Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Join AASTANABLOG
Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

TRANSLATION OF QURAN
BY DR. QAMAR ZAMAN
Translation Status
آیات
سورۃ
نمبر
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now


»«
ISLAM
BELIEFS
Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
QAMAR, MOAZZAM, NARGIS, NAEEM,  
 
DOES QAMAR AND AASTANA BLOG BELIEVE THE FOLLOWING ASSERTIONS TO THE TRUTH?  
 
 
 
Add Your Comments  Question by: DHULQARNAIN On 27 September 2011
Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 27 September 2011Report Abuse
1. "Muhammad was not an individual.  
 
2. Anyone who is praiseworthy is Muhammad.  
 
3. Same is the case with other fictitious names of prophets.  
 
4. Anyone who cleanses the environment like a razor removes hair, is Musa.  
 
5. Any man who becomes a great grandfather is Ibrahim ....... and so on.  
 
6. Similarly, there is no such thing as the people of Nooh, people of Firon, people of Shoaib etc. The Qur'an narrates only their make-believe stories for our understanding.  
 
7. Zina does not mean adultery. It means a corrupt nation.  
 
8. Wahi is not extrinsic revelation. A genius man absorbs knowledge from his environment and becomes wise.  
 
9. There is no such thing as life after death. By Akhira, the Qur'an means the future of a nation in this world.  
 
10. Nabi and Rasul were not specific people.  
 
11. Any genius man is a Nabi.  
 
12. If that genius conveys his wisdom to people he is a Rasul.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: Waqar On 27 September 2011Report Abuse
Aastana team,  
Please consider my questions while you are answering brother Dhulqarnain's questions.  
 
 
Which Muhammad you believe in. Muhammad of grammer, Muhammad of Bukhari, Muhammad of History, Muhammad bin Abdullah, Muhammad bin Umar, Muhammad bin Zubari, Muhammad of 6th century, Muhammad of 3rd century, Muhammd of 21st century or Muhhamd of Quran. Please also specify what Muhammad of your choice will do for you?  
 
Please explain the difference between nabi and prophet.  
 
If you believe in zina=adultery then prove it with your action, especially those who live in the West. They should ask their governments to pose a 100 lashes fine on zani and zaniah and they (male members only, females are not allowed) should offer their services as witness to the sacred event. They should also make sure that zani marries to zaniah or mushrikah and vice versa. They should also share their experience of living among zanis, zaniahs, mushriks and mushrikas with others.  
 
Please also share the mission of aastana and what is being done to make sure that aastana is not sidetracked from it.  
 
Please also tell us whether aastana belive in changing beliefs of others or forcing their beliefs on others.  
 
Regards,  
Waqar

Comments by: moazzam On 27 September 2011
Brother Waqar! Salam,  
 
 
Waqar: Which Muhammad you believe in. Muhammad of grammer, Muhammad of Bukhari, Muhammad of History, Muhammad bin Abdullah, Muhammad bin Umar, Muhammad bin Zubari, Muhammad of 6th century, Muhammad of 3rd century, Muhammd of 21st century or Muhhamd of Quran. Please also specify what Muhammad of your choice will do for you?  
 
Moazzam: Muhammad of Alquran, ie not proper noun rather an attribute, try to understand the following verses, already discussed in detail at different thread.  
 
l3/144, وَمَا مُحَمَّدٌ إِلَّا رَسُولٌ قَدْ خَلَتْ مِنْ قَبْلِهِ الرُّسُلُ  
33/40, مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ وَلَٰكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ  
47/2وَآمَنُوا بِمَا نُزِّلَ عَلَىٰ مُحَمَّدٍ وَهُوَ الْحَقُّ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ  
48/29 مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ وَالَّذِينَ مَعَهُ أَشِدَّاءُ عَلَى الْكُفَّارِ رُحَمَاءُ بَيْنَهُمْ  
Waqar: Please explain the difference between nabi and prophet.  
Moazzam: Each nabi is prophet as well but each rasool in not Nabi.  
 
Waqar: If you believe in zina=adultery then prove it with your action, especially those who live in the West. They should ask their governments to pose a 100 lashes fine on zani and zaniah and they (male members only, females are not allowed) should offer their services as witness to the sacred event. They should also make sure that zani marries to zaniah or mushrikah and vice versa. They should also share their experience of living among zanis, zaniahs, mushriks and mushrikas with others.  
Moazzam: It concerns with who believe quranic term Zina used for adultery .Not concerns to us,  
Waqar: Please also share the mission of aastana and what is being done to make sure that aastana is not sidetracked from it.  
Moazzam: Read the mission/goal of Aastan at home page, as for as the sidetracking is concerns, check aastana’s work thoroughly from start to end.  
 
Waqar: Please also tell us whether aastana belive in changing beliefs of others or forcing their beliefs on others.  
Moazzam: Aastana never ever played belief, dogmas, rituals or any sort of lip services game.  
Remember Aastana trust at actions, behaviours, characters and deeds only.  
Regards,  
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comments by: moazzam On 27 September 2011
Dhulqarnain: Aastana teem answer the following.  
1. Muhammad was not an individual. 2. Anyone who is praiseworthy is Muhammad  
** Ahmad is superlative form of noun hameed( praiseworthy), any one could be Muhammad who possess the attribute of Hameed by due course mentioned in verse 17/79  
وَمِنَ اللَّيْلِ فَتَهَجَّدْ بِهِ نَافِلَةً لَّكَ عَسَى أَن يَبْعَثَكَ رَبُّكَ مَقَامًا مَّحْمُودًا)(and qualify the definition mentioned in verses 13/144,33/40,47/2,48/29  
3. Same is the case with other fictitious names of prophets.  
** Don’t say fictitious, rather the name mentioned in Quran are eternal models/ characters(generic tamplates) beyond time and space, the word used in Quran is USWA E HASANA.  
4. Anyone who cleanses the environment like a razor removes hair, is Musa.  
**The attribute of Musa is, who roots out the evil. The uswa e hasana of the said character (Mosa) could be seen in Quran described in different qasas(stories).So any body in any society in any era if having the said attributes will be called Mosa of the time.  
Dhulqarnain: And who becomes a great grandfather is Ibrahim ....... and so on.  
** Replied in above paragraph.  
6. Similarly, there is no such thing as the people of Nooh, people of Firon, people of Shoaib etc. The Qur'an narrates only their make-believe stories for our understanding.  
**The first part of your question has already been answered above.YES [the eternal message (qasas)] having guidance beyond time and space.  
 
7. Zina does not mean adultery. It means a corrupt nation.  
** The Quranic term ZINA used "is attached with Shirk" doesn’t mean adultery, rather distortion of Islamic/quranic ideology (which justifies shirk), there should be legislation to suppress the adultery/fornication like other crimes  
8. Wahi is not extrinsic revelation. A genius man absorbs knowledge from his environment and becomes wise.  
** Yes wahy is like conceiving some thing in wised/genius one’s mind. Remember if it is against quranic values /nature/universal values it would be from Shetan other wise from Rehman.  
9. There is no such thing as life after death. By Akhira, the Qur'an means the future of a nation in this world.  
** There is life after death and each individual would be accountable there, but its life formation has not been detailed, yes there is also youm Alakhira in this world aswell( detailes are given in quran).  
10. Nabi and Rasul were not specific people.  
** They are specific people(but not supper human)  
11. Any genius man is a Nabi.  
** If qualifies quranic conditions any one could be rasool.  
12. If that genius conveys his wisdom to people he is a Rasul.  
** YES if satisfies quranic conditions.  

Comments by: Nargis On 27 September 2011Report Abuse
Waqar :  
 
Which Muhammad you believe in, Muhammad of grammar,

Luckily, the grammar didn’t ask us to believe in Mohammed of grammar, the grammar just told us what Mohammed means. We can chose to reject or accept it, that’s our own choice and it will not affect the reality. Bu hu at those who tried...

Muhammad of Bokhari, Muhammad of History,

You mean the one who asked people to drink Camel Urine and married a 9 year old? Not to mention all the other grotesque actions he is attributed…I don’t believe in this crap of Bokhari Beemari. Let me tell you something, even the weirdo Bokhari didn’t believe in it…why? Because he never had a proof and it was all based on his own conspiracy plan to mislead people. But he surely believed these stories will make a hit in the head of the brain-dead. Oi it sounds like a poem, head of the brain dead…  
 
But, what will happen if I believe in it? How is he beneficial for me, when he is a male so his “Sunnah” is partly performable for a woman? His actions are partly achievable for a woman or the poor people in a society (Yes its true, having one woman will make you go crazy, taking care of several will make you split the moon)

Muhammad bin Abdullah,

Is this the one who divided the moon in two pieces? Ok I can believe in him and in his superman abilities, but then what? what's next ? Will I be able to do it? Can I split the moon in two three or four pieces if I believe in him? Okay Okay I can’t do it, should pray for forgiveness for even asking something like that…however, can I worship him, sing songs bhajan and dance in the temple for him? In what ways can I make something out of believing in him? How will a belief in him lead me to get an A in my exams/ assignments at the University?

Muhammad bin Umar, Muhammad bin Zubari,

Who is this? It only about belief, I can believe in both of them,,, nothing to lose in merely believing in them,,,just like there is not benefit in the opposite.

Muhammad of Quran

YES, this is the one who is REAL, at every time in every era, whenever he achieves the talent as explained in the Quran and only the Quran. (Mohammed of every century is covered in this answer)

Please also specify what Muhammad of your choice will do for you?

Mohammed of the Quran will physically lead the nation out of darkness to the light, he will physically for real, be a blessing for the society he have undertaken to lead or work for, he will physically and for real strive to attain the goals as prescribed in the Quran, he will struggle to help people attain the attributes of Muttaqi, Momin and Muslim, he will be steadfast in implementing the Quraniq values, his presence will not only benefit himself, but the whole society. Read more in the Quran.  
 
Hope you can see a difference in the Mohammed of the Quran and the fantasy figure presented to us through ignorant jahil individuals.  
 
The Mohammed of the Quran is the Mohammed of my choice, because he is beneficial and not just a fabricated fantasy figure.

Please explain the difference between nabi and prophet.

Nabi is the one who implement Wahy, risalat in the society. He is the one who comprehend its basic rules and he is able to transform the Quran into action. That is seen throughout the Quran when Nabis are mentioned, their task are to give orders and they are the head of the states.  
 
Prophet  
late 12c., from O.Fr. prophete (11c.), from L. propheta, from Gk. prophetes (Doric prophatas) "an interpreter, spokesman," especially of the gods, from pro- "before" (see pro-) + root of phanai "to speak," from PIE *bha- "speak" (see fame). Used in Septuagint for Heb. nabj "soothsayer." By early writers, Gk. prophetes was translated by L. vates, but the Latinized form propheta predominated in post-Classical times, chiefly due to Christian writers, probably because of pagan associations of vates. Non-religious sense is from 1848; used of Muhammad from 1610s (translating Arabic al-nabiy, and sometimes also al-rasul, prop. "the messenger"). The Latin word is glossed in O.E. by witga. Prophetess is recorded from c.1300. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=prophet  
 
There you can see the difference; a prophet is the one who is foretelling stories and he know what’s going to happen beforehand. It means that everything follows a fixed pattern, so we are doing what we are doing because we are robots. We cannot be accountable for something that is fixed, and a prophet is a human being, not a superman knowing the occult and having direct contact with the supernatural metaphysical beings. It is physically impossible and it is for not use if he is going to use his information for humans, because we cannot grasp his level of understanding.  
 
If he is in contact with the super natural Meta physical God, then he cannot explain it to us because we are not in direct contact with him.  
 
And even HE has to be in direct contact in order to decode the metaphysical.  
 
However, if he is in direct contact with the metaphysical, he is not human beings, because human beings have always been physical and part of the physical creation.  
 
So if a Nabi is a foreteller, then the picture would be something like  
 
* He is getting information from God through direct interaction,  
 
*He knows everything before it is going to happen, even 1000 of years before  
 
* He is sent to tell us what he is receiving through Meta physical beings  
 
* We have to believe in him although we are not able to comprehend anything, coz we are not at his level  
 
* He is a human being of flesh and blood, he is surrounded by physical laws and a part of the creation, still he is getting direct contact with the metaphysical being without leaving a trace of information about it  
 
* We don't know if he was half human (physical) and half supernatural (meta physical)  
 
*We will never understand how he broke the rules and laws of the nature in order to have direct contact with God, who is NOT part of his own creation  
 
* We are not informed about the method to deliver a message or the way of communication between a physical being and a Meta physical being  
 
* Every information he got, was not tried out by himself, he did not understand it himself, because he just got it because he was the chosen one  
 
* He had no free will or personal ability to develop himself as a human being, he was a robot and blindly followed what he was told by the Meta physical being through their secret super natural conversations  
 
*He will never come back, super natural men only come once and thrill people of their society in a given time period  
 
*He is was and will always be here, through fairy tales and unproven proofs  
 
* Because he is getting information before it happens, it is indicating that this is preplanned  
 
* I.E we cannot change anything, it’s already preplanned  
 
* His information and guidance to us are of NO USE, because we cannot change anything no matter what  
 
* we are following a fixed pre planned pattern, so no wahy , prophet, Rusool or superman can ever cure us  
 
The end of this grief attack on human intellect, ermmm, joke is: - "Dear friends, this is information from God and this is his every day activities."  
 
A Rusool is the one who have Risalat, the message to deliver.  
 
So the difference in the Nabi and the prophet is; YOUR own perception of the reality!  
 
-However, if you CHOSE to USE (again a poem :P) the word Prophet for Rusool in the west, without changing the meaning given in the Quran, then every Nabi is a prophet, but every Rusool is not a Nabi.  
 
 
Brother Moazzam have explained rest of it very nicely :-D


Comments by: Nargis On 27 September 2011Report Abuse

Not only is our prophet a foreteller of useless events his society cant witness, he is also conveying a message about God who is very much obsessed with sexual relationships out of wedlock. Contrary to this, he didn't prescribe a method or ceremony for the "marriage". Different countries have different rules, and your qabool hai qabool hai qabool hai is not qabooled in non-Muslim countries.He is not aware of the fact that those who are preaching "morality" are not following their own belief. Why so many paedophile pervert men in Muslim countries, why are the mullah's who believe in these rules raping children? How was the information beneficial in itself?  
 
I saw a video of Allama Parwez once, and he said something like:- the Prophet divided the moon in two pieces, but for what use? It is not recorded that even one person became Muslim after witnessing this event (:-D:-D)  
So true... Likewise, what is the point of giving commands to people who will believe it is a command, but they won't follow it?  
 
Commands are given to individuals who COMPREHEND the whole picture, those who GRASP the meaning of a message fully and those who actually LEARN from it in order to FOLLOW and ACT upon the given commands. Who would preach morality to a prostitute who has chosen this lifestyle him/herself?  
 
The word Zina is USED for adultery, but what does it root mean and did the Quran use the word in the sense of sexual relations?  
 
Why then is it linked with shirk? Come on now; don't tell me having sex is the same as bowing to Shiva?  
 
Anyway, if the Quran is telling us to flog people who are sleeping with someone without being married in the Islamic way, it is then IMPOSSIBLE to follow the Quran fully because it is not practical everywhere, so we will be Muslim light all our life :*( bu hu  
 
Not only is the Quran impractical and valid only at given times/eras, it is also dependent on the societies we are living in. They will determine how individuals can practice the Quran, until then it is for no use... woo-ow...  
 
So what is the Quran? A book of foretellers who were preaching peace sex and flogging... sounds like the slogan of Theirbacon...:-S

 

Comments by: Nargis On 27 September 2011Report Abuse
Please also share the mission of Aastana and what is being done to make sure that Aastana is not sidetracked from it.

In brief, Astana’s mission is to understand the Quran through its own language and grammar through its own methods like Ratal tartel, and not through the man-made external meanings it’s given.  
 
What have to be done in order to avoid sidetracking, is to continue our work no matter how people feel or think we should do.

Please also tell us whether Aastana believe in changing beliefs of others or forcing their beliefs on others.

I would say those who really agree with Aastana belong to people who are motivated by “mastery achievement goals” (to learn something in order to know the truth in itself, without having the desire to outperform others). People who strive to gain something because they are afraid of failure and the pain in not living up to certain expectations will not develop their talents fully. They will mostly use only what’s needed in order to solve a given task.  
 
But then you have people who have an achievement behavior that stem from positively oriented motive for success. They want to learn and develop their skills, and they are not afraid of difficult tasks. Called “high need achievers” by David mc Clelland and John Atkinson (Who in 1953 explored individual differences in “need for achievement”)  
 
So those who are afraid of failure and afraid of not living up to the expectations in their society, or those who are motivated by “”ego approach goals” (wanting to get positive judgment from society, hopefully with as little effort as possible, or wish to outperform others), will never develop all their skills fully or understand the thrill in getting to the core of a message.  
 
So Astana would like to know what the Quran is saying in order to implement it in their lives and act upon it, and to gain its promised success as an individual and society. For that they may face hardship and lose a few friends here and there by not living up to the societies expectations, but when the primary need of achievement is to gain success as human beings and societies,fake friendship and relations are disclosed to be useless, thus no pain in in losing them.  
 
