minaal: Our God has already verified 25 Prophets/Messengers by way of Al-Quran, in present days, as per the Muhammad’s attributes, we are True Followers/Believers/Ummati, not a Prophet or Messenger of God. Detail I have mentioned above.  
 
Surah-e-Zamur, Verse No.23:  
 
This is the guidance of God He guides therewith whom He pleases. And he whom God -causes to go astray, there is none to guide him.  
 
God may guide us in a right way.  
 
Thank you,  
 
Yours Sincere Friend.  

Comments by: moazzam On 14 February 2011
Dear Minaal ; Please read the translation of Surah Al Ahzab(33/ 1-40) by Dr Qamar zaman, currently available at this blog. I advise you kinly don't be so sentimental at this very important issue, be quranist (rationalist).You have mixed together the RIWAYAT and orthodox translation. Minaal said that ": Remember, every human name is based upon “attributes” ,ARE YOU SERIOUS? please find out the people in your society such as " Shams ul islam, Muhyuddin, Habib ullah, Rahmattullah, salamat ullah, Sibghatullah' and compare with their charecter in society. Thank you for pointiong out the typing mistake verse no 36/35, plz corrct it by 36/65

Comments by: Minaal On 15 February 2011Report Abuse
Dear Moazzam,  
 
I don't believe on Riwayat and Orthodox Translation, except True Historical Record.  
 
I wanna ask meaning of your good name.  
 
Thank you

Comments by: Minaal On 15 February 2011Report Abuse
Sister Nargis,  
 
Replies about your Questions are as under, as promised.  
 
(How come every prophet is a messenger BY BIRTH? Where is it written and how is it explained? Can you prove your statement?)  
 
Sister, because Prophet is a selected person of God, God said “I always sent down Wahi upon our chosen/selected persons.  
 
(And what do you mean by "divinatory"?)  
 
Thank you Sister to point out me my spelling mistake (Prophet mean “A Diviner”).  
 
(I wondered, how can Prophet Mohammed be a seal of prophets whos not alive at his time ? Whats the point of seal prophets that lived before?)  
 
Because Sister, he is alive between us by way of his Holy Book Al-Quran.  
 
Now “Prophets/Messengers of God” are not present between us “physically”, so we contact with his Holy Quran, and Quran will teach us, the True Followers of Prophets and will complete his Holy Mission “Aqamus Salath.  
 
For more replies about your question, you may see my previous comments.  
 
Thank you.  

Comments by: Nargis On 15 February 2011Report Abuse
Dear brother, you said :-  
 
Sister, because Prophet is a selected person of God, God said “I always sent down Wahi upon our chosen/selected persons.  
 
This does not mean a messenger BY BIRTH, it means a selected one is getting wahy. A messenger cant be messenger without a wahy, so if he is chosen when he was born, then he had to get the message when he was born aswell  
 
How are the prophets "selected"?  
 
If they are prophets by birth, they are robots, and thus not improved through their own efforts, but as they were programmed. That cant be, if you and me are able to improve our brain through hard work and achieve results accordingly, they why would the prophet's brain be subject to bloodline?  
 
If you interpret "selected for wahy" as prophet by birth, then its your understanding, its not the message given.  
 
Would you tell us what the difference between nabi and rusool is? Because Mohammed is the "seal of nabi's" and nto the Rusool, how come?  

Comments by: moazzam On 16 February 2011
Dear Minaal !The concept of Rasool-allah should be very cleared to every Muslim in a spirit as the concept of Malaika was mad cleared by Dr. Qamarzaman, at this blog. The Rasool are not supper human rather they are just ordinary human beings but they have especial vision(as per Qua'n).then it will be very easy to locate the Rasool in any society (by knowing his attributes written in Qura'n). In fact the Religious leaders (yahood initially Denied the next comming of Rasool), and our Mullas made this matter a sensitive issue by putting the mythological colour in the definition of Rasool.My dear ,you just imagine the population of BANI ISRAIL in that era,The consecutive 25 prophets (according to Mullahs belief) the actual figure we don't know see the verses 40/78,4/164, in that particular area /population?. What justification you have, to the Allah's claim of prophet hood in each nation in their own languages?.Is it not imparity among man kind, just imagine the population rate of China, Europe ,India, Indonesia, Amarica so on. Any body calling his society to salvation, by observing the universal values / laws of nature( in the field of humanity and verified by Alkitab) would be called Rasool-allah.Why we have objection at his title of Rasool, what harm is there if term is being applied according to the Qura'n??.As you admitted the term Imam is also used for prophet in verse 21/73 , then call them imam, if you not feel comfortable with the term Rasool (as ahl-e-tashie's belief).

Comments by: Damon On 17 February 2011Report Abuse
Salaam Dear Aastana Friends,  
 
i would like to address Sister Nargis' concerns, but first I wish to express my admiration for Brother Moazzam's post above.  
 
Brother Moazzam you are truly gifted and you possess an insight and ability of explanation that I am actually beginning to envy. In addition to what you already pointed out in your post above, we can remind ourselves of 10:47 which tells us that a rasool is sent to every nation and 17:15 tells us that there is no punishment UNTIL a rasool has been justifiably sent. And then there are 4:164 and 40:78 which say that SOME rasool are mentioned by name and some ARE NOT mentioned by name. I think this supports when you said in your post:  
 
"...just imagine the population rate of China, Europe ,India, Indonesia, Amarica so on. Any body calling his society to salvation, by observing the universal values / laws of nature( in the field of humanity and verified by Alkitab) would be called Rasool-allah..."  
 
Dear Sister Nargis,  
 
I think that The Quran drops us a hint on the idea of some people being reared and nurtured to be future Rasool and/or Nabiyy when we consider the different rasool that were of Abraham's bloodline such as Ishaq, Ismail, Jacob and his progeny, etc. To help us come to terms with this, I think it best if we think of the Rasool and Anbiyya/Nabiyyeen as VISIONARIES and REVOLUTIONARIES. If we do that and consider the possibility of these Visionaries and Revolutionaries raising their offspring to pick up the baton and "continue the struggle" then I think it makes the picture a little clearer.  
 
Think of the idea of Monarchy or Royal bloodline but from a perspective of the said families fighting for Justice and establishment of The Quranic Constitution instead of autocracy and dictatorship.  
 
In some ways it may be a little easier to understand it by looking at the Palestinian situation. Just about every Palestinian knows her/his history and the struggle against Zionist occupation and for the freedom of their people and their homeland. These issues are instilled into them from childhood and they are raised with these issues absorbed into their "DNA" so to speak. Imagine in this situation if the first Palestinians to be victimized by Zionist occupation in 1946 were Rasool and Anbiyyaa fighting against this injustice and they routinely raise their children to stand up and fight for the same cause. This means that their children will represent the same ideology from the same "Written Document" that their fathers and forefathers got it from and struggling against the same injustice and those administering this injustice.  
 
This is the mindset that I use when trying to understand 2:127-128, 2:132-133, 4:54, 19:58, 29:26-27 and Joseph's words in 12:38.  
 
I hope this is of some help to all involved in this discussion and I ask for you all to correct me if I am wrong.  
 
Salaam and God Bless You,  
Damon.

Comments by: moazzam On 17 February 2011
Brother Damon ! Thanks for Encouragement.

Comments by: Nargis2 On 17 February 2011Report Abuse
Damon Bro, im in rush so i'm not sure if i understood your post correctly.  
 
So do you mean Rusool is rusool by birth (well, it would be BEFORE his birth, coz risalat is in the DNA :-P)? And do you think Ismail and Isaac were biological sons of Abraham?  
 
Palestinian have been in a continuous struggle and they have all witnessed the abuse, but there are many years "gap" between Abraham and Mohammed......  
 
Plz Have a look at this when you have time:-  
 
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?SID=13&QID=730  
 
:-O

Comments by: Minaal On 17 February 2011Report Abuse
Dear Moazzam,  
 
According to Mullas "orthodox believe" 1,24,000 Prophets have passed, but according to Quran only 25 Prophets have passed, 24 in Bani Israel and only one for Bani Ismail. It is pertinent to mention here that in other nations out of Bani Israel, God sent Hadis (Hidayat dene wala), like Budha in China, Raam Kirshan in India etc etc. for their rectification, and Hadis were the Followers of Prophets.  
 
For more knowledge you may see the Book "Tawawwuf ki Haqiqat" of Allama Pervaiz Sahab.  
 
Thank you  
 

Comments by: Minaal On 17 February 2011Report Abuse
Sister Nargis,  
 
Rasool verbally have preach of Deen and Prophet verbally and in written have preach of Deen, therefore, Prophet is also a Messenger of God.  
 
Sister I have understand your problem I think in your view Duede and Wahi are the same thing.  
 
Sister you must read the Book "Tasawwuf ki Haqiqat" of Allama Ghulam Ahmad Pervaiz Sahab, the Great Master of Respected Dr. Qamar Zaman Sahab.  
 
Thank you  
 

Comments by: moazzam On 17 February 2011
Dear Mnaal: "Tasawwuf ki Haqeeqat" and muqam-e-hadith were my first books ,i gone through in 1982 and became substantial cause to turned from Ahl-e-hadith to Quranist. ( Credit gos to G A pervez) SITARON SE AAGY JAHAN AUR BHI HAIN .thanks for good advice.

Comments by: Nargis2 On 17 February 2011Report Abuse
No im very clear when i say i dont accept the theory of bloodlines, that Risalat is going through bloodcells and not their chracter,efforts,understanding etc. That would forced them to be rusool either they wanted it or not.  
 
Abraham, Ismail, Isaac Moses David Solomon etc are the most known people in the world, everyone have heard about them, but there is no evidence that they existed, is it not strange?  
 
Why do you think that's the case? Why can we find evidence for Neanderhtales and those living before them, but not Abraham and other rusools? Why is it impossible to find anything about S Mohammed other than what hadith's are telling us?  
 
There is a reason for that, dont you think?  
 
Where is the Temple of Solomon, is there any archeologic evidence it ever existed? All these Judeo-Christian stories were found in Egyptian and Babylonian mythology BEFORE Judaism was established. Including twelve brothers theory.  
 
If one reads the stories of the Sumeria God Baphomet(who is modern days Satan), Dagon, Horus, Ra, Osiris, etc, you can find the same nonsense kokckled mockled and presented in Judeo-Christian stories.  
 
Have a look at this :- http://www.egyptcx.netfirms.com/cover_page_egyptian_christianity.htm  
 
Another books revealing some of the truth  
 
http://ebooktube.net/book/314549  
 
http://ebooktube.net/book/315024  
 
http://filespart.com/b/bart-ehrman-e-book.html  
 
by Bart Ehrman  
 
Try this link if its not dowloading  
 
http://www.4shared.com/document/X5JaB2xL/JesusInterrupted-BartDEhrman.htm  
http://search.4shared.com/q/1/Bart%20D.%20Ehrman  
http://www.4shared.com/document/X5JaB2xL/JesusInterrupted-BartDEhrman.htm  
http://www.4shared.com/document/pynpR2BP/Bart_D_Ehrman_-_Misquoting_Jes.htm  
http://search.4shared.com/q/1/Bart%20D.%20Ehrman  
 
On top of all, people are trying to push the idea that Abraham was the ancestor of Muhammad and risalat were hidden in the blood cells for about 4 / 5 thousand years?  
 
