TOPIC: Islam >> Beliefs
Q.Dear Dr. Q.Z sb.  
A questio as comments below.
By: M Aslam On: 8/30/2011

1.Dear Dr. Q.Z sb.  
You have translated 33/40 as محمد تمہارے مرد میداں میں سے کسی کے پیشوا نہیں ہیں which is against reality & facts. Actually Mohammad (pbu) was/is leader(peshwa ) of all muslims. How you justify your version ?
Comments by: M Aslam On: 8/30/2011

 
2.Dear M Aslam! In verse 33/40  
مَّا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِّن رِّجَالِكُمْ وَلَكِن رَّسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا  
To comprehend the meanings of the said verse you have to know the sense of the Attrebute مُحَمَّدٌ first, there is indetailed discussion at this blog.
Comments by: moazzam On: 8/30/2011

 
3.Please direct me towards link of that discussion.
Comments by: M Aslam On: 8/30/2011

 
4.Dear M. Aslam!Mohammad is not a proper noun rather a character, Mohammad could be any NABI/ RASOOL who possesses the attributes of Ahmad as mentioned in verse 61/6.  
Mohammad as a NABI /RASOOL has the power / authority to validate / appoint ambiya in his time as mentioned in verse 33/40…  
مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ وَلَكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًاRemember there is no death to the character Mohammad.  
Go through the following verses to get involved in a very impotent discussion regarding " Khatem annabiyyeen" خاتم النبیین  
,3/164,2/129,9//128,40/34,28/59,39/71,3/101,20/134,23/32 ,14/4  
NOTE THE FOLLOWING POINTS PRIOR TO GO A HEAD  
1:- the Quranic term “KHATAMA” has been used in verses 2/7,6/46,45/23,42/24,36/35 meanings are very clear as a SEAL[even in in orthodox translations] it should be noted that Allah is فاعل in these verses.  
 
2:- The Qura’nic terminology “ IMAM “ has been used for prophets, see the verses 25/74,17/71,21/73,33/24  
 
3:- The Qura’nic terminology “RAJJAL” has also been used for prophets see the verses 21/7,16/43,12/109.  
 
4:- We believe that Qura’n is the last and final book (Alkitab)  
5:- There is almost half the Muslim population who believe in continuation of IMAMS (ahl-e-tashie).  
6:-Mind the difference is only to call them as a IMAM OR RASOOL  
7 :- If we believe ,that KHATIM means last, then according to orthodox believe the prophet EISA must be the last one not the MOHAMMAD.  
8:- If suppose, we consider the KHATEM means last then this will be in particular for NABI NOT FOR RASOOLS.  
9:- Think what would be the justification of 16/36,3/164,2/129,9/128,40/34,28/59,39/71,3/101,20/134,23/32 ,14/4 where Allah assured to send his messengers in every nation even in their languages  
وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِنْ رَسُولٍ إِلا بِلِسَانِ قَوْمِهِ لِيُبَيِّ  
Let us analyze the verse 33/40 مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ وَلَكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا 1: In verse 33/40 (فاعل ) is MUHAMMAD not Allah.  
 
 
1: Remember “ RASOOL ALLAH خاتم النبیین is the antonym of “ ABAA AHADUN MIRRIJALEKUM” as it is obvious from the verse33/40.  
2:- Pleas read the whole surah AL AHZAB, which is dealing with the war like situation and WILAYAT-E-NABI ,please focus on verse 5/33, concentrate on the terminology “ABAA-E-HIM”,who are ABAA? in fact,Their ascendants  
3:- Now go to the verse 33/23 and concentrate at term “RIJAAL” actually these are the people to whom Muammad appointed as a (nabi) for the certain task .  
 
4:-A RAJAL could be "NABI" who having the ATTREBUTS of Muhammad as per verse 61/6 (وَإِذْ قَالَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ يَا بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ إِنِّي رَسُولُ اللَّهِ إِلَيْكُم مُّصَدِّقًا لِّمَا بَيْنَ يَدَيَّ مِنَ التَّوْرَاةِ وَمُبَشِّرًا بِرَسُولٍ يَأْتِي مِن بَعْدِي اسْمُهُ أَحْمَدُ فَلَمَّا جَاءَهُم بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ قَالُوا هَذَا سِحْرٌ مُّبِينٌ) .  
The calamity of NABOWAT will be verified by Qura’n as per Muhmmad’s attributes.  
This is a point which has been described in the early part of the said verse مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ .  
Also the complete text of Surah Mohammad shows that there is continue hard/tough struggle in war like situation (maarka-e-haq-o-batil) to establish the Islamic state.  
The rewards( fruits of welfare state for Momineens) and the harsh consequences to Kuffar have been described. In the above said circumstances the Rasool with the attributes of Ahmad holding the position to appoint different commanders (ambiyas) is called MOHAMMAD.  
 
5:-Any rasool by a certain course of struggles as mentioned in verse 17/71 could get the status of MUHAMMAD..  
 
6:-The one of the apparent sign of a rasool, who is holding the title of "Mohammad" is, his companions around him having the qualities mentioned in verse 48/29.  
 
We should not worried about the personality of Mohammad (as he is not the supper human). He is a Rasool with the attributes of Ahmad see the verse 3/144.  
Mind! there is no any preplanned event at earth being played by Allah, other wise the concept of reward / punishment will be collapsed, as, if we consider” Muhammad or Ahmad” as a proper noun ,see the verse 61/6 (وَإِذْ قَالَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ يَا بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ إِنِّي رَسُولُ اللَّهِ إِلَيْكُم مُّصَدِّقًا لِّمَا بَيْنَ يَدَيَّ مِنَ التَّوْرَاةِ وَمُبَشِّرًا بِرَسُولٍ يَأْتِي مِن بَعْدِي اسْمُهُ أَحْمَدُ فَلَمَّا جَاءَهُم بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ قَالُوا هَذَا سِحْرٌ مُّبِينٌ) .Remember Alkitab is beyond time and space, please don’t confined it in particular era.  
 
Comments by: moazzam On: 8/31/2011

 
 AASTANA.COM © 2005-2010