Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Join AASTANABLOG
Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

TRANSLATION OF QURAN
BY DR. QAMAR ZAMAN
Translation Status
آیات
سورۃ
نمبر
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now


»«
BOOKS
HAQIQAT E HAJ
Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
as'salamualikum aap ne jo quran ke hawale (,,2/129,3/164,10/74,16/36,16/89,17/15,28/59,40/34) diye is se yeh maloom hota hain ke mohammed (s a w) aakhri nabi nahi they balke qayamat tak nabi aur rasooloon ka silsila rahega??
Add Your Comments  Question by: ABDULLAH NAMBIAR On 28 November 2010
Comments by: momin On 29 November 2010Report Abuse
Dear all,  
 
This is very sensitive and extremely important issue for everyone to think over.

Comments by: moazzam On 29 November 2010
Dear Momin: you are right ,in fact the religious intrigues entangled the emotional Ummah in their net ,and made this extremely important matter a very sensitive issue. My dear when the building of their religion has been demolished( along with its five pillers) with the quranic arguments,then what about the dareness required to address this issue in the light of quran.

Comments by: Dr. Qamar Zaman On 30 November 2010
Dear Abdullah nambiar ,  
 
This question has been asked before . I am posting once again the same answers with some details ,I hope this will suffice most of the readers quest .  
 
Rasool is a messenger so logically a Rasool can not be a Rasool without amessage. Now to know how allah gives a message is told in verse 51 of sura 42 .  
 
وَمَا كَانَ لِبَشَرٍ أَنْ يُكَلِّمَهُ اللَّهُ إِلا وَحْيًا أَوْ مِنْ وَرَاءِ حِجَابٍ أَوْ يُرْسِلَ رَسُولا فَيُوحِيَ بِإِذْنِهِ مَا  
يَشَاءُ إِنَّهُ عَلِيٌّ حَكِيمٌ  
 
51 it is not possible to any human being that Allâh speaks to him except by Wahi , or from behind a veil, or that He sends a Rasool to reveal what He wills Undoubtedly He is Most High, Most Wise.  
 
Now who is Nabi ?  
 
Nabi is a strong personality and implementer of the Wahi. You may study all those verses and suras where the word Nabi has appeared and you will find him :  
- As Giving orders  
- Making decisions  
- Appointing commanders  
- Head of the states  
So Rasool can not be a Rasool without Wahi as he is amessenger of Wahi. And Nabi can not be a Nabi without Wahi as he is the implementer of Wahi .  
 
Your question needs two words / terminologies to be understood .نبی and النبی The root letters of the word نبی is either ن ب و or ن ب ی نبی from ن ب و means a person posted at a high position like a Head of a state .But نبی from ن ب ی means a person who gives some news , and in Religion it means a person Who gets news from the God and gives it to the nation .النبی is a proper noun because of additional ال . Now the word وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ has appeared only once in sura 33.  
 
مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ وَلَكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا  
 
Now as you can see in the word خا تَم there is a زبر Zabar over the alphabet َت , So the paradigm isفا عَل with a زبر zabar over عWhereas in the word خا ِتم there is a Zer زیر under the alphabet ت ,so the paradigm is فاعل with a زیر zer under ع The words found under the paradigm فاعل ( fa il )with a زیر are کاتب katib قاتل qatil قادر qadir حامل hamil etc as you can see the meanings of the words made under this paradigm has inherent meanings of having faculty of a doer performer ,or an operator .The word خاتم with a زبر over ت is not under this paradigm but it is under the paradigm فاعل with a زبر over ت .The other word made under the paradigm with a زبر over the alphabet ع is عالم meaning universe with a زبر over ل . So to construe the meaning of خاتَم as the last prophet is through interpretation.Let me quote Ameen Ahsan Islahi on page 239 of Tadabbur -e- Quran Book 6 . دونون اھل لغت کے نزدیک بالکل ھم معنی ھین " خاتم Khatim خاتم Khatam  
 
Last man of a nation, Result of a thing , Last stamp of a letter, all these things are included in its meanings .”Although neither خاتم with زیر nor خاتم with زبر means to stop .The categorical word meaning the last is not used which is آخر ,this has made the whole confusion  
 
Now let us see some verses about closure of the coming of messenger, verse 71 of sura 39  
 
وسِيقَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا إِلَى جَهَنَّمَ زُمَرًا حَتَّى إِذَا جَاءُوهَا فُتِحَتْ أَبْوَابُهَا  
 
and those who rejected will be driven to hell in groups, till they reach it, the gates will be opened . and وَقَالَ لَهُمْ خَزَنَتُهَا its keepers will say  
 
أَلَمْ يَأْتِكُمْ رُسُلٌ مِنْكُمْ يَتْلُونَ عَلَيْكُمْ آيَاتِ رَبِّكُمْ وَيُنْذِرُونَكُمْ لِقَاءَ يَوْمِكُمْ هَذَا  
 
Did not the Messengers come to You from yourselves, reciting to You the Verses of Your Lord, and warning You of the Meeting of This Day of yours?  
 
َقالُوا بَلَى وَلَكِنْ حَقَّتْ كَلِمَةُ الْعَذَابِ عَلَى الْكَافِرِينَ  
 
they will say: "Yes, but the word of torment has been justified against those who rejected to accept .  
 
Note that  
1,.. messengers will be from amongst us ,not an outsider .  
2,.. messenger will recite by himself .  
3 .. messenger will warn us of the day of meeting .  
 
Considering the concept of the Mullah none of the past RASOOL ( messenger ) was from amongst us ,nor did he himself recite the AAYAT of RAB ( آیات ربکم ) nor did he warn us ,as they have left us centuries ago .  
A messenger according to this verse should be from us , should teach us by himself and warn us of the consequences .)  
Another verse no 21 from sura 3  
 
إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَكْفُرُونَ بِآيَاتِ اللَّهِ وَيَقْتُلُونَ النَّبِيِّينَ بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ وَيَقْتُلُونَ الَّذِينَ يَأْمُرُونَ بِالْقِسْطِ مِنَ النَّاسِ فَبَشِّرْهُمْ بِعَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ  
 
21. Verily! those who reject the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and kill the Prophets without right, and kill those men who order just dealings, ... announce to them a painful torment.  
In this verse the verbs used are not in past tense ,the verbs are  
یکفرون یقتلون  
These words can either be translated in present tense or future tense . these words can in no way be translated into past tense . So when this verse was revealed to prophet Mohammad there were so many انبیاء and it is a non ending continuous process .  
Another verse no 4 from sura 14  
 
وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِنْ رَسُولٍ إِلا بِلِسَانِ قَوْمِهِ لِيُبَيِّنَ لَهُمْ فَيُضِلُّ اللَّهُ مَنْ يَشَاءُ وَيَهْدِي مَنْ يَشَاءُ وَهُوَ الْعَزِيزُ الْحَكِيمُ  
 
4. and we always sent a Messenger in the language of his people, so that he the messenger makes the message clear for them. And then God does not guide the one who wants to remain misguided but guides only those who wants to be guided because He is the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.  
 