If we seek knowledge from the Quran through its own language, everyone else is free to seek knowledge from their own books. Why would Aastana care about what people chose to read, eat, believe, think or feel when God gave them the free will to do what they like?  
 
(Sssshh, don’t tell anyone, but I personally don’t like the pervert clergy and their discriminative attitude towards women… ) Off you guys talk too much, I'm leaving. ByeBye

 

Comments by: dawood On 27 September 2011Report Abuse
SA Br. Waqar: I share two cents of mine here.  
 
“Waqar: Which Muhammad you believe in. Muhammad of grammer, Muhammad of Bukhari, Muhammad of History, Muhammad bin Abdullah, Muhammad bin Umar, Muhammad bin Zubari, Muhammad of 6th century, Muhammad of 3rd century, Muhammd of 21st century or Muhhamd of Quran. Please also specify what Muhammad of your choice will do for you?”  
 
Brother no one here is discussing anyone other than MUHAMMAD mentioned in the Quran. Problem with Muazzam et al is that they take part of the grammar and set aside the remaining part. As an example, I posted the following links to establish/show that masculine proper names that are of Arabic origin, do take TANWEEN on them. http://arabic.tripod.com/Noonation2.htm  
 
“The only definite nouns that will take tanween are first names of people and some rare names of places, rivers etc. Most of names of places and rivers, etc. are forbidden to noonation. Any proper name of non-Arabic origin that have more than three letters is forbidden to noonation. Proper names of unknown Arabic origins include most of the names of towns and geographical features even in Arabia itself. Noonation usually happens only with first names of people but not with other proper names (in general), because most of those are forbidden to noonation. Of course, first names have to be of a known Arabic origin too in order to be noonated.”  
 
Thus, the inference that Moazzam et al are arriving at is erroneous because it does not take into consideration the entire grammar, rather it is selective and misleading. According to the above grammatical rules, the word Muhammadun mentioned in Quran is a proper name.  

Comments by: dawood On 27 September 2011Report Abuse
SA Br. Moazzam:  
 
First, I want to bring to your attention that you are ignoring the complete grammar on this issue, thus misleading yourself as well as others.  
 
Secondly, there are hundreds if not thousands of people in the world today who are praised for their work, or for other various reasons, etc. According to your assertion, they all should be called “Muhammadun Rasulallah”????? What you are saying is this: “Someone praiseworthy is messenger of Allah.” What could be the worse mockery of the word of Allah than this?  

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 27 September 2011Report Abuse
NARGIS and MOAZZAM,  
 
***WAQAR: Please explain the difference between nabi and prophet.***  
 
I think Waqar meant to ask: Please explain the difference between nabi and rasul? I could be wrong.  
 
Prophet, is the English translation of nabi.  
 
Al-Khatim Nabiyeen in English is the Seal of the Prophets.  
 
The Qur'an identifies a number of men as "Prophets of Islam" (Arabic: nabiyy نبي‎; pl. anbiyaa' أنبياء).  
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophet  
 
***Moazzam: Each nabi is prophet as well but each rasool in not Nabi.***  
 
You are mistaken. All of--"The" Rasuls were Prophets, but not all of the Prophets were of the Rasuls, that is, not all of the prophets were Messenger-Prophets.  
 
Another difference is:the Prophets could make mistakes—The Messengers could not. This is why Allah never says to obey the Prophet, but to obey the Messenger.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  
 
 

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 28 September 2011Report Abuse
Dawood! Re-read brother Moazzam's post with transparent glasses, you will definitely recognize Muhammad Rasool Allah,defined in Alquran, let me high light it again "  
** Ahmad is superlative form of noun hameed( praiseworthy), any one could be Muhammad who possess the attribute of Hameed by due course mentioned in verse 17/79  
وَمِنَ اللَّيْلِ فَتَهَجَّدْ بِهِ نَافِلَةً لَّكَ عَسَى أَن يَبْعَثَكَ رَبُّكَ مَقَامًا مَّحْمُودًا)(and qualify the definition mentioned in verses 13/144,33/40,47/2,48/29 "  
Mr Dawood! it is advised plz set aside the preconceived belief to stay long at Aastana research forum, you just realize your attitude with a research worker(Br Moazzam). Some one might be at wrong footings, and your stance might be correct,but don't be abusive and don't try to impose it at others.  
MIND YOUR LANGUAGE AND LOOK MIRROR WHICH REFLECTING THE IMAGE OF YOUR MENTAL CALIBER  
 
Secondly, there are hundreds if not thousands of people in the world today who are praised for their work, or for other various reasons, etc. According to your assertion, they all should be called “Muhammadun Rasulallah”????? What you are saying is this: “Someone praiseworthy is messenger of Allah.” What could be the worse mockery of the word of Allah than this?" (Dawood)  
 

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 28 September 2011Report Abuse
MOAZZAM and NAEEM,  
 
3. Same is the case with other fictitious names of prophets.  
 
*** MOAZZAM: Don’t say fictitious, rather the name mentioned in Quran are eternal models/ characters(generic)  
Well, the “names” of prophets mentioned in Al-Quran are referred to by the pronoun “he”, making that individual a historical male human being. So, whether the name is fictitious, non-fictitious, generic template or whatever, it is, nonetheless, a name or…a proper noun/name. In your following statement you admit that the nabis and rasuls were specific historical people:  
 
10. Nabi and Rasul were not specific people.***  
 
*** MOAZZAM: They are specific people (but not supper human)***  
 
Neem contradicts your position:  
 
DHULQARNAIN: Do you believe that Dawood was a historical figure? Yes or no.***  
 
***NAEEM: NO***  
 
38:17 Bear patiently what they say, and remember Our servant Dawood, the possessor of power; surely he was…  
 
17:55…and to Dawood We gave a scripture.  
 
Ayat 38:17 shows Dawood to be a male who "was", thus, making him an historical figure.  
 
Now: Is ayat 17:55 saying that a scripture was given to a “what”, that is, a generic template called dawood or a “who”, that is, an historical male figure called Dawood?  
 
If it is a “who”, then per the grammar, Dawood is a proper noun/name of a male historical figure.  
Do you agree?  
 
Dhulqarnain-  
 

Comments by: Amirkhan On 28 September 2011Report Abuse
My brother Dhulqarnain, I want to tell you that you are wasting your time telling all these things to these people. I see that these people cannot explain their point because they dont understand what they are saying. That is why they get angry on everyone who ask questions and call him fake. You asked very good question and you pointed a important contradiction but they did not answer.  
 
This is your question:  
(Anyway, you stated:  
***NARGIS:In fact, its easier --> Anyone who want us to GO OUTSIDE OF THE QURAN to prove something for them, is not a student of the Quran, thus we cannot help him.***  
Then you contradicted yourself with your latest assertion:  
***NARGIS: Xactly, join hands with the truth WHEREVER YOU FIND IT.***( My caps)  
So, which position is the TRUTH? You cannot support both positions, because they directly contradict each other.)  
 
These are two opposite statements and they removed your question three times and still not answering that what is correct? Are they not going outside Quran or are they going outside Quran? I asked few questions which were in my mind but Nargis changed the topic and no one answer my question.  
My brother I am not very good in reading Urdu but my friend can read it well and I ask him to read the translation of Dr. Qamar and he told me this:  
آیت ۱۰۲ میں سیدنا سلیمان کے قصے کو بطور دلیل بتایا گیا کہ ایسے ہی لوگوں نےسلیمان کی مملکت کے خلاف سازشیں کیں  
It says that Solomon was a person and not attribute and that people were doing conspiracies against the empire of Solomon. This show that Nargis, Moazzam, Naeem not only disagree with each other but they disagree with Dr. Qamar also who translate سلیمان as a specific person and not generic template. I am 100% sure that no one will give you the right answer and they will keep on calling bad names for other people who ask questions. These people get angry and fight with everyone because they them self do not know how to convince others.

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 28 September 2011Report Abuse
MOAZZAM, NARGIS, and NAEEM,  
 
8. Wahi is not extrinsic revelation. A genius man absorbs knowledge from his environment and becomes wise.  
 
*** MOAZZAM: Yes wahy is like conceiving some thing in wised/genius one’s mind. Remember if it is against quranic values /nature/universal values it would be from Shetan other wise from Rehman.***  
 
EXTRINSIC: Originating from the outside; external.  
 
If wahy, which is what Al-Quran is, is not extrinsic, then:  
 
1. It is intrinsic coming from within man. To suggest that wahy comes from nature would still make it extrinsic in origin.  
 
2. If wahy is not extrinsic, then what is the rationale for the following statements?  
 
1:1 Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds,  
1:2 The Beneficent, the Merciful,  
1:3 Master of the day of Requital.  
1:4 Thee do we serve and Thee do we beseech for help.  
1:5 Guide us on the right path,  
1:6 The path of those upon whom Thou hast bestowed favours,  
1:7 Not those upon whom wrath is brought down, nor those who go astray.  
 
1. Who is making the above request?  
 
2. To Whom or what is the request directed?  
 
Dhulqarnain-  
 

Comments by: Nargis On 28 September 2011Report Abuse
Mr Dawood! it is advised plz set aside the preconceived belief to stay long at Aastana research forum, you just realize your attitude with a research worker(Br Moazzam). Some one might be at wrong footings, and your stance might be correct,but don't be abusive and don't try to impose it at others. Naeem sheikh

 
We have one mullah, one sneaky double agent from Ourbeacon and one is a kooky conspiracy theorist. Two of them are personal and here to fulfil their mission, (One of them is even trying to set up Br. Moazzam and Dr Qamar Zaman against each other) the third one is honest and sincere, but don't understand what we are saying, coz he study everything through orthodox translations.  
 
Now you should save your time exactly like you suggested I should do.

f wahy, which is what Al-Quran is, is not extrinsic, then Dhulqarnain:

What does "extrinsic" mean, from outside the universe, outside the creation, from a meta physical being? If yes, then how is it transferred to the mind of prophets?  
 
and does intrinsic (you have to use such hard words, arggggh) means something man MAKE UP by his own mind?  
 
If the nature reveal itself, is it still Intrinsic ?

 

Comments by: Amirkhan On 28 September 2011Report Abuse
My sister Nargis you look very insecure because you think all others are bad people and everyone is wrong but not you. Why you are forcing your understanding on others when you cannot convince them with reason? Why you dont stay quiet and let others who understand Arabic to answer the questions? You called me fake and used so many bad words about me on this blog but I want to tell everyone that I am not fake because I am discussing many things with many people who are writing on this blog in email and they all know that I am not fake. And you deleted very important question by my brother Dhulqarnain three times and now you are calling my brother Dawood conspiracy theorist? Why everyone is bad and only you are good?  
 
My brother Dhulaqarnain asked this question:  
((Anyway, you stated:  
***NARGIS:In fact, its easier --> Anyone who want us to GO OUTSIDE OF THE QURAN to prove something for them, is not a student of the Quran, thus we cannot help him.***  
Then you contradicted yourself with your latest assertion:  
***NARGIS: Xactly, join hands with the truth WHEREVER YOU FIND IT.***( My caps)  
So, which position is the TRUTH? You cannot support both positions, because they directly contradict each other.)  
 
You decide first that if you are staying inside Quran or going outside Quran because you are not thinking on your own but copying other peoples work without understanding. I asked very important questions and my brother Dawood admitted that my questions were right. This time also I am asking a simple question but you are diverting topic by calling bad names and wrong things. I am asking only this that Dr. Qamar is telling about Solomon and he is saying that Solomon was a person. If I am wrong then tell me how I am wrong and prove your claim properly. Why all this drama every time a person ask real question?  
 
And now I want to show you first words I saw when I visit this blog.  
 
A PLATFORM FOR RESEARCH AND UNDERSTANDING OF QURANIC MESSAGE.  
4. This Quranic community believes in universal human fraternity and PEACE is the core message. All schools of thought and ideology are invited.  
5. Utmost respect for humanity is the basic policy. Therefore, civil manners, decency and politeness are advocated.  
6. No kind of rigidity, extremism, air of authority, religious edicts or final words are employed.  
7. The fundamental goal is to explore and discover the original logic, reason, rationality and wisdom of Quranic constitution that can be intellectually and empirically established in this scientifically advanced world. And to set it free from myth, miracles, fantasies, superstitions, dogmas and rituals.  
8. Use of impolite, offensive or abusive language and personal remarks of derogatory nature would disqualify you from AastanaBlog's membership.  
 
Seriously you are breaking all these rules and it is only you who fight with everyone and who use bad words on this blog but no one is asking you to stop. Why you want everyone to shut up when you have no answer to their questions and you are only damaging image of many good people on this blog who are doing good work. Please mind that this blog and all other blogs like this are for discussing things and not for fighting and using bad words about others.

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 28 September 2011Report Abuse
Peace Br. Amirkhan,  
 
***AMIRKHAN: My brother Dhulqarnain, I want to tell you that you are wasting your time telling all these things to these people. I see that these people cannot explain their point because they dont understand what they are saying. That is why they get angry on everyone who ask questions and call him fake. You asked very good question and you pointed a important contradiction but they did not answer. This is your question:***  
 
***DHULQARNAIN: Anyway, you stated:  
 
***NARGIS:In fact, its easier --> Anyone who want us to GO OUTSIDE OF THE QURAN to prove something for them, is not a student of the Quran, thus we cannot help him.***  
 
Then you contradicted yourself with your latest assertion:  
 
***NARGIS: Xactly, join hands with the truth WHEREVER YOU FIND IT.***( My caps)  
DHULQARNAIN: So, which position is the TRUTH? You cannot support both positions, because they directly contradict each other.)***  
 
***AMIRKHAN: These are two opposite statements and they removed your question three times and still not answering that what is correct? Are they not going outside Quran or are they going outside Quran? I asked few questions which were in my mind but Nargis changed the topic and no one answer my question.***  
 
Yes, this is only one of their several contradictions. Contradictions are an inevitable consequence of conjecturing/following opinion as if it were truth. Their deleting and editing posts are an indication that they cannot effectively defend their positions. Censoring benefits no one.  
 
******AMIRKHAN: My brother I am not very good in reading Urdu but my friend can read it well and I ask him to read the translation of Dr. Qamar and he told me this:  
آیت ۱۰۲ میں سیدنا سلیمان کے قصے کو بطور دلیل بتایا گیا کہ ایسے ہی لوگوں نےسلیمان کی مملکت کے خلاف سازشیں کیں  
It says that Solomon was a person and not attribute and that people were doing conspiracies against the empire of Solomon. This show that Nargis, Moazzam, Naeem not only disagree with each other but they disagree with Dr. Qamar also who translate سلیمان as a specific person and not generic template. I am 100% sure that no one will give you the right answer and they will keep on calling bad names for other people who ask questions. These people get angry and fight with everyone because they them self do not know how to convince others.***  
 
Thank you for the information, brother. Your observations are correct. They get angry because they cannot defend their assertions. Dawood and myself have exposed the flaws in their arguments. Btw, I am happy to see that you are still here and would ask you to stay and continue to debate. Why? Because maybe at some point their denial might break and they will truly become Quran only and alone. I debate hoping that some may change their minds, but I also debate so that those who come to this site can read these debates and decide for themselves how they will go. Vigorous debate, in my opinion, helps to make for an informed decision. I get e-mails from people from around the world saying how much they appreciate my debates, All Praises due to Allah. The arguments I present are not my arguments, but Allah’s Arguments. So for me debating is dawah/inviting to Deen Al-Islam. And please keep this in mind, I don’t see Nargis and Moazzam, for examples, as my enemies. I see their positions as my adversaries. So I hope you will stay, ask questions, provide answers, and debate.  
 
Dhulqaranin-  

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 28 September 2011Report Abuse
NARGIS,  
 
DHULQARNAIN: If wahy, which is what Al-Quran is, is not extrinsic,  
 
***then Dhulqarnain: What does "extrinsic" mean, from outside the universe, outside the creation, from a meta physical being? If yes, then how is it transferred to the mind of prophets? and does intrinsic (you have to use such hard words, arggggh) means something man MAKE UP by his own mind? If the nature reveal itself, is it still Intrinsic ?***  
 
Exactly!, wahy, IS extrinsic. It is from outside of human beings from The Being who created them. Allah is not creation/nature. Allah exists outside of all that He has created and that is why He says that there is NOTHING like Him.  
 
You ask—“how is it transferred to the mind of the prophets”. The answer is—I don’t know and neither do you nor Moazzam nor Qamar. Only Allah knows the answer to this question. Listen, scientists today still do not fully understand gravity or electricity! Not one scientist can tell you why they exist, not one.  
 
***If the nature reveal itself, is it still Intrinsic ?***  
 
Nature does not "reveal", in the Quranic sense anyway, anything. This IS only an expression like--"the sun rises in the east and sets in the west". Neither expression, however, is the truth.  
 
Can you address the following from my prior post:  
 
2. If wahy is not extrinsic, then what is the rationale for the following statements?  
 
1:1 Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds,  
1:2 The Beneficent, the Merciful,  
1:3 Master of the day of Requital.  
1:4 Thee do we serve and Thee do we beseech for help.  
1:5 Guide us on the right path,  
1:6 The path of those upon whom Thou hast bestowed favours,  
1:7 Not those upon whom wrath is brought down, nor those who go astray.  
 
