Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Join AASTANABLOG
Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

TRANSLATION OF QURAN
BY DR. QAMAR ZAMAN
Translation Status
آیات
سورۃ
نمبر
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now


»«
ISLAM
BELIEFS
Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
MOAZZAM, NARGIS, NAEEM, MUBASHIR, WAQAR,  
 
YOU PEOPLE CANNOT POSSIBLY BE SERIOUS ABOUT THIS....OR ARE YOU?  
 
PLEASE EXPLAIN!
Add Your Comments  Question by: DHULQARNAIN On 30 September 2011
Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 30 September 2011Report Abuse
MOAZZAM, NARGIS, NAEEM,  
 
***MOAZZAM: Because Alkitab is beyond time and space therefore, narrates only their MAKE-BELIEVE stories*** (My caps)  
 
This, WITHOUT DOUBT, has to be your’s/Aastana Blog’s wildest assertion to date. It’s simply astounding and extremely irresponsible! Let’s look at couple of definitions and ayats:  
 
MAKE BELIEVE: pretending that what is not real is real.  
 
PRETEND: To give a false appearance of; feign; to claim, represent, or assert falsely.  
 
10:37 And this Quran is not such as could be forged by those besides Allah, but it is a verification of that which is before it and a clear explanation of the Book, THERE IS NO DOUBT IN IT, from the Lord of the worlds.  
 
47:2 And those who believe and do good, and believe in that which has been revealed to Muhammad — and IT IS THE TRUTH FROM THEIR LORD— He will remove their evil from them and improve their condition.  
 
How can anything in Al-Quran be make-believe/pretense, given that, Allah states that His Quran has NO DOUBT IN IT AND IT IS THE TRUTH FROM HIM?! What are you thinking ?? You must immediately retract this assertion, because you are directly challenging the veracity of Allah Himsel, by casting doubt on His Words.  
 
*** The names of prophets written in Quran are not fictitious…* if any person/group in any era follows any specific character in the resembling situation could be called by that particular name (attribute). Allah called each prophet with their attributes (it make no difference call them proper noun/name) but impotent thing is their name were in accordance with their attributes (qualities). ***  
 
1. Now it doesn’t make any difference if you call them proper nouns! No matter, because Allah does refer to the prophets by name/proper noun. Anyway at last you admit that Al-Quran uses proper nouns/names for people/prophets, good deal.  
 
2. Also, contrary to Naeem, you admit that the prophets were actual historical people, good deal.  
 
3. Retract your assertion about make believe stories in Al-Quran.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 30 September 2011Report Abuse
Mr Dhulqarnain! Please don't be so panic, read the following (moazzam's post which might make you clear.  
 
The quranic term “WAHY” and “ALQAA” has been used in Quran to deliver a message from Almighty Allah to his prophets (to guide the man kind), also the same term has been used for Normal people(Muslim/none Muslims) even to none human as well.  
This process also should be completed through a set course of procedure as usually we observe across the universe in each aspects of life (there should be no exception, supper natural phenomenon).  
WAHY TO RASOOLALLAH= Conceiving of ideas in Rasool’s mind while pondering into Alkitab and laws of nature/universal values.  
WAHY TO NONE HUMAN BEING= The defaulted set program and set laws of nature see the verses 16/68,99/5,41/12.  
WAHY FROM SHEITAN= The conceiving of shetanic ideas in some ones mind see the verses 6/112,22/52.  
WAHY/ALQAA RFOM ALLAH TO NONE RASOOL= Conceiving of ideas/ development of inference in none rasool personalities whether muslims or none muslims see the verses 5/111,4/171,5/64,3/151,8/12,20/38,28/7, even for Aadam see the verse 2/73.  
CANCELLATION OF SHEITANIC “ALQAA” BY ALLAH’S WAHY= Some time (by due course of process) Allah removes/erases shetanic ideas if developed in some ones mind see the verses 22/52/53  
The Rasool of the time guides his nation through “WAHY”(what ever conceived in his mined while pondering into Alkitab) in that era.  
Remember ,each character which is written in Alkitab will /might be repeated in any/each era.,and Rsool of the time will guide his nation accordingly.  
 
MIND;THIS ALKITAB HAS BEEN GIVEN TO ALL PROPHETS , AND GUIDANCE/MESSAGE WRITTEN IN IT IS BEYOND TIME AND SPACE (ALL THE STORIES ARE GENERIC TEMPLATES) IT MIGHT COME INTO BEING IN “AALIM ALAMR”(WHEN ALL LAWS OF NATURE EXISTED INTO BEING)  
HOW THIS ALKITAB/ALQURAN FIRST TIME BEEN GIVEN FROM ALLAH TO THE MANKIND (WHEN MANKIND DEVELOPED INTO CONSCIOUS BEING), WE DON’T KNOW, SEE 17/85. (message in Alkitab= Alrooh)

Comments by: Nargis On 30 September 2011Report Abuse
Nargis, will you answer now? Is Moazzam accurate? Dhulqarnain

Yes he is accurate.  
 
would you now back up your claims through the Quran ?  
 
Dear Dhulqarnain, are you free from all the Myths and miracles ? Yes or No ? Are you free from all the Myths and miracles ? You still got few miracles and Myths intact which goes hand in hand with your current understanding? I think this is pre requisite to understand all what is being presented else it wont make any sense revolving around anything without zeroing down on it.***  
 
You present Allah's argument? What did Allah tell you to present as HIS argument? If you are presenting Allahs arguments, then can you refer to the Quran for your above statement? what did the Quran say about it being extrinsic, what definition for "extrinsic" is given in the Quran? Did the Quran only say wahy is extrinsic without telling us how it was transferred to the prophet? 2:11....How did the prophet prove it to his society if they asked for proofs ?  
 
Asking for the quraniq reference about the definition of Wahy and the Quraniq meaning of Extrinsic.  
 
you have made a claim (Exactly!, wahy, IS extrinsic) about the Quran, and you must back it up.  
 
When you say extrinsic, I understand it to mean meta physical, beyond the creation, universe, physical laws. Does the Quran define the origin of the Quran/ Wahy from a meta physical ...being or place? If yes, then it is also telling how it was transferred from there to here?  
 
and if wahy is extrinsic, wahy which is the Quran,,its content..how is information about prophets (you say they are proper nouns), extrinsic?  
 
Or maybe you mean to say the information in the Quran, wahy is Not extrinsic but its origin, where it came from, is extrinsic?  
 
strange, because its content is related to this world..  
 
However, you must back up your claim through the Quran and explain it through its ayahs

 

Comments by: Nargis On 30 September 2011Report Abuse

answer this one please

 
 
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?MID=4&SID=40&QID=1801&MSG=  
 
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?SID=23&QID=1796

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 01 October 2011Report Abuse
NARGIS,  
 
I answered your above posts here:  
 
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?QID=1795#COM9397  
 
***MOAZZAM: Because Alkitab is beyond time and space therefore, narrates only their MAKE-BELIEVE stories*** (My caps)  
 
In regard to this thread, are you asserting that, "Al-Kitab...narrates only their MAKE-BELIEVE stories"?  
 
Rmemeber now, "only" means: "And no one or nothing more besides; solely or exclusively"  
 
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=only&tbs=dfn:1&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=rCeHTqmcD4jt0gHVuoEO&sqi=2&ved=0CBoQkQ4&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=298cfbc9b6f1239a&biw=1280&bih=878  
 
Even if "only" doesn't mean the above, are you asserting that Al-Kitab mixes make-believe with truth?  
 
Dhulqarnain-

Comments by: Nargis On 01 October 2011Report Abuse

Truth will always be truth regardless of anyone believing in it or not. where is the original post of Brother Moazzam, I can't find it :(?


 REPORT ABOUT ABUSING COMMENTSCancell
 YOUR REMARKS 
MemberID : Password: >> Forgot Id/Password
Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 01 October 2011Report Abuse
Dear Dhulqarnain, so you disagreed with one of the answer, still i scored 75% (3/4)...(juz kiddin)  
 
I tend to disagree with you and Mauzzam on this, i dont think humans are making this wish feel free to disagree and convince me its Humans coz even am not sure just thinking loud.  
 
Reason: Humans who are no way bothered bout peace and enhancement would never care to be guided. (You just look around and you will understand). So it should be those who really want to do something for Human kind and not common man.  
 
What do you understand by this word Muslim. When would be say a person is MUSLIM??  
 
Looking forward for your explanation.  
 
You said : Do you..or Mubashir.. have full understanding of Allah’s Laws? Do either of you have full understanding of the Unseen?  
 
Mubashir : Well would you take it if i or any say yes..lol, No. And I am sure even you wont claim that at any stage coz any who claims he knows is a proof that is does not know. Well yes but for sure I am convinced with FIXED laws of Nature which wont change, again you just look around and you will understand. ( Do you happen to go thru Allama Pervez writings?? I would recommend you to go thru his writing you will enjoy those. Here is the link www.tolueislam.com )  
 
Do you just believe blindly that Quran has no contradictions with your traditional translation understanding?? Mostly your answer would be YES. ( correct me if am wrong, no offense ). No Matter at any stage of understanding 1.2 billion claim the same thing, amazing. And am sure you wont claim that you know all of the Quran that too in right essence. Do you?  
 
Note : With no intention to offend or defend....just 2 cents  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.  
 

Comments by: Nargis On 01 October 2011Report Abuse

Yes I agree, there is nothing like Him, yet he is able to have a direct interaction with the physical beings....how is this possible, having in mind 2:11,,bring your proofs if you are truthful.  
 
As I understand it, proofs are based on the physical material, so a proof itself is dependent on the laws of nature,,,so how would it be possible to prove the direct interaction/conversation between Allah, beyond physical material, and Rusool, physical being surrounded by laws...?


Comments by: Nargis On 01 October 2011Report Abuse
Humans who are no way bothered bout peace and enhancement would never care to be guided.

Dear Mubashir, think this line covered a lot. thanks , that's soooo true :)

just 2 cents

I don't have change otherwise I would also contribute, mastercard won't help, eh? :-D

Do you..or Mubashir.. have full understanding of Allah’s Laws? Do either of you have full understanding of the Unseen? Dhulqarnain

If I had, I would have applied for a better paid job..--:-( don't tell anyone that I don't have it sjjhhh


Comments by: dawood On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
SA All:  
 
"Dhulqarnain: Do you..or Mubashir.. have full understanding of Allah’s Laws? Do either of you have full understanding of the Unseen?"  
 
Thank you dear brother for the above. I wanted to write something similar but never got around it. You put it beautifully.  
 
For those of you, who even think that all the people in the world together know all the natural physical laws to be there, must examine their mental state. The ONE who can bring all the universe into existence, including you and me, is not capable of making a contact with his own creation in whatever way He wishes? if we, the humans, don't understand something, does this mean that something does not exist? If we cannot comprehend something, some laws, physical or non-physical, does that mean those laws don't exist? Who could have thought or known that electromagnetic waves even exist or travel at the speed of light just merely a few centuries ago? Did their not knowing this phenomenon meant that such phenomenon not exist? Have you not seen how people on earth communicate with those who are in the outer space? What physical material is present in the outer space? These are just some of my personal thoughts that we must humble ourselves with respect to the knowledge of infinite dimensions and our understanding which is finite at this time and is likely to stay finite.

Comments by: Amirkhan On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
My brother Mubashir I like you reply to the question my brother Dhulqarnain asked. I am happy that you send me email and want to talk to me on phone. I am in Frankfurt now and I will come back to home on 8 october and then I will give you a call.  
I can see that there is only one person who is saying that I am fake and that person is madam Nargis. I want to ask you one thing here that do you really want to talk to me or you only want to check if I am fake or real only because madam Nargis ask you to do this?  
I am saying this because before you came here three people with funny names like lanati, cow, sheep were writing bad things about my brother Dhulqarnain but when you came here they all stopped. I can see that you also defended madam Nargis in the other discussion which is this:  
http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?QID=1795#COM9332  
 
I want to tell you that you are also talking about good things like peace, guidance, enhancement and this is a good thing. I also want to tell you that after reading the comment of my brother Junaid in the other discussion I noted that I was right that it was madam Nargis who is using so many funny names like Bob, lanati, yellow cow, black sheep, hacker and she is making this blog look like a bad place. I also noted that she is using bad words against my brother Dhulqarnain and Dawood so I want to ask you straight question so that I can know what you think about this.  
 
My question is that do you think this is the right thing to write with many funny names and use bad words for others?  
 
I also want to ask you that did you know about here that she is writing with so many funny names on this blog and making fun of others and using bad words before you said this about her:  
(Nargis is a straight shooter, and generally humans appreciate straight shooters as long as they speak what we want to hear and hate them when they go against our understanding.)  
 
If you know it before then I want to tell you that you are also taking side of a bad person and this very bad but if you dont know that before then you please tell me if this is right or wrong thing? and if a person try to fool and decieve people and insult people then is this what Quranist do? What type of Quranist are you all who are ignoring all these bad things? and after looking all this then who will believe and trust the people of this blog?  
 

Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
Dear Dawood, with due respect to your above opinion please allow me to put forward some of the concerns. Though a lot had been discussed on this and whatsoever i might be putting in must not be new. And please consider it as a healthy discussion by no means am trying to offend or defend...  
 
You Thanked Dhulqarnain for asking a question beautifully. Dhulranain has been putting forward many traditional concepts which you already might have thought of and know it can be rectified with dialog ( correct me if am wrong in my assumption ). Putting differences apart please dialog with him when ever you differ with him as well.  
 
Back to topic, this question of whether you know all the laws, all of the Quran, all of the Arabic language, and first practice and then preach etc etc are used by those who somehow want to ignore rational inquiry which they cannot answer and want to stick to their own opinion. These are closed questions which are used in conversation to which initiator of question already knows the answer he will get..  
 
Creator getting in contact, yes he does contact with people of understanding with his fixed laws WHICH NEVER CHANGE. Ok for the argument sake if we consider there was a law which existed earlier and not now. Then why do we not consider Wahi coming to Valmiki who wrote Ramayana? Why cant Bhagwat geeta be from Allah to its author ??  
 
Just because we are made not to take this miracle from our traditional understanding, so we tend to take out all the rational questions and inquire kith and kin of it which we do very BEAUTIFULLY.  
 
If we take that Wahi is Extrinsic and it gave info which Humans never knew, why not info on Lord Krishna, Rama, Budha etc etc are mentioned with names like Ibrahim, Naoh, Musa which were known in Arab world were only revealed? Silly me I used to say coz even if that was revealed Arabs might have not recognized who they are and might not get admonished so God used only Names which were familiar to Arabs...:). I will not take science in Quran here, God forbid if it was to reveal things which human never knew then EM waves, Internet which reduces communication Gap and other medical formulae which saves many human life should also had been given so that Humans could have enjoyed all these from there on.  
 
God has no limitations, so why cant he take incarnation as Krishna, Rama and send a son ?? ( Coz we dont believe in it we believe in only our miracles and myths, same goes with Hindu and Christian as well, they say we believe in it, PERIOD. Even they ask the same question, do you know all the laws, rules of Meta physics etc)  
 
Note: Just 2 cents with concerns, and not an effort to disrespect any being or opinion.  
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
 
Dear Amir, I saw you comment after posting my comment…  
 
For all your enquiry I would like to put forward only one thing, I like to work only for message. Events, Personalities are seldom my concern. Coz life has taught me one thing if you really are working for Message nothing matters to you and I try abide by that.  
 
For me I don’t care what anyone say in what way or do, coz these kind of events are part and parcel of any Gigantic effort.  
 
Note: Hope I was clear…please feel free to call me anytime.  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.  