Even orthodox translations do not differ . see the orthodox translation,  
 
4. we sent not an apostle except (to teach) In the language of His (own) people, In order to make (things) Clear to them. Now Allah leaves straying those whom He pleases and guides whom He pleases: and He is Exalted In power, full of wisdom.( orthodox translation )  
Note :--من یشاء has been translated in orthodox translations as “for whom He pleases “ and proverb He is supposed to be God , this creates a problem ,and people are justified to ask “ why then man is responsible for his deeds .?”The word من is not for God but for the person who is doing a deed by his own choice .  
 
Now coming to our main discussion .  
 
There are many more verses which can be quoted in support of the above mentioned verses but lets now discuss it from another angle .  
The purpose of Quran is to establish a welfare state with a balanced socioeconomic system of justice to provide peace and prosperity to the community .  
 
To fulfill that aim , presence of a living leader is necessary . the messengers of the past can not come back and establish a welfare state , these personalities can be a role model to follow but can not guide us like a living person .  
For God to make someone the first or the last does not give that man any superiority on others . If becoming the last is superiority then automatically the previous ones were inferior ,which is against Quran .  
 
It can only lead to personality cult .  
 
Now coming to verse 40 of 33  
 
مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ وَلَكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا  
 
Lets see the orthodox translation first for comparison ,  
40. Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (He is) the Messenger of Allah, and the seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things. ( Mohsin khan )  
 
40. Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (He is) the Messenger of Allah, and the seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things .( yusuf Ali )  
 
even these orthodox translators have translated خاتم النبیین as seal of prophets.  
 
Now keeping in mind the verse 21 of sura 3 ( already discussed above ) , which clearly indicates that so many prophets انبیاء were present in the times of prophet Mohammad . This verse no 40 of sura 33 is declaring that Mohammad was the seal of the prophets , which simply means He was the appointing authority of other prophets .

Comments by: mohd.areeb On 01 December 2010Report Abuse
Dr.sb your answer have created very much confusion. Now where to go??????????? Plz tell what is the difference between your point of view regarding khatam-e-nabuwwat and of Qadyani sect. Will you tell the blog members who were other Nabi's at the time of Muhammad(SAW)???????????????? Is't it a new research??Who is a Nabi at present in India/Pakistan or any where in the world or you are going to declare yourself a Nabi in near future after making the minds of people

Comments by: Abdun On 01 December 2010Report Abuse
Salaam the poison of sovereign thought has infected the world, I read Dr. Qamar Zaman, and notice this disease of the mind is expressed in his information, if Allah is the Only Sovereign and not even a messenger of Allah can or could be sovereign over anyone, as clearly explained within the Qur'an, how can this statement be correct, quote:  
 
"To fulfill that aim , presence of a living leader is necessary . the messengers of the past can not come back and establish a welfare state , these personalities can be a role model to follow but can not guide us like a living person."  
 
The many symptoms we all suffer to varying degrees in the modern world, is from the disease of sovereign thought, an intentional indoctrination and establishment of the Roman Catholic Church, a death cult religion without value or benefit, I am happy to provide vast evidence to support this position, if demanded.  
 
The societal models expressed within the guidance of the Qur'an require no sovereign, Islam demands the individual is personally responsible for there actions, a sovereign is a mental crutch to trick the mind into thinking the unacceptable is acceptable, Allah is the ONLY sovereign.  
 
I have explained the four basic societal models of Islam in four short essay's posted on the fron tpage of my website:  
Allodial ownership  
polycentric community  
common law  
human energy economics  
 
I have also write some essays explaining how these models can be incorporated into real life applications:  
Islamic car insurance  
Islamic repository  
university community model  
 
as a few examples.  
 
We do not require the arrival of a Saviour, we require the arrival of true Muslims, who understand Muhammad's Islam, reject religion, and demand a sovereign free environment and establish a society of unity, harmony and growth.  

Comments by: Nargis On 02 December 2010Report Abuse
MOHD AREEB  
 
where did Dr Qamar say he is AGAINST khateme nabowat?Why did you write that on ourbeacon? people like you make me angry, and believe me, it does'nt happen often.  
 
Read Dr Qamar's post again.

Comments by: drshabbir On 02 December 2010Report Abuse
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman Saheb, AA  
 
You have written:  
 
QUOTE: "Now keeping in mind the verse 21 of sura 3 ( already discussed above ) , which clearly indicates that so many prophets انبیاء were present in the times of prophet Mohammad . This verse no 40 of sura 33 is declaring that Mohammad was the seal of the prophets , which simply means He was the appointing authority of other prophets ."  
 
QUOTE: "The purpose of Quran is to establish a welfare state with a balanced socioeconomic system of justice to provide peace and prosperity to the community .  
To fulfill that aim , presence of a living leader is necessary . the messengers of the past can not come back and establish a welfare state , these personalities can be a role model to follow but can not guide us like a living person .  
For God to make someone the first or the last does not give that man any superiority on others . If becoming the last is superiority then automatically the previous ones were inferior ,which is against Quran .... "  
 
QUOTE: "Considering the concept of the Mullah none of the past RASOOL ( messenger ) was from amongst us ,nor did he himself recite the AAYAT of RAB ( آیات ربکم ) nor did he warn us ,as they have left us centuries ago .  
A messenger according to this verse should be from us , should teach us by himself and warn us of the consequences"  
 
DR.SHABBIR: Dear Sir, we are curious. Please tell us know how your new ideas differ from the Qadianis. I thought KHAATAM with zabar (Fatha) over T means the CLOSING SEAL. Qadianis say exactly what you have said that KHAATAM means the appointing authority of other prophets and you believe that we need a living messenger/prophet from among us. If you come up with that claim, I will sincerely consider it and not be the first one to reject.  
 