Every nation had its messengers. They cant all be in a family,and why is only one or two Rusool chosen to become Rusool, why is this blood line not working at every single family member?  
 
Im surfing on every possible "anti religious"webside whos "proving" Bible and Torah to be a lie, but not even one of these sides mentioned any mistakes in the Quran...  
 
I dont believe Jews and christian elite is not studying the Quran and havnt tried to change it or manipulate it. Or done their best to find mistakes, but they failed.  
 
If there are any sites against islam, they are quoting hadith and the traditinal translation, but not even one "expert" at these web pages have been able to find mistakes in the Quran,,,how come?  
 
I wrote a letter to a proffesor in the university and told her his book is full of lies, he never contacted me again.  
 
There is something in this book whos telling us a lot more than we know, and i dont think our fixed mind will let us find the real truth. For that we need to open our mind and ask every possible question our mind is popping up. Im fully convinced this book is divine, thats why i dont accept easy and fleshy theories. The book have survived the worst criminals in history, and thats not to tell us a family history.  
 
It is absurd, old-fashioned and out of date to believe  
 
these days our senses are working to know  
 
(All respect to the brilliant and fantastic Allama Parwez for his work and efforts, but its not the final word)

Comments by: Damon On 18 February 2011Report Abuse
Salaam all,  
 
For the record, Khatam in no way, shape or form means LAST or FINAL. Khatam means seal in the sense of "stamp of approval" and "having a say and giving an approval" of something and also being the CULMINATION of something.  
 
The word for Final would be "Akher" and the word for last is actually "Al Akher" (literally the final). If Allah wanted to say that Muhammad was the last of the prophets, the term would have been "akher an-nabiyyeen" instead of "khatam an-nabiyyeen". Or simply "An-Nabiyy Al Akher" (the final prophet) or "Ar-Rasool Al Akher" (the final messenger).  
 
Using the Arabic Lexicons and grammar and ridding our minds of RIWAYAT and ORTHODOX translations will allow us to realize this pretty easily.  
 
Salaam All,  
Damon.

Comments by: Minaal On 18 February 2011Report Abuse
Peace be upon you Friends,  
 
Dear Moazzam,  
 
According to Baha Ullah Sahab, founder of Baha-e-Yat (Gnosticism), Quran is not a last and final book, and proved that “God never change his Sunnat/Rules of thumb”.  
 
According to Ghulam Ahmed Mirza Sahab, Muhammad Prophet is not a Last Messenger, and proved that “God never change his Sunnat/Rules of thumb”.  
 
According to you Muhammad Prophet is not a Last Prophet, and proved that “God never change his Sunnat/Rules of thumb”.  
 
What is correct?  

Comments by: moazzam On 18 February 2011
Dear minaal ! please focus at the following points to get cleared.from the chaos some situation 1:- Get the sense of SUNNATULLAH. 2;- Say NO to personality cult. 3:- Should know the status of Alkitab 4:- must be aware with Quranic term Rasool and nabi.DON'T BELIEVE IN THE GOLD SMITH, CONSULT TOUCH STONE(ALKITAB) TO DISTINGUISH RIGHT FROM WRONG.

Comments by: Damon On 19 February 2011Report Abuse
Peace Dear Aastana Friends,  
 
MINAAL - "What is correct?"  
 
DAMON - The Quran is correct :-)  
 
I'd say thoroughly study The Quran and then ascertain for yourself which of these is correct :-)  
 
Salaam and God Bless You,  
Damon.

Comments by: Nargis On 19 February 2011Report Abuse
Agree with B.Moazzam and B.Damon, the Award goes to ---> The Quran :-D

Comments by: Minaal On 19 February 2011Report Abuse
Dear Moazzam, don’t escape please, reply me with strict proof, without prejudice.  
 
Thank you.

Comments by: Damon On 19 February 2011Report Abuse
Peace Be With You Dear Minaal,  
 
I know that you are waiting to hear from Moazzam, but we should all keep in mind that Moazzam is only one person who cannot be everywhere all at once. He is very busy these days spreading "Quranic Enlightenment" all throughout this blog :-)  
 
My Dear Friend Minaal, you asked for "Strict Proof" that risalat has not terminated? What proof can be more strict than the 100% fact that the word "Khatam" DOES NOT mean "Last" or "Final"?  
 
Of course the Arabic Language does have a word which means Last and Final and that word IS NOT used in 33:40 at all. If Allah wanted to reveal that who Muslims regard as Prophet Muhammad was the last or final messenger He would have clearly done so.  
 
The Arabic Grammar and Lexicons make the linguistic aspect of this very clear. The only other thing that can prevent you from realizing this is a refusal or inability to erase your mind of Riwayat and N2I in which case I would have to ask who is the one being "prejudice"? :-)  
 
Salaam and God Bless You,  
Damon.

Comments by: momin On 21 February 2011Report Abuse
Dear Minnal,  
 
You wrote,  
According to Baha Ullah Sahab, founder of Baha-e-Yat (Gnosticism), Quran is not a last  
and final book, and proved that “God never change his Sunnat/Rules of thumb”  
 
Who was he ?

Comments by: Minaal On 21 February 2011Report Abuse
Okay Demon, you tell me plz,  
 
In your view Quran is Last and Final Book. I agree with you.  
 
But, “God changed his Sunnat only for Quran”, and not for Prophet and Messenger of God, why?  
 
Thank you  

Comments by: Minaal On 21 February 2011Report Abuse
Friend Momin, you may go on Google Search, and write (Bahaullah wikipedia or Bahaullah Biography).  
 
Thank you

Comments by: Damon On 21 February 2011Report Abuse
Salaam Dear Minaal,  
 
MINAAL:- Okay Demon, you tell me plz, God changed his Sunnat only for Quran”, and not for Prophet and Messenger of God, why?  
 
DAMON:- Exactly what are you talking about when you say God's Sunnat? What sunnat was changed for Quran and not for Prophet and Messenger of God?  
 
And, in case you missed it, I am going to re-post a statement I made earlier in this thread...  
 
-------------------------------------------------------  
FOR THE RECORD, Khatam in no way, shape or form means LAST or FINAL. Khatam means seal in the sense of "stamp of approval" and "having a say and giving an approval" of something and also being the CULMINATION of something.  
 
The word for Final would be "Akher" and the word for last is actually "Al Akher" (literally the final). If Allah wanted to say that Muhammad was the last of the prophets, the term would have been "akher an-nabiyyeen" instead of "khatam an-nabiyyeen". Or simply "An-Nabiyy Al Akher" (the final prophet) or "Ar-Rasool Al Akher" (the final messenger).  
 
Using the Arabic Lexicons and grammar and ridding our minds of RIWAYAT and ORTHODOX translations will allow us to realize this pretty easily.  
------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
The Quran is an Arabic document which means we must use the Arabic language to engage it and ascertain its contents. DOING JUST THAT as well as using the method of tasreeful ayaat and getting linguistic aid from the grammars and lexicons has made all too clear that the term "khatam an-nabiyeen" simply DOES NOT mean last or final messenger. I do not see how it CAN possibly mean that knowing that there is an Arabic word for FINAL as well as LAST and that Arabic word IS NOT used at all in 33/40 when it could have been used and it SHOULD HAVE been used if the intended message was finality or cessation of risalat.  
 
I'll say once more for your consideration; You will NOT be able to see what The Quran is saying as long as the teachings, (mis)interpretations and definitions of the orthodox mullahs are still filling your head and impeding your ability to think independent of them.  
 
Again, you must RID YOURSELF of the riwayat and orthodox translations, wipe the slate clean and come back to The ARABIC Quran (and only The Quran without hadees and N2I madness) to understand how, when, where and why we were misled and by whom.  
 
Salaam and God Bless You,  
Damon.  
 
 

Comments by: Minaal On 22 February 2011Report Abuse
Mr. Damon,  
 
I have mentioned my questions very clearly, plz see again:  
 
According to Baha Ullah Sahab, founder of Baha-e-Yat (Gnosticism), Quran is not a last and final book, and proved that “God never change his Sunnat/Rules of thumb”.  
 
According to Ghulam Ahmed Mirza Sahab, Muhammad Prophet is not a Last Messenger, and proved that “God never change his Sunnat/Rules of thumb”.  
 
According to you Muhammad Prophet is not a Last Prophet, and proved that “God never change his Sunnat/Rules of thumb”.  
 
And due to short time I am not going in dispute, but for your satisfaction you may see my previous posts about word Khatam.  
 
Thank you

Comments by: momin On 22 February 2011Report Abuse
Dear Damon,  
 
You are crystal clear.

Comments by: Damon On 22 February 2011Report Abuse
Dear Minaal,  
 
Salaamun / Peace, Prosperity and Safety Be Upon You,  
 
I have read your understanding of the word "Khatam" in your earlier posts in this thread. I am still in disagreement with your understanding of this word. In my humble opinion, you are not getting your understanding of this term from the Arabic lexicons or from the use of tasreef of The Quran but instead attaching the orthodox and riwayat understanding to it.  
 
I personally am not too concerned with the claims of Baha Ullah , Ghulam Mirza Ahmed, Rashad Khalifa, Malikai Z York, David Koresh, Joseph Smith, Warren Jeffs or anyone else in the world working to establish a "cult" based on personality worship. Even if Dr. Qamar Zaman Sahab were to come out and make the same kinds of claims as the above mentioned I STILL would not allow my cage to be rattled. I will do with him as I have done with the others and continue to do until my dying day which is to "Verify their teachings and views against the ARABIC QURAN".  
 
As far as The Quran is concerned, I am of the humble belief and understanding that it is the final "divine document/constitution" revealed by Allah and I base that understanding on the attributes that Allah uses to describe The Quran as well as that which The Quran has come to do for the Humanity. My humble understanding is that The Quran we have in our present possession is a "mushaf" which is representative of the eternal "Al Kitab" that is eternally with Allah. I am also of the humble opinion that OTHER (meaning non Arabic) documents and constitutions can, should and WILL be produced from this Arabic Mushaf that we have...of which this mushaf itself is a direct product of Al Kitab.  
 
Because of this, I am also of the belief that there was never a termination or cessation of "risalat". Allah never punishes a nation or community unless he FIRST sends a rasool and all peoples will eventually receive a rasool who will clarify Allah's commandments to them in their own tongue 20/134, 28/47, 10/47, 17/15. The people of conviction are repeatedly commended to pay heed to the rasool. How can this be done if there is no rasool among us? How can we pay heed to a non living rasool who was the last one?  
 
We can get to the bottom of this if we dissect 33/40 and linguistically analyze it. By doing so, I think it would become apparent that the misunderstandings stem from the incorrect views and definitions of "khatam", Rasool (and the concept of risalat) and the Arabic word "Muhammad" which is not a proper noun or name. I think it would be best to tackle these terms and concepts one at a time and then bring it all together for an overall coherent picture.  
 