1. Who is making the above request?  
 
2. To Whom or what is the request directed?  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: Amirkhan On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
My brother Dhulqarnain, thank you for this encouragement. I want to tell you that I came here sincerely to learn so i asked questions which came in my mind after reading many articles and comments from different people on this blog. But then I saw a very strange thing that one of my question was first changed to XXXXXXX and then Nargis started using bad words for me. This is the blog where it is happening:  
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?QID=1753  
You tell me honestly do you think I ask wrong questions and I am fake? Then why all these abusive bad words for a person asking question with sincere mind?  
My brother Moazzam said that (ALQURAN = The true divine message comprehended through Tasreef Alayaat + by observing context of the verses + by observing grammatic rules + appropriate selection of meanings from lexicon + keeping in view the core message of Quran  
LAWS OF NATURE /UNIVERSAL VALUES = All the scatered universal truth whether in CHURCH + MANDIR + GORDWARA + IMAM BARGAH + MASQUE OF ANY SECT+ UNDHR + CDHR +OIC + UN + HADITH + BIBLE + archialogy etc)  
 
Can you see that he use the word HADITH and he is saying that hadith is true. I only asked him to confirm which statement is correct? If you read old comments then you will see that so many people wrote so many times that religions and hadith are manmade and there is a book on main page with the title TRUTH OF HADITH but now they are saying hadith and religion is correct and all other things like MOSQUE+IMAM BARGAH+ SECT+CHDR+UN+CHURCH+MANDIR are also correct. Please tell me which statement is correct? first one or second one? And in your question it was very clear that Nargis is saying two different things but no one is replying. But in reply a drama started and Nargis started misbehaving and used bad words for me and other people an my post was changed by someone into XXXXXXXX. Can you see that these people are ignoring all questions?  
And even these people are using funny and bad names to write on this blog like ganda, lanati, hacker, yellowcow, redcow blacksheep and so many other names. Is this the respect of Quran for them? And now I asked a very simple question that Dr. Qamar himself is saying in his translation that Solomon is a person so which statement is correct? Tell me what is wrong with my question and why no one is answering me? And tell me what is wrong with your question and why they are deleting your question? Please aastana tell me if everything is correct then why are you abusing other people and calling them mullah or orthodox translators? If aastana is platform for research and understanding of Quran then why aastana is giving statements for other things? And what is this lady Nargis? Is she a expert of Arabic and world affairs or is she a scholar of Quran and master of every other subject too? Why no straight answers for our questions and why all this bla bla bla? My brother please check this that she again reply to my post saying bad words to different people and gave no answer for my simple question. Why no one is answering me and why only this lady is answering every question with bad words?

Comments by: Nargis On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Exactly!, wahy, IS extrinsic. It is from outside of human beings from The Being who created them. Allah is not creation/nature. Allah exists outside of all that He has created and that is why He says that there is NOTHING like Him. Dhulqarnain

can you refer to the Quran for this? what did the Quran say about it being extrinsic, what definition for "extrinsic" is given in the Quran? Did the Quran only say wahy is extrinsic without telling us how it was transferred to the prophet? 2:11....How did the prophet prove it to his society if they asked for proofs ?


Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Nargis,  
 
8. Wahi is not extrinsic revelation. A genius man absorbs knowledge from his environment and becomes wise.  
 
*** MOAZZAM: Yes wahy is like conceiving some thing in wised/genius one’s mind. Remember if it is against quranic values /nature/universal values it would be from Shetan other wise from Rehman.***  
 
EXTRINSIC: Originating from the outside; external.  
 
***what did the Quran say about it being extrinsic, what definition for "extrinsic" is given in the Quran? Did the Quran only say wahy is extrinsic without telling us how it was transferred to the prophet***  
 
You're a bright woman, you know exactly, as apparently does Moazzam, what extrinsic means. Moazzam denies that wahy is extrinsic. Are you really going to play dumb, Nargis? So, do I assume that you...don't agree with him?  
 
***Did the Quran only say wahy is extrinsic without telling us how it was transferred to the prophet***  
 
Al-Quran tells you that you are a created being, however, Allah didn't tell you how He created you did He?, yet, here you are! Playing games already, Nargis?.... a sure indication that you cannot prove another one your assertions.  
 
So...  
 
***can you refer to the Quran for this?***  
 
Can you address the following from my prior post? Because if you can, then it will clear this matter of extrinsic/intrinsic as it pertains to wahy, right up, yeah?  
 
2. If wahy is not extrinsic, then what is the rationale for the following statements?  
 
1:1 Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds,  
1:2 The Beneficent, the Merciful,  
1:3 Master of the day of Requital.  
1:4 Thee do we serve and Thee do we beseech for help.  
1:5 Guide us on the right path,  
1:6 The path of those upon whom Thou hast bestowed favours,  
1:7 Not those upon whom wrath is brought down, nor those who go astray.  
 
1. WHO IS MAKING THE ABOVE REQUEST?  
 
2. TO WHOM OR WHAT IS THE REQUEST DIRECTED?  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: moazzam On 29 September 2011
Brother Ameer Khan, Dear Dhulqarnain:  
Please find here under the clarification to your confusions(I failed to make you understand)  
 
***NARGIS:In fact, its easier --> Anyone who want us to GO OUTSIDE OF THE QURAN to prove something for them, is not a student of the Quran, thus we cannot help him.***  
Then you contradicted yourself with your latest assertion:  
***NARGIS: Xactly, join hands with the truth WHEREVER YOU FIND IT.***( My caps)  
My brother Moazzam said that (ALQURAN = The true divine message comprehended through Tasreef Alayaat + by observing context of the verses + by observing grammatical rules + appropriate selection of meanings from lexicon + keeping in view the core message of ALquran.  
LAWS OF NATURE /UNIVERSAL VALUES = All the scattered universal truth whether in CHURCH + MANDIR + GORDWARA + IMAM BARGAH + MASQUE OF ANY SECT+ UNDHR + CDHR +OIC + UN + HADITH + BIBLE + archeology etc)  
So, which position is the TRUTH? You cannot support both positions, because they directly contradict each other.)  
MOAZZAM: please re-read my above written statement, IT CONCLUDES THAT, THE TRUTH (HAQQ) IS ALWAYS CORRECT NO MATTER WHO IS SPEAKING.  
REMEMBER THE HAQQ IS DIVINE, THE ALQURAN IS ALSO BEEN PRESERVED IN LOH E MAHFOOZ(THE UNIVERSE).  
I didn't recognize ALL the material written in books(other than quran) is correct.  
 
 
 
 
 
 

Comments by: Nargis On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
MOAZZAM: please re-read my above written statement, IT CONCLUDES THAT, THE TRUTH (HAQQ) IS ALWAYS CORRECT NO MATTER WHO IS SPEAKING.  
REMEMBER THE HAQQ IS DIVINE, THE ALQURAN IS ALSO BEEN PRESERVED IN LOH E MAHFOOZ(THE UNIVERSE).  
I didn't recognize ALL the material written in books(other than quran) is correct. brother Moazzam  
 
 
--> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJZoOGXIXQU  
 
---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GX_EmhpGJI&feature=related  
 
---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpMX1eSVWpY&feature=related  
 
 
 

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Brother Moazzam! Can we call "the role model or any other better word for Ambiya" than the generic template ,it has no concern to me (whether proper or common noun).

Comments by: moazzam On 29 September 2011
Dear Naeem Sheikh! Salam wa rahma on you and on all rest of the participants.  
Ahmad is superlative form of noun hameed( praiseworthy), same like musalli (who observe salah) and Muzakkiany( who purified).  
One could be Muhammad who possess the attribute of Hameed by due course mentioned in verse 17/79  
وَمِنَ اللَّيْلِ فَتَهَجَّدْ بِهِ نَافِلَةً لَّكَ عَسَى أَن يَبْعَثَكَ رَبُّكَ مَقَامًا مَّحْمُودًا)(and qualify the definition mentioned in verses 13/144,33/40,47/2,48/29  
The names of prophets written in Quran are not fictitious, rather the eternal models/ characters(uswa e hasana) beyond time and space, a better English word could be selected from dictionary which may reflect its true sense(if some one not feel comfortable with generic template) as I asked for(from Aurangzaib in my last posts).  
Similarly, the people of Nooh, people of Firon, people of Shoaib,Abu lahab, haroot maroot, dhulqarnain Ass haab e feel Asshaab Alhijr, Asshaab Alkhf same like Asshaab Alyameen and Asshaab Ashimaal etc.  
Because Alkitab is beyond time and space therefore, narrates only their make-believe stories (having eternal guidance) for our understanding; if any person/group in any era follows any specific character in the resembling situation could be called by that particular name (attribute).and the follower would become a model (rasool of the time will become role model), for that particular society.  
For example, the attribute Musa is, who roots out the evil after strong confrontation with the character Firaon . The attribute Mosa could be seen in Quran as described in different qasas(stories).  
Allah called each prophet with their attributes (it make no difference call them proper noun/name) but impotent thing is their name were in accordance with their attributes (qualities).  
Remember all prophets has not nominated by their parents, because Qur'an narrates only their make-believe stories( having eternal guidance) for our understanding So any body in any society in any era if having the said attributes could be called Mosa, zakariya, nooh Ibraheem Muhammad of the time.  
Mind! There are some specific examples in quran, eg Allah nominated Ishaq,Yaqoob, Ismail, Eisa (masieh) Yahya, even they were called just GHULAMUN before bestowing prophet hood, Allah didn’t call them by their parents nominated name.  
 

Comments by: Amirkhan On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
My brother Moazzam I am sorry but I dont understand what you are saying. May be because your mental level is too high than me or may be you are not expressing your thoughts in proper way. In both cases it is your duty to explain this clearly in more easy words.  
My brother Dhulqarnain if you understand the answer by brother Moazzam then please explain it to me.  
My brother Moazzam, in your last comment you are telling about Mosa, Zakariya, Nooh, Ibraheem, Muhammad of the time but no one has seen Mosa, Zakariya, Nooh, Ibraheem of this time or in past. I want to ask you that are you talking about fantasies or real life? Where are these Mosa, Zakariya, Nooh, Muhammad of the time? Why no one can see them?  
Also I want to ask you people that please stop making this blog a place for fun and stop using bad words for others because people come here to learn and not to watch funny videos on youtube or to be called mullah and stupid. My sister Nargis has a very bad habit of interfering and sometime she use abusive words and sometime she give links for funny youtube videos and she dont understand that we are learning quran over here. If a person want to watch youtube videos then he will go to youtube and not come to this blog so please dont make it a entertainment place and a place for using bad words for other people.

Comments by: Amirkhan On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
My brother Dhulqarnain I see that you are from United States so I want to ask you a question. I am reading about occupy wall street and watching people in video doing some protest in New York. Please tell me why they are doing this protest and what is this occupy wall street?

Comments by: abdullahbashoeb On 29 September 2011
Salam Brother Muazzam..........  
 
please keep going you are doing excellent job . Dr Qamar and your understanding and presentation far far ahead of existed understanding ........ and one day the world will realise what Asstana have done.  
 
right now most of the peoples thinking level have not reached to understand these presentation. don't disheartend please go ahead with your discoveries.... for your kind information there are silent viewers of Asstana writings they are enjoying them.  
 
A Bashoeb  
 
Abdullah Bashoeb  

Comments by: moazzam On 29 September 2011
THANK YOU, Abdullahbashoeb.

Comments by: Amirkhan On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
My brother Abdullahbashoeb you are saying that:  
(right now most of the peoples thinking level have not reached to understand these presentation.)  
My brother this mean you understand what brother Moazzam is saying. Its good that you understand what he is saying so I request you to please explain what brother Moazzam mean by saying this:  
 
(ALQURAN = The true divine message comprehended through Tasreef Alayaat + by observing context of the verses + by observing grammatical rules + appropriate selection of meanings from lexicon + keeping in view the core message of ALquran.  
LAWS OF NATURE /UNIVERSAL VALUES = All the scattered universal truth whether in CHURCH + MANDIR + GORDWARA + IMAM BARGAH + MASQUE OF ANY SECT+ UNDHR + CDHR +OIC + UN + HADITH + BIBLE + archeology etc)  
 
(please re-read my above written statement, IT CONCLUDES THAT, THE TRUTH (HAQQ) IS ALWAYS CORRECT NO MATTER WHO IS SPEAKING.  
REMEMBER THE HAQQ IS DIVINE, THE ALQURAN IS ALSO BEEN PRESERVED IN LOH E MAHFOOZ(THE UNIVERSE).  
(I didn't recognize ALL the material written in books(other than quran) is correct. )  
 
My brother Moazzam I am not saying that you are wrong and I am right but I only want to understand this in simple words. Your understanding and presentation is far far ahead of existed understanding but it is much better if you make others to understand what you yourself understand and this is not possible if you dont use easy words. Can you understand all what is written in LOH E MAHFOOZ and can you understand all who is speaking HAQ and who is not speaking HAQ? I think by observing grammatical rules + appropriate selection of meanings from lexicon you can only translate Quran written in Arabic and only a person who has done PHD in all fields of life can claim to understand everything in this world like my sister Nargis who reply to every person like she has done PHD in every field of life but when a person ask question she start using bad words. I want to tell you that you all are also human beings and you can also do mistakes so if you understand something wrong then you can mislead many people also a person can misunderstand what you are telling so you have more responsibility. And tell me why you leave discussion in middle and then come back after long time to answer old questions? Why you dont give full answer in easy words in one go?

Comments by: ARCHILOCUS On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
MOAZZAM, NARGIS, NAEEM,  
 
***MOAZZAM: Because Alkitab is beyond time and space therefore, narrates only their MAKE-BELIEVE stories*** (My caps)  
 
This, WITHOUT DOUBT, has to be your’s/Aastana Blog’s wildest assertion to date. It’s simply astounding and extremely irresponsible! Let’s look at couple of definitions and ayats:  
 
MAKE BELIEVE: pretending that what is not real is real.  
 
PRETEND: To give a false appearance of; feign; to claim, represent, or assert falsely.  
 
10:37 And this Quran is not such as could be forged by those besides Allah, but it is a verification of that which is before it and a clear explanation of the Book, THERE IS NO DOUBT IN IT, from the Lord of the worlds.  
 
47:2 And those who believe and do good, and believe in that which has been revealed to Muhammad — and IT IS THE TRUTH FROM THEIR LORD— He will remove their evil from them and improve their condition.  
 
How can anything in Al-Quran be make-believe/pretense, given that, Allah states that His Quran has NO DOUBT IN IT AND IT IS THE TRUTH FROM HIM?! What are you thinking ?? You must immediately retract this assertion, because you are directly challenging the veracity of Allah Himsel, by casting doubt on His Words.  
 
*** The names of prophets written in Quran are not fictitious…* if any person/group in any era follows any specific character in the resembling situation could be called by that particular name (attribute). Allah called each prophet with their attributes (it make no difference call them proper noun/name) but impotent thing is their name were in accordance with their attributes (qualities). ***  
 
1. Now it doesn’t make any difference if you call them proper nouns! No matter, because Allah does refer to the prophets by name/proper noun. Anyway at last you admit that Al-Quran uses proper nouns/names for people/prophets, good deal.  
 
2. Also, contrary to Naeem, you admit that the prophets were actual historical people, good deal.  
 
3. Retract your assertion about make believe stories in Al-Quran.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  
 

Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Dear Amer, I agree with some of your concerns but there is alwayz other side of the coin as well. We just cant expect things to come in the way we understand or wanted. Sometimes we need to reap the message from a major data.  
 
Its not about who is saying its all about what is being said neglecting the way it has been delivered.  
 
Nargis is a straight shooter, and generally humans appreciate straight shooters as long as they speak what we want to hear and hate them when they go against our understanding. No this by no means is an effort to defend Nargis. Am just using her name as an example, hope she might forgive me if am wrong here.  
 
Mauzzam gives a high level comment which needs homework to understand what he wants to convey. Not sure how many of reader really go through his given references to understand. ( I hope and think Abdullah Bashoeb does so its easy for him to understand). Yes sometimes its tough to convey message by using appropriate words and might look like raw. But we are at initial stage of decoding Quran mayb at later stages people might be able to use appropriate wordings to make common man understand. Either we need to wait or try hard to get the message which someone want to convey even when its raw.  
 
Please go through comments by Dr QZ, Damon, Junaid, Bob, Momin and few others who already gave comments for on almost each and every topic you might find their writings easy to understand.  
 
Note : Please dont consider my comment to be biased or an effort to offend or defend any being...above are my own opinions to which even Nargis, Mauzzam and Abdullah Bashoeb might disgree.  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.

Comments by: ARCHILOCUS On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
MOAZZAM, NAGIS, AMIRKHAN,  
 
***Ameer Khan, Dear Dhulqarnain: Please find here under the clarification to your confusions(I failed to make you understand) ***  
 
You’re kidding us, right? Listen, Moazzam, I’m not confused nor have I’ve failed to understanding anything in regard to what Nargis asserted. Amirkhan, likewise, is not confused nor is his understanding clouded. You and, unfortunately, dear sister Nargis, are confused and lacking in understanding.  
 