Thank you!

Comments by: William On 02 December 2010Report Abuse
Abdun,  
 
The concept of Allah can be quite difficult to comprehend if biased opinions are lagging! Allah is not a deity as perceived by many people.  
 
From my understanding (bearing in mind this explanation is basic) Allah is a divine system of Governance that controls all state affairs. It is a specific authority of the state the implements and maintains the laws of the Quran.  
 
Now, if the Quran is beyond space and time, the fact remains that the divine system should be implemented at the present time.  
 
Obviously any government or council require a leader to deal with state affairs, making decisions, co-ordinating all activities of the government departments, ensuring the standard of living including safety and security for the citizens is at the best level and creating an ambience of positivity and harmony.  
 
It is logical.  

Comments by: William On 02 December 2010Report Abuse
mohd.areeb,  
 
If a person is able to fathom algebra, and is able to solve a mathematical problem, should he be disrespected?  
 
If I was able to distinguish Mexican currency, 20 pesos, and a South African Gentleman was also able to recognise the note, how is that peculiar?  
 
It is said that truth stands out from erroneous assertions – then it would be probable that someone will come to realise the truth, it is inevitable!  
 
Person A is able analyses and cross examines the Quran without any biased opinion, using sound logic and reasoning and comes to understand that “Salat” is not ritual of prayer.  
 
Person B is also able to grasp the concepts and comprehends what the Quran is referring to.  
 
Person C is critical of person A’s character; producing assertions and discrediting his personality in the public eye. Person C also attacks person B, sanctioning both, categorising and labelling them as mediocrists, and declaring them “Kafir”.  
 
The lack of understanding and insecurity forces person C to only produce insults. Person C lags behind not developing or progressing – no new knowledge is absorbed. It is a real shame indeed.  
 
I hope you understand my subtle hint !  
 

Comments by: moazzam On 02 December 2010
Dear Dr Shabbir: regards,a Quranic meager student is daring to ask you(the renowned Scholar) the following 1:-Should we be impartial of sectarian’s belief while elaborating the quran. 2:- Should we select the meanings of the quranic terms by comparisons n analysis, which is most suited and posses eternal sense.3:- Should we be in-emotional while solving any deference of opinion, in quranic elaboration, and try to implement the rational approach, lexicon, tasreef alayat,and scientific knowledge. 4:-If many other beliefs, other than the KHATM E NABUWAT are exactly matching with some one’s true quranic belief, does it mean he is QADYANI. 5:- In my opinion, the Qadyanies or any one having their belief, ideologies, and behaviors those are UN-QURANICS,should be declared none Muslim in general.I think Dr Qamarzaman having true inference of HKATEM AL NABI, WHILE OBSERVING THE FOLLOWING VERSES,(,,2/129,3/164,10/74,16/36,16/89,17/15,28/59,40/34).

Comments by: Abdun On 02 December 2010Report Abuse
Salaam William,  
 
I am more than aware of the structure of Allah, this does not alter the fact you can have no earthly sovereign, and Allah is the only sovereign, the religious personification has nothing to do with this concept, I am not suggesting you pray or climb a mountain to have your decisions made for you, I'm suggesting you make you own decisions through the application of reason upon the facts of the situation, as you are held accountable personally for the result of your decisions, but decisions based on the guidance of the Qur'an.  
 
'OBVIOUSLY' you say is the very disease of the mind I am explaining, obviously you have not bothered to read the systems I have presented for your consideration on my website, because obviously you cannot conceive of Islam from your perspective of religion, diametrically opposed to the sovereign systems humanity suffers in the modern world, the Qur'an explains but requires a clean mind, not one that has preconceived views, 'obviously' presents such contamination. These four systems I explain on my website were established in the past by true Muslims, free of sovereigns and slavery.  
 
Muhammad never establishes a government, he never created a state, he established the four models of Islam, Muhammad never established himself as sovereign, and he never gave sovereignty to anyone else as Muhammad knew Allah is the only sovereign; you state obviously, but Muhammad did not establish what you see as obvious.  
 
You say sovereignty is logically, when it is the opposite, this confusion is a creation of sophistry, when has sovereignty aided humanity? The sophists attribute many things to sovereigns, take as an example Vlad the impaler (1431-1476), he was a devout Roman Catholic, religion empowered, and Sovereign of Transylvania, he was a very effective sovereign, in fact he completely irradiated crime, in his view, as no one committed crime in his kingdom.  
 
How did the sovereign manage such a feat, he murdered, as all sovereigns do, even the sovereigns of our modern world, little has changed, here's a little of his method of crime removal:  
 
Vlad's tyranny was such that none dared break any laws in his land, for fear of being punished or killed.  He even had his mistress disembowelled publicly for having lied about being pregnant with his child.  Vlad enjoyed torturing and killing women, often mutilating their breasts and sexual organs in the process. He is even rumored to have forced mothers to eat their own babies.  In order to impress visiting dignitaries with the efficiency of his methods at promoting order, he had a gold cup placed on display in the center of central square of Tirgoviste, unguarded from any thief that would fancy stealing it during the night.  The cup remained, as no one would have been so foolish as to risk impalement for being caught stealing.  
 
Impalement was a particularly horrible way to die, Victims were either impaled from the anus or in the case of women, the vagina, but rarely from the mouth, as this usually meant a quicker death.  The impaled would then be hoisted up, their own weight dragging them down upon the thick stakes, the process sometimes taking several hours.  Vlad was only referred to as the Impaler sometime after his death, a "title" he would have probably liked to have held during his six year reign, for the number of those who suffered this cruel fate at his hands may number well into the hundreds of thousands.  
 
Just an example of a sovereign, the more power of subjugation men allow another to wield upon them, the more murderous the sovereign, modern sovereigns are equally as blood thirsty, but sophistry is used to defend and redirect the blame.  

Comments by: William On 02 December 2010Report Abuse
Abdun,  
 
In my opinion, it is impractical to have a system in place that has no leader!  
The judicial system within the United Kingdom requires most civil cases to be governed and coordinated by a Judge.  
 
A shop that sells household goods also requires an individual to manage the overall running of the business.  
 