Comments by: Amirkhan On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
My brother Mubashir I want to thank you for replying to my question. But I want you to know that you did not gave clear answer to both my questions. I can see that you are a nice person so your point is valid about work for message. But my question was this:  
 
Did you know that before that madam Nargis is writing with many funny names?  
 
If you dont know this before then now you know this so will you call it a bad thing then?  
 
I want to tell you that other people on this blog make small questions look like so complicated here and dont give clear answer but I can see that you dont do that so please give me clear answer that do you call it a bad thing to do if a person use funny names and write bad things about other people and make fool of others by using fake names to write.

Comments by: bob On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
Dawood: Is not capable of making a contact with his own creation in whatever way He wishes?  
 
Respected brother Dawood, I was asked the same question by a Shia friend: "Cannot the creator who created everything in the universe, perform a miracle, do you really think he is unable to do so”?  
 
The question is not about Gods abilities, it is rather about God establishing the laws of nature, but only to break them. When wahy is sent and the prophets opposed the dogmas and rituals with Al Kitab, they cannot be unable to back up their knowledge through evidences.  
 
Dawood: If we cannot comprehend something, some laws, physical or non-physical, does that mean those laws don't exist?  
 
Dear brother, again it is not about our abilities to comprehend something, it is about what we are conveyed and how it is assisted by confirmations.  
 
*To say that direct interaction between God and humans is possible but not comprehensive, or that direct interaction are part of the laws of nature but not discovered yet, would be conjecturing. Although it is stated that wahy is complete and preserved, thus no prophet will come and receive it again, we are doomed to live in the darkness about the method of transmitting wahy. This because only the prophets can confirm the findings, as God is only talking to them… The “hidden law” of interaction between man and God will be found, thus not evaluated…It’s like we will find the sender, but the receiver is not here…  
 
If wahy was revealed 1400 years ago while its method of transmission will be revealed several hundred years later, how is this fair to the society of the prophet at that time? The message is not fully delivered to them because they don’t understand how it is communicated to him; still they have to believe it is from God who diffused it miraculously to the Qalb of the prophet.  
 
If the law related to the method of transmission is dependent of our discoveries through science, then how did the prophet himself understand it? I hope we agree on the matter of Bashr and a prodigious Bashr.  
 
What credibility would the prophet have if he presents a doctrine about God without being able to prove it is really from God? The content of the book speaks for itself, and it deny miracles and paranormal sensations. Yet it is transferred to the mind of our prophets in an astoundingly way.  
 
I’m left to wonder, what is the need for God to contact human beings directly in order to convey a message related to individuals and societies of this world, but he had to hide mathematical formulas and all kind of knowledge, in the universe?  
 
Why wahy is categorically needed to be transmitted through direct contact between God and Rusools, but no other knowledge like math, science, medicine, psychology etc. been needed to come through direct interaction between God and scientists?  
 
How would it looks like if Newton presented his findings to his society, and told them, with an anticipation that they will believe him: “This is passed on to me by God, and after hundreds of years you will be able to understand this particular method of conducting messages between God and human beings.”  
 
We must let the Quran itself support such an idea of direct communication between the clairvoyant and the ecological. The definition of such a method of direct contact must be emphasized clearly in the Quran, and supported with substantiations which are available for every society the message is delivered to. In that case, the one who claim it is transferred through direct interaction between the creator and his creation, must provide verifications from the Quran supporting and proving the claim.

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
BOB,  
 
***BOB: The question is not about Gods abilities, it is rather about God establishing the laws of nature, but only to break them. When wahy is sent and the prophets opposed the dogmas and rituals with Al Kitab, they cannot be unable to back up their knowledge through evidences.***  
 
Certainly it’s about God’s ability to establish laws both in our phenomenal world and the world of the Unseen.  
 
DAWOOD: If we cannot comprehend something, some laws, physical or non-physical, does that mean those laws don't exist?  
 
BOB: Dear brother, again it is not about our abilities to comprehend something, it is about what we are conveyed and how it is assisted by confirmations.  
 
“ it is about what we are conveyed and how it is assisted by confirmations”.  
 
Call me crazy Bob, but that speaks directly to our ability to comprehend!  
 
Bob, what law…brought the creation into existence? Where did it come from and how? Can you or anyone explain it? What laws impact those who have died?  
 
There are some laws that only Allah is aware of…for all time.  
 
 
Bob, what about the following:  
 
***MOAZZAM: Because Alkitab is beyond time and space therefore, narrates only their MAKE-BELIEVE stories*** (My caps):  
 
MAKE BELIEVE: pretending that what is not real is real.  
 
PRETEND: To give a false appearance of; feign; to claim, represent, or assert falsely.  
 
10:37 And this Quran is not such as could be forged by those besides Allah, but it is a verification of that which is before it and a clear explanation of the Book, THERE IS NO DOUBT IN IT, from the Lord of the worlds.  
 
47:2 And those who believe and do good, and believe in that which has been revealed to Muhammad — and IT IS THE TRUTH FROM THEIR LORD— He will remove their evil from them and improve their condition.  
 
Do you believe Al-Quran has untrue accounts in it? Yes or no. If so, what is you evidence?  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
MUBASHIR,  
 
You have yet to answer this:  
 
***MOAZZAM: Because Alkitab is beyond time and space therefore, narrates only their MAKE-BELIEVE stories*** (My caps):  
 
MAKE BELIEVE: pretending that what is not real is real.  
 
PRETEND: To give a false appearance of; feign; to claim, represent, or assert falsely.  
 
10:37 And this Quran is not such as could be forged by those besides Allah, but it is a verification of that which is before it and a clear explanation of the Book, THERE IS NO DOUBT IN IT, from the Lord of the worlds.  
 
47:2 And those who believe and do good, and believe in that which has been revealed to Muhammad — and IT IS THE TRUTH FROM THEIR LORD— He will remove their evil from them and improve their condition.  
Do you believe Al-Quran has untrue accounts in it? Yes or no. If so, what is you evidence?  
 
***MUBASHIR: You Thanked Dhulqarnain for asking a question beautifully. Dhulranain has been putting forward many traditional concepts.***  
 
Please, concretely, define “traditional concepts” as it pertains to Deen Al-Islam. However you define it you and some others here at Aastanablog are committing a serious blunder if you believe all traditional concepts are inaccurate.  
 
***MUBASHIR: Back to topic, this question of whether you know all the laws, all of the Quran, all of the Arabic language…***  
Doesn’t make them any less valid. The burden of proof is on you…not them.  
 
** MUBASHIR *Creator getting in contact, yes he does contact with people of understanding with his fixed laws WHICH NEVER CHANGE.***  
 
Okay, now prove this claim beyond any shadow of a doubt. What fixed law, exactly, does Allah use to contact people? What is it it called and show me where it’s found so I can tap into it.  
 
***If we take that Wahi is Extrinsic and it gave info which Humans never knew, why not info on Lord Krishna, Rama, Budha etc etc are mentioned with names like Ibrahim, Naoh, Musa which were known in Arab world were only revealed?***  
 
You question still does not prove that wahy is not extrinsic. Your task is to prove that it is not. When are you going to offer your concrete proof and stop asking questions. You, Moazzam, Nargis don’t believe wahy is extrinsic so the burden of proof is on you.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
DAWOOD,  
 
Thank you for your kind words, Dawood.  
 
You explained it better than me:  
 
DAWWOD: If we cannot comprehend something, some laws, physical or non-physical, does that mean those laws don't exist?  
 
That pretty much says it all.  
 
 
NARGIS: Yes I agree, there is nothing like Him, yet he is able to have a direct interaction with the physical beings....how is this possible, having in mind 2:11,,bring your proofs if you are truthful.  
 
***NARGIS: As I understand it, proofs are based on the physical material, so a proof itself is dependent on the laws of nature,,,so how would it be possible to prove the direct interaction/conversation between Allah, beyond physical material, and Rusool, physical being surrounded by laws...?***  
 
Allah exists in the Unseen and many of His Laws exist there as well. Do you believe the man was created know everything Allah knows? If so, then man is destined to become another Allah. There are many physical laws which we can, to some degree explain, but even those laws are not understood in full.  
 
Nargis, what law…brought the creation into existence? Where did it come from and how? Can you or anyone explain it?  
 
What laws impact those who have died?  
 
There are some laws that only Allah is aware of…for all time.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: bob On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
Dhulqarnain: Certainly it’s about God’s ability to establish laws both in our phenomenal world and the world of the Unseen.  
 
Dear Dhulqarnain, the Quran would provide the indispensable evidence regarding Gods abilities to establish laws, if it’s meant for us to comprehend. I would say everything that is created is for us to grasp with time. Something that is not part of the creation is not for us to understand. However, the laws established are all here in this world; if they are unseen then they will be discovered. A law that is already in use (Transmitting wahy) is partly discovered, the remaining part is to prove direct interaction, something that the prophet would present before he ask others for proofs. I used to ponder on why the prophets said the information is from God, if they can’t prove it?  
 
Dhulqarnain: but that speaks directly to our ability to comprehend!  
 
Sorry for not being clear, what I attempted to convey is that this is about what we are conveyed (Wahy with the entreaty to follow it) and how it is assisted by confirmations (evidences for coming from God by direct interaction between God and human). You are right that it is about our ability to comprehend, which would mean that every claim the Quran is stating or command we are ordered to follow, is given to our knowledge because we can comprehend it. If the Quran and its diffusion are not for us to come to terms with, it would be a claim without any assistance of verifications. However, to say that this is not for us because of various reasons such as undiscovered laws would be conjecture and a meaning we are adding to the Quran.Dhulqarnain: There are some laws that only Allah is aware of…for all time.I would suggest that the creator of the universe is aware of ALL his created laws to every time. Humans will know as much as they work for and try to discover at each time.  
 
وَمَا كَانَ لِبَشَرٍ أَنْ يُكَلِّمَهُ اللَّهُ إِلا وَحْيًا أَوْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ حِجَابٍ أَوْ يُرْسِلَ رَسُولا فَيُوحِيَ بِإِذْنِهِ مَا يَشَاءُ إِنَّهُ عَلِيٌّ حَكِيمٌ (٥١)  
 
51. . it is not given to any human being that Allah should speak to Him unless (it be) by inspiration, or from behind a veil, or (that) He sends a Messenger to reveal what He wills by his Leave. … Accepted translation  
 
Here we can see that to talk directly to a human being is not an option as per Quran… There is no way that a human being can talk to Allah, and Allah talk to a human being by means of wahy, behind a veil or through a messenger.  
 
As I understand from this, Quran have negated the theory of miracles, so the wahy when delivered to the Qalb of prophet is when he makes efforts to understand it. I cannot imagine God talking to the prophet as he is a human being and surrounded by the same laws like any other human beings. It means he must observe the wahy which is not visible to others because they don’t ponder on the world in the same way.  
 
Allow me to Quote Dr Qamar Zaman:  
 
“”There are different levels of consciousness. I am writing with my clear mind it is the conscious level. If I am hit and I lose my consciousness I become unconscious. I recall some incidences consciously it is memory. But if I respond reflex to a similar event which has happened in my life before without recalling my memory, it is from my subconscious level. It has three stages.  
 
1. You are not sleeping and doing things without recalling your memory it is a reflex action.  
2. You are sleeping and you see yourself doing things it is dream  
3. You are neither sleeping nor doing things reflex but you are interpreting your experiences, knowledge, observations and actions of Your past and of others and you are visualizing the laws of nature then you are a genius and you can predict the fate of a nation. You can warn a nation against the disaster they are heading to or you can predict their bright and prosperous future.  
 
This faculty to learn from the nature is, when nature comes so close to a human being that all hidden secrets start opening up. The person and nature becomes like two bows together (Sura 53 Verse 9).  
At this stage Nature starts revealing himself and THIS IS WAHI. “”  
 
Dhulqarnain: Do you believe Al-Quran has untrue accounts in it? Yes or no. If so, what is you evidence?  
No, I don’t think the Quran has untrue accounts, on the contrary I think every claim provided to humanity in AlKitab, is proven and for us to comprehend. Otherwise we don’t need it, as we cannot understand it anyway. I don’t believe God provide us blind beliefs through his book, when he is fully capable of providing us evidence based Knowledge.  
 
As a human being, my needs are not fulfilled by a God who wants to be worshipped or to be blindly believed in; my needs are fulfilled through a God who provides me an assistance to superintend me out of the darkness so I can benefit and take help from the reality and not through misapprehensions.  
 
I have not read the post of brother Moazzam, when I have gone through it I will let you know.  

Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
Dear Dhulqarnain, please find my comments inline…  
 
Dhulqarnain: You have yet to answer this:  
 
***MOAZZAM: Because Alkitab is beyond time and space therefore, narrates only their MAKE-BELIEVE stories*** (My caps):  
 
MAKE BELIEVE: pretending that what is not real is real.  
 
PRETEND: To give a false appearance of; feign; to claim, represent, or assert falsely.  
 
Mubashir : No they are not make believe stories (its not like Fazaile Amal), Mauzzam might not be using right word to express himself. And if he really means that, then I disagree with Mauzzam. For me what I understood is it’s a situation which occurs any any era and a solution being provided to overcome the situation in God’s way.  
 
Dhulqarnain: Please, concretely, define “traditional concepts” as it pertains to Deen Al-Islam. However you define it you and some others here at Aastanablog are committing a serious blunder if you believe all traditional concepts are inaccurate.  
 
Mubashir : Over all Traditional concept with touch of myths and miracles attached to it and/or concepts misunderstood as in Intoxication, Nisa, Zina, etc.  
 
Dhulqarnain : ***MUBASHIR: Back to topic, this question of whether you know all the laws, all of the Quran, all of the Arabic language…***  
Doesn’t make them any less valid. The burden of proof is on you…not them.  
 
Mubashir: Yes it is neutral and closed question, other party can raise same question to you as well and we all GROWN UP’s know no man will ever claim yes I know all. Can you?  
 
Dhulqarnain: Okay, now prove this claim beyond any shadow of a doubt. What fixed law, exactly, does Allah use to contact people? What is it it called and show me where it’s found so I can tap into it.  
 
Mubashir : A new born when hungry will always cry to convey the message will never laugh sometimes to convey he is hungry. This is law of God which all parents understand, Don’t they?? On same lines When ever you throw a ball in air it will come down unless some external and opposite force is applied. Similarly Human social order follows a law which never changes. I already directed you to www.tolueislam.com where a giant has sacrificed his life to explain people about Fixed laws of nature (Allama Pervez). Please let me know when you go thru his writings.  
 
Dhulqarnain: ***If we take that Wahi is Extrinsic and it gave info which Humans never knew, why not info on Lord Krishna, Rama, Budha etc etc are mentioned with names like Ibrahim, Naoh, Musa which were known in Arab world were only revealed?***  
 
You question still does not prove that wahy is not extrinsic. Your task is to prove that it is not. When are you going to offer your concrete proof and stop asking questions. You, Moazzam, Nargis don’t believe wahy is extrinsic so the burden of proof is on you.  
 
Mubashir : Well content of Quran as whole with its rational understanding is the answer, then indeed we can say what has been revealed is Haqq with no controversies and no doubts in it. Else it would conjecture claim which all religions do. Please don’t shy away with burden to proof you have to share the same burden why you don’t believe in other religions blind faith and why not advance science and knowledge Lord Krishna, Rama, Budha are not mentioned when you say info was beyond what human could knew thru Gods fixed laws. Why the limitation??  
 
Between you don’t answer most of the questions directed to you, yet you always complain others not answering all of your questions. Please prove me wrong that you answer all the questions, you seem to be honest man and am sure you will acknowledge and justify and not use this as an excuse/sympathy for you in our HEALTHY DEBATE.  
 