STATEMENT A ***NARGIS:In fact, its easier --> Anyone who want us to GO OUTSIDE OF THE QURAN to prove something for them, is not a student of the Quran, thus we cannot help him.***  
 
Then you contradicted yourself with your latest assertion:  
 
STATEMENT B ***NARGIS: Xactly, join hands with the truth WHEREVER YOU FIND IT.***( My caps)  
 
Nargis, in STATEMENT A, was rejecting my request for empirical historical evidence for prophets at the time of “Muhammad” and since his death. I stated that some hadith writer, historian, journalist, etc. would have had to, at some point, document one of these prophets she claimed existed or exists today. When Nargis could not provide such evidence she then made STATEMENT A. When you, Moazzam, stated that truth could found and used from sources outside of Al-Quran, then she made STATEMENT B, contradicting herself.  
 
***My brother Moazzam said that (ALQURAN = The true divine message comprehended through Tasreef Alayaat + by observing context of the verses + by observing grammatical rules + appropriate selection of meanings from lexicon + keeping in view the core message of ALquran. ***  
 
Al-Quran has commanded the believers to also get verification outside of itself. For example, ayat 7:157:  
 
7:157 Those who follow the Messenger-Prophet, the Ummi, whom they find mentioned in the Torah and the Gospel.  
 
So, no, Moazzam, I’m not at all confused or lacking in understanding nor is Amirkhan. You are referring to yourself.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  
 

Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Dear All, I see there is bit confusion and fuss going around on the topic within Quran and outside Quran.  
 
Let me put my thoughts on the said issue, hope it may or may not help someone who is not intoxicated or mayb even I might be incapable to represent. ( My apologies in advance )  
 
Out of Quran is not considered to understand Quran. As in biased history written by people to match their conjectures. Any data which cannot be justified and is just made believe cannot be considered.  
 
Example of out of Quran, “To know the truth is one’s own responsibility” , this message is from Bhagwath Geeta ( Thanks to Bro Zubair who shared this on Facebook ). Now this message needs no proof this can easily be considered as Haqq.  
 
This is what I think is the difference between within Quran to understand Quran ( In Arabic ) and any Haqq outside the Quran which can be considered to understand the message.  
 
Note : Let your ideology developed from Quran be representable to people from any religion/aethist... ( This ideology will be Haqq )  
 
Just 2 cents, not sure if it makes sense to any…  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.  

Comments by: Nargis On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Exactly!, wahy, IS extrinsic. It is from outside of human beings from The Being who created them. Allah is not creation/nature. Allah exists outside of all that He has created and that is why He says that there is NOTHING like Him. Dhulqarnain  
 
The arguments I present are not my arguments, but Allah’s Arguments

You present Allah's argument? Allah told you what to say? then can you refer to the Quran for your above statement? what did the Quran say about it being extrinsic, what definition for "extrinsic" is given in the Quran? Did the Quran only say wahy is extrinsic without telling us how it was transferred to the prophet? 2:11....How did the prophet prove it to his society if they asked for proofs ?  
 
Asking for the quraniq reference about the definition of Wahy and the Quraniq meaning of Extrinsic.  
 
you have made a claim (Exactly!, wahy, IS extrinsic) about the Quran, and you must back it up.  
 
When you say extrinsic, I understand it to mean meta physical, beyond the creation, universe, physical laws. Does the Quran define the origin of the Quran/ Wahy from a meta physical ...being or place? If yes, then it is also telling how it was transferred from there to here?  
 
and if wahy is extrinsic, wahy which is the Quran,,its content..how is information about prophets (you say they are proper nouns), extrinsic?  
 
Or maybe you mean to say the information in the Quran, wahy is Not extrinsic but its origin, where it came from, is extrinsic?  
 
strange, because its content is related to this world..  
 
However, you must back up your claim through the Quran and explain it through its ayahs.

 
 

Comments by: Nargis On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Nargis, in STATEMENT A, was rejecting my request for empirical historical evidence for prophets at the time of “Muhammad” and since his death. I stated that some hadith writer, historian, journalist, etc. would have had to, at some point, document one of these prophets she claimed existed or exists today. When Nargis could not provide such evidence she then made STATEMENT A. When you, Moazzam, stated that truth could found and used from sources outside of Al-Quran, then she made STATEMENT B, contradicting herself.

You should not talk about something when you don’t get it. I said EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE IS NOT NEEDED TO EXPLAIN THE QURAN, IT EXPLAIN IT SELF.  
 
You want the meaning of Fael to change IF you can’t find anyone YOU think is qualified as a Nabi. You mean to say that the QURANIQ word will change its meaning as long as there is no empirical evidence for a person who is qualified as a Nabi per your orthodox understanding.  
 
Sorry Mac, that’s not how it is working. YOU present the argument of Allah, and you don't even know what his book is saying, you are using orthodox translations. You say you present Allahs argument, then tell me where Allah said his book is valid only through your paradigms of nabi?  
 
Where did he say his words, his book, his grammar change if your paradigms of nabi is not living up to yoru standards?  
 
Do you mean to say you can't understand what it means when I say " join hands with the truth WHEREVER YOU FIND IT ?  
 
Let me make it easy for you, to see if you understood what I said, you can point out what you think I have said in my above statement.  
 
* The Quran need help from outside sources to be understood, otherwise it is useless  
 
* The Quran cant be understood unless we understand UN charter  
 
* The Quran is sending invitation to every human being who is a peace provider, to work together for the betterment of society  
 
* The Quran explains itself, and it is saying ’’کَانَ النَّاسُ اُمَّۃً وَاحِدَۃ‘‘  
 
* the Quran is given to humanity so Muslims can make their own mosque and pray to their God, and exclude other people they are living with in a society  
 
* The Quran is a book of myths, so it cannot let us mix with other people because they have their own myths  
 
* The Quran is dividing humanity and only those who "believe in Allah" will enter the paradise, others will go to hell  
 
* The Quran is complete, it explains itself, it is uniting humanity and encourage to find a common ground no matter what others believe, to make a betterment for humanity?  
 
Now you tell me what my line meant, let's see how smart you are.  
 
Lastly, DON'T PUSH YOUR MULLAH BELIEF ON OTHERS, KEEP IT TO YOURSELF


Comments by: dawood On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Dear All, SA: Here is another example of contradiction and confusion at Nargis et al's part.  
 
Recall, the conversation about the "Khatam Alnabiyeen ..." and Nargis et al's assertion that Muhammad was an "appointing authority" of prophets. Dhulqarnain was pressing them hard to come up with at least one name of a Nabi since the time of Muhammad, which they did not do. Back then, Muhammad was a real person who had the "appointing authority" to appoint other Alnabiyeen. Now, in an other thread in which we are discussing Tanween and the proper nouns, etc., the same Muhammad is an attribute.

Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Dear Naeem Sheikh, please find my comment inline for your suggestion...  
 
Naeem Sheikh : Brother Moazzam! Can we call "the role model or any other better word for Ambiya" than the generic template ,it has no concern to me (whether proper or common noun).  
 
Mubashir : I think Attributes is the best suitable words for Names which are not Proper Nouns. And " Stituation " looks appropriate for generic templates..  
 
Let me give an example to justify both words, my apologies in advance if you find it childish...:)  
 
" When people were sad with no hope, Mubashir perked them up and they started believing in jannah"  
 
Above is an example of a SITUATION where Mubashir ( Not me ) perked them up to believe that jannah ( frame of mind with peace) can be achieved.  
 
Mubashir = Bringer of glad tidings... this could be any person with any name who posses this ATTRIBUTE ( His/Her Name could be John, Peter, Ramesh, Suresh, Bhagat Singh, Jinnah, Seeta, Geeta.....)  
 
Just 2 cents not sure if makes sense to any...  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.

Comments by: ARCHILOCUS On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
NARGIS,  
 
CC: MOAZZAM, MUBASHIR, NAEEM,  
 
All of your questions/ the resolution to our discussion lie in the two questions following the 7 oft-repeated. All you have to do is answer them. So why do you continue to stall and evade them? Why won't you, Moazzam, Mubashir, Naeem, et al, answer them? Each question requires only a one word reply. You can write volumes of conjecture, but now to write just two simple words is just..too..taxing. How can any of you possibly expect to be taken seriously?  
 
Anyway...  
 
2. If wahy is not extrinsic, then what is the rationale for the following statements?  
 
1:1 Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds,  
1:2 The Beneficent, the Merciful,  
1:3 Master of the day of Requital.  
1:4 Thee do we serve and Thee do we beseech for help.  
1:5 Guide us on the right path,  
1:6 The path of those upon whom Thou hast bestowed favours,  
1:7 Not those upon whom wrath is brought down, nor those who go astray.  
 
1. WHO IS MAKING THE ABOVE REQUEST?  
 
2. TO WHOM OR WHAT IS THE REQUEST DIRECTED?  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: dawood On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Br. Moazzam, SA:  
 
"Moazzam: **The attribute of Musa is, who roots out the evil. The uswa e hasana of the said character (Mosa) could be seen in Quran described in different qasas(stories).So any body in any society in any era if having the said attributes will be called Mosa of the time."  
 
where did you get this definition from? Lane writes the following on on page 2744, last column, part 7: The dim. of MUSA, in the sense above explained , [not as a proper name, in which case it is MUSA only, without Tanween, and has no relation to the same word signifying a razor]. Thus, at least one lexicon is clear as to what MUSA in quran is.

Comments by: Nargis2 On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
Recall, the conversation about the "Khatam Alnabiyeen ..." and Nargis et al's assertion that Muhammad was an "appointing authority" of prophets. Dhulqarnain was pressing them hard to come up with at least one name of a Nabi since the time of Muhammad, which they did not do. Back then, Muhammad was a real person who had the "appointing authority" to appoint other Alnabiyeen. Now, in an other thread in which we are discussing Tanween and the proper nouns, etc., the same Muhammad is an attribute.

Dear all, here we can see that these guys are not here to learn, but they are trying to work for their hidden agenda.  
 
Here I will quote what I said :- Comments by: Nargis On 09 September 2011 My 4th post in this link  
 
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?QID=1720  
 
A Nabi is nabi when he implements the wahy, khatimal nabi when he is appointing nabis at other departments. The appointing authority will be MUHAMMED; at EVERY TIME EVERY ERAS EVERY EPOCHS WHEN A PERSON BUILD THE CHARACTER OF A RUSOOL AND THEN NABI. The one who will be the appointing authority of other nabis must have the qualities of Muahammed, mahmood, ahmadu…  
 
now Dawood, tell me what concept of first names did Arabic hav1400 ago ?  
 
and why you telling a lie abut my statements, just because we disagree?


Comments by: Nargis2 On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
where did you get this definition from? Lane writes the following on on page 2744, last column, part 7: The dim. of MUSA, in the sense above explained , [not as a proper name, in which case it is MUSA only, without Tanween, and has no relation to the same word signifying a razor]. Thus, at least one lexicon is clear as to what MUSA in quran is.

provide us EMPIRICAL evidences for the Musa mentioned in the Quran. don't show me Jewish prayers, show us EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES, and not Jewish myths.  
 
Also explain uswa husna?


Comments by: dawood On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
SA Mubashir:  
"Mobashir: " When people were sad with no hope, Mubashir perked them up and they started believing in jannah"  
According to my limited understanding, in that case, the word "Mubashir" will precede with "a" and will not begin with a capital letter "M" as you suggested.  
 
The problem is that you cannot write your own grammar. You have to follow what grammarians say about these things. You folks are cherry-picking the grammatical rules that favor your assertion, discarding the ones that negate your position.

Comments by: Nargis2 On 29 September 2011Report Abuse

Dhulqarnain, provide your proofs from the Quran about Wahy being extrinsic. you must back up your claim through the Quran and explain it fully. Quraniq reference about the definition of Wahy and the Quraniq meaning of Extrinsic.  
 
you have made a claim " (Exactly!, wahy, IS extrinsic)" about the Quran, and you must back it up through the Quran.


 REPORT ABOUT ABUSING COMMENTSCancell
 YOUR REMARKS 
MemberID : Password: >> Forgot Id/Password
Comments by: dawood On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
SA Nargis:  
"Nargis: and why you telling a lie abut my statements, just because we disagree?"  
 
I retract my statement with an apology to you.

Comments by: Nargis2 On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
I retract my statement with an apology to you.

Awww dear brother, its okay no worries, so sorry for overlooking your link (


Comments by: dawood On 29 September 2011Report Abuse
SA Nargis:  
 
'Nargis: You are right that first names ( proper names ) in Arabic can be written with tenween (checked out your link and and other sources confirmed it), BUT did Arabic hav the concepts of first names at tht time? same rules applied then?"  
 
First, I appreciate you checking the grammar and admitting it that it is indeed true. Therefore, the grammar as it stands today will not have you declared that Muhammad is not a proper name. It should put to rest all such claims based on grammar.  
 
Secondly, I don't know what grammar rules were then and what are now. This brings me to Br. Damon's conversation that he had with Br. Badar long time ago. If my memory serves me, Br. Damon was of the view that all "harakat, Tanween, etc." were not needed for those who's mother tongue is Arabic. (Damon, my apologies to you if I have misquoted you, I am relying on my memory here). This is true even today. Just the other day, I checked this with another Arab who I believe know the grammar as well. His reply was, he does not need these harakat to figure it out if a proper name is used or not in any sentence. It is their language and they know what is being talked about.

Comments by: Nargis-Badshah-Salamat On 29 September 2011Report Abuse

I asked other sources and they said yes to tenween on proper (first) name. Dr Qamar Zaman said the names in the Quran are attributes,  
 
"jin ke sanche main hum ne Dhalna hai" Don't know how to translate this to English someone do it for me plz. Same is with S suleimaan, they are uswa husna, we have to adopt these attributes.  
(Dr Uncle may correct me if I understood him wrong)  
 
the other source said Arabic back then didn't have the concepts of first names. I'll wait when he have time to explain it further.


Comments by: ARCHILOCUS On 30 September 2011Report Abuse
NARGIS,  
 
1. The Aastanna position is that Al-Khatim Nabiyeen does not mean Last/End of the Prophets.  
 
2. Nargis declared: ***"In this verse (referring to 3:21 )…So when this verse was revealed to prophet Mohammad there were so many انبیاء and it is a non ending continuous process . Now keeping in mind the verse 21 of sura 3 ( already discussed above ) , which clearly indicates that so many prophets انبیاء were present in the times of prophet Mohammad . This verse no 40 of sura 33 is declaring that Mohammad was the seal of the prophets , which simply means He was the appointing authority of other prophets."***  
 
So, Nargis declares that:  
 
1. There were so many prophets at the time of Muhammad.  
 
2. The prophethood is a non-ending continuous process.  
 
***NARGIS: You should not talk about something when you don’t get it. I said EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE IS NOT NEEDED TO EXPLAIN THE QURAN, IT EXPLAIN IT SELF.***  
 
No, this is what you said:  
 
***NARGIS:In fact, its easier --> Anyone who want us to GO OUTSIDE OF THE QURAN to prove something for them, is not a student of the Quran, thus we cannot help him.***  
 
Then you contradicted yourself with this after Moazzam mentioned accepting truth outside of Al-Quran:  
 
***NARGIS: Xactly, join hands with the truth WHEREVER YOU FIND IT.***  
 
Saying---wherever you find it, means just that—wherever you find it, including outside of Al-Quran.  
 
Anyway, Al-Quran does explain itself, hence, Allah states:  
 
44:5 A command from Us — truly We are ever sending messengers/rasuls —  
 
Now, you claim prophets is a non ending continuous process. Fine. Now post the ayat where Allah says:  
prophets is a non ending continuous process.  
 
Given Al-Quran explains itself, where then, as with 44:5 and rasuls, does it mention prophets as an ongoing reality?  
 
Moazzam has now acquiesced that prophets were, in fact, people, and, had names.  
 
***MOAZZAM: The names of prophets written in Quran are not fictitious…Allah called each prophet with their attributes (IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE CALL THEM PROPER NOUN/NAME) but impotent thing is THEIR NAME were in accordance with their attributes (qualities).***  
 
Allah, prior to “Muhammad” named some prophets. Now, He names no prophets contemporary with “Muhammad” or after “Muhammad”, only the coming of a rasul-Ahmed. So, seeing how you claim that prophets existed along with “Muhammad”, after his death, and are a continuing process, you must now prove that claim by doing as Allah did and name at least two prophets. One at the time of “Muhammad” and one since his death, otherwise, you’re position is just nonsensical, period. Some hadith writer, some secular or religious historian, some journalist, somebody somewhere, at some point in history, must have seen one of the prophets you claim existed and exist and written about it. So, where is there an account of this, where? Many people didn’t approve of “Muhammad” as prophet, so do you want us to believe that he “appointed” other prophets and everyone accepted his choices? Come on! lol  
 
***However, you must back up your claim through the Quran and explain it through its ayahs.***  
 
On the contrary, the burden of proof is on YOU, Moazzam, and Aastana Blog. Moazzam stated:  
 
***8. Wahi is not extrinsic revelation. A genius man absorbs knowledge from his environment and becomes wise.***  
 
*** MOAZZAM: Yes wahy is like conceiving some thing in wised/genius one’s mind. Remember if it is against quranic values /nature/universal values it would be from Shetan other wise from Rehman.***  
 
I have simply challengd your claim, but the burden of proof is on you people.  
 