Project managers within any industry, are an integral unit within the workings of a team – the project manager supervises and administers the project and each person working on the project.  
 
Unfortunately I have not been able to read through the information you have presented on your website. When I have the opportunity, I will read about the four models you claim “Muhammad” established.  
 
I would like to point out that your approach to the deliverance of such assertions is completely inadequate. Your contribution to the discussion is more than welcomed but stick to the topic at hand providing references where appropriate.  
 

Comments by: moazzam On 02 December 2010
Dear Muhammad Areab: Relex plz, If you want to know your question that"Who is a Nabi at present in India/Pakistan or any where in the world or you are going to declare yourself a Nabi in near future after making the minds of people" Any body who is performing the duties written in this verse is the rasool, any were in the world,see the verse 2/129.

Comments by: drshabbir On 02 December 2010Report Abuse
Dear brother Moazzam, I am neither emotional nor blaming anyone, and I am in agreement with the views you have expressed.  
 
Without being judgmental, my simple question is for Dr. Zaman.  
 
1. How do your new views differ from the Qadianis?  
 
2. To my knowledge according to the Qur'an, NABI and RASOOL are two offices of the same person. He is NABI by way of being at the height of character and receiving WAHI. And he is RASOOL by way of conveying the Message to people. What do you think?

Comments by: mohd.areeb On 02 December 2010Report Abuse
Dear Moazzam if you read 2/126-to-129 than it will be clear to you for whom RASOOLAM is said.

Comments by: Dr. Qamar Zaman On 02 December 2010
Most respected Members ,  
I am being asked ,  
How am I different from Qadianis ?  
 
Well I hate to comment on personalities or sect having different opinions. What I will do is that I will try to clarify my understanding of Quran further. But before clarifying further I will ask from my respected members,  
 
Please let me know my mistakes or misinterpretations of Ayats discussed .  
 
Now let me take the quarries, The firs comment is,  
 
1.. What is the difference between me and Qadianis ?  
The biggest difference is that Qadiani religion is a personality cult. Their focus is a person whereas my understanding of Quran is that Islam is not a personality cult. It is a CONTINUOUS PROCESS of establishing peace in a community by establishing a socioeconomic system of Justice .  
 
In this process personalities are important but they are only tools of implementation of values, morals and divine commands which are the real essence.  
 
Let me quote a verse, sura 3 verse 144, with usual translations,  
 
وَمَا مُحَمَّدٌ إِلا رَسُولٌ قَدْ خَلَتْ مِنْ قَبْلِهِ الرُّسُلُ أَفَإِنْ مَاتَ أَوْ قُتِلَ انْقَلَبْتُمْ عَلَى أَعْقَابِكُمْ وَمَنْ يَنْقَلِبْ عَلَى عَقِبَيْهِ فَلَنْ يَضُرَّ اللَّهَ شَيْئًا وَسَيَجْزِي اللَّهُ الشَّاكِرِينَ  
 
144. Muhammad is no more than a Messenger, and indeed (many) Messengers have passed away before Him. if He dies or is killed, will You Then turn back on Your heels (as disbelievers)? and He who turns back on his heels, not the least harm will He do to Allâh, and Allâh will give reward to those who are grateful.(Mohsin Khan )  
 
144. Muhammad is no more than an apostle: many were the apostle that passed away before Him. if He died or were slain, will ye then turn back on your heels? if any did turn back on His heels, not the least harm will He do to Allah. but Allah (on the other hand) will swiftly reward those who (serve him) with gratitude.(Yusuf Ali)  
 
This verse totally negates personality cult. Invariably all religions or sects are personality based .  
 
2. the second question was " who is our Rasool or Nabi at this time.  
This question was immediately asked by my teacher ( not a مولانا but علامہ صاحب ) who taught me اصول حدیث when I expressed my views to him and My immediate answer was  
YOU….you are my rasool because you are conveying the message, you are teaching me Quran .  
Remember ,  
 
Whosoever is conveying divine message is a Rasool. My first Rasool was my مو لا نا صاحب the one who taught me how to read Quran .  
 
As far as Nabi is concerned he has to have power to rule according to Divine commands .  
 
So question does not arise of my declaring myself either as a Rasool or a Nabi. Because there are so many seniors and better knowledgeable persons like Dr Shabbir and Mr Akhtar Sherazi.  
 
I am no more than a humble human being trying to mould myself according to Quran. In our community there are messengers everywhere, whosoever is giving us advice according to Quran is our messenger of Quran .  

Comments by: bilal_khan5181 On 02 December 2010Report Abuse
Dear Dr Qamar Zaman if I say that a Nabi is the one who recieves WAHI from Allah and a RAHOOL (Prophet) is the one who spreads this Divine Wahi,will i be wrong?

Comments by: Abdun On 03 December 2010Report Abuse
Salaam William,  
 
you pass comment on a topic you have no idea of, as you have not read the models, Allodial ownership should be your first one, explain why Allah is not the owner of the Earth and all within it in a physical sense, tell me who was given ownership of the earth and its resources to buy and sell them as if they were their property, and I will read you explanations with interest.  
 
I read in this thread you are banned from OurBeacon website, I was the only person banned, the last time I say Arnold Mol, is it just you or have they begun banning on a wider scale?

Comments by: Nargis On 03 December 2010Report Abuse
Dr Shabbir  
 
I have just seen you and Jawaiddas comment on ourbeacon about Dr Qamar Zaman :  
 
http://www.ourbeacon.com/cgi-bin/bbs60x/webbbs_config.pl/page/1/md/read/id/314123119159366  
 
Question is, why have none of you commented on the matter but rather, as it is your tradition, started to bully Aastana?  
 
Have you no shame? Have you no self respect? you are a scholar so behave like one. or try to behave like a man. why the hell are you and your thingy, Jawaid telling lies about other people ? Everyone know your a plagiarist. Your work is a direct copy of Allam Parwez and a few others. You cant debate, you failed to answer William on the Al- Ilah issue and instead banned him.You didnt understand Haqiqate Saum, instead you started to tell lies about Dr Qamar. This is DISGUSTING.  
 
Ourbeacon gang is more dangerous than any shia sunni mullah, at least they admit their teaching is from the Hadith , but you are pretending to follow the Quran only. I know your not. You should apologize and change your behavior and conduct.