Note: Following points are not a logical reason to convey your message, no neutral person can buy this.  
1. Directing to ayaat as the only proof. Every religion has got a book to which they can direct you which you might not consider.  
2. Don’t ask me ask Allah is no logic answer. Same can be given by people from other religion.  
 
Note : I would appreciate if you can give reasoning which might convince a neutral person or from any other religion,  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.

Comments by: dawood On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
SA Br. Mubashir:  
 
“Mubashir: Back to topic, this question of whether you know all the laws, all of the Quran, all of the Arabic language, and first practice and then preach etc etc are used by those who somehow want to ignore rational inquiry which they cannot answer and want to stick to their own opinion. These are closed questions which are used in conversation to which initiator of question already knows the answer he will get..”  
 
Dear brother it is the lack of comprehension at your part that makes you think that I am avoiding rational inquiry. This question about the Wahy or the nature of the Wahy is not new, having been initiated at the very time of the Messenger himself. Please ponder in 17:85: “They ask thee concerning the Ruh (Spirit). Say: "The Ruh (Spirit) (cometh) by command of my Lord: of knowledge it is only a little that is communicated to you." Thus both the question and the answer are captured in this one. I believe in it with 100% certainty that there is a law through which Wahy took place and that law is beyond my comprehension as it was for those who asked this question to the Messenger himself.  
 
Further, ponder in 2:2, the very first verse of Surah Baqara: “This is the Book; in it is guidance sure, without doubt, to those who fear Allah;” First, did you establish (confirm through some evidence with 100% objectivity) yourself that (1) there is no doubt in this book, and (2) there is guidance in it for only those who want to guard against bad results? If you did establish these two facts, then please share your results and the methodology to get these results with the rest of us. If you did not, or you cannot for whatever reason, what then stops you from considering all Bhagwat Geetas, etc., etc. at the level of this BOOK? For me, there does not exist a book in this world that begins with the statement like 2:2. If there is such a book, please refer me to that, I will pay attention to it as well.  
 
“Mubashir: Creator getting in contact, yes he does contact with people of understanding with his fixed laws WHICH NEVER CHANGE. Ok for the argument sake if we consider there was a law which existed earlier and not now. Then why do we not consider Wahi coming to Valmiki who wrote Ramayana? Why cant Bhagwat geeta be from Allah to its author ??”  
 
If you don’t know a law (any law) you cannot say it existed earlier and no more now? Thus, there is a problem of comprehension again. As far as other people claiming to have received the Wahi, who stops you from considering their claims, if you think they are true.  
 
“Mubashir: If we take that Wahi is Extrinsic and it gave info which Humans never knew, why not info on Lord Krishna, Rama, Budha etc etc are mentioned with names like Ibrahim, Naoh, Musa which were known in Arab world were only revealed? Silly me I used to say coz even if that was revealed Arabs might have not recognized who they are and might not get admonished so God used only Names which were familiar to Arabs...:). I will not take science in Quran here, God forbid if it was to reveal things which human never knew then EM waves, Internet which reduces communication Gap and other medical formulae which saves many human life should also had been given so that Humans could have enjoyed all these from there on.”  
 
My understanding is that the info contained in the BOOK, Alquran is for the guidance of human race. How (in which language, with what names, etc.) that guidance is conveyed is not for me or you to decide, rather the decision is of the ONE who originated this process to begin with. You misunderstood my EM waves example. It was to highlight the extent of knowledge that people had a few centuries ago, now, and a few centuries ahead of us.  
 
“Mubashir: God has no limitations, so why cant he take incarnation as Krishna, Rama and send a son ?? ( Coz we dont believe in it we believe in only our miracles and myths, same goes with Hindu and Christian as well, they say we believe in it, PERIOD. Even they ask the same question, do you know all the laws, rules of Meta physics etc)”  
Please direct this question at God. I don’t believe in any miracle, etc, except Quran itself is a miracle for me for it is an XTRA-ordinary book, nothing like it exists in the world.  

Comments by: dawood On 02 October 2011Report Abuse
SA Bob:  
“Bob: The question is not about Gods abilities, it is rather about God establishing the laws of nature, but only to break them. When wahy is sent and the prophets opposed the dogmas and rituals with Al Kitab, they cannot be unable to back up their knowledge through evidences.”  
“Bob: Dear brother, again it is not about our abilities to comprehend something, it is about what we are conveyed and how it is assisted by confirmations.”  
 
This seems at the heart of the problem, i.e. comprehending it. If we don’t know “All the laws established by God” we cannot infer that He has broken any of His laws. It is just an erroneous assumption that He has broken His laws. Please refer to 17:85. It is telling you in no uncertain words that you cannot possibly comprehend the complete phenomenon of Alruh Or Wahy.  
 
“Bob: *To say that direct interaction between God and humans is possible but not comprehensive, or that direct interaction are part of the laws of nature but not discovered yet, would be conjecturing. Although it is stated that wahy is complete and preserved, thus no prophet will come and receive it again, we are doomed to live in the darkness about the method of transmitting wahy. This because only the prophets can confirm the findings, as God is only talking to them… The “hidden law” of interaction between man and God will be found, thus not evaluated…It’s like we will find the sender, but the receiver is not here……”  
 
First, we need to look at the purpose of the BOOK, a product of revelation or Wahy. Is God’s intent to tell us about the process of Wahy? Will it make any difference if we really know how the Wahy was transferred? Would it make our lives any better if we really know how the Wahi was transmitted? The answer to me is that knowing the process of Wahy has nothing to do with what the BOOK conveys. If such questions had any importance and relevance to the purpose of the book, it would have been explained, and not just concluded as per 17:85.  
 
“ Bob: The message is not fully delivered to them because they don’t understand how it is communicated to him; still they have to believe it is from God who diffused it miraculously to the Qalb of the prophet.”  
 
This is another erroneous assumption. The message itself has no relationship to how it was delivered. The message is not fully delivered if every bit and piece of it is not conveyed to the recipient in exactly the same way as it was intended to be delivered.  
 
“Bob: What credibility would the prophet have if he presents a doctrine about God without being able to prove it is really from God? ….  
 
Did anyone till date has proven the existence of God, like a mathematical proof? If you know someone who did it, please let me know. The position that you and Moazzam et al has adopted about the revelation is that “genious person gets Wahi from nature.” (my words, after reading through various threads). Those who get knowledge from nature are neither called Rasuls, nor prophets, rather they are scientists and engineers, etc. Did anyone in the world from this group ever claim that their work is a Wahi from God? Did anyone write a book that begins with the statement like 2:2? This should at least make us pause and think about this: “there was indeed something fundamentally different in terms of Wahi to Prophets/Rasula than what scientists infer from nature.”  
 
“Bob: How would it looks like if Newton presented his findings to his society, and told them, with an anticipation that they will believe him: “This is passed on to me by God, and after hundreds of years you will be able to understand this particular method of conducting messages between God and human beings.”  
 
Did Newton say so? Is this not a clear indication that Newton was not a Rasul or a Prophet from Allah rather a scientist? If he would have been a Rasul or a Prophet from God, he would have said to the world “I am a rasul or Prophet from the Lords of the Worlds…”  
 
“Bob: We must let the Quran itself support such an idea of direct communication between the clairvoyant and the ecological. The definition of such a method of direct contact must be emphasized clearly in the Quran, and supported with substantiations which are available for every society the message is delivered to. In that case, the one who claim it is transferred through direct interaction between the creator and his creation, must provide verifications from the Quran supporting and proving the claim.”  
 
For me, 17:85; 26:193; 40:15; 78:38; 70:4 etc. are a clear evidence. You seem to be in doubt about the Prophets and the Quran itself, you need to find your own rationale. That is all I can say.  

Comments by: bob On 03 October 2011Report Abuse
Dawood: For me, 17:85; 26:193; 40:15; 78:38; 70:4 etc. are a clear evidence. You seem to be in doubt about the Prophets and the Quran itself, you need to find your own rationale. That is all I can say.  
 
You are entitled to believe whatever you like.  
 
I would make a humble request to other readers that they please read through it carefully and pay attention to the questions raised.  
 
Thank you

Comments by: Nargis On 03 October 2011Report Abuse
Dawood :For me, 17:85; 26:193; 40:15; 78:38; 70:4 etc. are a clear evidence.

Where are these ayahs say and prove that the prophet is having direct conversation with God, and where are they does it saying HOW they are having the conversation and how are they proving the method?  
 
First you said the law of method is hidden, now these ayas are EVIDENCE ?


Comments by: Nargis On 03 October 2011Report Abuse
My understanding is that the info contained in the BOOK, Alquran is for the guidance of human race. How (in which language, with what names, etc.) that guidance is conveyed is not for me or you to decide, rather the decision is of the ONE who originated this process to begin with. Dawood

If its not for you to know how the message is conveyed, then why are you discussing it here? What are you trying to achieve through this discussion where you cant prove your claims, as the law is hidden maybe.... ? And wahy have been discussed earlier many times. You have yet to prove how these ayas are proving direct interaction between metaphysical and physical,,,even though the law is hidden

“Mubashir: Creator getting in contact, yes he does contact with people of understanding with his fixed laws WHICH NEVER CHANGE. Ok for the argument sake if we consider there was a law which existed earlier and not now. Then why do we not consider Wahi coming to Valmiki who wrote Ramayana? Why cant Bhagwat geeta be from Allah to its author ??” Mubashir  
 
If you don’t know a law (any law) you cannot say it existed earlier and no more now? Thus, there is a problem of comprehension again. As far as other people claiming to have received the Wahi, who stops you from considering their claims, if you think they are true.Dawood

Can you answer his question please'


Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 04 October 2011Report Abuse
Dear Dawood, most of your comments are based on those thoughts which indeed we had earlier, so its not new to me as i had been with the same thoughts earlier but not after truth started coming.  
 
I would like to comment for your last statement, coz for understanding of Wahi Dr QZ's explanation and all of the discussions on blog are more than enough for anyone who is rational not biased in his opinion.  
 
when i asked : “Mubashir: God has no limitations, so why cant he take incarnation as Krishna, Rama and send a son ?? ( Coz we dont believe in it we believe in only our miracles and myths, same goes with Hindu and Christian as well, they say we believe in it, PERIOD. Even they ask the same question, do you know all the laws, rules of Meta physics etc)”  
 
You said :Please direct this question at God. I don’t believe in any miracle, etc, except Quran itself is a miracle for me for it is an XTRA-ordinary book, nothing like it exists in the world.  
 
Dawood : Please direct this question at God.  
Mubashir : Actually i did and God said Dawood needs to think more and rectify.  
 
I know my answer is irrational, but so is the question itself. If anyone thinks question is valid then please assume even answer is valid.  
 
Dawood : I don’t believe in any miracle, etc, except Quran itself is a miracle for me.  
 
Mubashir : Second part of sentence negates your first part. Any one can be true but not both.  
 
If we dig deeper to rational understanding of word MIRACLE as an idiom then yes any extra-ordinary thing is called miracle. Its like the one we can understand from this song "teri tirchi nazar me hai jadu, jaadu hai teri baataon me, tere roop rang me hai jadu" (Jadu=Miracle, an idiom)  
 
Dawood : Quran is an XTRA-ordinary book, nothing like it exists in the world. ( just picked the last part of ur sentence )  
 
Mubashir : I agree, it is indeed.  
 
Just 2 cents, no intention to offend any being or opinion.  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.

Comments by: Nargis On 04 October 2011Report Abuse
Dawood : I don’t believe in any miracle, etc, except Quran itself is a miracle for me.  
 
Mubashir : Second part of sentence negates your first part. Any one can be true but not both.

Nargis: Mubashir, EXACTLY. "I don't believe in ANY miracle, except one"..err what?  
 
Dawood : Please direct this question at God.  
Mubashir : Actually i did and God said Dawood needs to think more and rectify.  
 
and Nargis is wondering why Dawood participate in a debate when he can't answer questions but direct us to God,,,are you not talking for God ...?  
 
Dear Mubashir, where have you been? It is sooo nice to read your rational thinking , pheeew. Really nice to see your posts I must say. Keep sharing your 2 cents, ill soon buy a happy meal:-D


Comments by: dawood On 05 October 2011Report Abuse
SA Br. Mubashir:  
 
“Mubashir: Dear Dawood, most of your comments are based on those thoughts which indeed we had earlier, so its not new to me as i had been with the same thoughts earlier but not after truth started coming.”  
 
Brother, first define for me as well as for yourself what is “Truth.” Is what I say, you say, or anyone says the truth? Then, how do you recognize that it is indeed the truth, nothing but the truth?  
 
“Mubashir: I would like to comment for your last statement, coz for understanding of Wahi Dr QZ's explanation and all of the discussions on blog are more than enough for anyone who is rational not biased in his opinion.”  
 
I see the problem with your above statement. According to the above, a person is not rational and is biased if he/she does not consider "enough" your, others, or Dr. QZ’s explanations. Is this the definition/meanings of rationality and/or unbiasedness?  
 
“Mubashir : Actually i did and God said Dawood needs to think more and rectify.”  
 
I agree with “Dawood needs to think more..” part. Have you done so at your part? What did God tell you about yourself?  
 
“Mubashir: I know my answer is irrational, but so is the question itself. If anyone thinks question is valid then please assume even answer is valid.”  
 
It is confirmed now by your own admission that you are being irrational. Good deal. We are humans.  
 
“Dawood : I don’t believe in any miracle, etc, except Quran itself is a miracle for me.”  
“Mubashir : Second part of sentence negates your first part. Any one can be true but not both.”  
 
That is why exception clause is there. You agreed “Mubashir : I agree, it is indeed” with this “Dawood: Quran is an XTRA-ordinary book, nothing like it exists in the world.” At one level it is a miracle. It is said, this book is beyond time and space (Moazzam’s words), it is a miracle at another level. Can you explain the bases of your agreement with my statement?  

Comments by: dawood On 05 October 2011Report Abuse
SA Sr. Nargis:  
 
“Nargis: Where are these ayahs say and prove that the prophet is having direct conversation with God, and where are they does it saying HOW they are having the conversation and how are they proving the method? First you said the law of method is hidden, now these ayas are EVIDENCE?”  
 
Please ponder in 17:85: They ask thee concerning the ALRUH (WAHI). Say: "The RUH (cometh) by command of my Lord: of knowledge it is only a little that is communicated to you.” A prophet of the time making claims that God communicated to him this this … via Wahi. His people are asking him exactly the same question you are asking now, i.e. tell us how did the God communicate to you. Would it not make sense that the prophet should explain to them as he did for so many other such questions which are documented in the Quran? But instead he said, it is beyond you, beyond your comprehension. This is the answer from the very person who is receiving the Wahi. Who else other than him could be in a better position to answer such a question? Yet, his reply is as above. The evidence of direct conversation is the first part where it says “ALRUH is from the commands of my RAB.” Further evidence 40:15, “Raised high above ranks (or degrees), (He is) the Lord of the Throne (of Authority): by His Command doth He send the RUH (of inspiration) to any of His servants he pleases, that it may warn (men) of the Day of Mutual Meeting.” Thus, in my humble understanding God is communicating to the messemger(s) via ALRUH. If Allah’s verses are not a good proof then I rest my case.  
 
Now you may want to present your understanding of this verse and show that the above positions are incorrect. Tell me exact words, how did the communication take place between the messengers and the God. Please use the Quran to prove your point of view.  
 
“Nargis: and Nargis is wondering why Dawood participate in a debate when he can't answer questions but direct us to God,,,are you not talking for God ...?”  
 
First, let me make one thing clear. I am not debating with anyone, I am not here to win an argument. I am here to get answers to my questions related to the Book of Allah. Period. If you don’t look at the verses, there is no point to go further on this. You got to point out as to what is wrong with the translations of the verses presented in the discussion. Then you need to point out the right translation and link your inference with that translation.  