Beginning with the word khatam, I suggest to first study the Arabic root and definitions of this word which we can do by studying the following links to Lane's Arabic-English Lexicon...  
 
http://www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume2/00000338.pdf  
 
http://www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume2/00000339.pdf  
 
I find the information in the second link especially interesting as it has the words "Khatam" and "Khatim" listed along with their respective connotation. What is interesting is that Lane has (correctly) pointed out that the word "khatam" is the ACTING AGENT meaning WHOEVER or WHATEVER the word "khatam" is referring to is the one who "Originates" and "Performs" the ACTION of this word. The word "khatam" is an active participle by the way and it is of the "Faa'il" pattern.  
 
Now, what makes this information relevant is that when we look at all of the other ayaat in The Quran where the word "khatama" is used we see that it is ALLAH who is the acting agent of this verb. However, when we read 33/40 we see that it is NOT Allah who is the acting agent of the word Khatam, but it is Muhammad that is the acting agent. And here a question pops up; If the word Khatam in this verse means to be "last" or "final" as we have been wrongfully taught, then how can Muhammad be the acting agent of it? Meaning how can HE be the one to bring risalat to an end when it is only Allah who has jurisdiction to do such a thing. 33/40 very clearly says that it is Muhammad and not Allah who is acting as a door closer of risalat and naboowat. As far as my studies have taken me in the other ayaat of The Quran where "khatama" is used it is always Allah who is the acting agent of this word as this is His power and jurisdiction. The WORDING of 33/40 suggests that it is Muhammad and Muhammad alone who is closing the door of risalat and naboowat. Am I the only one who find this somewhat odd?  
 
I have to ask a question now. If the word khatam means last or final as you believe, then why is this word not used in certain ayaat of The Quran where the idea of "last" or "final" is obvious and without doubt? One example of such an ayaat is 57/3. This ayat is clearly conveying the message that Allah is the "Alpha" and the "Omega", the "First" and the "Last", the "Beginning" and the "End". Why is the word "khatam" not used in this verse? Instead it uses the word that I have already pointed out earlier in this thread. We can also look at 7/38 and 56/49,50 where the FIRST and the FINAL groups are imprisoned in the life of hell. What is interesting about both of these passages is that they not only use the word "akhir" but the word akhir is used AS AN ANTONYM of the Arabic word "awwal" which means FIRST. You can also have a look at 29/36 and 33/21 to see how this word is used for last or final.  
 
I wish to end this reply by posting here something I had wrote in the thread concerning the name of Muhammad which is here  
 
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?SID=23&QID=1066  
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
The word Muhammad is actually a "Passive Participle" in the second derived form.  
 
All this means is that it is a type of noun which is used to show the person or thing that is on the receiving end of the verb being used in the word. Conversely, an active participle does the opposite, meaning it is a word used to show the sender/originator of the verb being used.  
 
The actual, literal definition of the word Muhammad is "He who receives many or high praises". So it is actually a "descriptive" word rather than a proper name or noun. So ANY OF US can be given the descriptive label of Muhammad even though we already have proper names. It is almost the same as describing a person (who has a proper name) as being "an institution"  
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
I included this information because I believe that the misunderstanding of this word adds to the "matrix" of mass confusion.  
 
Salaam / Allah Hafiz,  
Damon.  

Comments by: Minaal On 01 March 2011Report Abuse
Peace be upon you Dear Damon, and Salam my Aastana Friends and Participants,  
 
Sorry for wait, dear Damon, I wanna share my views with you, and I have mentioned your post parawise, so that, any confusion don't be create.  
 
Damon: I have read your understanding of the word "Khatam" in your earlier posts in this thread. I am still in disagreement with your understanding of this word. In my humble opinion, you are not getting your understanding of this term from the Arabic lexicons or from the use of tasreef of The Quran but instead attaching the orthodox and riwayat understanding to it.  
 
Minaal: Sorry to say that you did not read my previous posts carefully, I have explained the word Khatam with Tasreef-e-Ayat and Qurani Arabic Terminology. As I have explained in my previous posts that I don’t believe on Riwayat and Orthodox Translation. For your satisfaction I once again explain here with Tasreef-e-Ayat:  
 
(Al –Quran has brief the word Seal (by way of Tasreef-e-Ayat) in verses 2/7, 6/46, 45/23, 42/24, as per his Terminology, not orthodox terminology.)  
 
Damon: I personally am not too concerned with the claims of Baha Ullah , Ghulam Mirza Ahmed, Rashad Khalifa, David Koresh, Joseph Smith, Warren Jeffs or anyone else in the world working to establish a "cult" based on personality worship. Even if Dr. Qamar Zaman Sahab were to come out and make the same kinds of claims as the above mentioned I STILL would not allow my cage to be rattled. I will do with him as I have done with the others and continue to do until my dying day which is to "Verify their teachings and views against the ARABIC QURAN".  
 
Minaal: I am very glad to know that, I appreciate you.  
 
Demon: As far as The Quran is concerned, I am of the humble belief and understanding that it is the final "divine document/constitution" revealed by Allah and I base that understanding on the attributes that Allah uses to describe The Quran as well as that which The Quran has come to do for the Humanity. My humble understanding is that The Quran we have in our present possession is a "mushaf" which is representative of the eternal "Al Kitab" that is eternally with Allah. I am also of the humble opinion that OTHER (meaning non Arabic) documents and constitutions can, should and WILL be produced from this Arabic Mushaf that we have...of which this mushaf itself is a direct product of Al Kitab.  
 
Minaal: But dear God never do his work directly, God always do his work through his System.  
 
Demon: Because of this, I am also of the belief that there was never a termination or cessation of "risalat". Allah never punishes a nation or community unless he FIRST sends a rasool and all peoples will eventually receive a rasool who will clarify Allah's commandments to them in their own tongue 20/134, 28/47, 10/47, 17/15. The people of conviction are repeatedly commended to pay heed to the rasool. How can this be done if there is no rasool among us? How can we pay heed to a non living rasool who was the last one?  
 
Minaal: Dear Damon, doesn't matter if Muhammad Prophet is not between us, but his Good Divine Message have us, as you know Quran is a last Divine Message, and after Surah-e-Naas divine messaging system is Sealed. When divine Messaging System is sealed so it is not possible now that any Divine Messenger or Divine Prophet would come, and if any person challenged the verse 33/40 "Khatam-un-Nabiyeen" its mean he is indirectly challenge the Last Divine Message (Al-Quran). And you know being a Muslim we have no need of any Divine Messenger or Divine Prophet in presence of Holy Quran. Now a days Quran is translating in many and different languages, because Quran is sent down through the Wahi for all human being, on his respectable Muhammad/Ahmad Prophet.  
 
For your kind consideration it is pertinent to mention here that in UAE “Postman” called as Rasool/Messenger, but its not mean that he is Rasoolallah/Messenger of God.  
 
If we are sending God’s message, its mean we are Messenger of Quran / Messenger of Divine Revelation, not a Messenger of God or Diviner/Prophet of God.  
I say that the above noted Verses are true and correct.  
 
Damon: We can get to the bottom of this if we dissect 33/40 and linguistically analyze it. By doing so, I think it would become apparent that the misunderstandings stem from the incorrect views and definitions of "khatam", Rasool (and the concept of risalat) and the Arabic word "Muhammad" which is not a proper noun or name. I think it would be best to tackle these terms and concepts one at a time and then bring it all together for an overall coherent picture.  
 
Minaal: Okay Friend.  
 
Demon: Beginning with the word khatam, I suggest to first study the Arabic root and definitions of this word which we can do by studying the following links to Lane's Arabic-English Lexicon...  
 
http://www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume2/00000338.pdf  
 
http://www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume2/00000339.pdf  
 
I find the information in the second link especially interesting as it has the words "Khatam" and "Khatim" listed along with their respective connotation. What is interesting is that Lane has (correctly) pointed out that the word "khatam" is the ACTING AGENT meaning WHOEVER or WHATEVER the word "khatam" is referring to is the one who "Originates" and "Performs" the ACTION of this word. The word "khatam" is an active participle by the way and it is of the "Faa'il" pattern.  
 
Minaal: I have seen above noted websites (Khatam mean “THE LAST OF A COMPANY OF MEN" as also whence[THE LAST OF THE PROPHETS], in the ]ur [xxxiii. 40]; accord. to one reading with damm to the Mohammad also called, and the last portion of anything that is drunk, in the [xxxiii. 26], means t The last that they will perceive thereof will be the odour of mush: its result shall be the taste of mush: Fr says, . and U.Aand are nearly the same in meaning whence the reading of 'Alee, L t ,1.: and the explanation is this; that when any one shall drink thereof, lie will find the last culp thereof to have the odour of musk: Er.Righib says that the meaning is, The End, And The Last Draught. witat shall renmain, thaereof shall be in perfume [like] mnusk: and that the assertion that it means it shall be sealed with musk is noulght. (TA.) [See also .. I and .'..] Also, (IAqr,.K,) and Vt, (],) or, accord. to IAar, t; ,, (TA,) sings. of , which signifies t The places of separation of the joints (J.,.) oJ horses. and whlich is more commonly known than.l., (Mfb, [but see what follows,]) and V;cts and t.; (JK, $,1g, THE LAST IN THE CV AND TA ) and TA but omitted in the CK) and signify the same”.  
 
Demon: Now, what makes this information relevant is that when we look at all of the other ayaat in The Quran where the word "khatama" is used we see that it is ALLAH who is the acting agent of this verb. However, when we read 33/40 we see that it is NOT Allah who is the acting agent of the word Khatam, but it is Muhammad that is the acting agent. And here a question pops up; If the word Khatam in this verse means to be "last" or "final" as we have been wrongfully taught, then how can Muhammad be the acting agent of it? Meaning how can HE be the one to bring risalat to an end when it is only Allah who has jurisdiction to do such a thing. 33/40 very clearly says that it is Muhammad and not Allah who is acting as a door closer of risalat and naboowat. As far as my studies have taken me in the other ayaat of The Quran where "khatama" is used it is always Allah who is the acting agent of this word as this is His power and jurisdiction. The WORDING of 33/40 suggests that it is Muhammad and Muhammad alone who is closing the door of risalat and naboowat. Am I the only one who find this somewhat odd?  
 
 
Minaal: Oh my Dear, God clearly giving evidence that “Muhammad is not a father of your people, but he is only a Messenger of God and Seal of Prophet. AND EVERY THING IS UNDER THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOD / GOD WELL KNOWN EVERY THING”.  
 
In someplace contained in Quran, “Allah/God”, its mean “God’s System”), further mean that we may also gain the knowledge through the System/rule of God after investigation/asscertation.  
 
Surah-e-Baqarah Verse 23,  
Younus Verse No.38,  
Hood Verse No.13.  
Surah-e-Bani Israel Verse No.88,  
Surah-e-Toor Verse No.34.  
(Surah-e-Hijar Verse No.9),  
Surah-e-Ha-Meem-Al-Sajda Verse No.42.  
 
Surah-e-Ale-Imran Verse No.61: La’anatullahi A’lal-Kazibeen.  
 