Comments by: William. On 03 December 2010Report Abuse
First and forefmost I would like to apologise to the members of Aastana and Dr Qamar Zaman for the tone and manner in which I write within this post! I express regret for using this platform in order to reply to an individual who has yet to behave in a scholarly manner (Shabbir Ahmed of Ourbeacon)  
 
 
 
Shabbir,  
 
You have stated:  
 
“ Shabbir: Thank you for teaching me Arabic!”  
 
Well, you’re welcome! Being a lifelong student, you have had the privilege to learn something from me!  
 
You have also stated:  
 
“Shabbir: It translates to "My God" and nothing else.”  
 
Provide proof of this!  
 
I have affirmed that the Arabic word إِلَٰهِ is used within 28:38 – and does not mean “My God”  
 
It has one Kasra (which you agree upon) and if it has one Kasra, phonetically would sound like a “ilaheh”.  
 
If it had Kasaratain then the sound would become “ilahin” - The word which has the Kasaratain is إِلَٰهٍ and is used in 3:62  
 
Unless you are visually impaired, how on earth did you manage to miss this? Where did you learn Arabic?  
 
The main point which you keep avoiding, for some strange reason, is that the root word does not change!  
 
You continue to misdirect the main point by trying to criticise the written typeface in English! Whether it is spelt Ilahi or Ilahe it doesn’t change the Arabic does it? It is clearly visible from my posts!  
 
As for Mohd.Areeb, he made a bogus claim – I interjected as your so called moderators are unable to distinguish when malice remarks are made! He stated a lie, stating “Dr.Qamar Zaman is against khatam-e-nabuwwat”  
 
Firstly he is unable to grasp the whole concept and on top of that he creates false claims? You should ban him for being such an imbecile! By allowing this to continue you are endorsing and advocating such behaviour – are you in the habit of harbouring liars and imbeciles?  
 
What exactly did I say that forced you from disclosing my post?  
 
You have a hypocritical censorship which is installed just to propagate your own personal agenda of self-praise - You have the audacity to ban me? You should feel privileged I participated in your boring repetitive topics!  
 
Your moderators have said:  
 
”We treat ladies with more respect at Ourbeacon.”  
 
What exactly has bob said, which was so disrespectful?  
 
You stated:  
 
“we are not as liberal as you might have thought”  
 
This is very evident!  
 
You are unable to answer points raised to so you resort to mis-directing / dismissing the arguments with retorted nonsense!  
 
You have asked Dr Qamar Zaman the question:  
 
“How do your new views differ from the Qadianis”  
 
What on earth has that got to do with anything?  
 
The “mullahs” disagree with anything that goes against their beliefs, placing fatwas on individuals who have an alternative way of thinking. They label people as Parvezi or Qadiyani or any other foolish name you can think of!  
 
Anyone who sits down and investigates what the Quran says, they patronise with their imprudent mannerisms. You do the exact same thing! You ban those who disagree with you because you feel insecure about the work (plagiarised) you have done which does not make any sense!  
 
If 20 people realise the truth about a certain topic within the Quran, how can you categorise them – regardless of backgrounds, profiles, upbringing, beliefs or ideas, whether they disagree on other areas of the Quran or not... you declare them to be a Sect? Who made you the final authority on the Quran?  
 
You’re doing exactly what Mullahs do!  
 
You state:  
 
“I have proceeded with my R&R (Research and Reflection)”  
 
Exactly what research have you done? Apart from forge the works of others, plagiarising articles and claiming them to be your own – what have you brought to the table? QXP is blatantly a copy of Parvez’s work I see no difference what so ever!  
 
When you are unable to provide a rational explanation – you just waffle on – when you realise its truth, you hide behind your personal disclaimer that you are a “lifelong student”?  
 
Using personal attacks to avoid responding to important and obvious points – flaws within your so called research!  
 
If you are going to copy Parvez, then copy his people skills too!  
 
Has parvez done this? Does he discriminate others? Mocking them? NO!  

Comments by: Iqbal kay shaheen On 03 December 2010Report Abuse
All of you please take a doze of dopamine.  
 
Listen to Abida Perveen (Bhulle shah)  
 
Yahan hona na hona hey,  
Na hona ain hona hey,  
 
makani hoon kay azadey makan hoon,  
jahan main hoon kay khud sara jahan hoon.  
 
Tu apnee laa makaanee main rehe must,  
mujhey itna bataday main kahan hoon.  
 
Arzo "Eartho" Sama "Azimuth" kahan teree wusaat ko paa sakay.  
Meraa hee dil hey jahan tu sama sakay.  
 
Please.  
 
Quran! may be, the Bhajan of Berhaman, But it is in Arabic Mubeen.  
 
Not many knows how to say? "Q" Qay like Qatil, Qiyaaam, Qatar etc from the depth of throat.  
 
Like all of you i need help too.  
 
Please be Kind to each other, it goes some thing like this "Those of you whom are inclined towards balance, should be kind to each other".  
 
Salam.  

Comments by: Nargis On 03 December 2010Report Abuse
Dear brother, some people, like Dr Shabbir the plagiarist , need to be told the truth. Have a look at what the "scholar " is saying :  
 
http://www.ourbeacon.com/cgi-bin/bbs60x/webbbs_config.pl/page/1/md/read/id/314123119159366  
 
"ROFL  
 
Azizam Jawaid Saheb,  
 
LOL. First I thought it was your humor making me laugh but soon I realized that the writing was too silly to be yours. Then I clicked the link and lo and behold! I could not behold, could not believe my eyes. The man was serious.  
 
What is going on out there? Samples from there show up here and bring in with them the mad-cow disease. One of them had to be banned today, another one is in line.  
 
Any advice? "  
 
Yeh sure , change your behaviour.

Comments by: Maniza On 03 December 2010
Dear All and Dr.Shabbir,  
 
I think enough is enough, I dont know what you are doing on our "silly website" as you put it Sir, please stay on your own. I dont think aastana should be a platform for making a mockery of others here. If there is any subject to be discussed then we should discuss the subject and not the person so please do not put references to other sites and what is being discussed there, only that which you need clarification or debate is welcome.  
 
God Bless

Comments by: mohd.areeb On 03 December 2010Report Abuse
Dr.Sb now did not you changed the definitions of RASOOL & NABI?????

Comments by: Damon On 03 December 2010Report Abuse
Peace Be Unto Those Who Follow Right Guidance,  
 
I will not participate in any arguments or squabbles here, I wish only to express TWO things...  
 