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 05 October 2011Report Abuse
NARGIS,  
 
“NARGIS: Where are these ayahs say and prove that the prophet is having direct conversation with God, and where are they does it saying HOW they are having the conversation and how are they proving the method? First you said the law of method is hidden, now these ayas are EVIDENCE?”  
 
CONVERSATION: The informal exchange of ideas by spoken words; the use of speech for informal exchange of views or ideas or information etc.; oral exchange of sentiments, observations, opinions, or ideas.  
 
I cannot think of an ayat where a conversation takes place between Allah and the prophet. I thought Al-Quran was revealed in total, sometime in the month of Ramadan, and then the prophet was to recite it to the people. There was no exchanging of words/conversation between Allah and the prophet. Am I incorrect? If I’m incorrect please post the ayat where they are in a conversation.  
 
Nargis, can you tell us:  
 
1. What law(s) brought forth the Creation?  
2. Where was the human being before he/she came into the world and what law brought him/her into the world?  
3. What law(s) governs the dead?  
 
Can you explain the above? If not, then you have to accept that your knowledge, as with the rest of us, is extremely limited. Allah is before we are born and He is after we die. How can you or anyone possibly understand the laws which are at work where Allah dwells?  
 
You have to accept that Allah is Eternal, hence, He existed before His Creation and the laws which govern it.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: Nargis On 05 October 2011Report Abuse
The evidence of direct conversation is the first part where it says “ALRUH is from the commands of my RAB.”

Dear Dawood, HOW did you understand “from the commands of my Rab” to mean DIRECT CONVERSATION?  
 
Even if we use your translation, it is saying ALruh is FROM THE COMMANDS/ Amri of my Rab…  
Now you should find out what commands wahy are of/from….What it is meant by “amri”  
40:45 by His Command doth He send the RUH  
 
Again it is alrrooha min amrihi

I am here to get answers to my questions related to the Book of Allah. Period.

How nice, then you of all, shouldn’t don’t direct others to God when you yourself are unable to answer for your own claims. Orthodox views are not providing any answers to individuals who are trying to understand the Quran as a practical book of reality and not a book of myths and miracles…  
 
“I don’t believe in miracles except one” is like saying “I can resist everything except temptation”  
 
You have interpreted by command to mean direct conversation, which is fine and very common among Orthodox thinkers. However, any discussion based on belief is a dead end, because belief is …belief. If you believe the Quran is given through direct conversation between God, metaphysical being, and the prophet, a physical being surrounded by the laws of nature, it is totally fine. Keep it up.  
 
Wahy have been discussed in detail earlier, like here http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?QID=742  
 
Hope you get some of your answers.


Comments by: Nargis On 05 October 2011Report Abuse
I thought Al-Quran was revealed in total, sometime in the month of Ramadan,

“Month of Ramadan”, I’m surprised that the translators didn’t add it was on a Friday or that the Quran was revealed at a green paper because it is an Islamic colour.  
 
They didn’t add the time either, was it 12 am or pm, was the Sheitaan sleeping and unaware of what was going on in his paganistic world. Until now he had mislead everyone to worship statues, but finally the most awaited month of Ramadan came and destroyed all his plans.  
 
Uffff God is talking about a month of Ramadan, and didn’t even give us the calendar…Now it is left to the mercy of human beings, either they make a calendar to give any meaning to the claim regarding the Quran and it’s time for revelation, or we have an pointless aya giving no meaning because God forgot to provide us the relevant calendar…

Nargis, can you tell us:  
1. What law(s) brought forth the Creation?  
2. Where was the human being before he/she came into the world and what law brought him/her into the world?  
3. What law(s) governs the dead?

Is information related to these questions written in the Quran? Please provide the relevant ayah’s.


Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 06 October 2011Report Abuse
Dear Dawood, please find my comments inline….  
 
Dawood: Brother, first define for me as well as for yourself what is “Truth.” Is what I say, you say, or anyone says the truth? Then, how do you recognize that it is indeed the truth, nothing but the truth?  
 
Mubashir: OK, let me try but not sure if it will make any difference to you…  
 
There was a time when people believed earth is flat and sun revolves around earth and a geocentric universe. But when God speaks with intellectuals who strive hard to understand the TRUTH, it was revealed that earth is spherical and earth revolves around the sun and not otherwise. Now this truth when conveyed to the world people who were biased and irrational with their approach were not happy and rejected. Not to forget they even killed people who said this as this was against their held RELIGIOUS belief/dogmas. This is what Bakhara (THE COW) means.  
 
Moses asked people to sacrifice this same yellow cow if they want to understand God’s way.  
 
 
Dawood: I see the problem with your above statement. According to the above, a person is not rational and is biased if he/she does not consider "enough" your, others, or Dr. QZ’s explanations. Is this the definition/meanings of rationality and/or unbiasedness?  
 
Mubashir: There is no problem at all, rationality and/or unbiasedness is when your concepts are presentable to any human which cannot be denied. If your concepts are like please leave your miracles and dogmas and believe in my miracles and dogmas then it is irrational and biased.  
 
 
Dawood :I agree with “Dawood needs to think more..” part. Have you done so at your part? What did God tell you about yourself?  
 
Mubashir: Good for you and humanity that you agreed to think more just to add and rectify. Yes I did asked for myself and God said “Lage raho Munna bhai…….Good going”  
 
“Mubashir: I know my answer is irrational, but so is the question itself. If anyone thinks question is valid then please assume even answer is valid.”  
 
Dawood: It is confirmed now by your own admission that you are being irrational. Good deal. We are humans.  
 
Mubashir : You see to a simple sentence you were able to interpret as YOU WANTED. When I said I know my answer to your comment and appeal to ask god is irratioanal, you generalized it to convey all my concepts are irrational. If to agree with our irrational answers/concepts is to be human, then please be Human.  
 
“Dawood : I don’t believe in any miracle, etc, except Quran itself is a miracle for me.”  
“Mubashir : Second part of sentence negates your first part. Any one can be true but not both.”  
 
Dawood : That is why exception clause is there. You agreed “Mubashir : I agree, it is indeed” with this “Dawood: Quran is an XTRA-ordinary book, nothing like it exists in the world.” At one level it is a miracle. It is said, this book is beyond time and space (Moazzam’s words), it is a miracle at another level. Can you explain the bases of your agreement with my statement?  
 
Mubashir: There is no exception, You cant say I hate all fruits, but I like mangoes. When you believe in any miracle then you cant claim I don’t believe in miracles.  
 
You said at one level it is a miracle, please define that LEVEL and what do you understand by Miracle ( Is it like teri tirchi nazar me hai jaadu(Miracle)?)  
 
What do you understand by “beyond time and space”. The concept here which Mauzzam was trying to convey is The Message and solutions given in Quran are valid in any era and at any place. Do you think otherwise that it was only for Arabs that too who lived 1400 years back and which is null and void now?? If not then you can say it is beyond time and space.  
 
Just 2 cents, with no intention to offend any being or opinion…  
 
Thanks,  
Mubashir Syed.  

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 06 October 2011Report Abuse
NARGIS,  
 
DHULQARNAIN: I thought Al-Quran was revealed in total, sometime in the month of Ramadan,  
 
***NARGIS; “Month of Ramadan”, I’m surprised that the translators didn’t add it was on a Friday or that the Quran was revealed at a green paper because it is an Islamic colour. They didn’t add the time either, was it 12 am or pm, was the Sheitaan sleeping and unaware of what was going on in his paganistic world. Until now he had mislead everyone to worship statues, but finally the most awaited month of Ramadan came and destroyed all his plans. Uffff God is talking about a month of Ramadan, and didn’t even give us the calendar…Now it is left to the mercy of human beings, either they make a calendar to give any meaning to the claim regarding the Quran and it’s time for revelation, or we have an pointless aya giving no meaning because God forgot to provide us the relevant calendar… ***  
 
I didn’t intend for you to focus on Ramadan as it is not relevant to an event which occured . The point of my post was the following:  
 
1. Whenever Al-Quran was revealed to the prophet it came from a source extrinsic to his/our natural plane of reality/existence.  
 
2. There was no exchanging of words/conversation between Allah and the prophet.  
 
Am I incorrect? If I’m incorrect please post the ayat where they are in a conversation.  
 
DHULQARNAIN: can you tell us:  
1. What law(s) brought forth the Creation?  
2. Where was the human being before he/she came into the world and what law brought him/her into the world?  
3. What law(s) governs the dead?  
 
***NARGIS NARGIS Is information related to these questions written in the Quran? Please provide the relevant ayah’s. ***  
 
This is precisely what I’m asking you! My point is, there are laws/phenomena which are beyond our plane of existence/reality and there is no way for you or anyone else to understand them. The wahy, which came in the form of Al-Quran, came from a realiy extrinsic to ours. This why I asked you how could the prophet know the following except from an extrinsic source:  
 
3:44 This is of the tidings of things unseen which We reveal to thee. And thou wast not with them when they cast their pens (to decide) which of them should have Mary in his charge, and thou wast not with them when they contended one with another.  
 
11:49 These are announcements relating to the unseen which We reveal to thee; thou didst not know them —(neither) thou nor thy people — before this. So be patient. Surely, the (good) end is for the dutiful.  
 
Dhulqarnain-

Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 06 October 2011Report Abuse
BOB,  
 
Dhulqarnain: Certainly it’s about God’s ability to establish laws both in our phenomenal world and the world of the Unseen.  
 
***BOB: the Quran would provide the indispensable evidence regarding Gods abilities to establish laws, if it’s meant for us to comprehend. I would say everything that is created is for us to grasp with time. Something that is not part of the creation is not for us to understand. However, the laws established are all here in this world; if they are unseen then they will be discovered. A law that is already in use (Transmitting wahy) is partly discovered, the remaining part is to prove direct interaction, something that the prophet would present before he ask others for proofs. I used to ponder on why the prophets said the information is from God, if they can’t prove it? ***  
 
Death is part of this world, but do you fully comprehend it? Do you think mankind will ever fully comprehend it? What makes death work? Wahy is realized in this world, but like death, which is also realized in this world, it is from a source outside of this plane of reality/existence.  
 
Dhulqarnain: but that speaks directly to our ability to comprehend!  
 
Death is part of this world, but do you fully comprehend it? Do you think mankind will ever fully comprehend it? What makes death work? Wahy is realized in this world, but like death it is from a source outside of this plane of reality/existence.  
 
Dhulqarnain: There are some laws that only Allah is aware of…for all time.  
 
***BOB: I would suggest that the creator of the universe is aware of ALL his created laws to every time. Humans will know as much as they work for and try to discover at each time. ***  
 
Again, Death is part of this world, but do you fully comprehend it? Do you think mankind will ever fully comprehend it? What makes death work? Wahy is realized in this world, but like death it is from a source outside of this plane of reality/existence.  
 
 
وَمَا كَانَ لِبَشَرٍ أَنْ يُكَلِّمَهُ اللَّهُ إِلا وَحْيًا أَوْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ حِجَابٍ أَوْ يُرْسِلَ رَسُولا فَيُوحِيَ بِإِذْنِهِ مَا يَشَاءُ إِنَّهُ عَلِيٌّ حَكِيمٌ (٥١)  
 
51. . it is not given to any human being that Allah should speak to Him unless (it be) by inspiration, or from behind a veil, or (that) He sends a Messenger to reveal what He wills by his Leave. … Accepted translation  
 
***BOB: Here we can see that to talk directly to a human being is not an option as per Quran… There is no way that a human being can talk to Allah, and Allah talk to a human being by means of wahy, behind a veil or through a messenger. ***  
 
Agreed, hence, there was no conversation between Allah and His prophet. Wahy came from Allah (nazzala) to him. If wahy is was already present in nature, then its discovery would not directly be from Allah, hence, it would not be wahy no more than man discovering coal can be called wahy.  
 
 
***BOB: As I understand from this, Quran have negated the theory of miracles, so the wahy when delivered to the Qalb of prophet is when he makes efforts to understand it. I cannot imagine God talking to the prophet as he is a human being and surrounded by the same laws like any other human beings. It means he must observe the wahy which is not visible to others because they don’t ponder on the world in the same way.***  
 
What you or I can imagine is not relevant ( imagining is conjecture), it’s what we can prove about Al-Quran that is relevant.  
 
I agree with you about the term miracle. I don’t use the term.  
 
How could the prophet know the following by observing nature:  
 
3:44 This is of the tidings of things unseen which We reveal to thee. And thou wast not with them when they cast their pens (to decide) which of them should have Mary in his charge, and thou wast not with them when they contended one with another.  
 
11:49 These are announcements relating to the unseen which We reveal to thee; thou didst not know them —(neither) thou nor thy people — before this. So be patient. Surely, the (good) end is for the dutiful.  
 
***BOB: This faculty to learn from the nature is, when nature comes so close to a human being that all hidden secrets start opening up. The person and nature becomes like two bows together (Sura 53 Verse 9). At this stage Nature starts revealing himself and THIS IS WAHI. “”***  
 
The faculty to learn from nature is called—Science, not wahy. The information which came from Allah’s realm/the unseen to the mind of the prophet cannot be fully grasped by science/the study of the nature.  
 
Dhulqarnain: Do you believe Al-Quran has untrue accounts in it? Yes or no. If so, what is you evidence?  
 
BOB: No, I don’t think the Quran has untrue accounts, on the contrary I think every claim provided to humanity in AlKitab, is proven and for us to comprehend. Otherwise we don’t need it, as we cannot understand it anyway. I don’t believe God provide us blind beliefs through his book, when he is fully capable of providing us evidence based Knowledge.  
You don’t “think” the Quran has untrue accounts…or are you certain it contains no untrue accounts?  
 
***BOB: As a human being, my needs are not fulfilled by a God who wants to be worshipped or to be blindly believed in; my needs are fulfilled through a God who provides me an assistance to superintend me out of the darkness so I can benefit and take help from the reality and not through misapprehensions. ***  
 
Allah has commanded our service for Him not worship of Him. I totally agree with you, bro.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  
 
 

Comments by: dawood On 06 October 2011Report Abuse
SA Nargis:  
 
“Nargis: Dear Dawood, HOW did you understand “from the commands of my Rab” to mean DIRECT CONVERSATION?”  
 
First, a clarification: Strictly speaking “Direct Conversation” is not the right word to be used here, because it is against (42:51): “And it is not for any human being that Allah should speak to him except by revelation or from behind a partition or that He sends a messenger to reveal, by His permission, what He wills. Indeed, He is Most High and Wise.”  
 
“Nargis: Even if we use your translation, it is saying ALruh is FROM THE COMMANDS/ Amri of my Rab…  
Now you should find out what commands wahy are of/from….What it is meant by “amri”  
40:45 by His Command doth He send the RUH”  
 
According to Lane (vol. 1, pages 97-98, Amr from root letters (Hamza, Mim, Ra) means: A command; an order; judgemnet; a bidding; injunction; a state; a business; an affair; a matter; a concern; choice, etc.  
 
Now cast a fresh look at 17:85. “They ask thee concerning the ALRUH. Say: "The RUH (cometh) by command (you can put any word here you like) of my Lord: of knowledge it is only a little that is communicated to you.” The point that I was trying to make is: Humans are given limited knowledge about it. We just cannot make a claim that He made a law and then broke it, etc., since we don’t know this to begin with.  
 
The above was/is my understanding. Now please enlighten me about your understanding of 17:85, etc? What you think it is, is it a law or not, and how have you inferred it to be so. Thanks.  
 