Demon: I have to ask a question now. If the word khatam means last or final as you believe, then why is this word not used in certain ayaat of The Quran where the idea of "last" or "final" is obvious and without doubt? One example of such an ayaat is 57/3. This ayat is clearly conveying the message that Allah is the "Alpha" and the "Omega", the "First" and the "Last", the "Beginning" and the "End". Why is the word "khatam" not used in this verse? Instead it uses the word that I have already pointed out earlier in this thread. We can also look at 7/38 and 56/49,50 where the FIRST and the FINAL groups are imprisoned in the life of hell. What is interesting about both of these passages is that they not only use the word "akhir" but the word akhir is used AS AN ANTONYM of the Arabic word "awwal" which means FIRST. You can also have a look at 29/36 and 33/21 to see how this word is used for last or final.  
 
Minaal: As you know Friend, self-created traditions/Riwayat ruined the Deen-e-Islam and Previous Holy Religions, and the Seal was made a major issue due to the Riwayat of “Seal of Solomon”. Basically this Riwayat/wolf derived from the Jewess to Christianity, and Christianity to Islam, and targeted and sentenced the Verse 33/40, and changed the Khatam in Literal meaning.  
 
FIRST EXAMPLE:  
 
In Literal (Lughwi) meaning “Cut the Hands of Thief” or “Amputation of Hands”,  
 
But in Terminological (Istalahee) meaning “Social Byecot / Disaffilication / Dissciation / Secede / Renunciation etc etc.  
 
SECOND EXAMPLE:  
 
In Lexical/Literal (Lughwi) meaning, “Khatam/Seal” mean “Postal Stamp / Name of animal sea ‘Seal’/ SEAL OF SOLOMON etc etc.  
 
In Terminological (Istalahee) Meaning “The last of man of the Company / Khataman Nabiyeen by way of Khatam-ul-Quran etc etc.  
 
 
And Aakhir mean “posterior / eternal / eternal life” etc etc.  
 
You know friend enemy of Deen, converted the Terminological meaning to Literal Meaning, and Literal meaning in Terminological meaning.  
 
Damon: The word Muhammad is actually a "Passive Participle" in the second derived form.  
 
All this means is that it is a type of noun which is used to show the person or thing that is on the receiving end of the verb being used in the word. Conversely, an active participle does the opposite, meaning it is a word used to show the sender/originator of the verb being used.  
 
The actual, literal definition of the word Muhammad is "He who receives many or high praises". So it is actually a "descriptive" word rather than a proper name or noun. So ANY OF US can be given the descriptive label of Muhammad even though we already have proper names. It is almost the same as describing a person (who has a proper name) as being "an institution"  
 
Minaal: Dear, if it is correct that the Muhammad is only a descriptive label or title as you mentioned above so why God didn’t give the title/label of Muhammad to all previous Prophets/Messengers.  
 
You must see Surah-e-Muhammad Verse No. 1 & 2,  
Surah-e-Haqa Verse No. 40 to 43.  
Surah-e-Yousuf, Verse No.108.  
Surah-e-Noor, Verse No.40.  
 
 
Dear I know very well, no any result of this dispute, so why we don’t discuss on similarities.  
 
(Surah-e-Ale Imran, Verse 64)  
 
God may guide you in right way,  
 
Thank you and God Bless you,  
 
Yours Sincere Friend.  

Comments by: Damon On 04 March 2011Report Abuse
My Dear Minaal,  
 
Salaamun/ Peace, Prosperity and Safety Be Upon You,  
 
Thank You very much for the detailed response concerning your views of "khatam" and "rasool".  
 
For me, I humbly feel as though that it all boils down to the fact that "Khatam" and "Akher" are two entirely different words with two different meanings. ONE OF THOSE WORDS "clearly" means Last and Final. Which of those words is it? When Allah intended to give the understanding of something in The Quran being "Last" or "Final", then it was made very clear when the word "Akher" was used as in the example ayaat cited in my last post.  
 
MINAAL: As you know Friend, self-created traditions/Riwayat ruined the Deen-e-Islam and Previous Holy Religions, and the Seal was made a major issue due to the Riwayat of “Seal of Solomon”. Basically this Riwayat/wolf derived from the Jewess to Christianity, and Christianity to Islam, and targeted and sentenced the Verse 33/40, and changed the Khatam in Literal meaning.  
 
DAMON: While I thank you for this explanation and your examples, the fact remains that none of the examples or the explanation refute or deny the facts I have pointed out concerning the true and definite Arabic word for "Last" and/or "Final" which is the Arabic word "Akher" and I have used what I believe to be the STRONGEST evidence to demonstrate this by citing relevant ayaat from The Quran. Again, here they are for your perusal...57/3, 7/38, 56/49-50, 29/36 and 33/21. Now I have cited these ayaat from The Quran to "Prove" that the word "Akher" means last or final and NOT the word "Khatam". It is up to you to also bring ayaat from The Quran to prove otherwise. I am of the humble position that if you are unable to do this, then what you are presenting is mere opinion and ingrained perception without the supporting evidence.  
 
MINAAL: Dear, if it is correct that the Muhammad is only a descriptive label or title as you mentioned above so why God didn’t give the title/label of Muhammad to all previous Prophets/Messengers.  
 
DAMON: There are TWO THINGS that I need to point out to you...  
 
One...The "word" Muhammad IS NOT a proper name or noun but is a "Passive Participle". I have given the grammatical explanation and breakdown to prove my assertion. If I am incorrect about this then I ask that you present the grammatical explanation and breakdown to correct my understanding.  
 
Two...If the name of the prophet who received "wahi" of The Quran was the passive participle "Muhammad" (as you believe) then WHY WAS HE NOT ADDRESSED AS MUHAMMAD in all of the ayaat where he is "Clearly" being addressed? There is no such ayaat. When he is being addressed, he always addressed to as "Ya Ayahaa Nabiyy" (Oh Prophet) or "Ya Ayyahaa Rasul" (Oh Messenger) but we have NO AYAAT in The Quran where he is being addressed as "Ya Ayyahaa Muhammad" (Oh Muhammad).  
 
There are two reasons why there are no such ayaat in The Quran addressing "Oh You Muhammad".  
 
One, because it is not his proper birth name. It is a passive participle and it is used as a descriptive label in the very few ayaat in The Quran where this word is mentioned.  
 
The second reason is because the address "Ya Ayaha Muhammad" (Oh Muhammad) would be COMPLETELY nonsensical according to the Arabic grammar AND because it would not be addressing ANYONE in particular as it could be applied to ANYONE who fits the characteristic and spirit that the word describes. The LITERAL definition of the word Muhammad is "He who receives many or extreme praise". So "Ya ayyahaa Muhammad" would literally be saying "Oh You HE who receives many/extreme praise" and by making this statement no person in particular is being addressed and as I said this goes against the Arabic grammar.  
 
Now, a proper noun and name derived from the root word Ha-Mi-Da is simply "Hameed" and grammatically and sensically it would be more appropriate to say "Ya Ayyhaa Hameed"...Oh YOU who are praiseworthy.  
 
So, if anything if the prophet's proper name was a derivative of Ha-Mi-Da it would have been "Hameed" and not "Muhammad". I'm afraid the Arabic grammar wouldn't have it any other way no matter what the opinions of people.  
 
Regards,  
Damon.

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 04 March 2011Report Abuse
Dear Minaal / Brother Damon ! You both are really truth seekers, plz read the following in support of your noble discussion. " Let me reproduce the MUBAHIS from the translation of Surah Al Ahzab (by Dr. Qamar)  
40 مَّا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِّن رِّجَالِكُمْ وَلَٰكِن رَّسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا  
محمد تمہارے مرد میداں میں سے کسی کے پیشوا نہیں ہیں بلکہ احکامات الہی کے پہنچانے والے اور نبیوں کی مہر ہیں اور مملکت خداداد ہر چیز سے واقف ہے۔  
 
 
 