1). I have ACCEPTED Br Dr Qamar Zaman's research and understandings on Rasool, Nabi and Khatam An-Nabiyeen mainly because that is an understanding that I have had on this issue for a very long time now even before I've read Br Dr Qamar's insights.  
 
2). I have learned more from Dr Qamar Saheb than I have from any other scholar and Quranic thinker. Also, he was able to point out and thoroughly explain questions NO ONE ELSE was able to. In my opinion he is a TRUE Quranic scholar.  
 
Fi'amanillah,  
Damon.

Comments by: moazzam On 03 December 2010
Dear Muhammad Areeb: The verse 2/126--129 is very clear, plz emphasize at 2/126 where the quranic term" AHLAHOO" is written.Now find out AHLAHOO , the AHL E BAIT, and AL BAIT. All these terminologies could be comprehend by TASREEF AL AYAT IN QURAN.Any body amongst the "AHL E BAIT" is performing the duties assigned in verse 2/129, i e 1:-YATLOO ALAIHIM AYATIKA. 2:-YUALLIM O HUM ALKITAB. 3:-YUALLIM HUM ALHIKMAH. 4: YUZAKKEY HIM. If any one from AHL E BAIT (muslims), will perform the above quoted four jobs in his society, he will be considered RASOOLALLAH. As for as ur question from Dr Qamar is concerns that " did not you changed the definitions of RASOOL & NABI?????>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in my opinion Dr Qamar's views are still same at this issue,which is obvious from hih posts. As we said many time at this blog, plz point out our mistakes and correct us rationally, logically,and quranicly, if we are wrong.

Comments by: Dr. Qamar Zaman On 03 December 2010
Dear members,  
I am no authrity on Quran. We all are in learning phase, so we can be wrong. The beauty of Aastana blog is that nothing is blocked. Everyone who participates can say anything he likes. If something rubbish comes up it is negated by the members on the basis of Quran.  
 
Our understanding of Quran is going to be different because of certain reason,  
 
1...our mind set is fixed either by the centuries old baseless mythological stories or concocted ahadis.  
2...we dont find any translation with a purpose i.e.to devolop a welfare society .  
3...we dont find in previous translations any coherence in different passages of Quran .  
4... even tenses and nouns and pronouns are wrongly translated which makes interpretations a lot different .  
5... similis are translated making the sentence meaningless  
 
what we are trying is:  
1.. giving a translation on purely grammatical bases  
2.. with a purpose as told by Quran itself,  
 
الر كِتَابٌ أَنْزَلْنَاهُ إِلَيْكَ لِتُخْرِجَ النَّاسَ مِنَ الظُّلُمَاتِ إِلَى النُّورِ بِإِذْنِ رَبِّهِمْ إِلَى صِرَاطِ الْعَزِيزِ الْحَمِيدِ  
 
1. A. L. R. a Book which we have revealed unto thee, In order that Thou mightest lead Mankind out of the depths of darkness into light - by the leave of their Lord - to the way of (Him) the Exalted In power, worthy of all praise!-(yusuf Ali )  
 
the purpose of this book is to lead mankind out of the depth of darkness into light . The same purpose was acheived by Moses,  
 
وَلَقَدْ أَرْسَلْنَا مُوسَى بِآيَاتِنَا أَنْ أَخْرِجْ قَوْمَكَ مِنَ الظُّلُمَاتِ إِلَى النُّورِ وَذَكِّرْهُمْ بِأَيَّامِ اللَّهِ إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لآيَاتٍ لِكُلِّ صَبَّارٍ شَكُورٍ  
 
5. we sent Moses with Our Signs (and the command). "Bring out Thy people from the depths of darkness into light, and teach them to remember the days of Allah." Verily In This there are Signs for such As are firmly patient and constant,- grateful and appreciative.( yusuf Ali )  
 
Moses simply got his nation freed from the cluches of pharos ( فرعون )  
 
and that is what prophet Mohammad did.  
So dear sir I am trying to translate Quran with a purpose in mind on purely grammatical grounds. It will be not acceptible to so many with orthodox views.  
 
SO MY HUMBLE REQUEST IS ............PLEASE DO BRING OUT OUR MISTAKES BUT EITHER ON GRAMMATICAL BASE OR IF ITS GOING AGAINST THE ESSENCE OR PURPOSE OF QURAN.

Comments by: UmeAimon On 03 December 2010Report Abuse
Salam,  
 
I do understand what Dr. Qamar zaman has expressed, as I thought about it the same way and it makes sense too. The Quran is a message to stay for humanity and its NOT about any PERSONALITY even THE messenger!  
All references to the messenger, the way something happened and history are also for the sake of giving message of some kind. Attaching the devinity of this message to someone who is not ever lasting would be wrong.  
This message is and has been same for all for ever!  
So it should NOT matter if Mohammad was the name of the messenger or not (Sab bakar could be right)  
Nor should it matter if that messenger was the last or not as he was not the person to keep the message safe. He did his work at that time and went...  
 
The question to me was who compiled Quran? Who got the wahi and wrote down Quran in this so called final form and how it is?  
The answer is simple enough... Its the guarentee of "Allah" that is enough or isn't it!  
So if from Quran we know that any new message does not come without wahi AND Allah Itself has already FINALISED this way of life as per Quran and Allah Itself claimed to protect it ..... what else is required?  
Since there is no more NEW message coming there is no more WAHI or messenger tht will be given NEW BOOK!!  
 
As for messenger/rasool / nabi the... they are what they are when ever and where ever they get THE BOOK  
and try to tell it to people and implement it !  
 
ITS THE MESSAGE THAT IS STAYING THE SAME AND THAT WHAT MATTERS!  
 
 
That thinking is exactly what creates Personality Cult!  
 
But the reason stopped going any further was that this idea

Comments by: aurangzaib On 04 December 2010 Edit DeleteReport Abuse
We have already seen earlier that an unsupervised debate brings in its wake sentiments of rivalry and bitterness. It invariably comes down to personal insinuations of diverse nature. In the aftermath, you can witness people of consequential intelligence and learning, resorting to subjectivism and, to some extent, by-passing the norms of politeness.  
 