“Nargis: You have interpreted by command to mean direct conversation, which is fine and very common among Orthodox thinkers…”  
 
I have clarified the “direct conversation” part above. If you don’t know a law (any law) you cannot say it existed earlier and no more now? You can translate COMMAND to be equal to a LAW, it will not change anything.  
 
“Nargis: However, any discussion based on belief is a dead end, because belief is …belief. If you believe the Quran is given through direct conversation between God, metaphysical being, and the prophet, a physical being surrounded by the laws of nature, it is totally fine. Keep it up.”  
 
First, you are assuming God to be a “metaphysical being.” How did you get this?  
 
Secondly, please enlighten me about your theory as to how the Quran was delivered to the Prophet? Please use the verses to back up your claim.  

Comments by: dawood On 07 October 2011Report Abuse
SA Mubashir:  
 
“Mubashir: There was a time when people believed earth is flat and sun revolves around earth and a geocentric universe. But when God speaks with intellectuals who strive hard to understand the TRUTH, it was revealed that earth is spherical and earth revolves around the sun and not otherwise. Now this truth when conveyed to the world people who were biased and irrational with their approach were not happy and rejected. Not to forget they even killed people who said this as this was against their held RELIGIOUS belief/dogmas. This is what Bakhara (THE COW) means.”  
 
First, according to this assertion, “when God speaks with intellectuals..”, either God only started speaking fairly recently or there were no intellectuals up until recently. Which one or both are true and why?  
 
Secondly, the example is nice one to bring home the following points:  
1. Facts/Truth existed/exists, we recognize and know them or not.  
 
2. Intellectuals needed some instruments, some foundational knowledge, some observations, etc. to confirm and be sure that they have indeed discovered the truth/facts about the earth. But did they discover how the truth/facts were brought into existence? Which law was responsible to bring the earth into its present form? The answer is no. At this stage, various theories are being tested and contested. Can they, the intellectuals at this stage claim that the law that created the earth is working and/or no more working? This is the extent of human knowledge at this stage, despite the fact that humans can discover this law for there is no such restriction as mentioned in 17:85 about Alruh.  
 
3. Similarly, Alquran is a fact/truth in our hands which is a product of a law called Alruh (Wahi). First, did anyone used any instrument, a device, a mathematical tool, etc. to determine if the facts within this book are facts? Does there exist such a tool that can determine that it is indeed true? We at this stage even cannot determine this much, given the facts that it is a tangible thing in our hands and is much easier to handle it compared to the law that brought it into the existence? And there are no such restrictions like 17:85 as well.  
 
“Mubashir: There is no problem at all, rationality and/or unbiasedness is when your concepts are presentable to any human which cannot be denied. ….  
 
Dear concepts are concepts, its not like math. Concepts can always be denied on various accounts, such as, they are not well presented; not well understood; not well conceived, etc. My humble suggestion is that instead of saying “either my way or the highway” one should present his/her case to the best of his/her ability. Then leave it to the reader if he/she wants to take it. If there are questions, one could clarify them. In present case, we are talking about the Alquran. We should refer back and forth to the verses to put our discussion and concepts on solid footings.  
 
“Mubashir : You see to a simple sentence you were able to interpret as YOU WANTED. When I said I know my answer to your comment and appeal to ask god is irratioanal, you generalized it to convey all my concepts are irrational. If to agree with our irrational answers/concepts is to be human, then please be Human.”  
 
This simply demonstrated that one cannot infer a definite conclusion based on a very limited data or observation. I cannot generalize the way I did about you being irrational because the data/observation is very limited. In similar way, you cannot generalize that those who see or don’t see your way are biased, etc. Don’t take it to heart dear, you are my Brother.  
More later when I get time.  

Comments by: moazzam On 07 October 2011
Dear Dawood, Dhulqarnain,Mubashir, Sister Nargis! Although a lot of material for and against has been written at the matter under debate even at this blog too., but remained inconclusive.  
All of us agree at the point that, the divine message written in Alkitab/Alquran is no doubt most protected one, eternal, beyond time and space (called Alrooh/Rooh Alqudus). How/when/where it was revealed doesn’t matter, I advise all you-like intellectuals (may Allah bless you with more wisdom), please put your valuable efforts to enlighten the people with the “DIVINE MESSAGE” written in this ALKITAB in accordance with the current global scenario, and avoid to discuss such a matters which already ended with the Allah’s words “MA OTITUM MIAL ILLM E ILLA QALILA”. THANKS  

Comments by: Nargis On 07 October 2011Report Abuse
When arguments like this is presented: If you don’t know a law (any law) you cannot say it existed earlier and no more now? You can translate COMMAND to be equal to a LAW, it will not change anything.

ehhh, what?  
 
I guess you should continue your belief and when you have time, visit the other threads where this has been discussed in detail. Brother Moazzam is right, cough cough, just like myself :-D ... This is an old discussion and the arguments for or against are archived here somewhere over there, please read them.


Comments by: ARCHILOCUS On 07 October 2011Report Abuse
Peace Moazzam,  
 
***MOAZZAM:: How/when/where it was revealed doesn’t matter, I advise all you-like intellectuals (may Allah bless you with more wisdom), please put your valuable efforts to enlighten the people with the “DIVINE MESSAGE” written in this ALKITAB***  
 
Now you’re talking, Moazz. Exactly! What is the point of discussing matters which are conjectural in nature? Allah repeatedly warns against conjecturing. We have plenty of concrete issues to resolve from the The Huda/The Guidance which don't require conjecturing.  
 
What does this mean: ***“MA OTITUM MIAL ILLM E ILLA QALILA”. THANKS***  
 
Dhulqarnain-  

Comments by: dawood On 10 October 2011Report Abuse
Thank you Br. Moazzam for clearly stating that "our discussion on this issue remained inconclusive." I hope that everyone can see this reality and avoid putting a broad brush on those who don't see the way some see this.  
 
I fully agree agree with your stance that we need to put our efforts to understand the Divine Message. Thank you.  
 
Additionally, when you stated "Moazzam: All of us agree at the point that, the divine message written in Alkitab/Alquran is no doubt most protected one, eternal, beyond time and space (called Alrooh/Rooh Alqudus)," it highlights that we do have some degree of belief regarding this book to begin with, else we wouldn't be here.

»«
OTHER QUESTIONS ON
BELIEFS
Thank you very much for your hardworking on QURAN.... Sir kindly let me know about NAMAZ-E-JANAZA is this proved from Quran or not? if not so what should we do when we die.. plz tell me in detail. Question by: Adnan Khan On 16/01/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Zaman, Please explain the meaning of Islam, Muslim and Momin according to quran and your research. Thanks Question by: Naeem Subhani On 23/01/2010
 
how can we define that quran is the book of allah Question by: laiq ahmed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 01/03/2010
 
what is the meaning of Islam n Muslim? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 03/03/2010
 
Dear Mr. Aurangzaib Bhai: what is the concept of "PAAKI & NA-PAAKI" in our "DEEN" ? Kindly explain. and what is your SHORTEST/BRIEFED reply when someone taunts/asks you regarding performing NAMAZ, HAJ, keeping ROZA and giving ZAKAT? Question by: Adnan Khan On 15/03/2010
 
Dear Aurangzaib. Please explain about the 99 Names of Allah. What is the reality and what Quran says. furthermore pople also claim to prove Rasool S.A.W. names (quantity i don't exactly remember) from Quran. Question by: Adnan Yousuf Zai On 17/03/2010
 
Dear Mr. Aurangzaib: Please explain about the 99 Names of Allah, do such names exist in Quran? Question by: Adnan Khan On 17/03/2010
 
Asslam-o-Alikum.. Mujhe Pata hai mera sawal us level mien buhat chota hai jis level per app research kar rahe hain magar please 4 Cheezen in detail batain 1) Nazr-o-Niaz 2) Dargah 3) Huzoor (S.W.T.) Bashar Ya Noor 4) Huzoor (S.W.T.) ka Elm-e-Gaib Question by: Umair_Hamidani From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 26/03/2010
 
Respected dr. Qamar zaman kindly give a detailed concept about the life ,if any, after death with Quanic references especially, and had we spent a life before this present life. Question by: dr shahid From PAKISTAN On 26/03/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Zaman sb. please define the life after death from quran, regarding punishment, reward. Question by: Dr. Samreen Mohsin From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 27/03/2010
 
Question is open to the forum Does Islam shun or celebrate life?? Question by: MohYam On 31/03/2010
 
Dear aurangzaib sahib regards,the almost entire dean has been misinterprated and being followed by mass (so called muslims).In the light of Dr Qamars Quraanic research ,the most of europe seems nearly muslim states ware as muslims otherwise ,is it? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 09/04/2010
 
sir, According to Quran, i heard that God is beyond man's thinkings and could not be limitized or shaped and also not imaginated(equel to nothing).If someone accepts existance of God then he is wrong. Question by: mac.cruise On 17/04/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman,i want to ask you that at the time of imams how could such a large number of muslims be decived by tellin that the quranic word salat means the ritulistic namaz.sir i am so curious to know plz answer my question Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 30/04/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman i wolul like to ask you whether you have written other books besides the bokks given at your site.if yes plz tell me the names of a few more books.may God bless you.Ameen Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 03/05/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman my question is only for you i would like to ask you about GHUSAL after ejaculation in islam.is it necessary?what quran says about this? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 04/05/2010
 
dear mr qamar zaman or aurangzeb i have heard from mullahs that a non-muslim i.e a hindu or christian or any ,will never ever enter the jannah i.e the heaven no matter how much beneficial for humanityh he is.what quran says? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 10/05/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman or aurangzeb i have read in quran that muslims are not allowed to have a friendship with christian or jews i do not know the verse.plz elaborate can we have frienship with chritians or jews or non muslims? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 10/05/2010
 
my brother aurangzeb is eating parsad from hindus halal in islam. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 10/05/2010
 
dear aurangzeb you said parsad is not haram.but what about the verse of the quran where allah says that blood and pig and any thing upon which the nane of sth other than allah is taken is haram.so parsad should be haram.isn't it?plz elaborate Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 11/05/2010
 
brother auranzaib or qamar zaman is shaking hand with a non mahram halal Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 12/05/2010
 
a person told me that salat is the same ritual namaz and quoted versr from the quran which tell three times namaz i will give you reference only cause the lack of space (11:114) and(17:78).plz expalin it is very confusing brother aurangzaib. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 13/05/2010
 
dear dr qamar what is "TAWAAF".tell me about the hadiths which says:The "TAWAAF" will be continue untill the qayamat.is this a forged Hadith?plz elaborate Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 14/05/2010
 
dear aurangzaib, plz let me know about "ISTIKHARA".is it islamic?i have seen many people offering istikhara prayer Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 17/05/2010
 
dear aurangzaib i have heard that the "prophet Ibraham" was thrown into fire by "Namrood".and he was protected by Allah in the fire.is this mentioned in quran.isnt it a miracle and i think Allah does not do miracles.plz elaborat.thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/05/2010
 
My understanding so far that Quran is free from myth, miracles, fantasies, superstitions, dogmas.etc.. So what is the Concept of Jannat & Dozakh… Question by: Danish roomi On 18/05/2010
 
Salam.. mojuda QURAN kya wohi QURAN hai jo AP S.A.W.W ne murattab krwaya???agr han to phir wo asal quran dunya me kahin mojud hai.?? or agar nahin to phir hum is QURAN pr kese etbar kren jese ahadis sahih nahi to wese QURAN b SAHIH Nahi. Question by: UMAR HUSSAIN On 18/05/2010
 
dear aurangzaib a person argud with me that we should not use our mind in islam because we say that allah is merciful but look in the jungle one animal kills another ruthlessly leavind its offsprings alone.is it not cruelity.plz give me answer Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 20/05/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib, i acting for women in dramas and films or coming on televiion in news ,shows etc allowed in ilam.plz explain in the light of quran Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 20/05/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib, pal let me know whether asking the parents of bride for "Jahaz" i .e dowry allowed in islam.give a satisfying answer in the light of the glorious quran Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/05/2010
 
Jnab Aurangzaib sb / Dr.Qamar sb. Is it zina with wife to go to her for enjoyment and not for child. Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 27/05/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib i have heard from mullas that on the day of judgement the prophet wii do "SHAFA'At" for us.and qoute a verse from the ayatul kursi e.g "ila biznihi"is it right will prophet do SHAFA"AT For us.i think it is wrong plz explain Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 28/05/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib some people have misconception that God is not good becuse if he knew that a person was going to the hell then why he created him.plz give a satiusfactory answer from your islamic mind Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 29/05/2010
 
what Quran says about "DAJJAL"?... Question by: Dr. Samreen Mohsin From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 01/06/2010
 
dear aurangzaib or dr qamar tell me how to argue with a person who says that growing beard is a fundamental part of slam and your islam is incopmplete without it.plz give me some arguments sothat i can answer such blind people.God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 02/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib or qamar zaman the muslims preach there religion throughtout the world and so do the muskims of saudi arabia.but no non-muslim is allowed to preach his religion in saudi arabia.is it not unfair? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 03/06/2010
 
Dr Sahab when we are looking for everything in Quran than how can we say that CARNIVOROUS ANIMALS like cat,lion,dog and other animals like horse etc are Haram in Islam as we dont find any verse which says that these are haram? Question by: Nadeem_Akhtar From PAKISTAN On 03/06/2010
 
Dr sahab u say tht sex 4 enjoyment is permited whereas G.A Pervez says under 4:24(al.quran) while explaning words MOHSENEN AND GHAIR MUSAFEHEN that it is not permited and it can be done only when baby is needed.plzz explain Question by: Nadeem_Akhtar From PAKISTAN On 03/06/2010
 
sir plz tell me why islam allows a muslim man to marry a ehle kitab woman and does not permit a muslim woman to marry a ehle kitab. why there is such boundation over a muslim lady?thnx Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 04/06/2010
 
brother auragzaib is not the worship of idols shirk.when you argue with people that hindus too will enter the jannah they quote a verse from the quran that allah never forgives shirk as idol worship is a shirk so hindus can never enter the jannah Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 05/06/2010
 
dear mr aurangzaib is the profession of a lawyer permissible in islam.beacuse i have heard many people that it is haram and the income of a lawyer is haram.plz explain Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 08/06/2010
 
salaam Dr. sahib, Quran means reading/recitation, so the hadith followers argue that it is just for reading. how to give them a justified answer. and why is Quran translated as reading when it is for implementing? Question by: shireen On 09/06/2010
 
Salam Aurangzeb Bhai, would u please explain the mystery of kaba for me, why it is for us ect.......... Question by: Nadeem_Akhtar From PAKISTAN On 11/06/2010
 
dear brother auragzaib quran says pray for the MAGHFIRAT of your parents .what does it mean? if my parents have done something against quran how can allah forgive because of my pray.plz let me know about this Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 11/06/2010
 
dear aurangzaib is there any mention of shroud for the deceased in the quran?is it neccessary?plz explain.God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 13/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib plz tell me about some arabic lughats that are standard and suitable for me caz you know my level.and whats about al mawrid arabic-english dictionary?God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 14/06/2010
 
dear aurangzaib or qamar zaman if it was not the wife of the prophet zachariah that was barren but was his nation than whats your opinion about the verse(21-89-90) which says WA ISLAHAN LAKA ZAOJA and we cured his wife. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 16/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib is sayng "ALLAH O AKBAR" right according to quran? God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 17/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib some people dedicate goat to their dead parents.or when they are in some trouble or ill they decide to dedicate a goat etc to dedicate.i think it is not right but i am not that confident plz give this confidence.explain Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 20/06/2010
 
dear qamar zaman or aurangzaib a muslim is one that lives in peace.if someone abuses ones sister or moher or wife it is quite unbearable.what should a muslim do in this situation?should he fight with such a person?plz elaborate Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 22/06/2010
 
dr qamar zaman sahab regards in one of your answers in blog you have mentioned that if any none muslam is doing a good deed he will be rewared in life after death and you have quoted a verse of quran, but i want to ask about it. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 25/06/2010
 
dear brother aurangzaib or qamar zaman i want to learn about the fact about karbala i know that it is a false story but i want the reality from you.thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/06/2010
 
dear aurangzaib or qamar zaman kindly let me know about "NAZR E BAD"?thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 27/06/2010
 
the quran has been devided into RAKOO'AT and PARAS.is this division right Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 03/07/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman is the hell eternal despite of the mercy of God Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 06/07/2010
 