Regardless, when are you going to stop evading the “proof”:  
 
2. If wahy is not extrinsic, then what is the rationale for the following statements?  
 
1:1 Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds,  
1:2 The Beneficent, the Merciful,  
1:3 Master of the day of Requital.  
1:4 Thee do we serve and Thee do we beseech for help.  
1:5 Guide us on the right path,  
1:6 The path of those upon whom Thou hast bestowed favours,  
1:7 Not those upon whom wrath is brought down, nor those who go astray.  
 
1. WHO IS MAKING THE ABOVE REQUEST?  
 
2. TO WHOM OR WHAT IS THE REQUEST DIRECTED?  
 
Dhulqarnain-  
 

Comments by: ARCHILOCUS On 30 September 2011Report Abuse
MOAZZAM,  
 
 
***MOAZZAM: Dear Dhulqarnain! your queries that,***  
 
1. WHO IS MAKING THE ABOVE REQUEST?  
 
***MOAZZAM: Human being***  
 
2. TO WHOM OR WHAT IS THE REQUEST DIRECTED?  
 
*** MOAZZAM: to the creator of the universe.***  
 
Ahhh…at last, a direct and accurate response, thank you, Moazzam. What took you so long? :D  
 
Nargis, will you answer now? Is Moazzam accurate?  
 
Now, the questions are…  
 
1. Is the Creator of the Universe extrinsic to human beings and all that He has created? Yes or no, will do.  
 
2. Did the Creator of the Universe answer that request?  
 
3. If so, where in Al-Quran can the answer be found?  
 
Dhulqarnain-

Comments by: moazzam On 30 September 2011
Dear Aastana Members! Salam wa rahmah.  
The quranic term “WAHY” and “ALQAA” has been used in Quran to deliver a message from Almighty Allah to his prophets (to guide the man kind), also the same term has been used for Normal people(Muslim/none Muslims) even to none human as well.  
This process also should be completed through a set course of procedure as usually we observe across the universe in each aspects of life (there should be no exception, supper natural phenomenon).  
WAHY TO RASOOLALLAH= Conceiving of ideas in Rasool’s mind while pondering into Alkitab and laws of nature/universal values.  
WAHY TO NONE HUMAN BEING= The defaulted set program and set laws of nature see the verses 16/68,99/5,41/12.  
WAHY FROM SHEITAN= The conceiving of shetanic ideas in some ones mind see the verses 6/112,22/52.  
WAHY/ALQAA RFOM ALLAH TO NONE RASOOL= Conceiving of ideas/ development of inference in none rasool personalities whether muslims or none muslims see the verses 5/111,4/171,5/64,3/151,8/12,20/38,28/7, even for Aadam see the verse 2/73.  
CANCELLATION OF SHEITANIC “ALQAA” BY ALLAH’S WAHY= Some time (by due course of process) Allah removes/erases shetanic ideas if developed in some ones mind see the verses 22/52/53  
The Rasool of the time guides his nation through “WAHY”(what ever conceived in his mined while pondering into Alkitab) in that era.  
Remember ,each character which is written in Alkitab will /might be repeated in any/each era.,and Rsool of the time will guide his nation accordingly.  
 
MIND;THIS ALKITAB HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ALL PROPHETS , AND GUIDANCE/MESSAGE WRITTEN IN IT IS BEYOND TIME AND SPACE (ALL THE STORIES ARE GENERIC TEMPLATES) IT MIGHT COME INTO BEING IN “AALIM ALAMR”(WHEN ALL LAWS OF NATURE EXISTED INTO BEING)  
HOW THIS ALKITAB/ALQURAN FIRST TIME BEEN GIVEN FROM ALLAH TO THE MANKIND (WHEN MANKIND DEVELOPED INTO CONSCIOUS BEING), WE DON’T KNOW SEE 17/85.  

Comments by: dawood On 30 September 2011Report Abuse
SA Br. Moazzam:  
 
"Moazzam: WAHY TO RASOOLALLAH= Conceiving of ideas in Rasool’s mind while pondering into Alkitab and laws of nature/universal values."  
 
Where did the first rasul get the ALKITAB to begin with so that he could ponder into it?

Comments by: moazzam On 30 September 2011
Dear Dawood! Please read my post thoroughly ,sure you will get answer.

Comments by: dawood On 30 September 2011Report Abuse
Br. Moazzam. Please don't beat around the bush. Your post does not answer the question I posted above and repeated here under:  
 
Where did the first rasul get the ALKITAB to begin with so that he could ponder into it?

Comments by: Nargis On 30 September 2011Report Abuse
Where did the first rasul get the ALKITAB to begin with so that he could ponder into it?

He answered it , you don't understand it or you don't want to understand?  
 
got it HERE, in this world  
 
MOAZZAM:- TIME AND SPACE (ALL THE STORIES ARE GENERIC TEMPLATES) IT MIGHT COME INTO BEING IN “AALIM ALAMR”(WHEN ALL LAWS OF NATURE EXISTED INTO BEING)  
 
let me post it again  
 
TIME AND SPACE (ALL THE STORIES ARE GENERIC TEMPLATES) IT MIGHT COME INTO BEING IN “AALIM ALAMR”(WHEN ALL LAWS OF NATURE EXISTED INTO BEING)  
 
WHEN ALL LAWS CAME INTO BEING, the first one pondered on their method of working, how the resources was distributed and how their "consumption" lead to development and prosperity....  
 
NOW YOU GOT THE MESSAGE, ITS UP TO YOU TO ACCEPT OR REJECT IT, BUT ITS GIVEN TO YOU....


Comments by: Amirkhan On 01 October 2011Report Abuse
Madam Nargis you look like official spokes person for Mr. Moazzam because he dont reply but ask his assistant to reply and also to bully when someone ask hard question. The way you answer the questions show that you are annoyed with all other people and you always use these words:  
(you don't want to understand?)  
(you are mullah)  
(You are following some agenda)  
(you are following orthodox translations)  
(you are following preconceived ideas)  
 
I can see that this time you did not do your job properly because Mr. Moazzam said WE DONT KNOW but you are saying you know. OK now we know that you know everything and you are a PHD in all fields but without any certificate from university.  
Mr. Moazzam said this:  
HOW THIS ALKITAB/ALQURAN FIRST TIME BEEN GIVEN FROM ALLAH TO THE MANKIND (WHEN MANKIND DEVELOPED INTO CONSCIOUS BEING), WE DON’T KNOW SEE 17/85.  
 
I am very afraid now because if I quote this translation then you people will say I am following orthodox translations.  
(17/85) And they ask you about the soul. Say: The soul is one of the commands of my Lord, and you are not given aught of knowledge but a little.  
 
And you people will not agree with this translation too:  
(O Messenger) they ask you about Rooh (the ´Spirit´, Revelation, ´Soul´). Tell them, “The ´Spirit´ is Divine Energy from which free will has been given to humans. Revelation is from your Lord´s World of command, of which you have been given little knowledge.” The ´Soul´ is your own ´self´. [Rooh = ´Spirit´ = ´Soul´ = Revelation = Divine Energy = Angel of revelation. ´Spirit´ and ´Soul´ are non-Qur´anic terms. Only for their popular use, I have tried to describe them according to my best ability. Nafs (meaning Self) in the Qur´an comes closest to these two terms]  
 
And this mean that the question will remain a question without answer because you people always make things look complicated. This is just like a blind man holding a yellow card in his hand and asking me to tell what color is this and if I tell him it is yellow he will not agree and if I tell him it is green then also he will not agree but then he says that OK its YELLOW because Mr. XYZ said it to me so now I believe it is yellow but this does not mean that you are right because only I can be right and no other person can be right. You people make things look complicated like this.  
 
And what is this?  
You are saying that:  
(the first one pondered on their method of working, how the resources was distributed and how their "consumption" lead to development and prosperity....)  
What?? You mean that ALKITAB is telling people how to distribute and consume resources? and if someone pondered on resources then it means he is receiving ALKITAB?  
This look strange to me. But I dont want you to explain it because I dont want to hear the bad words and bla bla bla again.

Comments by: moazzam On 01 October 2011
Dear Amirkhan, Dawood! As per verse 17/85, sure, we don't know when/how/where ALKITAB/ALQURAN/ALROOH (ROH ALDUDUS) was given to first genius person (when man kind existed into full conscious being).  
Alrooh(rooh alkudus) = message written in ALKITAB see the verses 26/193,40/15,78/38,76/102,5/115,2/253, 2/87.  
 
RESPECTED BROTHER AMIR; your assertion for ROH, [.” The ´Soul´ is your own ´self´. [Rooh = ´Spirit´ = ´Soul´ = Revelation = Divine Energy = Angel of revelation. ´Spirit´ and ´Soul´ are non-Qur´anic terms. Only for their popular use, I have tried to describe them according to my best ability. Nafs (meaning Self) in the Qur´an comes closest to these two terms]  
Remember the Quranic term "ROH" which you are describing is not under discussion.  
It might come under the elaboration/discussion of verses 15/29,but, i am talking about ALROH mentioned in verse 17/85 not about ROH(you are describing).

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 01 October 2011Report Abuse
THANK YOU BROTHER MOAZZAM ! Its crystal clear now, ALROH (ROH ALDUDUS) = MESSAGE WRITTEN IN ALKITAB

Comments by: Nargis On 01 October 2011Report Abuse
Dear Amirkhan, Dawood! As per verse 17/85, sure, we don't know when/how/where ALKITAB/ALQURAN/ALROOH (ROH ALDUDUS) was given to first genius person (when man kind existed into full conscious being).

Dear brother Moazzam thank you for your reply, nice explanation.


Comments by: dawood On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
SA Br. Moazzam:  
“Moazzam: Dear Amirkhan, Dawood! As per verse 17/85, sure, we don't know when/how/where ALKITAB/ALQURAN/ALROOH (ROH ALDUDUS) was given to first genius person (when man kind existed into full conscious being). Alrooh(rooh alkudus) = message written in ALKITAB see the verses 26/193,40/15,78/38,76/102,5/115,2/253, 2/87.”  
 
Brother Moazzam, you do admit that there is something that you don’t know. It is a good answer, one should resort to if one does not know. I agree with it.  
 
Having said that, if you don’t know how the first Rasul/Prophet got the BOOK, you would not know either how the subsequent ones got the BOOK. How did you find out that 17:85 is only referring to the first one and not the last one?  
 
Can you elaborate a bit more what you understand by this “Alrooh(rooh alkudus) = message written in ALKITAB?” Thank you.  

Comments by: moazzam On 03 October 2011
Dear Dawood ! Salam.  
Remember Alkitab has an unique style of narration, to deliver its eternal message, for example there are many question/queries being asked with the same word “يَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ” and in forthcoming verse their answer has also been given by Allah Himself .But there are only two following cases where Allah not answered the query asked because of our (limitations) lacking to comprehend the sense of the relevant answer. I personally feel it is better to avoid pondering further into deep in such a matters; we may put our efforts/energies to understand the rest of the message of Alkitab ( we received though our ancestors and have in our hand) .We all recognize its message is from Allah, doubt free, possess eternal guidance, the most protected one, easy to understand by it self,  
 
1) About the Youm Assaa’ see the verses 7/147 ,79/42-44  
2) About the Alrooh(Roh alqudus) that is Alkitab/Alquran see the verse 17/85.  
 
 
يَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ السَّاعَةِ أَيَّانَ مُرْسَاهَا قُلْ إِنَّمَا عِلْمُهَا عِندَ رَبِّي لاَ يُجَلِّيهَا لِوَقْتِهَا إِلاَّ هُوَ ثَقُلَتْ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ لاَ تَأْتِيكُمْ إِلاَّ بَغْتَةً يَسْأَلُونَكَ كَأَنَّكَ حَفِيٌّ عَنْهَا قُلْ إِنَّمَا عِلْمُهَا عِندَ اللّهِ وَلَـكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لاَ يَعْلَمُونَ  
They ask thee about the (final) Hour - when will be its appointed time? Say: "The knowledge thereof is with my Lord (alone): None but He can reveal as to when it will occur. Heavy were its burden through the heavens and the earth. Only, all of a sudden will it come to you." They ask thee as if thou Wert eager in search thereof: Say: "The knowledge thereof is with Allah (alone), but most men know not."  
 
يَسْأَلُونَكَ عَنِ السَّاعَةِ أَيَّانَ مُرْسَاهَا  
79/42  
They ask thee about the Hour,-'When will be its appointed time?  
 
فِيمَ أَنتَ مِن ذِكْرَاهَا  
79/43 Wherein art thou (concerned) with the declaration thereof?  
79/44 إِنَّمَا أَنتَ مُنذِرُ مَن يَخْشَاهَا  
Thou art but a Warner for such as fear it  

»«
OTHER QUESTIONS ON
BELIEFS
Thank you very much for your hardworking on QURAN.... Sir kindly let me know about NAMAZ-E-JANAZA is this proved from Quran or not? if not so what should we do when we die.. plz tell me in detail. Question by: Adnan Khan On 16/01/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Zaman, Please explain the meaning of Islam, Muslim and Momin according to quran and your research. Thanks Question by: Naeem Subhani On 23/01/2010
 
how can we define that quran is the book of allah Question by: laiq ahmed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 01/03/2010
 
what is the meaning of Islam n Muslim? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 03/03/2010
 
Dear Mr. Aurangzaib Bhai: what is the concept of "PAAKI & NA-PAAKI" in our "DEEN" ? Kindly explain. and what is your SHORTEST/BRIEFED reply when someone taunts/asks you regarding performing NAMAZ, HAJ, keeping ROZA and giving ZAKAT? Question by: Adnan Khan On 15/03/2010
 
Dear Aurangzaib. Please explain about the 99 Names of Allah. What is the reality and what Quran says. furthermore pople also claim to prove Rasool S.A.W. names (quantity i don't exactly remember) from Quran. Question by: Adnan Yousuf Zai On 17/03/2010
 
Dear Mr. Aurangzaib: Please explain about the 99 Names of Allah, do such names exist in Quran? Question by: Adnan Khan On 17/03/2010
 
Asslam-o-Alikum.. Mujhe Pata hai mera sawal us level mien buhat chota hai jis level per app research kar rahe hain magar please 4 Cheezen in detail batain 1) Nazr-o-Niaz 2) Dargah 3) Huzoor (S.W.T.) Bashar Ya Noor 4) Huzoor (S.W.T.) ka Elm-e-Gaib Question by: Umair_Hamidani From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 26/03/2010
 
Respected dr. Qamar zaman kindly give a detailed concept about the life ,if any, after death with Quanic references especially, and had we spent a life before this present life. Question by: dr shahid From PAKISTAN On 26/03/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Zaman sb. please define the life after death from quran, regarding punishment, reward. Question by: Dr. Samreen Mohsin From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 27/03/2010
 
Question is open to the forum Does Islam shun or celebrate life?? Question by: MohYam On 31/03/2010
 
Dear aurangzaib sahib regards,the almost entire dean has been misinterprated and being followed by mass (so called muslims).In the light of Dr Qamars Quraanic research ,the most of europe seems nearly muslim states ware as muslims otherwise ,is it? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 09/04/2010
 
sir, According to Quran, i heard that God is beyond man's thinkings and could not be limitized or shaped and also not imaginated(equel to nothing).If someone accepts existance of God then he is wrong. Question by: mac.cruise On 17/04/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman,i want to ask you that at the time of imams how could such a large number of muslims be decived by tellin that the quranic word salat means the ritulistic namaz.sir i am so curious to know plz answer my question Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 30/04/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman i wolul like to ask you whether you have written other books besides the bokks given at your site.if yes plz tell me the names of a few more books.may God bless you.Ameen Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 03/05/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman my question is only for you i would like to ask you about GHUSAL after ejaculation in islam.is it necessary?what quran says about this? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 04/05/2010
 
dear mr qamar zaman or aurangzeb i have heard from mullahs that a non-muslim i.e a hindu or christian or any ,will never ever enter the jannah i.e the heaven no matter how much beneficial for humanityh he is.what quran says? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 10/05/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman or aurangzeb i have read in quran that muslims are not allowed to have a friendship with christian or jews i do not know the verse.plz elaborate can we have frienship with chritians or jews or non muslims? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 10/05/2010
 
my brother aurangzeb is eating parsad from hindus halal in islam. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 10/05/2010
 
dear aurangzeb you said parsad is not haram.but what about the verse of the quran where allah says that blood and pig and any thing upon which the nane of sth other than allah is taken is haram.so parsad should be haram.isn't it?plz elaborate Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 11/05/2010
 
brother auranzaib or qamar zaman is shaking hand with a non mahram halal Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 12/05/2010
 
a person told me that salat is the same ritual namaz and quoted versr from the quran which tell three times namaz i will give you reference only cause the lack of space (11:114) and(17:78).plz expalin it is very confusing brother aurangzaib. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 13/05/2010
 
dear dr qamar what is "TAWAAF".tell me about the hadiths which says:The "TAWAAF" will be continue untill the qayamat.is this a forged Hadith?plz elaborate Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 14/05/2010
 
dear aurangzaib, plz let me know about "ISTIKHARA".is it islamic?i have seen many people offering istikhara prayer Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 17/05/2010
 
dear aurangzaib i have heard that the "prophet Ibraham" was thrown into fire by "Namrood".and he was protected by Allah in the fire.is this mentioned in quran.isnt it a miracle and i think Allah does not do miracles.plz elaborat.thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/05/2010
 