With my unconditional assurance of respects to all participants, I beseech them to take a turn towards a constructive approach. The perennial question is not about who’s opposing the convictions/dogmas of whom, but the sufferings and humiliation perpetrated by Muslim vessel rulers upon their subjects for many centuries, in utter disregard of where the rest of the developed world is going; and what practical steps we Quranists must take in unison to alleviate that suffering and humiliation in the light of Quranic guidance. Understanding the TRUTH of Quranic concepts forms the basic pre-requisite in that direction, and Aastana is doing no “secret planning” whatsoever, but following this goal vehemently and is open to public view and scrutiny worldwide. Holy Scriptures are collective inheritance of humanity and, I think, no one has been given rights to monopolize them.  
 
An uncontrolled debate most of the times screws up things. Sorry, by ‘control’ I would never imply a kind of restriction or limitation imposed upon participants. I would only suggest keeping friends within right perspective and parameters whenever their reflections seem drifting away from the basic topic and from the main focal point of discussion. And I would suggest always utilizing Quranic texts as the criterion, yardstick or decisive element in our discussions. As far as reflections of personal nature are concerned, as we see above, they have no scholarly validity/authority, I am afraid.  
 
Our topic was the translation of :  
“verse no 21 from sura 3  
إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَكْفُرُونَ بِآيَاتِ اللَّهِ وَيَقْتُلُونَ النَّبِيِّينَ بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ وَيَقْتُلُونَ الَّذِينَ يَأْمُرُونَ بِالْقِسْطِ مِنَ النَّاسِ فَبَشِّرْهُمْ بِعَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ (٢١)  
21. Verily! those who reject the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and kill the Prophets without right, and kill those men who order just dealings, ... announce to them a painful torment.  
In this verse the verbs used are not in past tense ,the verbs are  
یکفرون یقتلون  
These words can either be translated in present tense or future tense . these words can in no way be translated into past tense . So when this verse was revealed to prophet Mohammad there were so many انبیاء and it is a non ending continuous process . “  
 
THIS IS THE ISSUE that caused a furor in Quranic circles and elsewhere. Aastana team says, as Dr. QZ also pointed out, that Any one having a difference of opinion about this TRANSLATION and the inferences drawn from it, is always at liberty to come up with a more rational and logical interpretation. If one can prove that Aastana’s translation/interpretation IS NOT RIGHT and there are MISTAKES OF LANGUAGE, GRAMMAR, ROOT MEANINGS - OR EVEN INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE CONTEXT - his observations will be held in utter respect and given serious consideration.  
 
All members have noted friends’ personal opinions, like “Resemblance to Qadiyaniat”, “disease of Sovereignty of Thought”, “Intentional indoctrination and establishment of the Roman Catholic Church, a death cult religion”, “Allodial ownership”, etc. The concern and profound knowledge displayed in some of the remarks by Brother Abdun is highly appreciated too. I am sorry but the way our friends are trying to approach the reality is a hotch-potch or bad-blend of several intellectual episodes or threads. There is a clever game of "selection" or "labelling" involved than sincere, solution-oriented and responsible thought. Please don't mind, I beg your pardon.  
 
The solution lies not in lengthy side diversions but in keeping within our borderlines in the spirit of arriving at a consensus.  
 
I welcome Brother Dr. Shabbir’s fresh entry into this “Silly Blog” and may quote for him this saying :  
 
“We don't see but our own extended shadows! Our desires, biases and appetite see not we! Here, lechers see only lechery, greedy see only greed, haters see hatred and so on....... Here you'll become what you see! What you concentrate on!”  
 
I have always wanted him to share this Blog with us for reconstructing between us what he has demolished during the last couple of years. It makes us sad to see that his entry again has a negative paradigm – and represents a repercussion of the exchange of many derogatory posts on his Blog. I would still adore him as our Senior if he rubs out from his heart the prejudice that is the product of his myopic understanding of Aastana’s aspirations. Both of his questions (very respectfully) may seem superfluous:-  
 
1. How do your new views differ from the Qadianis?  
 
(ANSWER: Why don’t you straightaway tally those views with Quranic text and point out the discrepancies of language and grammar you may notice? Why resort to looking for Aastana’s affiliations? Aastana has no affiliations!)  
 
2. To my knowledge according to the Qur'an, NABI and RASOOL are two offices of the same person. He is NABI by way of being at the height of character and receiving WAHI. And he is RASOOL by way of conveying the Message to people. What do you think?  
 
(ANSWER: Why don’t you throw some light on the Root meanings Dr. QZ has taken, and explain why in Verse 39/71, the word RUSUL (the plural of Rusool) is particularly used – please read carefully the explanation of this Verse by Dr. QZ, it may drive you into a whole new world of understanding - and why in 3/21 only Nabiyyeen is used with reference to “Yaqtuloona”? And why “Yamuroona bil Qist” are associated and placed at par with Nabiyyeen?)  
 
About the above debate, some members have sent mails and expressed their serious concerns. I quote one of the opinions that is worth considering by our valued guests as well as by all members of Aastana :-  
 
“This sort of thing can interrupt the PEACE and Serene atmosphere that I have come to love at the aastana blog. I come here to learn and share understanding, not to watch trouble makers come here and turn the blog forum into a slug-fest.”  
 
Dr. Sahib and Aastana team would definitely respect the feelings expressed, and may soon consider steps to be taken in this direction. In the meantime, kindly try to keep up the very congenial family atmosphere that this Blog was created to offer and is desirous to preserve.  
 
Thanks and God bless all.  