 
مباحث:۔  
اس سے پہلے کہ اس آیت کے متعلّق بات کی جائے عمومی ترجمع دیکھتے ہیں ۔  
''محمد تمہارے مردوں میں سے کسی کے والد نہیں ہیں بلکہ خدا کے پیغمبر اور نبیوں (کی نبوت) کی مہر (یعنی اس کو ختم کردینے والے) ہیں اور خدا ہر چیز سے واقف ہے '' (ترجمع مولانا فتح محمدجالندھری)  
اوپر دئے گئے عمومی ترجمع میں بھی خَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ کا ترجمع نبیوں کی مہر ہی کیا گیا ہے البتّہ آخری نبی ثابت کرنے کے لئے قوسین ( brackets ) کا سہارہ لیا گیا ہے ۔اگر ان قوسین کو ہٹا دیا جائے تو ترجمہ وہی ہوگا جو ہم نے پیش کیا ہے ۔ بنیادی فرق چند الفاظ کے مفہوم میں ہےجس کے متعلّق پہلےبھی عرض کرچکے ہیں لیکن ایک مرتبہ پھر دہرا دیتے ہیں ۔  
۱۔۔ رجال  
رجال کا ترجمع مرد کی بجائے مرد میداں کیا گیا ہے۔  
۲۔۔ اللہ  
اللہ کا جو مظہر ہمیں نظر آتا ہے وہ اس آیت میں پیش کیا گیا ہے ۔کیونکہ قرآن خود کہہ رہا ہے لا تُدْرِكُهُ الأبْصَارُ وَهُوَ يُدْرِكُ الأبْصَارَ وَهُوَ اللَّطِيفُ الْخَبِيرُ جب ہماری بصیرت اس کی ماہیت تک نہیں پہنچتی تو اس کی پہچان کا ذریعہ صرف اسکی صفات ہی رہ جاتی ہیں ۔ وَلِلَّهِ الأسْمَاءُ الْحُسْنَى فَادْعُوهُ بِهَا اللہ ہی کے احکامات حسین ترین ہیں ،پس انہی کی ذریعے اس کی دعوت دو ۔ اس لئے قرآن میں جہاں جہاں اللہ کا لفظ آیا ہے وہاں وہاں ہم کو سیاق و سباق کودیکھ کر متعین کرنا پڑے گا کہ اس اسم یعنی اس صفت کا اطلاق کیا ہوگا ۔مثلاً أَقْرِضُوا اللَّهَ قَرْضًا حَسَنًا اللہ کو قرض حسن دو ۔اس حکم کے تحت آپ کچھ رقم لے کر نکلتے ہیں کہ اللہ کو آج قرض حسن دینا ہے ۔لیکن اللہ کہیں نظر نہیں آتا اس لئے وہ رقم مجبوراً کسی محتاج کودے کر آ جاتے ہیں۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔لیکن کبھی آپ نے پلٹ کر نہیں سوچا کہ آپ کو کسی محتاج کو رقم دینے کا نہیں کہا گیا تھا بلکہ حکم تھا کہ اللہ کو قرض حسن دو۔۔۔۔۔۔۔! کیا آپ نے اس محتاج کو اللہ سمجھ لیا تھا ۔۔۔۔۔نہیں قطعاً نہیں،پھر ایسا کیوں کیا گیا ۔۔۔؟ اس لئے کہ اس کائنات میں ہر جگہ اللہ کے احکامات کی بادشاہت ہونی چاہئے ،اور جہاں جہاں اللہ کے احکامات کی بادشاہت ہوگی وہاں وہاں مملکت وقت کی ذمہ داری ہے کہ وہ ان سب ذمہ داریوں کو پورا کرے جس کا ذکر اللہ کی صفات کے ذریعے کیا جاتا ہے ، اور تب ہی ایسی مملکت کو حق حاصل ہوگا کہ اس کو مملکت خداداد کہا جا ئے۔ ایسی مملکت کی غیر موجودگی میں یہ فرض مومنین اور صالحین کا ہو گا کہ وہ انفرادی طور پر اس ذمّہ داری کو پورا کریں ۔  
اسی طرح و ما مِنْ دَابَّةٍ فِي الأرْضِ إِلا عَلَى اللَّهِ رِزْقُهَا اللہ نے یہ ذمہ داری لی ہے کہ ہر ذی حیات کو جوزمین ہیں ہے وہ رزق مہیّا کرے گا ۔۔۔۔۔۔اسکا یہ مطلب نہیں کہ ہر ذی حیات کواللہ خود آکر رزق مہیا کرے گا بلکہ یہ ذمہ داری اس مملکت کی ہوگی جو احکامات الہی کی بنیادوں پر قائم کی جائے گی ۔ أُولَئِكَ لَهُمْ نَصِيبٌ مِمَّا كَسَبُوا وَاللَّهُ سَرِيعُ الْحِسَابِ اور اسی طرح اللہ کے سریع الحساب ہونے کا مطلب ہے کہ اس مملکت خداداد کا قانونی نظام ایسا ہوگا جو کام کرنے والے کو فوراً اس کے کئے کے مطابق جزاء اور سزا دے ۔  
۳۔۔ خاتم النبین  
اس آیت میں ایک لفظ خَاتَم آیا ہے جس کا مفہوم آخری لیا جاتا ہے ۔ حالانکہ خَاتَم کے معنی میں آخری کا مفہوم نہیں ملتا ہے ۔آپ نے خود دیکھا کہ قوسین کے بغیر یہ مفہوم ممکن ہی نہیں ۔اسی لئے قوسین ڈال کر مفہوم کو اپنی مرضی کے مطابق ڈھالا جاتا ہے ۔ دوسری بات کہ ہم رسول اللہ کو آخری نبی مان کر ان کی کس خوبی میں ا ضافہ کر تے ہیں؟ کسی بھی رسول کا آخری ہونا اس کی شان میں کیا اضافہ کرتا ہے ؟ اس موضوع کو ہم دو جہت سے سمجھنے کی کوشش کرینگے ،یعنی رسالت اور نبوت ۔  
رسالت / رسول ،  
تمام اقوام عالم نے اپنے اپنے رسولوں کو آخری بنا کر آنے والی اقوام سے جھگڑے مول لینے کے سوا کچھ نہیں کیا اس بات کا ذکر قرآن میں خود موجود ہے ملاحظہ فرما لیجئے ۔  
وَلَقَدْ جَاءَكُمْ يُوسُفُ مِنْ قَبْلُ بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ فَمَا زِلْتُمْ فِي شَكٍّ مِمَّا جَاءَكُمْ بِهِ حَتَّى إِذَا هَلَكَ قُلْتُمْ لَنْ يَبْعَثَ اللَّهُ مِنْ بَعْدِهِ رَسُولا كَذَلِكَ يُضِلُّ اللَّهُ مَنْ هُوَ مُسْرِفٌ مُرْتَابٌ (سورۃ المومن آیت نمبر۳۴)  
ترجمہ "اورتمہارے پاس پہلے یوسف آیات کے ساتھ آئے تھےتو تم اس چیز کے ساتھ شک ہی میں مبتلا رہے جس کے ساتھ وہ تمہارے پاس آئے تھے اور تم نے کہا کہ اس کے بعد اب اللہ کسی کو مبعوث نہیں کرے گا ۔اسی لئے اللہ اس کو جو شکّی اور حد سے گزرنے والا ہو ہدایت پر نہیں پا تا ۔"  
کسی بھی رسول کا سب سے بڑا کارنامہ اس کی زندگی میں اسکی کامیابی ہے اور اس کے جانے کے بعد اسے اس کے کارناموں سے یاد رکھا جائے ۔ میں پورے وثوق سے اس بات کا یقین رکھتا ہوں کہ اس دنیا میں رسالتمآب محمد رسول اللہ سے بڑھ کر کوئی بھی اپنے مشن میں کامیاب نہ ہوا ہے اور نہ ہی ہوگا ۔  
جہان تک آئندہ رسولوں کے آنے کی بات ہے تو اس کا ذکر قرآن میں مذکور ہے ،خود ملاحظہ فرما لیجئے ،  
وَسِيقَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا إِلَى جَهَنَّمَ زُمَرًا حَتَّى إِذَا جَاءُوهَا فُتِحَتْ أَبْوَابُهَا وَقَالَ لَهُمْ خَزَنَتُهَا أَلَمْ يَأْتِكُمْ رُسُلٌ مِنْكُمْ يَتْلُونَ عَلَيْكُمْ آيَاتِ رَبِّكُمْ وَيُنْذِرُونَكُمْ لِقَاءَ يَوْمِكُمْ هَذَا قَالُوا بَلَى وَلَكِنْ حَقَّتْ كَلِمَةُ الْعَذَابِ عَلَى الْكَافِرین (سورۃ الزمر آیت نمبر ۷۱)  
ترجمہ "اور کافرون کو گروہ گروہ بنا کر جہنم کی طرف لے جا ئینگے یہاں تک کہ جب وہ اس کے پاس پہنچ جائینگے تو اس کے دروازے کھول دئے جائینگے تو اس کے داروغہ ان سے کہیں گے کیا تمہارے پاس تم ہی میں سے رسول نہیں آئے تھے جو تم کو تمہارے پروردگار کی آیتیں پڑھ پڑھ کر سناتے اور اس دن کے پیش آنے سے ڈراتے تھے ، کہیں گے " کیوں نہیں لیکن کافروں کے حق میں عذاب کا حکم تحقیق ہو چکا تھا "۔( ترجمع مولانا فتح محمدجالندھری )  
دیکھ لیجئے کہ  
۱۔۔ رسول ہمیشہ اپنوں لوگوں میں سے ہوتے ہیں ۔  
۲۔۔رسول پروردگار کی آیتیں خود پڑھ کر سناتے ہیں۔  
۳۔۔اور اس دن کی ملاقات کے متعلق بذات خود پیش آگاہ کریں گے ۔  
وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِنْ رَسُولٍ إِلا بِلِسَانِ قَوْمِهِ لِيُبَيِّنَ لَهُمْ ُ (سورۃ ابراہیم آیت نمبر ٤)  
ترجمہ "اور ہم نے کوئی رسول نہیں بھیجا مگر اپنی قوم کی زبان میں تاکہ انہیں واضح کردے۔ "  
یعنی رسول اپنی قوم کی زبان میں آتا ہے اور وہ اس لئے کہ اگر وہ کسی اور قوم سے ہوگا تو وہ دوسری قوم کی زبان میں اپنی بات نہیں سمجھا سکتا ۔ ہر قوم کواس کی اپنی زبان میں سمجھایا جا سکتا ہے۔  
آئیے اب رسول کے بعد نبی اور النبی کے فرق کو بھی جان لیتے ہیں ۔  
نبوت / نبی ،  
نبی کا لفظ نکرہ (common noun ) ہے جبکہ النبی کا لفظ معرفہ (proper noun ) ہے ۔دیکھئے" النبی "(proper noun )تو وہ ہو گئے جن کو خالق نے خود مبعوث کیا ۔ لیکن "نبی" (common noun ) کون سے انبیاء ہیں ؟  
سوال اٹھے گا کہ کیا رسالتمآب کے بعد بھی انبیآء آسکتے ہیں ؟  
سورۃ الطلاق کی پہلی آیت ہے ۔  
يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ إِذَا طَلَّقْتُمُ النِّسَاءَ فَطَلِّقُوهُنَّ لِعِدَّتِهِنَّ وَأَحْصُوا الْعِدَّةَ وَاتَّقُوا اللَّهَ رَبَّكُمْ لا تُخْرِجُوهُنَّ مِنْ بُيُوتِهِنَّ وَلا يَخْرُجْنَ إِلا أَنْ يَأْتِينَ بِفَاحِشَةٍ مُبَيِّنَةٍ وَتِلْكَ حُدُودُ اللَّهِ وَمَنْ يَتَعَدَّ حُدُودَ اللَّهِ فَقَدْ ظَلَمَ نَفْسَهُ لا تَدْرِي لَعَلَّ اللَّهَ يُحْدِثُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ أَمْرً  
اس آیت میں آیا ہے يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ اے نبی ،جو کہ واحد کا صیغہ ہے ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔لیکن آیت کے اگلے حصے میں آیا ہے ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ اِذَا طَلَّقْتُمُ جو جمع مذکر حاضر کا صیغہ ہے ۔  
اس سے صرف دو نتائج ہی نکل سکتے ہیں ۔۔۔۔  
۱۔۔النبی کے معنی بھی جمع کے لئے جائیں ۔یا  
۲۔۔ اِذَا طَلَّقْتُمُ کوواحد کے معنی میں لیا جائے جو عربی گرامر کے قوانین کی خلاف ورزی ہوگی اور قابل قبول نہیں ہوگی ۔  