My understanding so far that Quran is free from myth, miracles, fantasies, superstitions, dogmas.etc.. So what is the Concept of Jannat & Dozakh… Question by: Danish roomi On 18/05/2010
 
Salam.. mojuda QURAN kya wohi QURAN hai jo AP S.A.W.W ne murattab krwaya???agr han to phir wo asal quran dunya me kahin mojud hai.?? or agar nahin to phir hum is QURAN pr kese etbar kren jese ahadis sahih nahi to wese QURAN b SAHIH Nahi. Question by: UMAR HUSSAIN On 18/05/2010
 
dear aurangzaib a person argud with me that we should not use our mind in islam because we say that allah is merciful but look in the jungle one animal kills another ruthlessly leavind its offsprings alone.is it not cruelity.plz give me answer Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 20/05/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib, i acting for women in dramas and films or coming on televiion in news ,shows etc allowed in ilam.plz explain in the light of quran Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 20/05/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib, pal let me know whether asking the parents of bride for "Jahaz" i .e dowry allowed in islam.give a satisfying answer in the light of the glorious quran Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/05/2010
 
Jnab Aurangzaib sb / Dr.Qamar sb. Is it zina with wife to go to her for enjoyment and not for child. Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 27/05/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib i have heard from mullas that on the day of judgement the prophet wii do "SHAFA'At" for us.and qoute a verse from the ayatul kursi e.g "ila biznihi"is it right will prophet do SHAFA"AT For us.i think it is wrong plz explain Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 28/05/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib some people have misconception that God is not good becuse if he knew that a person was going to the hell then why he created him.plz give a satiusfactory answer from your islamic mind Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 29/05/2010
 
what Quran says about "DAJJAL"?... Question by: Dr. Samreen Mohsin From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 01/06/2010
 
dear aurangzaib or dr qamar tell me how to argue with a person who says that growing beard is a fundamental part of slam and your islam is incopmplete without it.plz give me some arguments sothat i can answer such blind people.God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 02/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib or qamar zaman the muslims preach there religion throughtout the world and so do the muskims of saudi arabia.but no non-muslim is allowed to preach his religion in saudi arabia.is it not unfair? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 03/06/2010
 
Dr Sahab when we are looking for everything in Quran than how can we say that CARNIVOROUS ANIMALS like cat,lion,dog and other animals like horse etc are Haram in Islam as we dont find any verse which says that these are haram? Question by: Nadeem_Akhtar From PAKISTAN On 03/06/2010
 
Dr sahab u say tht sex 4 enjoyment is permited whereas G.A Pervez says under 4:24(al.quran) while explaning words MOHSENEN AND GHAIR MUSAFEHEN that it is not permited and it can be done only when baby is needed.plzz explain Question by: Nadeem_Akhtar From PAKISTAN On 03/06/2010
 
sir plz tell me why islam allows a muslim man to marry a ehle kitab woman and does not permit a muslim woman to marry a ehle kitab. why there is such boundation over a muslim lady?thnx Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 04/06/2010
 
brother auragzaib is not the worship of idols shirk.when you argue with people that hindus too will enter the jannah they quote a verse from the quran that allah never forgives shirk as idol worship is a shirk so hindus can never enter the jannah Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 05/06/2010
 
dear mr aurangzaib is the profession of a lawyer permissible in islam.beacuse i have heard many people that it is haram and the income of a lawyer is haram.plz explain Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 08/06/2010
 
salaam Dr. sahib, Quran means reading/recitation, so the hadith followers argue that it is just for reading. how to give them a justified answer. and why is Quran translated as reading when it is for implementing? Question by: shireen On 09/06/2010
 
Salam Aurangzeb Bhai, would u please explain the mystery of kaba for me, why it is for us ect.......... Question by: Nadeem_Akhtar From PAKISTAN On 11/06/2010
 
dear brother auragzaib quran says pray for the MAGHFIRAT of your parents .what does it mean? if my parents have done something against quran how can allah forgive because of my pray.plz let me know about this Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 11/06/2010
 
dear aurangzaib is there any mention of shroud for the deceased in the quran?is it neccessary?plz explain.God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 13/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib plz tell me about some arabic lughats that are standard and suitable for me caz you know my level.and whats about al mawrid arabic-english dictionary?God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 14/06/2010
 
dear aurangzaib or qamar zaman if it was not the wife of the prophet zachariah that was barren but was his nation than whats your opinion about the verse(21-89-90) which says WA ISLAHAN LAKA ZAOJA and we cured his wife. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 16/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib is sayng "ALLAH O AKBAR" right according to quran? God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 17/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib some people dedicate goat to their dead parents.or when they are in some trouble or ill they decide to dedicate a goat etc to dedicate.i think it is not right but i am not that confident plz give this confidence.explain Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 20/06/2010
 
dear qamar zaman or aurangzaib a muslim is one that lives in peace.if someone abuses ones sister or moher or wife it is quite unbearable.what should a muslim do in this situation?should he fight with such a person?plz elaborate Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 22/06/2010
 
dr qamar zaman sahab regards in one of your answers in blog you have mentioned that if any none muslam is doing a good deed he will be rewared in life after death and you have quoted a verse of quran, but i want to ask about it. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 25/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib or qamar zaman i want to learn about the fact about karbala i know that it is a false story but i want the reality from you.thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/06/2010
 
dear aurangzaib or qamar zaman kindly let me know about "NAZR E BAD"?thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 27/06/2010
 
the quran has been devided into RAKOO'AT and PARAS.is this division right Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 03/07/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman is the hell eternal despite of the mercy of God Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 06/07/2010
 
Aslamoalikum Dr. Qamar I have to ask you a question about life after death Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 11/07/2010
 
Dr Qamar and Aurangzeb Bhai, there is a verse in Quran 8:63 and 49:10,3:102 my question is about these verses, let me explain my question. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 11/07/2010
 
is burying the dead in grave neccessary ?hindus burn their dead is it right? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 11/07/2010
 
Dear Docter Qamer-uz-Zaman, A.A 1. Please explain in what sence Quran is the word of GOD? Question by: pervez On 11/07/2010
 
Dear Docter Qamer, In your opinion how for Iqbal"s philosophy of Khoodi is in cnfirmity with quranic teachings. Question by: pervez On 11/07/2010
 
i have heard that the prophet uzair was given death for 100 year by allah and then he was arosen.is it not a miracle?is it real plz expalin Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 13/07/2010
 
salaam Dr. Sahib, plz explain 5:101 and 102. what kind of question would those be that would turn people into disbelievers? Question by: shireen On 16/07/2010
 
Aslamolalikum Dr Qamar: I want to ask a question about Economical System, I am explaing it below. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 16/07/2010
 
Dr. Qamar there are verses in Quran whose usual translation give the whole pictures of Human development but it is imposible to believe on these verses 1400 years ago,therefore plz give the exact translations of all those verses. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 16/07/2010
 
Assal O Allaikum Paidaish Masih main Aap Ne yahya Ka Zikar kia (Salasa Alleel) 3 Raat hey Aap Ne is ka mafhoom Kaha Se lia he Aur Dorr-e-Zulmat ye kaha se lia he.( Aamrati ) Jis se murad Aurat K hain Aap Ne is se Muraad Qaum kaha se lia? Question by: babarsharif34@yahoo.com On 17/07/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman i have seen mullah to quote (2:102) to prove black magic .i think this verse it too mistranslated.plz explian? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 19/07/2010
 
is masturbation haram according to the following verse (23:5-7).i have seen mullah quoting this verse to prove masturbation haram.is it true? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 24/07/2010
 
dr zakir naik interpretes the verse (21:30) as the prediction of BIG BANG THEORY.i ask dr qamar whether this interpretation is true?plz tell does the above verse really tells about the BIG BANG THEORY? thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/07/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman i argued with a person that quran is complete way of life(ZABITA E HAYAT).he told me if quran is complete than which sort of system it seems to establish.i will tell the rest part of question in comments becuse of the lak of sps Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 01/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaib or dr qamar is the clonning of human being allowed in islam? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 07/08/2010
 
Why God did not sent women as Prophet to guide humanity? Any one may like to answere. Question by: pervez On 07/08/2010
 
dea aurangzaib can we say merry christmas to a christian? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 08/08/2010
 
Dear Doctor Qamer sahib, A.A Allah is beyond human understanding but it is subject of Quran, why not life after death? Question by: pervez On 10/08/2010
 
IF QURAN IS BEYOND TIME AND SPACE WHY IT WAS REVEALED IN 23 YEARS? Question by: pervez On 10/08/2010
 
In accordance with QURANIC teachings is there any relationship of natural calamities like floods ,earthquakes etc with human deeds? Question by: pervez On 10/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaib does the Quran merely means RECITATION? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 12/08/2010
 
Please review" wahdatul waajood " in the light of Quran? Question by: pervez On 13/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaiib is the verse (2:222-223) about MENSTRUATION?i think it is about something else not menstruation.plz tell me what it means Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 15/08/2010
 
dear auragzaib Mullahs say how we will distribute The "WAR BOOTY" among the" MUJAHIDIN" if we do not believe in hadith books.how the prophet distributed the war booty, the quran does not tell.How should i answer such blind mullahs.Thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 17/08/2010
 
God has taken the responsibility of Quran for its protection, why not of other divine books if the message was the same and it was beyond time and space? Question by: pervez On 19/08/2010
 
dear auragzaib does ABUBAKAR mean the father of vigin(BAKIRA KA BAAP) or something else.plz tell me is calling him abubakar right.i think there is something wrong?Isn't it? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 19/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaib does the verse " And the Thunder and other Malaika strive to glorify Him by carrying out there duties in awe of him (13:13) show that Malaika are the forces of nature?or it is mistranslated.?this is the translation of allama pervez Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 19/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaib can you plz tell me about the history of Firqa ahl e hadith i mean its emergence ,history etc. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 21/08/2010
 
Dear aurangzaib Does islam allows to kill or punish people like Salman Rushdi?i think islam can not allow.am i right? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 22/08/2010
 
did moses really killed a man by hitting him according to surah qasas? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 23/08/2010
 
Dr Qamar sahib has reffered to a book Tafhim Ul Quran book 2 last line page 80 in the link below http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?SID=40&QID=453 I want to ask which book is it?who has writen this? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/08/2010
 
It is said that Abu Bakar launched Jihad against a group of people that refused to give ZAKAT.Is it right? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/08/2010
 
GOD IS ONE BUT WHY AT TIMES HE USES THE WORD WE, (NAHNO,PLURAL) INSTEAD OF I, (SINGULAR) WHEN HE ADDRESSES HUMAN-BEINGS IN HIS BOOK? Question by: pervez On 26/08/2010
 
WHAT IS THE CONCEPT OF INTEREST (SOOD) IN ACCORDANCE WITH QURAN? Question by: pervez On 26/08/2010
 
salaam Dr. Sahib, 1. what is the purpose of saying pbuh for prophets/messengers. does it give them peace after they are dead? 2. why especially for Muhammed and not for other prophets/messengers? Question by: shireen On 27/08/2010
 
Out of fourteen major religions of the world, is Islam the best religion to follow ? It can be noted that out of 6.5 billion world population only 1.4 billion are Muslims; among whom only about 24% are practicing Muslim. Question by: bqayyum From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 27/08/2010
 
Dear Docter Qamer, PLEASE THROUGH SOME LIGHT ON HUMAN NATURE, IN THE LIGHT OF QURAN ? Question by: pervez On 28/08/2010
 
In the quran Allah says that the body of Pharo will be preserved (10:92).Today it is said that Faroah's body was dscovered during excavations in 1898 .Is it the body of pharoa or this verse is mistranslated? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 28/08/2010
 
What is the significance of genotype and phenotype of a persons upbringing in the light of Quran? Question by: pervez On 02/09/2010
 
Dear aurangzaib the Lexicographer's of arabic were also IRANIS like Raghib,Ibne faris etc.And there is no lexicon writen in the age of prophet.is it possible that these IMAMS may also have done some corruption like the IMAMS of ahadith? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 05/09/2010
 
Dear Docter Qamer , Please give references of Quranic verses which guarantees individuals life after death? I request humbly for Docter Sahibs personal answer. Question by: pervez On 08/09/2010
 
Salam Qamar Sb, my question is that if we search gradually development of islam according to Muhammad's mind, then ultimately we concludes that Muhammad borrowed as Sikh pioneer Nanak did, is it true? please reply comprehensively? Question by: amnesty4all On 11/09/2010
 
Dear Docter Sahib , kindly explain verse no 81/19 sura taqweer ayat no 19. Question by: pervez On 12/09/2010
 
Dear aurangzaib or dr qamar can you plz prove KASHAF and ILHAM fake from Quran? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 13/09/2010
 
Dear Dr Sahib and brother aurangzaib can you plz tell me that what was the teaching method of prophet muhammad he was a mualim (teacher) so how he explained the KITAB and HIKMAH? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 14/09/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamar and aurangzaib i ave a question regarding the translation of verse(5:103).i will explain my question below in comments due to the lack of space. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 17/09/2010
 
KINDLY EXPLAIN IN DETAIL , AYAT NO 5-6 OF SURA AL-MOMINOON? Question by: pervez On 19/09/2010
 
Please explain verse 33 of sura noor? Question by: pervez On 19/09/2010
 
Please translate verse 223/2. traditional translation is, Question by: pervez On 21/09/2010
 
Dear brother aurangzaib i want to ask you was prophet muhammad given WAHI outside the quran?is there any verse in the quran which says that Prophet Muhammad was not given WAHI outside the quran?Thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 21/09/2010
 
Please explain Ayat no 34 of sura al-nisa. Question by: pervez On 22/09/2010
 
what the Quran says about the theory of evolution?Does the quran suport it? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 23/09/2010
 
Dear Dr Sahib and brother Aurangzaib kindly expalin what SUNNAT is according to the Quran? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 27/09/2010
 
Please explain concept of Praying in Islam? Please do not not mix it with Namaz. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 29/09/2010
 
Please briefly describe economic values Quran desires to be followed in a welfare state? Question by: pervez On 30/09/2010
 
Please briefly describe political values Quran desires to be followed in an Islamic state? Question by: pervez On 30/09/2010
 
What should be the salient features of the defense of an Islamic state in the present scenario in the light of Quranic values ? Mubashir Syed to please include your views on keeping weapons of mass destruction. Question by: pervez On 01/10/2010
 
Historically speaking, a Muslim soldier fights courageously, world knows that, question is why? Question by: pervez On 01/10/2010
 
Please explain origin and meaning of word Allah in Arabic language? Question by: pervez On 09/10/2010
 
Please discuss evolution in the light of" Kun fayakoon" Question by: pervez On 10/10/2010
 
What is God's interest in our well being when he is omnipotent. Please answer this stupid question? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 11/10/2010
 
Where is Muslim world found today in view of new definition of , Muslim, momin etc and does there exist Muslim Umma in these modern times? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 11/10/2010
 
salam dr shab janab sey arz hey k hum english nai jantey,hum kesey quran samaj saktey hain hamarey jeasey kafi loog hain jo ser urdo jantey hain hamara bhe huk hey k deen sumjhain. aghar deen main ibadat nai hey to (maksad e hayyat)kiya hey Question by: iqbalasghar From PAKISTAN (SARA E ALAMGIR) On 14/10/2010
 
salam, janab dr sahab jawab aap sey manga thaa jawab koi or deeta hey kiya ye theek hey ye bhi ho sakta hey k jawab deney walla meri tara k student ho brae mehbani khood jawab dain shukria Question by: iqbalasghar From PAKISTAN (SARA E ALAMGIR) On 18/10/2010
 
PLEASE REVIEW SIGNIFICANCE OF" MAIHER" IN MUSLIM MARRIAGE LAW IN THE LIGHT OF QURAN? Question by: pervez On 21/10/2010
 
sr. mere sawal kajawab nahi mila jin aurat ka shohar marr jae woh 4 mahina 10 din ki eddat kion karti he? haqqoqunnissa parh leney k bad phi sawal mera yahi he ? Question by: babarsharif34@yahoo.com On 21/10/2010
 
Please explain "QAYAMAT" in detail? Will it come when the whole universe will be destroyed and ALLAH will disclose NAMA-I-AIMAL of every individual and his fate for paradise or hell will be decided? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 22/10/2010
 
Gay's, homosexuals claim they are born like that....What do our Astanamembers have to say about it ? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 22/10/2010
 
Salaamun 'Alaikum, After careful research and study on some 'key' Quranic concepts, I realize that we are to ESTABLISH DEEN in our lives REGARDLESS of the Secularists and their man-made laws. What are your thoughts on this viewpoint? Question by: Damon From UNITED STATES (PITTSBURGH) On 23/10/2010
 
does the concept of hoor exist in christianity?plz help me know it.i need it very much Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 26/10/2010
 