Aslamoalikum Dr. Qamar I have to ask you a question about life after death Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 11/07/2010
 
Dr Qamar and Aurangzeb Bhai, there is a verse in Quran 8:63 and 49:10,3:102 my question is about these verses, let me explain my question. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 11/07/2010
 
is burying the dead in grave neccessary ?hindus burn their dead is it right? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 11/07/2010
 
Dear Docter Qamer-uz-Zaman, A.A 1. Please explain in what sence Quran is the word of GOD? Question by: pervez On 11/07/2010
 
Dear Docter Qamer, In your opinion how for Iqbal"s philosophy of Khoodi is in cnfirmity with quranic teachings. Question by: pervez On 11/07/2010
 
i have heard that the prophet uzair was given death for 100 year by allah and then he was arosen.is it not a miracle?is it real plz expalin Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 13/07/2010
 
salaam Dr. Sahib, plz explain 5:101 and 102. what kind of question would those be that would turn people into disbelievers? Question by: shireen On 16/07/2010
 
Aslamolalikum Dr Qamar: I want to ask a question about Economical System, I am explaing it below. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 16/07/2010
 
Dr. Qamar there are verses in Quran whose usual translation give the whole pictures of Human development but it is imposible to believe on these verses 1400 years ago,therefore plz give the exact translations of all those verses. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 16/07/2010
 
Assal O Allaikum Paidaish Masih main Aap Ne yahya Ka Zikar kia (Salasa Alleel) 3 Raat hey Aap Ne is ka mafhoom Kaha Se lia he Aur Dorr-e-Zulmat ye kaha se lia he.( Aamrati ) Jis se murad Aurat K hain Aap Ne is se Muraad Qaum kaha se lia? Question by: babarsharif34@yahoo.com On 17/07/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman i have seen mullah to quote (2:102) to prove black magic .i think this verse it too mistranslated.plz explian? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 19/07/2010
 
is masturbation haram according to the following verse (23:5-7).i have seen mullah quoting this verse to prove masturbation haram.is it true? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 24/07/2010
 
dr zakir naik interpretes the verse (21:30) as the prediction of BIG BANG THEORY.i ask dr qamar whether this interpretation is true?plz tell does the above verse really tells about the BIG BANG THEORY? thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/07/2010
 
dear dr qamar zaman i argued with a person that quran is complete way of life(ZABITA E HAYAT).he told me if quran is complete than which sort of system it seems to establish.i will tell the rest part of question in comments becuse of the lak of sps Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 01/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaib or dr qamar is the clonning of human being allowed in islam? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 07/08/2010
 
Why God did not sent women as Prophet to guide humanity? Any one may like to answere. Question by: pervez On 07/08/2010
 
dea aurangzaib can we say merry christmas to a christian? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 08/08/2010
 
Dear Doctor Qamer sahib, A.A Allah is beyond human understanding but it is subject of Quran, why not life after death? Question by: pervez On 10/08/2010
 
IF QURAN IS BEYOND TIME AND SPACE WHY IT WAS REVEALED IN 23 YEARS? Question by: pervez On 10/08/2010
 
In accordance with QURANIC teachings is there any relationship of natural calamities like floods ,earthquakes etc with human deeds? Question by: pervez On 10/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaib does the Quran merely means RECITATION? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 12/08/2010
 
Please review" wahdatul waajood " in the light of Quran? Question by: pervez On 13/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaiib is the verse (2:222-223) about MENSTRUATION?i think it is about something else not menstruation.plz tell me what it means Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 15/08/2010
 
dear auragzaib Mullahs say how we will distribute The "WAR BOOTY" among the" MUJAHIDIN" if we do not believe in hadith books.how the prophet distributed the war booty, the quran does not tell.How should i answer such blind mullahs.Thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 17/08/2010
 
God has taken the responsibility of Quran for its protection, why not of other divine books if the message was the same and it was beyond time and space? Question by: pervez On 19/08/2010
 
dear auragzaib does ABUBAKAR mean the father of vigin(BAKIRA KA BAAP) or something else.plz tell me is calling him abubakar right.i think there is something wrong?Isn't it? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 19/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaib does the verse " And the Thunder and other Malaika strive to glorify Him by carrying out there duties in awe of him (13:13) show that Malaika are the forces of nature?or it is mistranslated.?this is the translation of allama pervez Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 19/08/2010
 
dear aurangzaib can you plz tell me about the history of Firqa ahl e hadith i mean its emergence ,history etc. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 21/08/2010
 
Dear aurangzaib Does islam allows to kill or punish people like Salman Rushdi?i think islam can not allow.am i right? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 22/08/2010
 
did moses really killed a man by hitting him according to surah qasas? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 23/08/2010
 
Dr Qamar sahib has reffered to a book Tafhim Ul Quran book 2 last line page 80 in the link below http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?SID=40&QID=453 I want to ask which book is it?who has writen this? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/08/2010
 
It is said that Abu Bakar launched Jihad against a group of people that refused to give ZAKAT.Is it right? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/08/2010
 
GOD IS ONE BUT WHY AT TIMES HE USES THE WORD WE, (NAHNO,PLURAL) INSTEAD OF I, (SINGULAR) WHEN HE ADDRESSES HUMAN-BEINGS IN HIS BOOK? Question by: pervez On 26/08/2010
 
WHAT IS THE CONCEPT OF INTEREST (SOOD) IN ACCORDANCE WITH QURAN? Question by: pervez On 26/08/2010
 
salaam Dr. Sahib, 1. what is the purpose of saying pbuh for prophets/messengers. does it give them peace after they are dead? 2. why especially for Muhammed and not for other prophets/messengers? Question by: shireen On 27/08/2010
 
Out of fourteen major religions of the world, is Islam the best religion to follow ? It can be noted that out of 6.5 billion world population only 1.4 billion are Muslims; among whom only about 24% are practicing Muslim. Question by: bqayyum From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 27/08/2010
 
Dear Docter Qamer, PLEASE THROUGH SOME LIGHT ON HUMAN NATURE, IN THE LIGHT OF QURAN ? Question by: pervez On 28/08/2010
 
In the quran Allah says that the body of Pharo will be preserved (10:92).Today it is said that Faroah's body was dscovered during excavations in 1898 .Is it the body of pharoa or this verse is mistranslated? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 28/08/2010
 
What is the significance of genotype and phenotype of a persons upbringing in the light of Quran? Question by: pervez On 02/09/2010
 
Dear aurangzaib the Lexicographer's of arabic were also IRANIS like Raghib,Ibne faris etc.And there is no lexicon writen in the age of prophet.is it possible that these IMAMS may also have done some corruption like the IMAMS of ahadith? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 05/09/2010
 
Dear Docter Qamer , Please give references of Quranic verses which guarantees individuals life after death? I request humbly for Docter Sahibs personal answer. Question by: pervez On 08/09/2010
 
Salam Qamar Sb, my question is that if we search gradually development of islam according to Muhammad's mind, then ultimately we concludes that Muhammad borrowed as Sikh pioneer Nanak did, is it true? please reply comprehensively? Question by: amnesty4all On 11/09/2010
 
Dear Docter Sahib , kindly explain verse no 81/19 sura taqweer ayat no 19. Question by: pervez On 12/09/2010
 
Dear aurangzaib or dr qamar can you plz prove KASHAF and ILHAM fake from Quran? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 13/09/2010
 
Dear Dr Sahib and brother aurangzaib can you plz tell me that what was the teaching method of prophet muhammad he was a mualim (teacher) so how he explained the KITAB and HIKMAH? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 14/09/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamar and aurangzaib i ave a question regarding the translation of verse(5:103).i will explain my question below in comments due to the lack of space. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 17/09/2010
 
KINDLY EXPLAIN IN DETAIL , AYAT NO 5-6 OF SURA AL-MOMINOON? Question by: pervez On 19/09/2010
 
Please explain verse 33 of sura noor? Question by: pervez On 19/09/2010
 
Please translate verse 223/2. traditional translation is, Question by: pervez On 21/09/2010
 
Dear brother aurangzaib i want to ask you was prophet muhammad given WAHI outside the quran?is there any verse in the quran which says that Prophet Muhammad was not given WAHI outside the quran?Thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 21/09/2010
 
Please explain Ayat no 34 of sura al-nisa. Question by: pervez On 22/09/2010
 
what the Quran says about the theory of evolution?Does the quran suport it? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 23/09/2010
 
Dear Dr Sahib and brother Aurangzaib kindly expalin what SUNNAT is according to the Quran? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 27/09/2010
 
Please explain concept of Praying in Islam? Please do not not mix it with Namaz. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 29/09/2010
 
Please briefly describe economic values Quran desires to be followed in a welfare state? Question by: pervez On 30/09/2010
 
Please briefly describe political values Quran desires to be followed in an Islamic state? Question by: pervez On 30/09/2010
 
What should be the salient features of the defense of an Islamic state in the present scenario in the light of Quranic values ? Mubashir Syed to please include your views on keeping weapons of mass destruction. Question by: pervez On 01/10/2010
 
Historically speaking, a Muslim soldier fights courageously, world knows that, question is why? Question by: pervez On 01/10/2010
 
Please explain origin and meaning of word Allah in Arabic language? Question by: pervez On 09/10/2010
 
Please discuss evolution in the light of" Kun fayakoon" Question by: pervez On 10/10/2010
 
What is God's interest in our well being when he is omnipotent. Please answer this stupid question? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 11/10/2010
 
Where is Muslim world found today in view of new definition of , Muslim, momin etc and does there exist Muslim Umma in these modern times? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 11/10/2010
 
salam dr shab janab sey arz hey k hum english nai jantey,hum kesey quran samaj saktey hain hamarey jeasey kafi loog hain jo ser urdo jantey hain hamara bhe huk hey k deen sumjhain. aghar deen main ibadat nai hey to (maksad e hayyat)kiya hey Question by: iqbalasghar From PAKISTAN (SARA E ALAMGIR) On 14/10/2010
 
salam, janab dr sahab jawab aap sey manga thaa jawab koi or deeta hey kiya ye theek hey ye bhi ho sakta hey k jawab deney walla meri tara k student ho brae mehbani khood jawab dain shukria Question by: iqbalasghar From PAKISTAN (SARA E ALAMGIR) On 18/10/2010
 
PLEASE REVIEW SIGNIFICANCE OF" MAIHER" IN MUSLIM MARRIAGE LAW IN THE LIGHT OF QURAN? Question by: pervez On 21/10/2010
 
sr. mere sawal kajawab nahi mila jin aurat ka shohar marr jae woh 4 mahina 10 din ki eddat kion karti he? haqqoqunnissa parh leney k bad phi sawal mera yahi he ? Question by: babarsharif34@yahoo.com On 21/10/2010
 
Please explain "QAYAMAT" in detail? Will it come when the whole universe will be destroyed and ALLAH will disclose NAMA-I-AIMAL of every individual and his fate for paradise or hell will be decided? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 22/10/2010
 
Gay's, homosexuals claim they are born like that....What do our Astanamembers have to say about it ? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 22/10/2010
 
Salaamun 'Alaikum, After careful research and study on some 'key' Quranic concepts, I realize that we are to ESTABLISH DEEN in our lives REGARDLESS of the Secularists and their man-made laws. What are your thoughts on this viewpoint? Question by: Damon From UNITED STATES (PITTSBURGH) On 23/10/2010
 
does the concept of hoor exist in christianity?plz help me know it.i need it very much Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 26/10/2010
 
Sir, AAP KI KITAB HAQIQAT MALAIKA PARHHI AIK SAWAL THA. ALLAH NE HAMAIN MALAIKA PAR IMAN LANE KO KAHA HE. AGAR AAP NE JO TAREEF KI MALIKA KI TO US PAR IMAN KA KIA TALOQ BANTA HE. Question by: babarsharif34@yahoo.com On 05/11/2010
 
Some Aastana peer watch the Video on the link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaCWVXNByTc) and comment on its religious aspect Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 05/11/2010
 
Have you read Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 07/11/2010
 
We have discussions about life after death and how disruptive it was to imagine that there is no life after death. Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 08/11/2010
 
Is "wahy" part of "sunnat Allah"? If so, how does it works in relation to the laws of nature? Can it be proven? I have another question too (answer one,get one free)please explain 2:78, what it means& whts with the slaves, free, women, etc? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 10/11/2010
 
MERRY EIDMAS AND HAPPY OLD YEARS,SORRY I MEAN CHRISTMAS MUBARIK . Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 16/11/2010
 
Dear Doctor Qamer ,Muslims believe Prophet Muhammad is "Khatim-un-nabeen" Kindly support this faith with reason? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 19/11/2010
 
Have a look at this : http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/origin.html Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 21/11/2010
 
IS QURAN A SIMPLE BOOK TO UNDERSTSND? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 23/11/2010
 
Someone please explain the "dream" concept of Prophet Yusuf? What do the Quran say about dreams,are they true or just thoughts? Im waiting,help:- O Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 24/11/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman Please translate verse 2:219 correctly. "And they ask what they should give.Say what is surplus".Does the arabic word "AFU" means surplus? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 27/11/2010
 
Salaam. Is the Quran saying anything about Aliens ,monsters from other planets etc :P?? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 30/11/2010
 
There is an ongoing discussion on “Ourbeacon” regarding the phrase “Allah-hu-Akbar”. I believe the subject matter to be extremely profound, something which members of Aastana would appreciate reading. Question by: William From UNITED KINGDOM On 30/11/2010
 
Is there any word in the Quraan for BELIEFor BELIEVE? Is Islam an ideology(A comprehensive and coherent set of basic beliefs about political, economic, social and cultural affairs that is held in common by a sizable group of people within a society)? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 01/12/2010
 
What are the meanings of EIMAN n MOMIN in 49: 14-15? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 01/12/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman do you believe that people can still get WAHI from Allah,and become Nabi?Do you not believe that Muhammad was the last who received direct knowledge from God?Why do you say Muhammad is appointing authority of other prophets? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 02/12/2010
 
I have created a branch of the Aastana blog called "Linguistic & grammatical Exposition of the Quran" on Facebook and hope all of you join. nahi to..argg Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 04/12/2010
 
Dear All: Please go through my comments. Question by: Adnan Muhammad Khan From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 04/12/2010
 
PLEASE EXPLAIN AYAT NO 7 OF SURA 33 ( AL AHZAB) Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 06/12/2010
 
Does Quran gives the concept of Nationhood or Countries as they exist today. If yes then what should be the mode and form of Government. Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 07/12/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamarzaman: Plz enlighten us about the verse14/48 keeping in view the context of the subject from 42-52.Also the verses 11/107-108,with respect to the context 11/103-108.Thanks Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 15/12/2010
 
How many men and women claimed Prophet hood after Muhammad and did anyone of them made any significant achievement or influenced humanity positively? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 18/12/2010
 
Dear All, what is Ahmed Huluci's Ellah ( idoelogy ) of Islam ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 20/12/2010
 
Plz explain 38:27, how can one become kafir if he think differently about the universe. Also explain 29:44,"signs in the heaven and earth for those who BELIEVE"? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 24/12/2010
 