اس مسئلے کا حل یہ سوچا گیا کہ مخاطب کو تو واحد ہی رکھا جائے اس لئے کہ نبی کے متعلق تو عقیدہ راسخ ہے کہ رسالتمآب کے زمانے میں بھی ان کے علاوہ کوئی اور نبی نہیں تھا ۔اس لئے اس جمع کے صیغے کو امت کی طرف منسوب کر دیا گیا اور اس طرح یہ کہا گیا کہ اصلاّ یہ امت کے لئے حکم ہے اور يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ کے بعد قل یا قومی محذوف ہے اور اسطرح عقیدہ تو ثابت کر لیا لیکن کتاب اللہ میں نقص کا امکان ڈال دیا ۔  
آپ اگر ادب کو دیکھیں تو آپ کو ایسی مثالیں عام مل جاتی ہیں جہاں کسی بھی طبقے کو واحد میں بیان کرکے جمع مقصود ہوتا ہے ۔ سور ۃ البقرہ کی آیت نمبر ۳۱ میں آدم کے لئے واحد کا صیغہ استعمال کرکے ھم جمع مذکر غائب کی ضمیر لائی گئی ہے ۔ملاحطہ فرمائیے  
وَعَلَّمَ آدَمَ الأسْمَاءَ كُلَّهَا ثُمَّ عَرَضَهُمْ عَلَى الْمَلائِكَةِ فَقَالَ أَنْبِئُونِي بِأَسْمَاءِ هَؤُلاءِ إِنْ كُنْتُمْ صَادِقِينَ  
یہاں پر بھی یہی اسلوب اختیار کیا گیا ہے ۔ اس کی اردو میں مثال یوں ہے ۔ اگر کوئی حکم بطور اعلان کسی طبقے کو کہا جائے تو اسی انداز سے کہا جائیگا مثلاّ  
" آج کُل عالم بے ایمان ہو گئے ہیں ۔" یا " پاکستان میں طالب علم پڑھائی کے بجائے دنگا فساد میں مشغول ہو گئے ہیں ۔" ان دونوں مثالوں میں لفظ "عالم " اور" طالبعلم " واحد کے صیغے میں ہیں لیکن اطلاق جمع پر ہو رہا ہے ۔ " اے طبیب تو پیسے بنانے پر اتر آیا ہے ۔ " یا " اے قانون دان فیصلے تو صحیح کرو " ان مثالوں میں طبیب اور قانون دان واحد کے صیغے ہیں جبکہ حکم کا اطلاق جمع پر ہو رہا ہے ۔ ان تمام مثالوں سےبات واضح ہو گئی کہ واحد کا صیغہ جمع کے لئے بھی استعمال ہوتا ہے ۔اب دیکھنا یہ ہے کہ۔  
۱۔۔ اس آیت میں النبی کا اطلاق اسی اصول کے تحت ہو سکتا ہے ؟۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔یا  
۲۔۔ النبی سے مراد رسالتمآب ہیں اور طلّقتموھنّ کا اطلاق تمام امت کے لئے کیا جائے گا ۔ اس مفہوم کو قبول کرنے کے لئے ہمیں کسی بات یا کہانی یا شان نزول سامنے رکھ کر کو ئی نہ کوئی بات محذوف رکھنی ہوگی جس کے لئے بھی کسی نہ کسی اصول کو سامنے رکھنا ہوگا ۔ اصول یہ تو ہو سکتا ہے کہ مخاطب اگر کسی طبقے سے متعلق ہو تو واحد کے صیغے سے مراد جمع لی جا سکتی ہے اور جملے میں مزید مقامات پر جمع کے صیغے استعمال ہو سکتے ہیں ۔ لیکن یہ کوئی اصول نہیں کہ۔۔۔۔آپ مخاتب تو کسی کو کریں اور حکم کسی کو دیں ۔  
یہاں پر النبی انبیاء کےتمام انواع پر محیط ہے اور خطاب بھی انبیاء سے ہی ہو رہا ہے اور يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ إِذَا طَلَّقْتُمُ النِّسَاءَ کاسادہ ترجمع یوں ہو گا ، "ائے نبی جب بھی تم نساء سے علہدگی کا فیصلہ کرو ۔۔۔۔۔یعنی مخاطب واحد النبی ہے لیکن اطلاق تمام انبیاء پر ہے ۔ اوریہی اصول ہر اس جگہ سامنے رکھنا ہوگا جہاں بھی اس قسم کی (کوئی شان نزول کے تحت کہانی ڈال کر یا خوس ساختہ ذہنی اختراع کے ذریعے ) تفسیر یا تشریح کی گئی ہے ۔  
آئیے مزیدغور کر تے ہیں ، سورہ آل عمران ک آیت ۲۱ میں ارشاد ہے  
إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَكْفُرُونَ بِآيَاتِ اللَّهِ وَيَقْتُلُونَ النَّبِيِّينَ بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ وَيَقْتُلُونَ الَّذِينَ يَأْمُرُونَ بِالْقِسْطِ مِنَ النَّاسِ فَبَشِّرْهُمْ بِعَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ  
ترجمہ "یقیناّ ان لوگوں کو تکلیف دہ عذاب کی نوید سنادیں جو اللہ کی آیات کا انکار کرتے ہیں اور انبیاء سے لڑائی (یا قتال )کرتے ہیں بغیر کسی حق کے اور ان سے بھی لڑائی کرتے ہیں جو لوگوں کے درمیان عدل کا حکم کرتے ہیں ۔"  
اس آیات سے دو باتوں کی وضاحت ہو گئی  
انبیاء ہر زمانے میں موجود رہیں گےاور  
یہ کہ نبی کا مقام و درجہ یہ ہے کہ اس سے نہ صرف لڑائی کی جا تی ہے بلکہ اس کے پاس پورا عدل کا نظام بھی موجود ہے اور ان افراد سے بھی لڑائی کی جا رہی ہے جو نظام عدل قائم کر رہے ہیں ۔ دیکھئے اگر کوئی قوم یا مذہب کسی بات میں فخر محسوس کر رہی ہے تو یہ ضروری نہیں کہ ہم بھی وہی دعوی کر بیٹھیں یہی حال رسالتمآب کے آخری نبی ہونے کے عقیدے سے متعلّق ہے ۔  
۱۔۔سب سے پہلے تو یہ سوچئے کہ آخری نبی ہونے میں کیا خوبی ہے ۔اگر دوسری اقوام نے آنے والے انبیاء کو نہ ماننے کا جواز پیدا کرنے کے لئے یہ عقیدہ گھڑ لیا ہے تو ہم بھی ان کی نقالی کرتے ہوئے رسالتمآب کو آخری بنا دیں ۔  
۲۔۔دوسری بات اللہ اپنی سنّت نہیں بدلتا ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔پھر اس سنت کو کیوں تبدیل کیا گیا۔یہ انسانیت کے ساتھ کتنی زیادتی ہوگی کہ آنے والی اقوام کو بے سر و سامانی میں بغیر نبی کے چھوڑ دیا جائے ۔  
۳۔۔دیکھئے سورۃ بقرہ کی آیت ۱۳۶ میں ارشاد ہے ،  
قُولُوا آمَنَّا بِاللَّهِ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالأسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ لا نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ ۔۔۔  
کہہ دو ہم نے امن قبول کیا احکامات الہی کے ساتھ یعنی جو ہمیں عطا کیا گیا اور جو دیا گیا ابراہیم ،اسمائیل ، اسحاق ،یعقوب اور ان کی نسل کو ،اور اس کے ساتھ بھی جو عطا کیا گیا موسی اورعیسی کو اور جو دیا گیا نبیون کو ان کے رب کی طرف سے ۔۔۔۔۔ ہم کسی ایک میں بھی فرق نہیں کرتے ہیں ،اور ہم اسی کے لئے سلامتی قائم کرنے والے ہیں ۔  
اس آیت میں بڑے واضح الفاظ میں بتا دیا گیا کہ ہم کسی بھی نبی میں فرق نہیں کرتے ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ پھر رسالتمآب اور دوسرے انبیاء میں یہ فرق کیوں ؟  
رسالتمآب کے لئے اللہ نے اپنی سنت میں تبدیلی کیوں کی ؟ یقیناّ نہ تو اللہ نے انبیاء کے درمیان فرق کیا ہے اور نہ ہی اللہ نے اپنی سنت بدلی ہے ۔  
آئیے ایک اور غلط فہمی کا بھی ازالہ کر لیا جائے ۔اور وہ یہ کہ کچھ لوگوں کا خیال ہے کہ نبی اس لئے نبی ہوتا ہے کہ اس کو کتاب یعنی شریعت دی جاتی ہے جبکہ رسول کو کتاب نہیں دی جاتی وہ نبی سے حاصل کرتا ہے ۔لیکن کچھ کا خیال ہے کہ رسول ہی کو کتاب دی جاتی ہے ۔ آئیے دیکھتے ہیں کہ قرآن کیا کہتا ہے ۔  
كَانَ النَّاسُ أُمَّةً وَاحِدَةً فَبَعَثَ اللَّهُ النَّبِيِّينَ مُبَشِّرِينَ وَمُنْذِرِينَ وَأَنْزَلَ مَعَهُمُ الْكِتَابَ بِالْحَقِّ لِيَحْكُمَ بَيْنَ النَّاسِ فِيمَا اخْتَلَفُوا فِيهِ ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ (سورۃ البقرہ آیت نمبر ۲۱۳)  
سورۃبقرہ کی اس آیت میں بتا دیا گیا کہ ۔۔۔۔۔۔تمام انسانیت ایک تھی ۔۔۔آپس میں اختلافات ہوئے اس لئیے نبیوں کو بطور پیش آگاہ کرنے والے اور خوشخبری دینے والے مقرر کیا اور انکے ساتھ الکتاب دی گئی تاکہ وہ ان اختلافات کو دور کریں۔ اس آیت سے یہ بھی واضح ہو گیا کہ انبیاء اس منصب پر فائز ہوتے ہیں جہاں وہ اقوام کے درمیان فیصلے کرنے کی قوت اور صلاحیت رکھتے ہیں ۔ آئیے اب رسول سے متعلق بھی دیکھ لیتے ہیں ۔کہ آیا اسے بھی کتاب ملتی ہے ؟سورۃ المائدہ کی آیت نمبر ۱۰۴میں ارشاد ہے ،  
وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمْ تَعَالَوْا إِلَى مَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ وَإِلَى الرَّسُولِ قَالُوا حَسْبُنَا مَا وَجَدْنَا عَلَيْهِ آبَاءَنَا أَوَلَوْ كَانَ آبَاؤُهُمْ لا يَعْلَمُونَ شَيْئًا وَلا يَهْتَدُونَ  
( اور جب ان سے کہا جاتا ہے کہ جو اللہ نے اتارا ہے یعنی رسول کی طرف تو کہتے ہیں ہم کو وہی کچھ کافی ہے جس پر ہم نے اپنے پیشواؤں کو پایا خواہ ان کے پیشواء نہ تو کسی چیز کا علم رکھتے ہوں اورنہ ہی ہدایت یافتہ ہوں ۔)  
اس آیت سے معلوم ہوا کہ الکتاب رسولوں کو بھی دی جاتی ہے۔ البتّہ یہ بھی معلوم ہوا کہ رسول کی بات کا کفار بڑے دھڑلے سے انکار کر رہے ہیں اور رسول ان کے خلاف کوئی فیصلہ سنانے کی پوزیشن میں نہیں ہے ۔جبکہ سورۃبقرہ کی آیت سے معلوم ہوا کہ نبی کی پوزیشن وہ ہوتی ہے جو امت کے اختلافات کو دور کرتی ہے ۔ رسول کے لئے کہا گیا بلّغ ما انزل الیک جبکہ نبی کی پوزیشن یہ ہے کہ وہ فوج کا کمانڈر مقرر کر رہا ہے ۔ ملاحظہ فرمائیے ،  
أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى الْمَلإ مِنْ بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ مِنْ بَعْدِ مُوسَى إِذْ قَا لُوا لِنَبِيٍّ لَهُمُ ابْعَثْ لَنَا مَلِكًا نُقَاتِلْ فِي سَبِيلِاللہ  
(کیا تم نے موسی کے بعد بنی اسرائیل کے سرداروں کے متعلّق غور نہیں کیا جب انہوں نے اپنے نبی سے مطالبہ کیا کہ "ہمارے لئے ایک ملک کو مقرر کیجئیے تاکہ ہم اللہ کے راستے میں جنگ کریں ۔" )  