Sir, AAP KI KITAB HAQIQAT MALAIKA PARHHI AIK SAWAL THA. ALLAH NE HAMAIN MALAIKA PAR IMAN LANE KO KAHA HE. AGAR AAP NE JO TAREEF KI MALIKA KI TO US PAR IMAN KA KIA TALOQ BANTA HE. Question by: babarsharif34@yahoo.com On 05/11/2010
 
Some Aastana peer watch the Video on the link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaCWVXNByTc) and comment on its religious aspect Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 05/11/2010
 
Have you read Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 07/11/2010
 
We have discussions about life after death and how disruptive it was to imagine that there is no life after death. Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 08/11/2010
 
Is "wahy" part of "sunnat Allah"? If so, how does it works in relation to the laws of nature? Can it be proven? I have another question too (answer one,get one free)please explain 2:78, what it means& whts with the slaves, free, women, etc? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 10/11/2010
 
MERRY EIDMAS AND HAPPY OLD YEARS,SORRY I MEAN CHRISTMAS MUBARIK . Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 16/11/2010
 
Dear Doctor Qamer ,Muslims believe Prophet Muhammad is "Khatim-un-nabeen" Kindly support this faith with reason? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 19/11/2010
 
Have a look at this : http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/origin.html Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 21/11/2010
 
IS QURAN A SIMPLE BOOK TO UNDERSTSND? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 23/11/2010
 
Someone please explain the "dream" concept of Prophet Yusuf? What do the Quran say about dreams,are they true or just thoughts? Im waiting,help:- O Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 24/11/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman Please translate verse 2:219 correctly. "And they ask what they should give.Say what is surplus".Does the arabic word "AFU" means surplus? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 27/11/2010
 
Salaam. Is the Quran saying anything about Aliens ,monsters from other planets etc :P?? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 30/11/2010
 
There is an ongoing discussion on “Ourbeacon” regarding the phrase “Allah-hu-Akbar”. I believe the subject matter to be extremely profound, something which members of Aastana would appreciate reading. Question by: William From UNITED KINGDOM On 30/11/2010
 
Is there any word in the Quraan for BELIEFor BELIEVE? Is Islam an ideology(A comprehensive and coherent set of basic beliefs about political, economic, social and cultural affairs that is held in common by a sizable group of people within a society)? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 01/12/2010
 
What are the meanings of EIMAN n MOMIN in 49: 14-15? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 01/12/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman do you believe that people can still get WAHI from Allah,and become Nabi?Do you not believe that Muhammad was the last who received direct knowledge from God?Why do you say Muhammad is appointing authority of other prophets? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 02/12/2010
 
I have created a branch of the Aastana blog called "Linguistic & grammatical Exposition of the Quran" on Facebook and hope all of you join. nahi to..argg Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 04/12/2010
 
Dear All: Please go through my comments. Question by: Adnan Muhammad Khan From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 04/12/2010
 
PLEASE EXPLAIN AYAT NO 7 OF SURA 33 ( AL AHZAB) Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 06/12/2010
 
Does Quran gives the concept of Nationhood or Countries as they exist today. If yes then what should be the mode and form of Government. Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 07/12/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamarzaman: Plz enlighten us about the verse14/48 keeping in view the context of the subject from 42-52.Also the verses 11/107-108,with respect to the context 11/103-108.Thanks Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 15/12/2010
 
How many men and women claimed Prophet hood after Muhammad and did anyone of them made any significant achievement or influenced humanity positively? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 18/12/2010
 
Dear All, what is Ahmed Huluci's Ellah ( idoelogy ) of Islam ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 20/12/2010
 
Plz explain 38:27, how can one become kafir if he think differently about the universe. Also explain 29:44,"signs in the heaven and earth for those who BELIEVE"? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 24/12/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman or brother Aurangzaib a person told me if God can communicate with Moses,Jesus and Muhammad.So why can he not communicate with anybody else today?Please answer my question.Thank you very much Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/12/2010
 
Why do people try to prove the Qur'an through science? We find science in other books than the Quran, why are not they labeled as "divine"? Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 26/12/2010
 
I wonder how and why the Human Beings have assumed the status of the best life spices on Earth (or Universe). The term "ASHRAF-UL-MAKHLUQAT" was also coined unilaterally without considering the significance of Mankind in the Universe. Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 27/12/2010
 
Please watch , a good video on zakat http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vtmZNziH6U&feature=player_embedded#! Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 29/12/2010
 
PLEASE DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN SCIENCE AND DIVINITY ? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 30/12/2010
 
AL-KITAB + LAWS OF NATURE, is divine guidance as Moazzem says, Why humanity was plunged in to religious wars??? SCIENTISTS NEVER FIGHT IF THEY ARE PROVED WRONG. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 31/12/2010
 
Muslims invented 5 pillows of Islam. Why learning Arabic is not mandatory in Islam?? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 31/12/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Zaman: can you explain: [6/105] وَكَذَلِكَ نُصَرِّفُ الْآيَاتِ وَلِيَقُولُواْ دَرَسْتَ وَلِنُبَيِّنَهُ لِقَوْمٍ يَعْلَمُونَ Question by: M.N.Khalid From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 01/01/2011
 
Sura Baqra Ayah 223 "Your Women are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth as ye will ......". If Allah had to restrict husbands to wifes only then why was "AZWAJ" not used instead of "NISA". Here NISA means any woman (not necessarily wife). Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 01/01/2011
 
Aap ke nazar me Tauheen e Risalat koi jurm hai ya nahi? 2- Tauheen e Risalat ke mujrim ko kia saza milni chahye? 3- kia ghair muslimo ko is baat ki ijazat honee chahyee ke wo Rasool e Akram PBUH ki shan me gustakhi kar saken? Question by: UMAR HUSSAIN On 04/01/2011
 
dear dr qamar sahib please translate the verse 4:34.thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 06/01/2011
 
Has Human's beautiful (Animal) instincts and natural desires been checked by Divinity ? Question by: M.N.Khalid From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 08/01/2011
 
Is Sex allowed with Slave Women in Islam? Dr Zakir Naik http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UVmSQHquJc&feature=player_embedded#! Question by: mohd.areeb On 08/01/2011
 
Dear Dr Qamar sahib i am not noticing your presence on the blog.You know that without you this blog is nothing.I know you are very busy.But i request you to please give some time to the blog.Thank you very much Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 09/01/2011
 
http://www.jang.com.pk/jang/jan2011-daily/10-01-2011/col8.htm Every one is invited to comment on above cited column written by Ansar Abasi, especially. Dr. Sb., Aurangzaib sb., Moazzam Sb., Dr. Shahid and Sister Nargis. Question by: Adnan Muhammad Khan From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 10/01/2011
 
A tribe in Africa who exercise "incest", and believe it to be a divine law. A consequences of such action are injurious to following generations, What are those consequences ? Question by: M.N.Khalid From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 10/01/2011
 
What is good about the "Little Mosque on the Prairie"? Question by: Zubair From UNITED STATES (WASHINGTON) On 11/01/2011
 
Surah Al-Ahzab Ayat No.57 and 61.. for Mr.Adnan and others. Question by: UMAR HUSSAIN On 11/01/2011
 
-Is the Quran changed?If yes,what is changed, how do we know it is changed, and what does it mean when it says no1 can change it?(i have a clue about the last one, but want to share it when i read your answers :-D) Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 25/01/2011
 
How to increase your knowledge? Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 25/01/2011
 
Brother Aurangzaib, I read Q&A of the your blog and found this ref of "Tabqaat-e-Ibn-e-Saad" to Dr. Samreen On23 Sept2010, http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?MID=4&SID=21. If the author of this book is `Abdullah ibn Sa`d Ibn Abi Sarh' Question by: Syeda On 29/01/2011
 
What is free will? What is basic instinct? How does free will separate man from animals? Question by: Junaid From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 31/01/2011
 
QURAN GIVES US PERMANENT VALUES BEYOND TIME AND SPACE, WHAT ARE THOSE? LET US ENUMERATE AND DISCUSS THEM ONE BY ONE? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 02/02/2011
 
Salaam Shalom shabba dabba do ,what is the "driving force" in Human beings, and what is the "nafs" thing? Are human beings superior to other creatures ? If yes, why?hhhhmmmm Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 17/02/2011
 
PERSONALITY IS CHANGELESSNESS IN CHANGE. WHAT IS THAT? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 25/02/2011
 
CAN PROPHETS MAKE MISTAKES? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 10/03/2011
 
Salaam to all (and me) ,What giant "fish" (whale/shark-zilla?) ate Prophet Yunus (37:142) Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 12/03/2011
 
Dear Aurangzaib and dr qamar sahib IS ALLAH THE ACTIVE FA'IL (DOER) IN THE UNIVERSE,OR HE HAS SET LAWS WHICH MANTAIN THE ORDER OF THE UNIVERSE?if allah is not the active fa'il will it not make him a far unapproachable God? n is allah a personal God? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 15/03/2011
 
Please review law of DEET. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 16/03/2011
 
Dear brother aurangzaib plz let me know about the actual story of TOOFAN E NOH (noah flood).i think the so called n2I interpretation is fake.am i right? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/03/2011
 
dear brother auragzaib plz let me know about the actual story of toofan e nooh.i think there is sth wrong with the so called n2i interpretation.am i right Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/03/2011
 
salaam Dr. Sahib, Does curse effect any one at all according to Quran? Question by: shireen On 22/03/2011
 
What's the point of mental development & how is it beneficial 4 the humanity? Does the Quran explain why we have to expand our capabilities when we are all goin to die anyway? how will Youm qayama have any meaning to me, when I'm not here? Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 22/03/2011
 
Good News As convener of Janat e Pakistan, Dr. AsarulIslam has nominated Mr. Aurangzaib Yousafzai as the adhoc President and “Party Leader” in Rawalpindi/Islamabad What are the Quranic injunctions for a political party ? Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 23/03/2011
 
Congratulations to brother AURANGZAIB!!! Dear Brother Aurangzaib i have come to know that you have been choosen as the president of JANAT E PAKISTAN party.I am very happy and want to congratulate you from the core of my hear!!! Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 24/03/2011
 
Brother Moazzam! Should we join/launch any political party to establish the true Islamic state?? As there are already so many parties working under the same manifesto. Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 24/03/2011
 
Can anyone announce manifesto of Jannet-i-Pakistan political party to see how it is different from manifesto of other political parties in Pakistan? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 24/03/2011
 
Will AI surpass Human Intelligence? Question by: Zubair From UNITED STATES (WASHINGTON) On 27/03/2011
 
Brother Aurangzaib ! With out you this blog seems like a picture with out color. eagerly waiting for your comments at mine 29th,march. HOWALLAZEE URSILA RASOOLAHO BIL HUDAA WA DEEN ALHAQQ LIYUZHIRAHO ALLADDIN-E-KULLIH, 6:33, 48:28, , 61:9 . Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 30/03/2011
 
Could woman be an IMAM/NABI/RASOOL in a man dominating societies.While keeping in view her physical system, structure, and her psychology,also MALKA SABA.If not then what about in the societies where she has equal rights? Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 30/03/2011
 
Moazzam saheb and Aastana Members! Your teachings reflects that there is no any predestined event being played at earth. What about the historical steps been described in Quran about prophet Musa and Yousaf see verses 12/4-5, 28/5-7?? Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 06/04/2011
 
The world has succeeded in creating global village by study of "lohimahfooz" and "Alkitab". Is it wise to struggle for a state having label of "Islamic state" which will create a sect in humanity and will not be acceptable even by Muslim Ummah? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 13/04/2011
 
1- Agr KHATIM ka matlab validater hae to MUHAMMAD se pehle kaun ye fareeza sr anjam deta tha? (haln keh Quran doosre nabbiun ka to zikr hae validater ka nahen) 2- Aur MUHAMMAD k bad ab kaun validater hae? Question by: Dr. Iqbal On 18/04/2011
 
In 3/81 " aur jb ham ne nabbiun se MISAAQ lya , jinhen ham ne KITAB aur HIKMAT de k jb tumhare pas koi RASOOL ae , us ki jo tumhare pas hae to tum us pe IMAAN le ana aur us ki NUSRAT krna....." wo kaunse NABI the aur RASOOL hen aur IMAN ka matlab? Question by: Dr. Iqbal On 18/04/2011
 
My dearest brother bob,please throw light on following ayats, sura haj ayat 47, almaaruj ayat 4, ayat 17 : 52 , ayat 10 : 45 , ayat 23 : 113. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 22/04/2011
 
In the present scenario of changing human civilization, Does the institution of family holds permanent value beyond time and space? What guidance we get from Quran. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 27/04/2011
 
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman, I wondered if the Quran are making any statements which are not certifiable, or describes mechanisms that our mind cannot understand? If yes, then how are such claims and depictions advantageous? Question by: bob From UNITED KINGDOM On 30/04/2011
 
Dear Members, I want to know about the true story of Toofan e Nooh. Is it different from orthodox story? Wassalam Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 01/05/2011
 
Dear members, please share your valuable thoughts about these questions Question by: bob From UNITED KINGDOM On 03/05/2011
 
IF AASTANA MEMBERS ARE NOT CLEAR AT THE VERY BASIC (IMPORTANT) ISSUE OF HAYAT ADDUNYA and AKHIRAH, HOW WOULD THEY GUIDE THE PEOPLE LIKE ME? PEOPLE LIKE MR MOAZZAM COULD ONLY MISGUIDE,AS I POINTED OUT IN THE BEGINNING.BE AWARE Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 03/05/2011
 
Dear All, does Quran try to convince people about existence of GOD which cant be proved??? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 04/05/2011
 
HAZRAT ALLAMA MOAZZAM SAHAB ! Enlighten us about the ALLAH O AKBAR. Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 05/05/2011
 
DearAurangzaib and Aastana members! Could atheist be included in the glad tiding offered to mankind in verse 2/62 . Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 06/05/2011
 
Can the Existence of God, as the Creator, be scientifically proved, irrespective of Quran's verdict that the nature of His existence can't be comprehended? Question by: aurangzaib From PAKISTAN On 12/05/2011
 
Allama moazzam Sahab ! IS POLYGAMY HARAM IN ISLAM AS A SPECIAL CASE ? For more detail read my comments Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 13/05/2011
 
What is alam-i-amer and alam-i-khalq, Question by: pervez On 16/05/2011
 
Dear brother Aurangzaib hope you are doing well.Plz let me now what the word RIBA means.Does it mean the interest of bank.Thank you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/05/2011
 
How can an individual act and help in creating an Islamic society because all efforts for this objective ends up in the demand for a theocratic state. What course of action has been laid down in the Quran Bakhtiar Qayyum Question by: bqayyum From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 21/05/2011
 
Dear Members I wnat to know the divine laws which Quran wants to implement on society. Thanks Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 23/05/2011
 
Dr. Zaman and Aastana Team, While your interpretation of the Quran in "Human Rights" terms is quite refreshing what does the Quran say of one who engages majority of his life in vain deeds(movies, games, relaxing ect) while being peaceful(Muslim)? Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 23/05/2011
 
Dear brother Moazzam plz elaborate what is meant by AL YAHOOD and ALNASARA (as character).I request my respected brother Aurangzaib to take part in the discussion also.Jazakallah. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 23/05/2011
 
Salam Not all Muslims or believers get a Jenna in this life as one could b peaceful all their life n develop cancer, bad kids, divorce, car accident injury, ect.. How do u explain when bad things happen to good peaceful people? Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 24/05/2011
 
51:56 وَمَا خَلَقْتُ ٱلْجِنَّ وَٱلْإِنسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ Pls explain the above ayat. wassalam Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 24/05/2011
 
Salam, Dr. Zaman and Students of Quran, what is the point in praying for the sick or praying for anything for that matter if God wills not to intervene in our lives? Yes we must do our part but where's the hope if God will not intervene? Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 25/05/2011
 
If all aspects of life are controlled by the divine laws and Alkitab is also preserved in "Loh-e-Mehfooz", then everything has to pass the test of logic. What then is the logic with Haraam and Halaal according to Quran. Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 25/05/2011
 
Dear Dear ones, is there anything called "soul" in the Quran? Explain like im two years old, here i need spoon feeding or feedingbottle. Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 26/05/2011
 
Dear Dr. Qamar, With all the information on this site and similarly others, how is one to digest it all? There has been a battle to rewire your system to think more rationally and when you think you are, you get another wake up call. Years, maybe? Question by: Shirley C From UNITED STATES (PITTSBURGH) On 26/05/2011
 
Dear brother Mubashir regards,i remember once some Mullah raised objection against the interpretation of MARYAM by Dr QZ that Name can not be translated.Then Dr QZ gave the answer.I request you to send me the link plz.God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 26/05/2011
 
Aslamoalikum Mozam bhai would you please elaborate the terminology Al-Kitab?? Thanks Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 29/05/2011
 
Please Members What is the true story behind Ashaab e Kahaf, mentioned in soora e Kahaf. In orthodox interpretition these people sleeped in a cave for thousand of years, or something like this. Thanks Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 30/05/2011
 
Salam Dear Brothers Where may I find "Adam o Iblees" English translation of Dr. Zamans book? Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 31/05/2011
 