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman or brother Aurangzaib a person told me if God can communicate with Moses,Jesus and Muhammad.So why can he not communicate with anybody else today?Please answer my question.Thank you very much Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 25/12/2010
 
Why do people try to prove the Qur'an through science? We find science in other books than the Quran, why are not they labeled as "divine"? Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 26/12/2010
 
I wonder how and why the Human Beings have assumed the status of the best life spices on Earth (or Universe). The term "ASHRAF-UL-MAKHLUQAT" was also coined unilaterally without considering the significance of Mankind in the Universe. Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 27/12/2010
 
Please watch , a good video on zakat http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vtmZNziH6U&feature=player_embedded#! Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 29/12/2010
 
PLEASE DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN SCIENCE AND DIVINITY ? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 30/12/2010
 
AL-KITAB + LAWS OF NATURE, is divine guidance as Moazzem says, Why humanity was plunged in to religious wars??? SCIENTISTS NEVER FIGHT IF THEY ARE PROVED WRONG. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 31/12/2010
 
Muslims invented 5 pillows of Islam. Why learning Arabic is not mandatory in Islam?? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 31/12/2010
 
Dear Dr. Qamar Zaman: can you explain: [6/105] وَكَذَلِكَ نُصَرِّفُ الْآيَاتِ وَلِيَقُولُواْ دَرَسْتَ وَلِنُبَيِّنَهُ لِقَوْمٍ يَعْلَمُونَ Question by: M.N.Khalid From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 01/01/2011
 
Sura Baqra Ayah 223 "Your Women are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth as ye will ......". If Allah had to restrict husbands to wifes only then why was "AZWAJ" not used instead of "NISA". Here NISA means any woman (not necessarily wife). Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 01/01/2011
 
Aap ke nazar me Tauheen e Risalat koi jurm hai ya nahi? 2- Tauheen e Risalat ke mujrim ko kia saza milni chahye? 3- kia ghair muslimo ko is baat ki ijazat honee chahyee ke wo Rasool e Akram PBUH ki shan me gustakhi kar saken? Question by: UMAR HUSSAIN On 04/01/2011
 
dear dr qamar sahib please translate the verse 4:34.thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 06/01/2011
 
Has Human's beautiful (Animal) instincts and natural desires been checked by Divinity ? Question by: M.N.Khalid From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 08/01/2011
 
Is Sex allowed with Slave Women in Islam? Dr Zakir Naik http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UVmSQHquJc&feature=player_embedded#! Question by: mohd.areeb On 08/01/2011
 
Dear Dr Qamar sahib i am not noticing your presence on the blog.You know that without you this blog is nothing.I know you are very busy.But i request you to please give some time to the blog.Thank you very much Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 09/01/2011
 
http://www.jang.com.pk/jang/jan2011-daily/10-01-2011/col8.htm Every one is invited to comment on above cited column written by Ansar Abasi, especially. Dr. Sb., Aurangzaib sb., Moazzam Sb., Dr. Shahid and Sister Nargis. Question by: Adnan Muhammad Khan From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 10/01/2011
 
A tribe in Africa who exercise "incest", and believe it to be a divine law. A consequences of such action are injurious to following generations, What are those consequences ? Question by: M.N.Khalid From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 10/01/2011
 
What is good about the "Little Mosque on the Prairie"? Question by: Zubair From UNITED STATES (WASHINGTON) On 11/01/2011
 
Surah Al-Ahzab Ayat No.57 and 61.. for Mr.Adnan and others. Question by: UMAR HUSSAIN On 11/01/2011
 
-Is the Quran changed?If yes,what is changed, how do we know it is changed, and what does it mean when it says no1 can change it?(i have a clue about the last one, but want to share it when i read your answers :-D) Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 25/01/2011
 
How to increase your knowledge? Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 25/01/2011
 
Brother Aurangzaib, I read Q&A of the your blog and found this ref of "Tabqaat-e-Ibn-e-Saad" to Dr. Samreen On23 Sept2010, http://www.aastana.com/blog/aastanablog.asp?MID=4&SID=21. If the author of this book is `Abdullah ibn Sa`d Ibn Abi Sarh' Question by: Syeda On 29/01/2011
 
What is free will? What is basic instinct? How does free will separate man from animals? Question by: Junaid From PAKISTAN (KARACHI) On 31/01/2011
 
QURAN GIVES US PERMANENT VALUES BEYOND TIME AND SPACE, WHAT ARE THOSE? LET US ENUMERATE AND DISCUSS THEM ONE BY ONE? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 02/02/2011
 
Salaam Shalom shabba dabba do ,what is the "driving force" in Human beings, and what is the "nafs" thing? Are human beings superior to other creatures ? If yes, why?hhhhmmmm Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 17/02/2011
 
PERSONALITY IS CHANGELESSNESS IN CHANGE. WHAT IS THAT? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 25/02/2011
 
CAN PROPHETS MAKE MISTAKES? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 10/03/2011
 
Salaam to all (and me) ,What giant "fish" (whale/shark-zilla?) ate Prophet Yunus (37:142) Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 12/03/2011
 
Dear Aurangzaib and dr qamar sahib IS ALLAH THE ACTIVE FA'IL (DOER) IN THE UNIVERSE,OR HE HAS SET LAWS WHICH MANTAIN THE ORDER OF THE UNIVERSE?if allah is not the active fa'il will it not make him a far unapproachable God? n is allah a personal God? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 15/03/2011
 
Please review law of DEET. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 16/03/2011
 
Dear brother aurangzaib plz let me know about the actual story of TOOFAN E NOH (noah flood).i think the so called n2I interpretation is fake.am i right? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/03/2011
 
dear brother auragzaib plz let me know about the actual story of toofan e nooh.i think there is sth wrong with the so called n2i interpretation.am i right Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/03/2011
 
salaam Dr. Sahib, Does curse effect any one at all according to Quran? Question by: shireen On 22/03/2011
 
What's the point of mental development & how is it beneficial 4 the humanity? Does the Quran explain why we have to expand our capabilities when we are all goin to die anyway? how will Youm qayama have any meaning to me, when I'm not here? Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 22/03/2011
 
Good News As convener of Janat e Pakistan, Dr. AsarulIslam has nominated Mr. Aurangzaib Yousafzai as the adhoc President and “Party Leader” in Rawalpindi/Islamabad What are the Quranic injunctions for a political party ? Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 23/03/2011
 
Congratulations to brother AURANGZAIB!!! Dear Brother Aurangzaib i have come to know that you have been choosen as the president of JANAT E PAKISTAN party.I am very happy and want to congratulate you from the core of my hear!!! Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 24/03/2011
 
Brother Moazzam! Should we join/launch any political party to establish the true Islamic state?? As there are already so many parties working under the same manifesto. Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 24/03/2011
 
Can anyone announce manifesto of Jannet-i-Pakistan political party to see how it is different from manifesto of other political parties in Pakistan? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 24/03/2011
 
Will AI surpass Human Intelligence? Question by: Zubair From UNITED STATES (WASHINGTON) On 27/03/2011
 
Brother Aurangzaib ! With out you this blog seems like a picture with out color. eagerly waiting for your comments at mine 29th,march. HOWALLAZEE URSILA RASOOLAHO BIL HUDAA WA DEEN ALHAQQ LIYUZHIRAHO ALLADDIN-E-KULLIH, 6:33, 48:28, , 61:9 . Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 30/03/2011
 
Could woman be an IMAM/NABI/RASOOL in a man dominating societies.While keeping in view her physical system, structure, and her psychology,also MALKA SABA.If not then what about in the societies where she has equal rights? Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 30/03/2011
 
Moazzam saheb and Aastana Members! Your teachings reflects that there is no any predestined event being played at earth. What about the historical steps been described in Quran about prophet Musa and Yousaf see verses 12/4-5, 28/5-7?? Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 06/04/2011
 
The world has succeeded in creating global village by study of "lohimahfooz" and "Alkitab". Is it wise to struggle for a state having label of "Islamic state" which will create a sect in humanity and will not be acceptable even by Muslim Ummah? Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 13/04/2011
 
1- Agr KHATIM ka matlab validater hae to MUHAMMAD se pehle kaun ye fareeza sr anjam deta tha? (haln keh Quran doosre nabbiun ka to zikr hae validater ka nahen) 2- Aur MUHAMMAD k bad ab kaun validater hae? Question by: Dr. Iqbal On 18/04/2011
 
In 3/81 " aur jb ham ne nabbiun se MISAAQ lya , jinhen ham ne KITAB aur HIKMAT de k jb tumhare pas koi RASOOL ae , us ki jo tumhare pas hae to tum us pe IMAAN le ana aur us ki NUSRAT krna....." wo kaunse NABI the aur RASOOL hen aur IMAN ka matlab? Question by: Dr. Iqbal On 18/04/2011
 
My dearest brother bob,please throw light on following ayats, sura haj ayat 47, almaaruj ayat 4, ayat 17 : 52 , ayat 10 : 45 , ayat 23 : 113. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 22/04/2011
 
In the present scenario of changing human civilization, Does the institution of family holds permanent value beyond time and space? What guidance we get from Quran. Question by: momin From PAKISTAN On 27/04/2011
 
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman, I wondered if the Quran are making any statements which are not certifiable, or describes mechanisms that our mind cannot understand? If yes, then how are such claims and depictions advantageous? Question by: bob From UNITED KINGDOM On 30/04/2011
 
Dear Members, I want to know about the true story of Toofan e Nooh. Is it different from orthodox story? Wassalam Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 01/05/2011
 
Dear members, please share your valuable thoughts about these questions Question by: bob From UNITED KINGDOM On 03/05/2011
 
IF AASTANA MEMBERS ARE NOT CLEAR AT THE VERY BASIC (IMPORTANT) ISSUE OF HAYAT ADDUNYA and AKHIRAH, HOW WOULD THEY GUIDE THE PEOPLE LIKE ME? PEOPLE LIKE MR MOAZZAM COULD ONLY MISGUIDE,AS I POINTED OUT IN THE BEGINNING.BE AWARE Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 03/05/2011
 
Dear All, does Quran try to convince people about existence of GOD which cant be proved??? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 04/05/2011
 
HAZRAT ALLAMA MOAZZAM SAHAB ! Enlighten us about the ALLAH O AKBAR. Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 05/05/2011
 
DearAurangzaib and Aastana members! Could atheist be included in the glad tiding offered to mankind in verse 2/62 . Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 06/05/2011
 
Can the Existence of God, as the Creator, be scientifically proved, irrespective of Quran's verdict that the nature of His existence can't be comprehended? Question by: aurangzaib From PAKISTAN On 12/05/2011
 
Allama moazzam Sahab ! IS POLYGAMY HARAM IN ISLAM AS A SPECIAL CASE ? For more detail read my comments Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 13/05/2011
 
What is alam-i-amer and alam-i-khalq, Question by: pervez On 16/05/2011
 
Dear brother Aurangzaib hope you are doing well.Plz let me now what the word RIBA means.Does it mean the interest of bank.Thank you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/05/2011
 
How can an individual act and help in creating an Islamic society because all efforts for this objective ends up in the demand for a theocratic state. What course of action has been laid down in the Quran Bakhtiar Qayyum Question by: bqayyum From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 21/05/2011
 
Dear Members I wnat to know the divine laws which Quran wants to implement on society. Thanks Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 23/05/2011
 
Dr. Zaman and Aastana Team, While your interpretation of the Quran in "Human Rights" terms is quite refreshing what does the Quran say of one who engages majority of his life in vain deeds(movies, games, relaxing ect) while being peaceful(Muslim)? Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 23/05/2011
 
Dear brother Moazzam plz elaborate what is meant by AL YAHOOD and ALNASARA (as character).I request my respected brother Aurangzaib to take part in the discussion also.Jazakallah. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 23/05/2011
 
Salam Not all Muslims or believers get a Jenna in this life as one could b peaceful all their life n develop cancer, bad kids, divorce, car accident injury, ect.. How do u explain when bad things happen to good peaceful people? Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 24/05/2011
 
51:56 وَمَا خَلَقْتُ ٱلْجِنَّ وَٱلْإِنسَ إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُونِ Pls explain the above ayat. wassalam Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 24/05/2011
 
Salam, Dr. Zaman and Students of Quran, what is the point in praying for the sick or praying for anything for that matter if God wills not to intervene in our lives? Yes we must do our part but where's the hope if God will not intervene? Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 25/05/2011
 
If all aspects of life are controlled by the divine laws and Alkitab is also preserved in "Loh-e-Mehfooz", then everything has to pass the test of logic. What then is the logic with Haraam and Halaal according to Quran. Shariq Question by: SS From CANADA (VANCOUVER) On 25/05/2011
 
Dear Dear ones, is there anything called "soul" in the Quran? Explain like im two years old, here i need spoon feeding or feedingbottle. Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 26/05/2011
 
Dear Dr. Qamar, With all the information on this site and similarly others, how is one to digest it all? There has been a battle to rewire your system to think more rationally and when you think you are, you get another wake up call. Years, maybe? Question by: Shirley C From UNITED STATES (PITTSBURGH) On 26/05/2011
 
Dear brother Mubashir regards,i remember once some Mullah raised objection against the interpretation of MARYAM by Dr QZ that Name can not be translated.Then Dr QZ gave the answer.I request you to send me the link plz.God bless you Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 26/05/2011
 
Aslamoalikum Mozam bhai would you please elaborate the terminology Al-Kitab?? Thanks Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 29/05/2011
 
Please Members What is the true story behind Ashaab e Kahaf, mentioned in soora e Kahaf. In orthodox interpretition these people sleeped in a cave for thousand of years, or something like this. Thanks Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 30/05/2011
 
Salam Dear Brothers Where may I find "Adam o Iblees" English translation of Dr. Zamans book? Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 31/05/2011
 
Salam Dear Brothers (Sisters included) and Aastana Administrators, Does the Quran give us a clear reason of WHY we are on planet Earth in human body and what we are here for? Please see comment below. Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 01/06/2011
 
Dear Brothers and Dr. Zaman, I've been beating myself up over this understanding of shirk or believing in a wrong concept of God. Yes I've read your understanding on this issue but there is a verse in Quran which warns those that say God is trinity Question by: Anwar From UNITED STATES On 02/06/2011
 
Kia app log Hadeeth ko nahi manty? kia app koi hawala hadeeth sy nahi detay. Mojzat ka to Hadeeth main bhi Ziker hay kia app mojzat ko nahi manty? Question by: guest From PAKISTAN On 05/06/2011
 
Dear Moazzam. I want to salute you for your hard work. I started learning Quran only 6 months back and I only started looking at AASTANA couple of weeks back. Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 05/06/2011
 
Dhulqarnain, Can we follow the injeel and Torah of today? Question by: Nargis-Badshah-Salamat From FIJI (FAUJI) On 06/06/2011
 
Tahir Ul Qadri Ne Murday Ko Kalima Padaya (urdu video) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Mfb6QriVh8 Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 14/06/2011
 
Dear Moazzam i have seen your recent post about Allah.I want to know Is Allah God or it means ISLAMIC STATE.Do you believe in a God who is FA'ALON LIMA YUREED.And what makes you not believe in a God who is an active fa'il? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 14/06/2011
 
dear moazzam DOES GOD EXISTS?And if he is not involved in the universe and i say HE IS DEAD.Will it be okay with you. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 15/06/2011
 
Is the Sunnat of Allah Unchangeable? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 15/06/2011
 
Dear brother Moazzam who authored the Quran according to you?Allah or Muhammad himself?Please do not go in details.Just tell me Allah or Muhammad that who is the author of the Quran.Best wishes!!! Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 18/06/2011
 
Dear Moazzam What is the meaning of " INNAHOO LAQUALOO RASOOLIN KAREEM " if the text of quran is from almighty Allah Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 19/06/2011
 