آپ دیکھیں گے کہ رسول کا جہاں ذکر ہوگا وہاں حاکمیت کا ذکر تو مل جائے گا لیکن ایسی پوزیشن میں نہیں ہوگا کہ احکامات کو اس طرح نافذ کرے جیسے حکومت کی مشینری نافذکرتی ہے ۔ ابتدا ئی طور پر رسول کو احکامات ملتے ہیں جس کی وہ تعلیم و تبلیغ کرتا ہے اور جس وقت اسکو قوّت ملتی ہے کہ وہ احکامات کا نفاذ بھی کرا سکے تو اس کو نبی کے درجے پر فائز کیا جاتا ہے ۔  
یعنی۔۔۔۔رسول کو بنیادی طور پر کتاب اور اس کی تعلیم و تبلیغ کا ذمّہ دیا جاتا ہے كَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا فِيكُمْ رَسُولا مِنْكُمْ يَتْلُو عَلَيْكُمْ آيَاتِنَا وَيُزَكِّيكُمْ وَيُعَلِّمُكُمُ الْكِتَابَ وَالْحِكْمَةَ وَيُعَلِّمُكُمْ مَا لَمْ تَكُونُوا تَعْلَمُونَ ۔  
اور نبی کے پاس طاقت و قوت ہوتی ہےتا کہ وہ احکامات کو نافذ کر سکے ۔سورہ الاحزاب آیت نمبر ۵میں ارشاد ہے ۔  
النَّبِيُّ أَوْلَى بِالْمُؤْمِنِينَ مِنْ أَنْفُسِهِمْ وَأَزْوَاجُهُ أُمَّهَاتُهُمْ وَأُولُو الأرْحَامِ بَعْضُهُمْ أَوْلَى بِبَعْضٍ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَالْمُهَاجِرِينَ إِلا أَنْ تَفْعَلُوا  
(مومنوں کے لئے اپنوں کے مقابلے میں نبی سب سے بڑھ کر ولی اور پشت پناہ ہیں ۔اور پیغمبر کی ساتھی جماعتیں اُن کی امتیں ہیں اور مومنین و مہاجرین میں سے خدا کے قانون کے مطابق رحم والے افراد بھی ایک دوسرے کے لئے ولی ہیں اور یہ کہ تم اپنے دوستوں کے لئے جو بھی کرو تو معروف طریقے سے کرو یہ حکم الکتاب میں لکھ دیا گیا ہے ۔)  
اس آیت سے بھی واضح ہے کہ نبی کو وہ حیثیت حاصل ہے کہ وہ بطور نبی تمام مومنین کا ولی ہے جو اس بات کا ثبوت ہے کہ نبوت وہ مقام ہے جب رسول کو حکومت سے نوازہ جاتا ہے۔  
مباحث مزید :۔  
لوگوں کے استفسار سے معلوم ہوا کہ مسئلہ مزید وضاحت کا متقاضی ہے اس لئے ان سوالات کا جواب بھی حاصل کر لیا جائے جو لوگوں کے ذہنوں میں اٹھ رہے ہیں ۔  
۱۔۔ لفظ نبی اور خاتم کی لغوی بحث ۔  
۲۔۔نبوت بمقابلہ امامت ،  
۳۔۔ رسالتماب کے بعد انبیاء کی پہچان ۔  
لغوی بحث :۔  
۱۔۔ نبی :۔ مادہ ۔۔ن ب و /ن ب ی  
"ن ب ی" مادہ سے بنے الفاظ میں معنی کے لحاط سے خبر کا پہلو ہوتا ہے ۔کیونکہ اسکے بنیادی معنی ایک جگہ سے دوسری جگہ آنے کے ہیں خبر کو بھی النباء اس لئے کہا جاتا ہے کہ وہ ایک جگہ سے دوسری جگہ جاتی ہے ۔  
" ن ب و " مادہ سے بنے الفاظ میں بلندی اور ارتفع کا مفہوم ملتا ہے ۔  
النبی کے متعلق صفحہ ۱۵۷۹ پر( آخری سطر ) علامہ پرویز فرماتے ہیں " بعض کا خیال ہے کہ یہ نبأ سے مشتق ہے اور اس لئیے اس کے معنی ہیں خبریں دینے والا ۔لیکن یہ تورات کادیا ہوا تصور ہے ۔یہودیوں میں نبی ھیکل کے ایک منصبدار کا لقب تھا جو پیش گوئیاں کیا کرتا تھا ۔اسی لئیے انگریزی میں نبی کو( Prophet ) کہتے ہیں یعنی پیش گوئیاں ( prophecies ) کرنے والا ۔لیکن ۡ قرآن کریم نے نبوت کا جو تصور پیش کیا ہے اس سے مترشح ہوتا ہے کہ یہ نباوۃ سے مشتق ہے جس کے معنی ہیں بلند مقام "  
نبوت وہ بلند مقام اور منصب ہے جہاں تک رصائی صرف الا نبیأ ہی کا خاصہ ہے۔  
خاتَم کا مادہ" خ ت م "ہے جس کے معنی ہیں" مہر" یا انگوٹھی ۔اس کے معنی میں اسم الفائل کے معنی یعنی ختم کرنے والا نہیں ہو سکتے ۔  
لفظ " خاتَم " فاعل کے وزن پر ہے ۔جس کے مفہوم میں مادہ کے بنیادی معنی کا اثرانداز ہونا پایا جاتا ہے ۔ عَالَم کا مادہ ع ل م ہے اور نوٹ فرما لیجئیے عالَم کا وزن ل پر زبر کے ساتھ فاعل کے وزن پر ہے ۔ عالَم کےمعنی ہیں وہ شیٔ جو کسی علم کا ذریعہ بنے ۔اسی لئیے دنیا کو عالَم کہا جاتا ہے کہ وہ خالق کائنات کے متعلق معلومات فراہم کرتا ہے ۔یہ لفظ عالِم نہیں ہے جو اسمالفاعل کا وزن ہے اور جس کے معنی میں عمل پیرا ہونے کا مفہوم لیا جا تا ہے ۔  
اسی طرح خاتَم اسمالفاعل کے وزن پر نہیں ہے جس کے معنی میں کرنے والے کا مفہوم لیا جائے ۔  
آپ قرآن میں دیکھینگے کہ ختم کا لفظ علی کے صلہ کے ساتھ مہر لگانے کے معنون میں استعمال ہوا ہے ۔اگر خاتم علی النبیین ہوتا تو نبییوں پر مہر لگانے کا تصور آسکتا تھا ۔جبکہ اس آیت میں خاتم النبیین آیا ہے جو مرکب اضافی ہے اور جس کا معنی ہونگے نبیوں کی مہر ۔  
نبوت / امامت ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔  
ہمیں قرآن کے علاوہ جو بھی ملا ہے وہ ایرانی روایتوں کا شاخسانہ ہے ۔آئیے پہلے علامہ احسان الہی ظہیر کی کتاب الشیعہ و السنہ سے اقتباس پیش خدمت ہے ۔ صفحہ نمبر ۶۹ پر علامہ صاحب فرماتے ہیں " شیعہ قوم کے نزدیک عقیدہ وصائت و امامت ائمہ کی اہمیت تمام اسلامی ارکان سے زیادہ ہے" ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔  
اسی صفح پر لکھا ہے " شیعہ قوم اپنے اماموں کے بارے میں بہت سے خلاف اسلام عقائد رکھتی ہے ۔ان کے مطابق بارہ امام انبیاءو رسل سے افضل ہیں یہی نہیں بلکہ وہ خدائی اختیارات و تصرفات کے مالک اور صفات الہیہ سے متصف ہیں ۔"  
صفحہ نمبر ۷۱پر فرماتے ہیں " شیعہ قوم کے نزدیک ان کے اماموں کا رتبہ انبیائے کرام سے زیادہ ہے ۔انبیاء و مرسلین ان کے عقیدہ کے مطابق اماموں سے ۔۔معاذاللہ ۔۔کمتر ہیں۔"  
ان اقتباسات کے لکھنے کا مطلب اہل تشیع پر تنقید قطعا نہیں ہے ۔یہ اقتباسات ان حضرات کے لئے لکھے گئے ہیں جو ایک طرف تو اہل تشیع سے عقیدہ امامت سے اختلاف بھی کرتے ہیں اور دوسری جانب ایسے عقیدہ کو بھی سینے سے لگائے بیٹحے ہیں جو صریحا عقیدہ امامت کے حق میں جاتا ہے ۔  
دیکھئے سیدنا ابراہیم کے لئے کہا گیا کہ وہ" امام الناس " بھی تھے اور نبی بھی ۔ تمام انبیاء امام تھے ۔  
نبوت کا دروازہ بند کرکے امامت کا دروازہ کھولنے کا ایک نقصان یہ ہوا ہے کہ ہم نے ذہنوں سے حکومت وقت کے صاحب اختیار اولوالامر کے فرائض منصبی کو بھلا دیا ۔  
اور آج نہ تو ہم کو اسلامی نطام کہیں مل رہا ہے اور نہ ہی اسلامی نطام کے چلانے والے ۔  
ہم شخصیت پرستی کی انتہاء کو پہنچ گئے ہیں جہاں رسول اور اس سے متعلق غیر قرآنی تصورات بھی مقدس ہو گئے ہیں ۔  
یقینا رسالتمآب دنیا کی اعلی ترین شخصیت تھے ہیں اور رہیں گے ۔وہ رسالت کے درجے پر فائز کئے گئے پھر ان کو مملکت اسلامی کے اعلی ترین منصب نبوت پر فائز کیا گیا ۔  
ان کے ماتحت ان کی حاکمانہ اختیار ( خاتم ) کی اجازت سے دوسرے اولو الامر متعین ہوئے ۔ سورہ احزاب کا موضوع ہی ولایت نبی ہے ۔جس میں ایک ایسی صورت حال کا ذکر ہے جس میں جنگ کی کیفیت کے بعد ایک ایسی صورت حال پیدا ہوگئی تھی کہ لوگ ان نو مسلم لوگوں کو بھی بھی مرد میداں سمجھنے لگے تھے جو ماضی میں اپنی قوم میں اہم اشخاص تھے ۔ سورہ احزاب میں انہی سوالات کے جوابات ہیں ۔اسی لئیے اس میں الحج کا بھی ذکر ملے گا ۔  
ماحاصل و تلخیص؛۔  
آئیے اب اوپر کی بحث کو سمیٹتے ہوئے اس کی تلخیص پیش کرتے ہیں اور دیکھتے ہیں کہ نتیجتا کیا حاصل ہوتا ہے ۔  
۱۔۔۔اللہ کی ذات ہمارے ادراک سے بعید ہے " لا تُدْرِكُهُ الأبْصَارُ وَهُوَ يُدْرِكُ الأبْصَارَ وَهُوَ اللَّطِيفُ الْخَبِيرُ (١٠٣) اس لئیے الہ کے متعلق جو بھی معلوم کرنا ہے وہ اس کی صفات کے ذریعے ہی معلوم ہو سکتا ہے ۔  
۲۔۔ۡقرآن میں جہاں جہاں اللہ کا ذکر آیا ہے وہ ۔۔۔۔۔۔۱  
۱۔خالق  
۲۔ قدرت اور قوانین قدرت یااحکامات الہی  
۳۔وہ مملکت جہاں احکامات الہی کا نفاذ ہو یعنی مملکت خداداد ،  
۴۔اگر قوانین مملکت کی بات ہو تو مملکت اسلامی کا قانونی ڈھانچہ  
۵۔اور اگر مملکت خداداد موجود نہ ہو تو ہر انسان کا فرض ہے کہ بغیر کسی مملکتی قانون کی خلاف ورزی کرتے ہوئے (خواہ وہ مملکت غیر اسلامی ہی کیوں نہ ہو)جو بھی انفرادی لحاظ سے ممکن ہو اسلامی نظام کی ذمہداری پوری کرے  
۶۔احکامات الہی کا ودیعت کرنا خا لصتا خالق کی صفت ہے ۔اس لئے اس میں کسی قسم کا شائبہ نہیں ہے ۔  
۷۔جس انسان پر احکامات الہی کا نزول ہوتا ہے وہ قرآن کی اسطلاح میں "الرسول " کہلاتا ہے اور جب کوئی شخص اسی پیغام کو آگے پہنچاتا ہے تو وہ صرف "رسول "ہوتا ہے ۔اور ہر زمانے میں اور ہر جگہ اور ہر قوم میں اسی کی زبان میں رسول موجودہوتا ہے ۔  
۸۔جب رسول کو اتنی قوت مل جاتی ہے کہ ایک نظام کی تشکیل دے یعنی مملکت خداداد کا قیام عمل میں آ جائے تو اس مملکت کے حکمران کو نبی کا درجہ ملتا ہے ۔  
۹ ۔وحی الہی ہمیشہ سے ایک ہی رہی ہے انسانیت کے پہلے انسان کو بھی یہی تعلیمات دی گئیں تھیں اور بعد کے آنے والوں کو بھی یہی تعلیمات دی گئی ہیں ۔ اور کیونکہ یہ تعلیمات ہر جگہ موجود ہیں اس لئے اب وحی الہی کے نزول کی ضرورت نہیں ہے ۔  
قرآن کی تعلیمات اصلا انسان کی ز ندگی گزارنے کے اصول اور پیمانے ہیں ۔جن کو ایک جملے میں" حقوق "سے تعبیر کر سکتے ہیں ۔آج کا انسان خوب جانتا ہے کہ انسانی حقوق کیا ہیں ۔  
'  
 