Salam Dear Brothers (Sisters included) and Aastana Administrators, Does the Quran give us a clear reason of WHY we are on planet Earth in human body and what we are here for? Please see comment below. Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 01/06/2011
 
Dear Brothers and Dr. Zaman, I've been beating myself up over this understanding of shirk or believing in a wrong concept of God. Yes I've read your understanding on this issue but there is a verse in Quran which warns those that say God is trinity Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 02/06/2011
 
Kia app log Hadeeth ko nahi manty? kia app koi hawala hadeeth sy nahi detay. Mojzat ka to Hadeeth main bhi Ziker hay kia app mojzat ko nahi manty? Question by: guest From PAKISTAN On 05/06/2011
 
Dear Moazzam. I want to salute you for your hard work. I started learning Quran only 6 months back and I only started looking at AASTANA couple of weeks back. Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 05/06/2011
 
Dhulqarnain, Can we follow the injeel and Torah of today? Question by: Nargis-Badshah-Salamat From FIJI (FAUJI) On 06/06/2011
 
Tahir Ul Qadri Ne Murday Ko Kalima Padaya (urdu video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Mfb6QriVh8 Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 14/06/2011
 
Dear Moazzam i have seen your recent post about Allah.I want to know Is Allah God or it means ISLAMIC STATE.Do you believe in a God who is FA'ALON LIMA YUREED.And what makes you not believe in a God who is an active fa'il? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 14/06/2011
 
dear moazzam DOES GOD EXISTS?And if he is not involved in the universe and i say HE IS DEAD.Will it be okay with you. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 15/06/2011
 
Is the Sunnat of Allah Unchangeable? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 15/06/2011
 
Dear brother Moazzam who authored the Quran according to you?Allah or Muhammad himself?Please do not go in details.Just tell me Allah or Muhammad that who is the author of the Quran.Best wishes!!! Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/06/2011
 
Dear Moazzam What is the meaning of " INNAHOO LAQUALOO RASOOLIN KAREEM " if the text of quran is from almighty Allah Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 19/06/2011
 
Dear Members,One group waiting for youm ul aakhira as life after death, other group said that youm ul aakhira will be happend in this world. Many people died waiting for this in this world. Are these two groups not in the same condition of waiting Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 20/06/2011
 
Dear All, Recently my uncle have a stoke and his right side is completely paralysed. He cant speak nor can comprehend.He is facing very hard days. What do you think, is he facing makafat e amal. Please comment Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 02/07/2011
 
HAS ALLAH, IN HIS QURAN, RULED ON THE EXPRESSION OF HUMAN SEXUAL BEHAVIOR OR IS MAN FREE TO DECIDE ON HIS OWN HOW TO EXPRESS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 08/07/2011
 
IS INCEST, AS A PARTICULAR SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ALLAOWABLE OR NOT ALLOWABLE IN DEEN AL-ISLAM? IF ALLOWABLE, WHY? IF NOT ALLOWABLE, WHY NOT? PLEASE GIVE AYATS. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 09/07/2011
 
DR. QAMAR ZAMAN WROTE: "SO ACTUALLY THERE IS NOTHING TO BE CALLED PREMARITAL SEX". IS THIS ASSERTION, ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, TRUE?!? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 16/07/2011
 
NARGIS WROTE: THE ZANI IS SOMEONE WHO DISTORTS THE QURANIQ WORD. IS THIS ASSERTION, ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, TRUE? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 18/07/2011
 
who is allah Question by: hm.zeeshan On 19/07/2011
 
Does aya 57/3 justify/give meaning that Allah is beyond time and space? Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 20/07/2011
 
Is it true that Moses prayed for Aaron and Aaron became prophet. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 21/07/2011
 
ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, IS THE UTTERING OF ALLAHU AKBAR, ACCEPTABLE IN THE DEEN OF ALLAH? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 21/07/2011
 
Mummy of Pharon in Egypt is the same pharon who clashes with Moses. ? Is it conforms from Quran? Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 23/07/2011
 
CAN ANYONE ANSWER THIS SIMPLE QUESTION---ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF--AKBAR? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 23/07/2011
 
Dear brother Moazzam if someone wants to understand the Quran and he is studying it for the first time.How should he study it?How he should attempt to understand a particular episode of the Quran.Thank you very much... Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 29/07/2011
 
Sahibaan, Lanati ka salaam Kia Quran paak main Roh amr Rabbi ke ilawa Rooh amr Allah bhi likha hai? In dono main kia farq hai? Question by: Universal-Lanati From ARMENIA On 30/07/2011
 
Dear Dr.Qamar and members. Please explain 21/53-60. and also 6/76-80 Were those idols made of stones? Didn't they used to worship كَوْكَبًا,الْقَمَرَ,الشَّمْسَ Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 01/08/2011
 
Dear Sir, It is being preached and commonly understood that Quranic guidance is eternal and everlasting for mankind during all eras. Whether any verse of Quran support this version ? if so , please quote reference of said verse . Thanks. Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 02/08/2011
 
Dear Sir, As per verse No.20 of Sura Al-Furqan(25) All , " Mursaleen;s" ate food and walk about in streets........... Why "Mursaleens;s" came to Seyedina Ibrahim ( who had to go towards "Qoum-e-Loot" , 51/32) denied to eat food from Ibrahim ? Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 02/08/2011
 
Dear Member, According to my new understanding I have left namaz,roza,Hajj. etc.Now what should I do according to Quran. How can I become a good Momin wothout these rituals. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 02/08/2011
 
WAS THE PROPHET WHO WAS GIVEN THE QURAN...THE LAST PROPHET? YES OR NO AND PROVE EITHER POSITION. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 05/08/2011
 
IS AL-QURAN THE LAST/FINAL REVELATION FROM ALLAH? YES OR NO AND PROVE EITHER POSITION. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 05/08/2011
 
Salaamun Alikum Dear Aastana Members Please forgive me if I offends the spirit of aastana as I am going to ask few question which seems critical to me. Question by: mmkhan20 From SAUDI ARABIA (JEDDAH) On 08/08/2011
 
Dear Aurangzaib sb, Please explain the meanings of verse 37 of sura 41 Thanks Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 19/08/2011
 
IS AASTANA BLOG DEVOTED TO PHILOSOPHICAL MATERIALISM AND RELIGIOUS HUMANISM AND NOT AL-ISLAM? I'M BEGINNING TO BELIEVE SO. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 19/08/2011
 
Dear Sir, Please explain the meanings of verse 37 of sura 41 Thanks Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 20/08/2011
 
TRUE OR FALSE? 4:82 Will they not then meditate on the Quran? And if it were from any other than Allah, they would have FOUND IN IT MANY A DISCREPANCY. 10:37 And this the Quran...THERE IS NO DOUBT IN IT, from the Lord of the worlds. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 20/08/2011
 
Dear Moazzam,Dr QZ as you say Quran should be understood according to grammar.I have a question:All the Arabic grammars were written by IRANIS.Is there no possibility they have corrupted it like Ahadith?Thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 22/08/2011
 
43:45 And ask those of Our messengers whom We sent before thee: Did We ever appoint gods to be worshipped besides the Beneficent? HOW COULD MUHAMMAD HAVE ASKED THE PRIOR MESSENGERS...ANYTHING? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 23/08/2011
 
Dear Zul-Qarnain. (with Two noons). You have repeatedly asserted on this blog that Surah Al-fatehaa is not part of the Al-Kitaab (Al-Quraan). Hereby I am humbly requesting you to produce your proof. (Read more in comments) Question by: Iqbal kay shaheen From NAMIBIA (WALVIS BAY) On 23/08/2011
 
TO ALL WHO IS THE "YOU" MENTIONED IN THE FOLLOWING AYAT? 2:4 And who believe in that which has been revealed to YOU and that which was revealed before YOU and they are sure of the hereafter. Question by: PRIEST BOKMEI From UNITED STATES On 24/08/2011
 
Dear Moazzam and Dr Qamar sahib Is the Phrase ALFE SHAHR MURAKAB E TOUSIFI or MURAKKABE ADADI?And what does it mean?Thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 28/08/2011
 
Dear Dhulqurnain,Why Allah called Himself Al-Momin and Al-salaam in 59/23 Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 30/08/2011
 
Dear Dr. Q.Z sb. A questio as comments below. Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 30/08/2011
 
WHY ARE RACIAL SLURS TOWARD AFRICAN AMERICANS ACCEPTABLE AT AASTANA BLOG? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 31/08/2011
 
CHALLENGE! CHALLENGE! CHALENGE! CAN ANYONE NAME ONE PROPHET, ALONG WITH, AND SINCE THE DEATH OF THE PROPHET REFERRED TO AS MUHAMMAD? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 06/09/2011
 
NARGIS/AASTANA BLOG, PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS CONCERNING AYATS 3:21 AND 33:40 Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 08/09/2011
 
NARGIS, MOAZZAM, WASEEMAMEER, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. GIVE US YOUR EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE. NO MORE CONVOLUTED DISCOURSES. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 13/09/2011
 
WASEEMAMEER, WHAT IS THE TRUE MEANING OF 51:56? WHAT IS THE HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DHULQARNAIN AND AASTANA THAT NO WAY CAN THEY GATHER ON ONE PLATFORM? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 15/09/2011
 
Dear Dr.Qamar and members. Please explain the meaning of Moosa and Esa. At what paradigms ابواب they are at, and what meanings they give on those ابواب? Dear Dr.Sahab, your input will be highly appreciated. Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 16/09/2011
 
Is the Quran preaching BELIEVES ? I.E does it state anything in order to achieve unconfirmed belief in its students? 2) does it back up its claims with proofs, 3) HOW? Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 16/09/2011
 
NARGIS and MOAZZAM THERE HAS BEEN ALOT OF TALK ABOUT THE "GRAMMAR" RELATIVE TO AL-QURAN. MY QUESTION IS THIS, ISTHE GRAMMAR 100% ACCURATE? YES: EXPLAIN NO: EXPLAIN Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 17/09/2011
 
Mr. Aurangzaib: Who is responsible for detracking me and many others who left Ramazan Fasting, Namaz especially after reading your booklet"tahqeeq namaz o salat"at Aastana? are you not an instable personality as per your shufling record?? Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 27/09/2011
 
NARGIS, MOAZZAM, WAQAR, NAEEM, ET ALL IS WAHY OR EXTRINSIC OR INTRINSIC? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 29/09/2011
 
MOAZZAM, NARGIS, NAEEM, MUBASHIR, WAQAR, YOU PEOPLE CANNOT POSSIBLY BE SERIOUS ABOUT THIS....OR ARE YOU? PLEASE EXPLAIN! Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 30/09/2011
 
PEACE TO ALL, ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF...A GOD" (I'M NOT REFERRING TO ALLAH, BUT THE TERM GOD IN GENERAL )? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 02/10/2011
 
WHICH TAKES PRIORITY--TASREEF OVER GRAMMAR OR GRAMMAR OVER TASREEF? PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 03/10/2011
 
What is the position of Athiest in Quran? Will Athiesm be practiced/ let exist in the Quranic Society? What difference it will make if oneself is Athiest? Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 05/10/2011
 
PEACE TO ALL, MOAZZAM ASKS: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROPHET AND MESSENGER PROPHET, NABI AND NABI RASOOL? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 07/10/2011
 
what the harm if someone perform rituals. Will Allah ask him why you did rituals. If one perform rituals and other dont then whats the difference they make on society. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 09/10/2011
 
PEACE TO ALL, DOES AASTANA BLOG REPRESENT: DEEN AL-ISLAM OR... DEISM. DHULQARNAIN- Question by: ARCHILOCUS From UNITED STATES On 15/10/2011
 
Dear Sir, Please explain meanings of 27/42 to 44 Thanx Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 30/11/2011
 
Dear sir, Please put some light on the death of Hazrat Hussain according to the history. and Dr sahib, we all are waiting for complete quranic translation Question by: matifsaeed From PAKISTAN (LAHORE) On 30/11/2011
 
PEACE NARGIS AND MOAZZAM. WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO ADDRESS THIS MAJOR CONTRADICTION: TELL US CLEARLY, IS YOUR POSITION STATEMENT "A" OR STATEMENT "B"? DHULQARNAIN- Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 01/12/2011
 
PEACE TO ALL, TO MY QUESTION: DO THE MALAIKA DO WRONG/EVIL? NAEEM SHEIKH ANSWERED: YES, SEE 2:34 IS HE CORRECT? DHULQARNAIN: Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 15/12/2011
 
WHY QURANISTS ARE DIVIDED LIKE RELIGIOUS MULLAHS IF THEY CLAIM THE RIGHTEOUS ONES ??? Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 01/02/2012
 
What do you guys think - Why some children around the world are born with defects like, blindness, handicapped, infected with acute diseases (HIV) etc., Why do they suffer their life for no fault of their own? Why does God do this them? Question by: sameermoopa From INDIA On 05/04/2012
 
Dear Members: Pls share ur thought on:'What is the 'purpose' of our existence?' Quran says 'And I didn't create the jinn and mankind except to do my IBADATH'(51:56). If this is the purpose, what does IBADATH mean here? Why God wants our Ibadath? Question by: sameermoopa From INDIA On 09/04/2012
 
can some one enlighten us about the real concept of SALAWATULLAH ALA NABI.Thanks. Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 20/04/2012
 
Assaam,iam Nasir(India)iam understanding salah by your explanation tell me about vazu in surah maaida Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 26/04/2012
 
thank you a better answer that Salath is not namaz so what is reality of namaz how this exist Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 28/04/2012
 
assalam,was Allah speak with insan directly ? Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 04/05/2012
 
agar zina najayij talluq nahi tho najayij talluq ke baare me quran me kya hai? Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 15/05/2012
 
dea members. If someone do misdeeds(do wrong things) than he repent and ask toba, will he still have to suffer his misdeeds in this life. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 10/06/2012
 
respected qamar sir, what about here after life(Akhirath) in sight of quran? Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 17/06/2012
 
Respected Dr Zaman. I am reading your translation of the Quran with great interest and I thank you for your efforts. I would like to understand the concept of Akhirat in light of the Quran. Salaam. Question by: Riaz From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 11/08/2012
 
If soam is not traditional "Roza" then why the later part of ayat relating to soam says that the women should complete the count after finishing with their menses? Question by: ansasausam From UNITED STATES (FLUSHING) On 27/10/2012
 
What is Shetan, can shetan affects the desire of Momin? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 11/12/2012
 
What "the Aastana research forum says about the Atheists ??? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 13/12/2012
 
What is the true sense of Duaa' mentioned at many places in Quran and been used as an effective tool in almost all religions? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 13/12/2012
 
salaam Dr sahib.pls explain the meaning of نسخ ? and 2:104? Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 17/12/2012
 
Salam Dr sahib pls Explain verse 2/106 مَا ننسخ من آية Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 19/12/2012
 
ABOUT EISA "death/up lifting to heaven" Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 01/04/2013
 
Some body asked about the meaning of سِقَايَةَ الْحَاجِّ وَعِمَارَةَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ . Here it is answer to the question asked. Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 23/04/2013
 
Some body asked that, how does it affect "the understanding of qura'an" as well practical life of people if Eisa borne with OR with out father???????? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 25/04/2013
 
Dr sahib salam pls pls pls explain 2:233 والوالدات يرضعن أولادهن.......................... Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 01/05/2013
 
who is muthllakth المطلَّقات Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 01/05/2013
 
Hijab Jilbaab/ by Moazzam Islam Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 18/06/2013
 
Respected Dr, Qamar Zaman sb some one says mostly the trad trans is what is written in Quran but what U r bringing is new verbal meanings of Words,why should we choose those words as Quran is Mubin and it explains itself.e.g what U describe of halal. Question by: shaista From PAKISTAN (LAHORE) On 08/12/2013
 
Kindly send Dr. Qamar Zaman's US phone number to me at AsarSyed@gmail.com Question by: Asarulislam From UNITED STATES (LOS ANGELES) On 12/06/2014
 
I wrote many times in the form on the site, but no one answers. So, I have a translation of the book "THE TRUTH ABOUT SALAT. Dr. Qamar Zaman" to Russian. Do you want to put it on the site? Question by: onlyquran01 From RUSSIAN FEDERATION (RUSSIA) On 04/07/2014
 
Respected Aastana team, please could you kindly point me to the surah and ayat number of the two ayats referenced on page 9 & 10 of Sarchashma Hidayat sirf Al Quran? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Question by: Riaz From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 27/12/2014
 
Aoa, dear aastana members can you kindly translate surah ikhlaas exposing its main theme Question by: Abdul Hadi Saqib From PAKISTAN (LAHORE) On 14/03/2015
 
مسلمانوں کی نمازوں کے زرتشتی ماخظ Dowanload Question by: Adnan From PAKISTAN On 17/04/2015
 
i have asked two questions please Dr Q z sab post my 2nd question in this blog too. if it is not possible to post it here. then please reply to me via email. as i am really confused about the soum. why ghulam ahmed perwez sab couldn't explain? Question by: kanju swat From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 11/11/2015
 
aap jo quran ki wazahat karte hein 'kia aap khuda(god) per yaqeen(belief) rakhte hein? oor han(yes)! to aap ka aqeda(belief) kia hai? Question by: sufyanarif From PAKISTAN On 21/12/2015
 
Comments...
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved
www.aastana.com