»«
OTHER QUESTIONS ON
HAQIQAT E HAJ
hajj k unwan me dr. sahib ne sura e baqara ki ayat number 196 ko nazar andaz kia he, is ki wajuhat pe rpshni dali jaey, or agar kitab k ainda edition me is ayat ko madde nazar rakha jaey to parhne walon k liye mazid asani ho jaey gi. wassalam! Question by: zahir On 10/01/2010
 
Respected Dr. Qamarzaman,the UN assembly debate addressing any humantarian problem or any globle issue(if for the bettterment of mankind) could call "HAJJ" as per Quraanic terminology,if performed according to the Quraanin instructions? Question by: moazzam From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 08/04/2010
 
Salam Why does the Quran identifies the first place for the Pilgrimage as “Bakk’a” and not Macc'a?Cant find Macc'a ever being called Bacc'a....bacc'a is in Jerusalem.... Question by: bob From UNITED KINGDOM On 08/04/2010
 
salaam, 5:96 says "all fish is made halal for you". first question is why is fish made halal when "all food is halal for you". & how does it provide for the hajj (debate). is this fish also mistranslated. kindly translate the verse in enlish. Question by: shireen On 22/04/2010
 
Salam! Mera sawal hai ka allah tala ne sirf mard ko paigamber bana kay kyun bheja aurat ko ye darja kyun nahe dia iski kya wajohat hain ??? Question by: foziazubair On 29/06/2010
 
Does anyone know what Safa and Marwa are? Are they meanings behind theses words? My Urdu is not good so I cannot read the book on Haqiqat E Haj Question by: faisal On 28/08/2010
 
A.O.A,why you not use the word ,ALLAH. instead of word ,GOD. Because god become ,gods,and not suitable for,ALLAH subhan ho tala . Question by: nadeem sohail From PAKISTAN (OKARA) On 20/09/2010
 
A.O.A...Thanks a lot for the detail answer and interpretation of my question the other one is here ....Is . MOLA. ALLAH`S personal name . and should not use for the peoples if it is then why so called .MOLVEE. use .the word .MOLANA.. Question by: nadeem sohail From PAKISTAN (OKARA) On 22/09/2010
 
Nargis is not happy. I know which translation to rely upon duo inconsistency and inaccuracies by many authors. Their translations are subject to previous views and biased opinions.I dont want to die not knowing the truth of the Quran. What to do? Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 22/09/2010
 
Dear Dr qamar salam If performing haj is a farz traditinally then what about the prophets whether noah , Moses, Eisa they never seemed to come to Mecca for haj and is there any hint about this in Al Quran ? Question by: sirajuddin From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 25/09/2010
 
Assalamu Alaikum do u have any urdu translation of quran if no so which translation we have to prefer. Question by: usool On 30/10/2010
 
as'salamualikum Quran me khnizeer ko haram kiya hai yeh khinzeer kya hai ?????? khinzeer ka sahih tarjuma kya hain kya khinzeer ke maine suvar hain ? shukriya Question by: abdullah nambiar From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 11/11/2010
 
Dear Aurangzaib can we do HAJJ ( according to the quran) in a place other than SAUDI ARABIA? Is KHANA E KA"BA important for us.For me it is not more than an ordinary building what do u think? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 19/11/2010
 
as salamualikum sure taaha(20)aayet 9 to 23 har lefz se lefz zera smjayeyen (mana aur matlab) mehar bani hogi agar ye roman english main ho Question by: abdullah nambiar From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 22/11/2010
 
as salamualikum agar essa' alahiasalam dubara duniyamain nahi aasakte to sure baqara (2)ayet 259 aur kahaff (18) ayat 25 main allah apna qanoon kyun badla??? jawab romamn english main ho meharbani shuqriya Question by: abdullah nambiar From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 22/11/2010
 
AS SALAMUALIKUM kya mohammed nabi aakhri nabi hain? hadeese kehata hain mohammed ke bad koi nabi nahi ayega kya quran bhi yehi kahta hain??? answer roman english main dejiye shukhriya Question by: abdullah nambiar From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 26/11/2010
 
The Kabah - another issue which is being deliberated on Ourbeacon... Question by: William From UNITED KINGDOM On 30/11/2010
 
as'salaamualikum pichle sawaalon ka jawab dene ke liye bohut shuq'riya agla sawaal yeh hain quraan main hain rasool kitaab aur hiqmat ke taalim deta hai kitaab tho quraan hain ye hiqmat kya hain sura 12 ayaat 71to76 main jo hain wohi hiqmat hain?? Question by: abdullah nambiar From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 30/11/2010
 
The Hajj and the Apartheid Train: Where Is the Muslim Outrage? Question by: Zubair From UNITED STATES (WASHINGTON) On 13/12/2010
 
assalaamu alikum sure nisa ayeth 3 main MALAKATH AIMANUKUM KA matlaab kya hain ????????? shokriya jawaab roman english main de to meharbani hogi Question by: abdullah nambiar From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 22/12/2010
 
as salamualikum sahaab is aayath (3) sure nisa (4) se yeh samajh'na sahi hai kya bagair nikha ke malakat ayimanakum se hum bistari (intercuors) kar sakte hain kya ????? aayath (24) ka bhi matlab samjaye ye roman english main tafseel se samjhaye ye Question by: abdullah nambiar From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 23/12/2010
 
Respected Dr. Qamar Zaman Sahab, Whats our first direction Bait-ul-Muqaddas or Baitullah. Thank you. Question by: Minaal On 04/01/2011
 
Respected Dr. Sahab, Kindly brief me in the light of Al-Furqan, If you may mentioned any verse of Quran (about our first direction), it will be highly appreciated. Thanx Question by: Minaal On 06/01/2011
 
why we have to go 7 times around a stone cube, adore and honour it ?. What is the purpose in performing those pagan rituals. Why we adore kaaba , which used to be Alat goddess? Question by: allli From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 04/03/2011
 
Dear Momin< Sister Nargis ! who is more friendly to society "ATHIEST OR RELIGIOUS ??????????? Question by: naeem sheikh From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 07/03/2011
 
dear aastana executive members, just wanted to know if translation of haqeeqat-e-haj (to enlgish) is on the way. if yes - when will it be available for us to view. thank you Question by: shireen On 30/03/2011
 
Salam o Rehmat Any one has studied Hazrat Yousuf life from Quran in detail? The present tarjumaat doesn't really convince in view of Quran purpose. I myself trying hard to get the understanding of Hazrat Yousuf life from Quran. waseem Question by: waseemameer From AUSTRALIA (SYDNEY) On 15/05/2011
 
Kitab haqiqat-Haj k page No 21 par 3,7,10 ka zikar hai jab k writer nay iss ka mafhoom 3, mazeed courses, aur takmeel e moashara keya hai, Please explain. Question by: adil From PAKISTAN On 03/09/2011
 
Dear Sir, What is "Youm Alhajj-e-Alakbar " mentioned in 9/3. Please elaborate. Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 29/10/2011
 
Is Haqiqat E Haj book available in English? If yes, where can I download it. Can't seem to find the link. Thank you. Question by: RCZ From MALAYSIA (PETALING JAYA) On 27/09/2012
 
RIJAAL Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 02/09/2013
 
Comments...
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved
www.aastana.com