 
 
 

Comments by: Anwer Suri On 07 March 2011Report Abuse
AOA,  
I posted my following question under Sura-Al Ahzab. One of my friend pointed to this discussion so I have cut-n-paste my question below. I don't mean to interrupt this discussion and can not add anything to it but I think mubahis of 33:40 conclude that at least Prophet Muhammad was the Last Ar-Rasool. Also can we relate this topic with verse 5:3.  
 
My original Quesrion to Dr Sahib.  
 
I have one question regarding the ‘mubahis’ of 33:40. I am still trying to digets this discussion.  
Conclusion number 7 – ‘Ar-Rasool’ is the one who receives the book.  
Conclusion Number 9 – there is no need of wahee anymore because the wahee-e-Ilahee will not change and it is available. (I am not using the exact words). Is it your opinion or there is something in the Quran?  
 
So does these conclusions mean Risalat-Maab was the last ‘Ar-Rasool’?  
 
Wassalam

Comments by: moazzam On 07 March 2011
Dear Anwar Suri ! Alyaum is not a specific day rather a time span (era). The verse 33/40 has no any relation with verse 5/3. the mankind has been invited at DEEN-E-HANIF(deen-e-ibrahimi).  
 
There was an era (Alyaom)of darkness / lamentation when Momineen had been suppressed by Firaon’s savagery and plundering as mentioned in verse 40/29.  
 
Please consolidate the verse 5/5-6 with the verses 5/3-4. The matter of eating / drinking are not described here rather (Alyaum) the era of enlightenment has been realized which is going to be established as verse 5/6 indicating. This is the era when Kuffars are hopelessly disappointed and all rules / laws would be driven from Alkitab, “TAAM = TEACHING”.  
 
To see the sense of “ALYAUM” read the following verses 40/16-17,43/39,42/68,45/28,45/34,64/24,70/44,76/11,78/39,83/34,and 85/2.  

Comments by: Anwer Suri On 08 March 2011 Edit DeleteReport Abuse
Thank you for exaplaining about 5:3.  
 
What is your opinion about my other question?  
 

»«
OTHER QUESTIONS ON
UN-QURANIC BELIEFS
daer sir i want to know about concept of second coming of ESSA as is it true and i also want the name of ESSA's father kindly dont ignore? Question by: awtunio From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 12/02/2010
 
Kindly let me know about follwoing (in URDU) which do have ambiguities : 1-WAQEA-E-MERAJ 2-HAQEEAT-E-WAQEA-E-QURBANI(Hazrat Ibrahim),,,,,3-Aqeeqa and about Qayamat and after death what Quran exactly elucidates.?? Question by: Adnan Khan On 24/02/2010
 
Sir Kindly let me know about the "ISTEKHARA" Question by: Adnan Khan On 13/03/2010
 
Sir please explain about calling AZAN in the ear of Childres right after their Birth...it does seem illogical to me but i need some authentic/solid elucidation in order to satisfy others. Question by: Adnan Yousuf Zai On 15/03/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Zaman/Aurangzaib Y. Z. Kindly let me know about "NAZAR KA LAGNA" and "JIN KA CHARHNA" as most of us must have observed/found such incident in life. I could not be able to understand the LOGIC of such thing. please explain. Question by: Adnan Yousuf Zai On 19/03/2010
 
I agree that "NAZAR KA LAGNA" & "JIN KA CHARHNA" have nothing to do with QURAN, but most of us beleive and i myself have experienced that reciting some verses and wearing TAWEEZ make you get rid off such painfull physical state. why? kindly reply Question by: Adnan Yousuf Zai On 20/03/2010
 
My Dear Brother Orangzaib, Thanx for your correction and good information. (1). I want to know that who is the founder of Tasawuf, and (2) what is a diference in Wahi and Ilhaam. Question by: Minaal On 23/02/2010
 
Yest. on EXPRESS NEW CHANNEL, a program was aired i.e. Point Blant, hosted by Mubashir Luqman regarding the concept of "KIA ISLAM ME LONDIYAN RAKHNA JAAIZ HAIN" Mr. Auragzaib plz explain, so that i can forward your valuable remarks to Mub. Luqman Question by: Adnan Khan On 01/06/2010
 
Janab Dr. Sb SA Sir i want to know about wahdatul - wajood and wahdatal - shahood Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 08/06/2010
 
Salamunalaikum Respected Br Dr Qamar Zaman, And Br Aurang Zaib, can i have your valueble interpretation for this verse. 9:36. And Br Dr Qamar Zaman thanks for your so impressive interpretation of Sura Tahrim. Fee amanillah Question by: abdullahbashoeb From INDIA (HYDERBAD) On 08/06/2010
 
Dear dr sahib is their any evidence in quran regarding shab-e- barat?????????? Iftikhar Hussain Question by: iftikhar2435 On 26/07/2010
 
sir what is the importance of roza of 15th shaban????????is their any concept of shab-e-barat in hadith????????? Question by: iftikhar2435 On 27/07/2010
 
hurry up! plz remark on "QURBANI" Specially requested to Dearest Mr. Aurangzaib Question by: Saad Haider On 15/11/2010
 
Dear Brother Aurangzeb, You are indeed a possessor of vast knowledge of history. Brother there are so many views on widening the wall of "BADA SHAITAAN" IN MECCA proximity. Please elaborate on that and is it a justified move by saudi govt. Question by: Syeda On 15/11/2010
 
Dr Q Zamman Is incite of Dr.Zakir Naik founder of PeaceT.V of showing face of Islam to the world true? Please do comment...................... Question by: Syeda On 15/11/2010
 
Aastana Teem! The ZAM ZAM, is the hygienic mineral water.Is it a water pocket under the Makkah valley or some sort of water supplied by the saudi regime? Is there any religious link between the GANGA and ZAMZAM. Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 28/12/2010
 
I believe that "a slave=his master and a woman=a man" everyman is equal in the eyes of Allah. BUT Which verses/lines specifically say that there is NO-Slavery/ Bondage in Islam; ALSO that "a slave is not the synonym to a servant / worker". Question by: Syeda On 23/01/2011
 
Dear All, my father gave reference of Al hadid surah 57 verse 22 in a healthy discussion for making me understand that every action/ destiny is pre written. Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 23/01/2011
 
Brother Aurangzaib! Please enlighten us about "ZULQARNAIN' mentioned in 18/83-94, Mr. moazzam is requested to hold his horse,because he might turn the "Zulqarnain" in to some ATTRIBUTE OR new terminology of Qura'n. Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 17/02/2011
 
Dear Dr QZ, is there any concept of spirituality (Mysticism) in Quran ? What does so called bieng spiritual mean from Quranic point of view? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 23/06/2011
 
DHULQARNAIN ! According to the faith you have, How will you deny the following facts??? Question by: Perwez1 From NORWAY (OSLO) On 06/09/2011
 
Dear Members! How aastana can proliferate its message in collaboration with all or some NGOs those are working for the same cause(the human rights), would it strengthen the mission or not? Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 12/09/2011
 
Brother Moazzam: As you most often said, that, the names given in Quran are eternal characters, always present in societies in each era. Kindly point out "Yajooj Maajooj,Haroot,Maroot, Abu lahab" in pakistani society? Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 08/11/2011
 
NARGIS, MOAZZAM, MUJEEB, WAQAR, NAEEM, ET AL. YOU CONTINUE TO AVOID, TIME AND AGAIN, THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS REGARDING AL-ISLAM. WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO STOP AVOIDING MY A-F, QUESTIONS? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 16/11/2011
 
Mr Qamar Zaman, I found the translation of Qur’an Chapter 17/32 as follow: And I think President divine orders not to alter the rights of the rejected ministers and very timely way. What does it mean specially connected to Zina and fuahs. Question by: setiadi ihsan From INDONESIA (JAKARTA) On 02/12/2015
 
What is of vital importance for mankind to know about the quran and deen of islam? Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 25/03/2017
 
How can mankind overcome language barrier between God and humanity? Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 28/05/2017
 
Why is the quran alone base of deen of islam and not quran & hadis or quran & sunnah? Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 24/02/2018
 
Surah 3 aali imraan explained in detail Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 24/02/2018
 
Surah 4 explained in detail Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 26/02/2018
 
Surah 5 explained in detail. Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 27/02/2018
 
Surah 6 explained in detail. Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 28/02/2018
 
Vital importance of logically consistent thinking according to the quran. Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 07/03/2018
 
Surah 7 explained in detail Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 14/04/2018
 
Surah 8 explained in detail Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 24/05/2018
 
surah 9 explained in detail Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 21/07/2018
 
Islam a deen or a mazhab? What has islam to offer humanity that it should accept and adopt it? Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 21/07/2018
 
Suras 101 to 114 explained in detail. Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 25/03/2019
 
Suras 91 - 100 explained in detail Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 26/03/2019
 
Suras 86 to 90 explained in detail. Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 08/05/2019
 
Suras 81 to 85 explained in detail Question by: Mughal1 From UNITED KINGDOM On 27/05/2019
 
Comments...
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved
www.aastana.com