Dear Members,One group waiting for youm ul aakhira as life after death, other group said that youm ul aakhira will be happend in this world. Many people died waiting for this in this world. Are these two groups not in the same condition of waiting Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 20/06/2011
 
Dear All, Recently my uncle have a stoke and his right side is completely paralysed. He cant speak nor can comprehend.He is facing very hard days. What do you think, is he facing makafat e amal. Please comment Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 02/07/2011
 
HAS ALLAH, IN HIS QURAN, RULED ON THE EXPRESSION OF HUMAN SEXUAL BEHAVIOR OR IS MAN FREE TO DECIDE ON HIS OWN HOW TO EXPRESS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 08/07/2011
 
IS INCEST, AS A PARTICULAR SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ALLAOWABLE OR NOT ALLOWABLE IN DEEN AL-ISLAM? IF ALLOWABLE, WHY? IF NOT ALLOWABLE, WHY NOT? PLEASE GIVE AYATS. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 09/07/2011
 
DR. QAMAR ZAMAN WROTE: "SO ACTUALLY THERE IS NOTHING TO BE CALLED PREMARITAL SEX". IS THIS ASSERTION, ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, TRUE?!? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 16/07/2011
 
NARGIS WROTE: THE ZANI IS SOMEONE WHO DISTORTS THE QURANIQ WORD. IS THIS ASSERTION, ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, TRUE? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 18/07/2011
 
who is allah Question by: hm.zeeshan On 19/07/2011
 
Does aya 57/3 justify/give meaning that Allah is beyond time and space? Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 20/07/2011
 
Is it true that Moses prayed for Aaron and Aaron became prophet. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 21/07/2011
 
ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, IS THE UTTERING OF ALLAHU AKBAR, ACCEPTABLE IN THE DEEN OF ALLAH? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 21/07/2011
 
Mummy of Pharon in Egypt is the same pharon who clashes with Moses. ? Is it conforms from Quran? Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 23/07/2011
 
CAN ANYONE ANSWER THIS SIMPLE QUESTION---ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF--AKBAR? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 23/07/2011
 
Dear brother Moazzam if someone wants to understand the Quran and he is studying it for the first time.How should he study it?How he should attempt to understand a particular episode of the Quran.Thank you very much... Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 29/07/2011
 
Sahibaan, Lanati ka salaam Kia Quran paak main Roh amr Rabbi ke ilawa Rooh amr Allah bhi likha hai? In dono main kia farq hai? Question by: Universal-Lanati From ARMENIA On 30/07/2011
 
Dear Dr.Qamar and members. Please explain 21/53-60. and also 6/76-80 Were those idols made of stones? Didn't they used to worship كَوْكَبًا,الْقَمَرَ,الشَّمْسَ Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 01/08/2011
 
Dear Sir, It is being preached and commonly understood that Quranic guidance is eternal and everlasting for mankind during all eras. Whether any verse of Quran support this version ? if so , please quote reference of said verse . Thanks. Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 02/08/2011
 
Dear Sir, As per verse No.20 of Sura Al-Furqan(25) All , " Mursaleen;s" ate food and walk about in streets........... Why "Mursaleens;s" came to Seyedina Ibrahim ( who had to go towards "Qoum-e-Loot" , 51/32) denied to eat food from Ibrahim ? Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 02/08/2011
 
Dear Member, According to my new understanding I have left namaz,roza,Hajj. etc.Now what should I do according to Quran. How can I become a good Momin wothout these rituals. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 02/08/2011
 
WAS THE PROPHET WHO WAS GIVEN THE QURAN...THE LAST PROPHET? YES OR NO AND PROVE EITHER POSITION. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 05/08/2011
 
IS AL-QURAN THE LAST/FINAL REVELATION FROM ALLAH? YES OR NO AND PROVE EITHER POSITION. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 05/08/2011
 
Salaamun Alikum Dear Aastana Members Please forgive me if I offends the spirit of aastana as I am going to ask few question which seems critical to me. Question by: mmkhan20 From SAUDI ARABIA (JEDDAH) On 08/08/2011
 
Dear Aurangzaib sb, Please explain the meanings of verse 37 of sura 41 Thanks Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 19/08/2011
 
IS AASTANA BLOG DEVOTED TO PHILOSOPHICAL MATERIALISM AND RELIGIOUS HUMANISM AND NOT AL-ISLAM? I'M BEGINNING TO BELIEVE SO. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 19/08/2011
 
Dear Sir, Please explain the meanings of verse 37 of sura 41 Thanks Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 20/08/2011
 
TRUE OR FALSE? 4:82 Will they not then meditate on the Quran? And if it were from any other than Allah, they would have FOUND IN IT MANY A DISCREPANCY. 10:37 And this the Quran...THERE IS NO DOUBT IN IT, from the Lord of the worlds. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 20/08/2011
 
Dear Moazzam,Dr QZ as you say Quran should be understood according to grammar.I have a question:All the Arabic grammars were written by IRANIS.Is there no possibility they have corrupted it like Ahadith?Thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 22/08/2011
 
43:45 And ask those of Our messengers whom We sent before thee: Did We ever appoint gods to be worshipped besides the Beneficent? HOW COULD MUHAMMAD HAVE ASKED THE PRIOR MESSENGERS...ANYTHING? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 23/08/2011
 
Dear Zul-Qarnain. (with Two noons). You have repeatedly asserted on this blog that Surah Al-fatehaa is not part of the Al-Kitaab (Al-Quraan). Hereby I am humbly requesting you to produce your proof. (Read more in comments) Question by: Iqbal kay shaheen From NAMIBIA (WALVIS BAY) On 23/08/2011
 
TO ALL WHO IS THE "YOU" MENTIONED IN THE FOLLOWING AYAT? 2:4 And who believe in that which has been revealed to YOU and that which was revealed before YOU and they are sure of the hereafter. Question by: PRIEST BOKMEI From UNITED STATES On 24/08/2011
 
Dear Moazzam and Dr Qamar sahib Is the Phrase ALFE SHAHR MURAKAB E TOUSIFI or MURAKKABE ADADI?And what does it mean?Thanks Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 28/08/2011
 
Dear Dhulqurnain,Why Allah called Himself Al-Momin and Al-salaam in 59/23 Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 30/08/2011
 
Dear Dr. Q.Z sb. A questio as comments below. Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 30/08/2011
 
WHY ARE RACIAL SLURS TOWARD AFRICAN AMERICANS ACCEPTABLE AT AASTANA BLOG? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 31/08/2011
 
CHALLENGE! CHALLENGE! CHALENGE! CAN ANYONE NAME ONE PROPHET, ALONG WITH, AND SINCE THE DEATH OF THE PROPHET REFERRED TO AS MUHAMMAD? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 06/09/2011
 
NARGIS/AASTANA BLOG, PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS CONCERNING AYATS 3:21 AND 33:40 Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 08/09/2011
 
NARGIS, MOAZZAM, WASEEMAMEER, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. GIVE US YOUR EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE. NO MORE CONVOLUTED DISCOURSES. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 13/09/2011
 
WASEEMAMEER, WHAT IS THE TRUE MEANING OF 51:56? WHAT IS THE HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DHULQARNAIN AND AASTANA THAT NO WAY CAN THEY GATHER ON ONE PLATFORM? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 15/09/2011
 
Dear Dr.Qamar and members. Please explain the meaning of Moosa and Esa. At what paradigms ابواب they are at, and what meanings they give on those ابواب? Dear Dr.Sahab, your input will be highly appreciated. Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 16/09/2011
 
Is the Quran preaching BELIEVES ? I.E does it state anything in order to achieve unconfirmed belief in its students? 2) does it back up its claims with proofs, 3) HOW? Question by: Nargis2 From TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (TOMBACCO) On 16/09/2011
 
NARGIS and MOAZZAM THERE HAS BEEN ALOT OF TALK ABOUT THE "GRAMMAR" RELATIVE TO AL-QURAN. MY QUESTION IS THIS, ISTHE GRAMMAR 100% ACCURATE? YES: EXPLAIN NO: EXPLAIN Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 17/09/2011
 
QAMAR, MOAZZAM, NARGIS, NAEEM, DOES QAMAR AND AASTANA BLOG BELIEVE THE FOLLOWING ASSERTIONS TO THE TRUTH? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 27/09/2011
 
Mr. Aurangzaib: Who is responsible for detracking me and many others who left Ramazan Fasting, Namaz especially after reading your booklet"tahqeeq namaz o salat"at Aastana? are you not an instable personality as per your shufling record?? Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 27/09/2011
 
NARGIS, MOAZZAM, WAQAR, NAEEM, ET ALL IS WAHY OR EXTRINSIC OR INTRINSIC? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 29/09/2011
 
PEACE TO ALL, ACCORDING TO AL-QURAN, WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF...A GOD" (I'M NOT REFERRING TO ALLAH, BUT THE TERM GOD IN GENERAL )? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 02/10/2011
 
WHICH TAKES PRIORITY--TASREEF OVER GRAMMAR OR GRAMMAR OVER TASREEF? PLEASE EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION. Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 03/10/2011
 
What is the position of Athiest in Quran? Will Athiesm be practiced/ let exist in the Quranic Society? What difference it will make if oneself is Athiest? Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 05/10/2011
 
PEACE TO ALL, MOAZZAM ASKS: CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROPHET AND MESSENGER PROPHET, NABI AND NABI RASOOL? Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 07/10/2011
 
what the harm if someone perform rituals. Will Allah ask him why you did rituals. If one perform rituals and other dont then whats the difference they make on society. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 09/10/2011
 
PEACE TO ALL, DOES AASTANA BLOG REPRESENT: DEEN AL-ISLAM OR... DEISM. DHULQARNAIN- Question by: ARCHILOCUS From UNITED STATES On 15/10/2011
 
Dear Sir, Please explain meanings of 27/42 to 44 Thanx Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 30/11/2011
 
Dear sir, Please put some light on the death of Hazrat Hussain according to the history. and Dr sahib, we all are waiting for complete quranic translation Question by: matifsaeed From PAKISTAN (LAHORE) On 30/11/2011
 
PEACE NARGIS AND MOAZZAM. WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO ADDRESS THIS MAJOR CONTRADICTION: TELL US CLEARLY, IS YOUR POSITION STATEMENT "A" OR STATEMENT "B"? DHULQARNAIN- Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 01/12/2011
 
PEACE TO ALL, TO MY QUESTION: DO THE MALAIKA DO WRONG/EVIL? NAEEM SHEIKH ANSWERED: YES, SEE 2:34 IS HE CORRECT? DHULQARNAIN: Question by: DHULQARNAIN From UNITED STATES On 15/12/2011
 
WHY QURANISTS ARE DIVIDED LIKE RELIGIOUS MULLAHS IF THEY CLAIM THE RIGHTEOUS ONES ??? Question by: Mujeeb From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 01/02/2012
 
What do you guys think - Why some children around the world are born with defects like, blindness, handicapped, infected with acute diseases (HIV) etc., Why do they suffer their life for no fault of their own? Why does God do this them? Question by: sameermoopa From INDIA On 05/04/2012
 
Dear Members: Pls share ur thought on:'What is the 'purpose' of our existence?' Quran says 'And I didn't create the jinn and mankind except to do my IBADATH'(51:56). If this is the purpose, what does IBADATH mean here? Why God wants our Ibadath? Question by: sameermoopa From INDIA On 09/04/2012
 
can some one enlighten us about the real concept of SALAWATULLAH ALA NABI.Thanks. Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 20/04/2012
 
Assaam,iam Nasir(India)iam understanding salah by your explanation tell me about vazu in surah maaida Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 26/04/2012
 
thank you a better answer that Salath is not namaz so what is reality of namaz how this exist Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 28/04/2012
 
assalam,was Allah speak with insan directly ? Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 04/05/2012
 
agar zina najayij talluq nahi tho najayij talluq ke baare me quran me kya hai? Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 15/05/2012
 
dea members. If someone do misdeeds(do wrong things) than he repent and ask toba, will he still have to suffer his misdeeds in this life. Question by: Saeed From PAKISTAN (KARACHI(MSAEEDTAJ@GMAIL.COM)) On 10/06/2012
 
respected qamar sir, what about here after life(Akhirath) in sight of quran? Question by: ameet From INDIA (ANANTAPUR) On 17/06/2012
 
Respected Dr Zaman. I am reading your translation of the Quran with great interest and I thank you for your efforts. I would like to understand the concept of Akhirat in light of the Quran. Salaam. Question by: Riaz From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 11/08/2012
 
If soam is not traditional "Roza" then why the later part of ayat relating to soam says that the women should complete the count after finishing with their menses? Question by: ansasausam From UNITED STATES (FLUSHING) On 27/10/2012
 
What is Shetan, can shetan affects the desire of Momin? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 11/12/2012
 
What "the Aastana research forum says about the Atheists ??? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 13/12/2012
 
What is the true sense of Duaa' mentioned at many places in Quran and been used as an effective tool in almost all religions? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 13/12/2012
 
salaam Dr sahib.pls explain the meaning of نسخ ? and 2:104? Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 17/12/2012
 
Salam Dr sahib pls Explain verse 2/106 مَا ننسخ من آية Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 19/12/2012
 
ABOUT EISA "death/up lifting to heaven" Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 01/04/2013
 
Some body asked about the meaning of سِقَايَةَ الْحَاجِّ وَعِمَارَةَ الْمَسْجِدِ الْحَرَامِ . Here it is answer to the question asked. Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 23/04/2013
 
Some body asked that, how does it affect "the understanding of qura'an" as well practical life of people if Eisa borne with OR with out father???????? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 25/04/2013
 
Dr sahib salam pls pls pls explain 2:233 والوالدات يرضعن أولادهن.......................... Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 01/05/2013
 
who is muthllakth المطلَّقات Question by: saidalavi ansari From INDIA (KERALA) On 01/05/2013
 
Hijab Jilbaab/ by Moazzam Islam Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 18/06/2013
 
Respected Dr, Qamar Zaman sb some one says mostly the trad trans is what is written in Quran but what U r bringing is new verbal meanings of Words,why should we choose those words as Quran is Mubin and it explains itself.e.g what U describe of halal. Question by: shaista From PAKISTAN (LAHORE) On 08/12/2013
 
Kindly send Dr. Qamar Zaman's US phone number to me at AsarSyed@gmail.com Question by: Asarulislam From UNITED STATES (LOS ANGELES) On 12/06/2014
 
I wrote many times in the form on the site, but no one answers. So, I have a translation of the book "THE TRUTH ABOUT SALAT. Dr. Qamar Zaman" to Russian. Do you want to put it on the site? Question by: onlyquran01 From RUSSIAN FEDERATION (RUSSIA) On 04/07/2014
 
Respected Aastana team, please could you kindly point me to the surah and ayat number of the two ayats referenced on page 9 & 10 of Sarchashma Hidayat sirf Al Quran? Thanks in advance for your assistance. Question by: Riaz From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 27/12/2014
 
Aoa, dear aastana members can you kindly translate surah ikhlaas exposing its main theme Question by: Abdul Hadi Saqib From PAKISTAN (LAHORE) On 14/03/2015
 
مسلمانوں کی نمازوں کے زرتشتی ماخظ Dowanload Question by: Adnan From PAKISTAN On 17/04/2015
 
i have asked two questions please Dr Q z sab post my 2nd question in this blog too. if it is not possible to post it here. then please reply to me via email. as i am really confused about the soum. why ghulam ahmed perwez sab couldn't explain? Question by: kanju swat From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 11/11/2015
 
aap jo quran ki wazahat karte hein 'kia aap khuda(god) per yaqeen(belief) rakhte hein? oor han(yes)! to aap ka aqeda(belief) kia hai? Question by: sufyanarif From PAKISTAN On 21/12/2015
 
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved
www.aastana.com